|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"mountain" and "road" pedals
In article , says...
Jim Higson wrote: I'm thinking of just putting double-sided "mountain" type SPD pedals on both bikes. [...] Will they cause any problems on the road bike? No. From the looks and larger platform it offers Shimano's one sided SPD pedal (PD-A520) might be worth a look... No problems, agreed. But I would stick with double-sided. Mike |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"mountain" and "road" pedals
On 15 Oct 2006 14:21:29 -0700, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman"
wrote: John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: On 15 Oct 2006 13:43:27 -0700, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" wrote: The real only advantage of clips and straps over clipless is lower cost and maintenance. It's easier to ride vigorously in street shoes or sneakers with clips and straps. More so than Powergrips? I think so. You have experience with Powergrips whereas I've only installed them and watched my wife use them but from what I've seen they look OK, but not as good as clips and straps. -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
"mountain" and "road" pedals
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"mountain" and "road" pedals
Mike wrote in
: In article , says... Jim Higson wrote: I'm thinking of just putting double-sided "mountain" type SPD pedals on both bikes. [...] Will they cause any problems on the road bike? No. From the looks and larger platform it offers Shimano's one sided SPD pedal (PD-A520) might be worth a look... No problems, agreed. But I would stick with double-sided. Mike Got a pair of A520s to replace a pair of M520s. The wider platform was more noticeably more comfortable without any practical problems from a single-side pedal. The mass distribution usually has the 'upper' side facing rearwards when there's no shoe attached, so it's no hassle to get clipped in. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"mountain" and "road" pedals
John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: On 15 Oct 2006 14:21:29 -0700, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" wrote: John Forrest Tomlinson wrote: On 15 Oct 2006 13:43:27 -0700, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" wrote: The real only advantage of clips and straps over clipless is lower cost and maintenance. It's easier to ride vigorously in street shoes or sneakers with clips and straps. More so than Powergrips? I think so. You have experience with Powergrips whereas I've only installed them and watched my wife use them but from what I've seen they look OK, but not as good as clips and straps. -- JT **************************** I've ridden quite a bit with Powergrips and if they are set up correctly, you can pull back and up pretty vigorously without a release. I still use them if I am going on a tour where I will be walking a lot and want the comfort of regular walking shoes. Otherwise I use Time ATACs with SPD type shoes. Smokey |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"mountain" and "road" pedals
wrote in message ups.com... * * Chas wrote: wrote in message oups.com... landotter wrote: Lou Holtman wrote: Ralph Hansell wrote: I used to use MTB(SPD) pedals on all my bikes (Road, MTB, Touring) until I started riding with a road group ride. We tend to get a little competative on these rides sprinting town lines and racing to the top of climbs. I had a few scary experiences with blowing out of my pedals with my SPD pedals during town line sprints. SPD and MTP type pedals tend to have less float and can release easier on the up-stroke than road pedals. After nearly going down at 25mph+ on a sprint I decided to get some road shoes and LOOK pedals. Since then I have never had an issue with blowing out. I don't agree. Lou -- seconded. That sounds like a big ole smear of brown roadie BS.Tighten them down nicely and most spds will grip as well as any mere mortal will ever need. Unless you have special needs knees, don't **** away your money on special needs pedals. The basic Shimanos, or even Wellgo 800s ($40), or the house branded Wellgos like Nashbar are great. Cleats are ubiquitous and inexpensive as well. Racer wannabes don't like dual-sided SPDs because they are "for mountain bikes" and because sponsored pros don't use them (not realizing that sponsored pros ride whatever the sponsor supplies). Watching recreational cyclists struggling to clip in to a one-sided pedal and struggling to walk on big, slippery exposed cleats is a source of amusement. How much faster are today's top pros than the iron men who raced for the previous 100 year before clipless pedals came out? It's the motor not the machine. ....and yer point is? My point was an editorial comment aimed at several posters in this thread who inferred that there was/is no cycling without clipless pedals. I just started riding again this spring after a 5 year hiatus. I would like to try modern clipless pedals but I haven't been able to find shoes that fit me. I'd use my old Cinelli clipless track pedals if I were doing a long ride with out a lot of stop signs/lights - they are hard to get in and out of. I still have a comfortable old pair of Ditto knockoffs with Cinelli cleats screwed onto them. As I see it, the real advantage of clipless pedals is the freedom from being tightly strapped into the pedals with uncomfortable pressure across the feet from the toeclip straps. I'm using a 30 year old pair of Adidas Eddie Merckx shoes. I had to have the soles reglued but otherwise they still work well even though they have 10,000 to 15,000 miles on them. I also dug out a pair of Specialized Touring shoes that I'd never used from the same era. Chas. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"mountain" and "road" pedals
"John Forrest Tomlinson" wrote in message ... On 15 Oct 2006 13:43:27 -0700, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" wrote: The real only advantage of clips and straps over clipless is lower cost and maintenance. It's easier to ride vigorously in street shoes or sneakers with clips and straps. -- JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"mountain" and "road" pedals
"John Forrest Tomlinson" wrote in message ... On 15 Oct 2006 13:43:27 -0700, "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" wrote: The real only advantage of clips and straps over clipless is lower cost and maintenance. It's easier to ride vigorously in street shoes or sneakers with clips and straps. -- JT I've been riding with toeclips and straps for over 35 years and I agree, you can use just about any shoes with them. We used to cut the front cleats off of soccer shoes for cyclocross and MTB. I'm not opposed to clipless and I like to try some. I just don't want spend $200-$300 for shoes just to see if they will work for me. Chas. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"mountain" and "road" pedals
In article
, "* * Chas" wrote: I still ride with toe clips because I haven't found any clipless shoes that comfortably fit my size 10 1/2 EEEE feet (size 44-45 ultra wide)! I had trouble fitting the width of my feet until I started buying longer shoes; longer than the nominal length of my feet. Suddenly the width problem disappeared. I eventually was told that my feet are 10*1/2 from heel to arch, though they are nominal 9*1/2*E* overall. From arch to toes my feet are wider and shorter than the `norm', though the sheer numbers of people who have trouble fitting width suggest that shoe manufacturers deliberately make shoes narrower than they should. A shoe that fits too narrowly at the metatarsal arch will wear out more quickly by bursting the upper and tearing out of the welt. -- Michael Press |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"mountain" and "road" pedals
"Michael Press" wrote in message ... In article , "* * Chas" wrote: I still ride with toe clips because I haven't found any clipless shoes that comfortably fit my size 10 1/2 EEEE feet (size 44-45 ultra wide)! I had trouble fitting the width of my feet until I started buying longer shoes; longer than the nominal length of my feet. Suddenly the width problem disappeared. I eventually was told that my feet are 10 1/2 from heel to arch, though they are nominal 9 1/2 E* overall. From arch to toes my feet are wider and shorter than the `norm', though the sheer numbers of people who have trouble fitting width suggest that shoe manufacturers deliberately make shoes narrower than they should. A shoe that fits too narrowly at the metatarsal arch will wear out more quickly by bursting the upper and tearing out of the welt. -- Michael Press I have the same kind of feet. Great for swimming but tough to find shoes that fit. When I was in my teens I wore size 12 1/2 or 13 E shoes for the same reason. As I got older and could afford better quality shoes I could get size 11 E that fit. My feet have gradually gotten shorter and wider while my high arch has remained the same. I found that with cycling shoes that are too long, they eventually stretch from the back and forth stresses of pedaling and I start to get heal blisters or they start to dig into the tops of my toes from flexing while walking. I tried on several pairs of Shimano clipless shoes (45 & 46) that were to long they had both problems. I still have 3 pairs of old fashioned cycling shoes left. When they wear out I'll have to bite the bullet. Chas. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A "road" trip of sorts. | pete fagerlin | Mountain Biking | 4 | August 23rd 06 10:18 PM |