|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
God fixes stupidity
On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote: http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868 It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with that sort of outcome. The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for pedestrians only, wouldn't you say? Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me. Wow. What perspicacity. The trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written. Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that sort of outcome")? What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising it. (If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists") How does that work? (The answer appears to be yes. But so what?) Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted? Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)? Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
God fixes stupidity
TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote: http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868 It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with that sort of outcome. The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for pedestrians only, wouldn't you say? Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me. Wow. What perspicacity. The trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written. Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that sort of outcome")? What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising it. (If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists") How does that work? (The answer appears to be yes. But so what?) Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted? Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)? Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. You really are a sad little ****. When is the last time you had a shag? Please tell. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
God fixes stupidity
On 30/05/2018 15:55, Bod wrote:
On 30/05/2018 12:46, JNugent wrote: On 30/05/2018 10:24, Peter Keller wrote: On 29/05/18 22:36, MrCheerful wrote: http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868 What collision? Certainly not another vehicle. With the wall? The ground? One of those steps? Ok, which one did he collide with? No doubt it will be worked out by the scene examiner and the Coroner. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
God fixes stupidity
On 30/05/2018 19:29, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote: http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868 It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with that sort of outcome. The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for pedestrians only, wouldn't you say? Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me. Wow. What perspicacity. The trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written. Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that sort of outcome")? What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising it. (If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists") How does that work? (The answer appears to be yes. But so what?) Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted? Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)? Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. You reckon he was followed down that steep flight of stone steps by a motor vehicle. I see. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
God fixes stupidity
On 31/05/18 07:19, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote: http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868 It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with that sort of outcome. The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for pedestrians only, wouldn't you say? Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me. Wow. What perspicacity. The trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written. Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that sort of outcome")? What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising it. (If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists") How does that work? (The answer appears to be yes. But so what?) Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted? Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)? Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. You really are a sad little ****. When is the last time you had a shag? Please tell. And you are masturbating over that? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
God fixes stupidity
On 30/05/18 21:08, JNugent wrote:
On 30/05/2018 19:29, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote: http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868 It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with that sort of outcome. The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for pedestrians only, wouldn't you say? Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me. Wow. What perspicacity. The trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written. Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that sort of outcome")? What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising it. (If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists") How does that work? (The answer appears to be yes. But so what?) Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted? Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)? Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. You reckon he was followed down that steep flight of stone steps by a motor vehicle. I see. I clearly see your inability to make logical connections. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
God fixes stupidity
On 30/05/18 20:19, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote: On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote: On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote: http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868 It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with that sort of outcome. The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for pedestrians only, wouldn't you say? Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me. Wow. What perspicacity. The trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written. Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that sort of outcome")? What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising it. (If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists") How does that work? (The answer appears to be yes. But so what?) Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted? Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)? Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists. You really are a sad little ****. When is the last time you had a shag? Please tell. If it wasn't for generations of men not having sex, you would be sitting under a tree and eating raw meat that you would have had to have caught with your bare hands. How do you think your comforts, security and the computer on which you write your drivel came about? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
God fixes stupidity
On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 11:36:42 AM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868 No mention of whether he was wearing a helmet or not, which means he was wearing a helmet. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How the LBS fixes rivnuts installed by wannabel bike mechanics | Andre Jute[_2_] | Techniques | 21 | February 20th 16 05:54 AM |
jerry lee lewis fixes a tight chain link | [email protected] | Techniques | 0 | October 4th 07 06:18 AM |
2003 cervelo P3 with stripped dropout adjusting screw-fixes? | serg | Techniques | 0 | June 8th 05 11:32 PM |
More stupidity. | soup | UK | 39 | March 19th 05 09:50 AM |
YoHost Brett Fixes FREE Bike Classifieds | Cycle America | General | 0 | May 13th 04 08:51 PM |