A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

God fixes stupidity



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 30th 18, 07:29 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default God fixes stupidity

On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with
that sort of outcome.

The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for
pedestrians only, wouldn't you say?

Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me.

Wow. What perspicacity.

The
trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written.

Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause
cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that
sort of outcome")?


What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising it.

(If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists")

How does that work?

(The answer appears to be yes. But so what?)

Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd
simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted?


Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if we
didn't have lots of stupid motorists.


What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)?


Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better chance of
survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists.
Ads
  #12  
Old May 30th 18, 08:19 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Pounder Esquire
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,896
Default God fixes stupidity

TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else
with that sort of outcome.

The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for
pedestrians only, wouldn't you say?

Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to
me.

Wow. What perspicacity.

The
trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written.

Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause
cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves
("that sort of outcome")?

What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising
it. (If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists")

How does that work?

(The answer appears to be yes. But so what?)

Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd
simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted?

Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if
we didn't have lots of stupid motorists.


What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)?


Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better chance
of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists.


You really are a sad little ****.
When is the last time you had a shag? Please tell.


  #13  
Old May 30th 18, 09:07 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,574
Default God fixes stupidity

On 30/05/2018 15:55, Bod wrote:
On 30/05/2018 12:46, JNugent wrote:
On 30/05/2018 10:24, Peter Keller wrote:

On 29/05/18 22:36, MrCheerful wrote:


http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

What collision?
Certainly not another vehicle.


With the wall? The ground? One of those steps?

Ok, which one did he collide with?


No doubt it will be worked out by the scene examiner and the Coroner.
  #14  
Old May 30th 18, 09:08 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,574
Default God fixes stupidity

On 30/05/2018 19:29, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868


It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else with
that sort of outcome.

The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for
pedestrians only, wouldn't you say?

Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me.

Wow. What perspicacity.

The
trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written.

Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause
cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that
sort of outcome")?

What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising it.

(If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists")

How does that work?

(The answer appears to be yes. But so what?)

Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd
simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted?

Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if we
didn't have lots of stupid motorists.


What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)?


Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better chance of
survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists.


You reckon he was followed down that steep flight of stone steps by a
motor vehicle.

I see.


  #15  
Old May 31st 18, 10:32 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default God fixes stupidity

On 31/05/18 07:19, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868

It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else
with that sort of outcome.

The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for
pedestrians only, wouldn't you say?

Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to
me.

Wow. What perspicacity.

The
trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written.

Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause
cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves
("that sort of outcome")?

What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising
it. (If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists")

How does that work?

(The answer appears to be yes. But so what?)

Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd
simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted?

Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if
we didn't have lots of stupid motorists.

What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)?


Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better chance
of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists.


You really are a sad little ****.
When is the last time you had a shag? Please tell.


And you are masturbating over that?
  #16  
Old May 31st 18, 05:50 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default God fixes stupidity

On 30/05/18 21:08, JNugent wrote:
On 30/05/2018 19:29, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868



It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else
with
that sort of outcome.

The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is for
pedestrians only, wouldn't you say?

Since you replied to me, I assume your question is addressed to me.

Wow. What perspicacity.

The
trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I have written.

Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910) cause
cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill themselves ("that
sort of outcome")?

What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble realising it.

(If you want "cyclists" then we still have "motorists")

How does that work?

(The answer appears to be yes. But so what?)

Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if he'd
simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is permitted?

Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival if we
didn't have lots of stupid motorists.

What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)?


Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better chance of
survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists.


You reckon he was followed down that steep flight of stone steps by a
motor vehicle.

I see.


I clearly see your inability to make logical connections.
  #17  
Old May 31st 18, 05:50 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default God fixes stupidity

On 30/05/18 20:19, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 23:55, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 22:09, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 21:01, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 20:47, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 14:45, JNugent wrote:
On 29/05/2018 14:27, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/05/18 11:36, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868



It is a shame that stupid motorists usually leave somebody else
with that sort of outcome.

The site of that "crash" looks very much as though it is
for pedestrians only, wouldn't you say?

Since you replied to me, I assume your question is
addressed to me.

Wow. What perspicacity.

The trouble is, your question has nothing to with what I
have written.

Drivers (whom you call "motorists", as though it were 1910)
cause cyclists to descend flights of stone steps and kill
themselves ("that sort of outcome")?

What a stupid question. I am surprised you have trouble
realising it. (If you want "cyclists" then we still have
"motorists")

How does that work?

(The answer appears to be yes. But so what?)

Do you think he'd have stood a better chance of survival if
he'd simply obeyed the law and only cycled where cycling is
permitted?

Many innocent people would have had a better chance of survival
if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists.

What about cyclists (in uk.rec.cycling)?


Yes, some innocent bicycle users would also have had a better
chance of survival if we didn't have lots of stupid motorists.


You really are a sad little ****. When is the last time you had a
shag? Please tell.


If it wasn't for generations of men not having sex, you would be sitting
under a tree and eating raw meat that you would have had to have caught
with your bare hands. How do you think your comforts, security and the
computer on which you write your drivel came about?
  #18  
Old May 31st 18, 08:39 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Jester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,727
Default God fixes stupidity

On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 11:36:42 AM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/warren-d...wich-1-5537868


No mention of whether he was wearing a helmet or not, which means he was wearing a helmet.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How the LBS fixes rivnuts installed by wannabel bike mechanics Andre Jute[_2_] Techniques 21 February 20th 16 05:54 AM
jerry lee lewis fixes a tight chain link [email protected] Techniques 0 October 4th 07 06:18 AM
2003 cervelo P3 with stripped dropout adjusting screw-fixes? serg Techniques 0 June 8th 05 11:32 PM
More stupidity. soup UK 39 March 19th 05 09:50 AM
YoHost Brett Fixes FREE Bike Classifieds Cycle America General 0 May 13th 04 08:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.