|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
At the basis of the global warming hysteria is the idea that man is causing
it and that therefore man is evil. The fact that trying to hold down CO2 emissions would end up costing millions if not billions of lives just doesn't seem to register on the do-gooders who are convinced that all we have to do is turn the therostat down to 68 and we'll all be fine. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0207171745.htm "The science policy experts, writing in the Feb. 8, 2007 issue of Nature, say adapting to the changing climate by building resilient societies and fostering sustainable development would go further in securing a future for humans on a warming planet than just cutting gas emissions." ""To define adaptation as the cost of failed mitigation is to expose millions of poor people in compromised ecosystems to the very dangers that climate policy seeks to avoid," the authors state. "By contrast, defining adaptation in terms of sustainable development, would allow a focus both on reducing emissions and on the vulnerability of populations to climate variability and change, rather than tinkering at the margins of both emissions and impacts." Nahh, I'm pretty sure that the Liberals would much rather just kill off 2/3rds of the world's population. That way their homes in the Marin Redwoods would remain unchanged. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
Righteous Moral Leader Found Drunk in a Park by a River
Irvine, California (8-February-2007) Tom Kunich, the official voice of honest, decent, righteous, moral American goodness, honesty, decency, righteousness and morality, and author of the book, "EVERYBODY Is A Filthy Slimy Scummy Immoral Piece Of **** Except You And Me And Sometimes I'm Not So Sure About You" was found drunk in a park by a river this morning, his hulking girth covered with the droppings and teeth marks of assorted barnyard animals including, but not limited to, horses, turkeys, goats, cows and pigs. According to investigating officer, Lieutenant Joe Dustoyevsky of the Irvine Police Department, Kunich had been speaking at a special retreat he'd organized for Republican members of the House and Senate, when the incident which caused his drunkeness occurred. "Apparently," said Dustoyevsky, "Kunich was teaching his "flock" of moral, righteous, decent and honest Republican House and Senate members, various advanced moral and righteous techniques for scarfing down huge racks of lamb and whole stuffed pigs and live chickens and cows, in one righteous gulp." According to Lieutenant Dustoyevsky, one of the cows unexpectedly turned on Kunich as the righteous moral leader was about to scarf her down in a single gulp, and bit off the righteous moral leader's moral righteous right ear. What followed, according to bystanders, was an apparently coordinated assault by an angry mob of embittered barnyard animals including, but not limited to, goats, turkeys, chickens, cows and pigs which was, however, much too gruesome and too immoral and too honest to be recounted in these pages which are, of course, dedicated to decency and morality and honesty and to protecting the purity and righteousness of our vicious, murdering, sanctimonious, scumbag children. But a spokesman for the Union of Concerned Cows and Pigs told reporters that the incident was simply "a pure, honest act of retribution against a man who had, without conscience, and solely for his own personal 'advancement,' casually scarfed down, whole and live, thousands of their brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers, and sons and daughters, while on his way to speak to cheering crowds about what pathetic worthless immoral scumbags they all were, and how they better all start being moral and righteous and good and honest and decent like Tom Kunich, if they didn't wanna get their pathetic asses kicked in like you-know-who." A spokesman for Kunich's righteous-but-drunken soul vigorously condemned the actions of the united barnyard animals as a conspiracy of left-wing commie wackos who were trying to create the false impression that the righteous moral honest decent kind Mr. Kunich was really some kind of gluttonous, hypocritical, slimy, scummy worthless piece of dog****. "Mr. Kunich," said the spokesman, clutching a free case of Amway products in his right hand, and a free case of Marlboro's in his left, "stands for all that is decent and good and honest and moral and righteous in the world, and he stands firmly against all that is slimy and scummy and mother****ing and cocksucking and ****ty, and therefore is in no way whatsoever the big fat gluttonous slimy scummy hypocritical lying worthless sack of **** that those left wing commie wackos keep insisting he is. In fact, THEY are the self same slimy scummy big fat hypocritical lying worthless sacks of **** they accuse him of being. Or, having been. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
On 2/11/07 8:41 PM, in article
, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote: At the basis of the global warming hysteria is the idea that man is causing it and that therefore man is evil. The fact that trying to hold down CO2 emissions would end up costing millions if not billions of lives just doesn't seem to register on the do-gooders who are convinced that all we have to do is turn the therostat down to 68 and we'll all be fine. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0207171745.htm "The science policy experts, writing in the Feb. 8, 2007 issue of Nature, say adapting to the changing climate by building resilient societies and fostering sustainable development would go further in securing a future for humans on a warming planet than just cutting gas emissions." ""To define adaptation as the cost of failed mitigation is to expose millions of poor people in compromised ecosystems to the very dangers that climate policy seeks to avoid," the authors state. "By contrast, defining adaptation in terms of sustainable development, would allow a focus both on reducing emissions and on the vulnerability of populations to climate variability and change, rather than tinkering at the margins of both emissions and impacts." Nahh, I'm pretty sure that the Liberals would much rather just kill off 2/3rds of the world's population. That way their homes in the Marin Redwoods would remain unchanged. It makes no sense........... The US is responsible for 20% of the worlds greenhouse gases. Nobody is putting that in perspective to the size of our economy, the amount of wealth we distribute to other parts of the world, etc.. EVEN IF we were even able to reduce OUR greenhouse gas emissions by a HUGE 25%!! That only equates to 5% of the global total AND China and India will make that up in less than 5 years!! AND!! China and India are EXCLUDED (as developing economies) from the Kyoto limits anyway?!?!?! Have you greeny types said ANYTHING about the constant massive amount of coal-fired energy plants the Chinese are building?? This crap about Kyoto?? Do not forgot it was ALL of our Senators who shot it down.. Ds & Rs! As Gore said on Larry King before....... "This will give us a chance to put into place things we SHOULD HAVE DONE ANYWAY!" And your Queen Bitch Pilosi wants a BIGGER plane?!?!?! Hypocritical windbags. It is just a skewed reading of what is mostly an issue of acceptance to force a massive socialized lifestyle change.. To even have a country like China come out and say WE have to bear the burden of ripping our economy to shreds to do something that they will NOT do and surpass our emissions anyway is a bunch of crap...... Most of you do not even think these changes forced on us would even effect you much.......... And you bitched about $2.50 gas? When it goes up to $5 which corporate right-wing fanatic will you blame then? I do not give a damn what you people say about this post...... It means nothing to my life |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
I do not give a damn what you people say about this post...... It means nothing to my life I love worthless, cowardly POS trolls who dont have the courage to post a REAL email address in their electronic flatulation. Makes it sooooo much easier to place them in the electronic waste basket of stupdidity where they belong. At least kunuch has the cajones to use a real email address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
Joe Cipale? As if that's your real name. What a dumbass! While your at
it, why not give full disclosure of all your personal information dumbass including your social security number, credit card number, expiration date, PIN, and mother's maiden name. "Joe Cipale" wrote in message ... I do not give a damn what you people say about this post...... It means nothing to my life I love worthless, cowardly POS trolls who dont have the courage to post a REAL email address in their electronic flatulation. Makes it sooooo much easier to place them in the electronic waste basket of stupdidity where they belong. At least kunuch has the cajones to use a real email address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
Richard Cheese wrote:
Joe Cipale? As if that's your real name. What a dumbass! While your at it, why not give full disclosure of all your personal information dumbass including your social security number, credit card number, expiration date, PIN, and mother's maiden name. "Joe Cipale" wrote in message ... I do not give a damn what you people say about this post...... It means nothing to my life I love worthless, cowardly POS trolls who dont have the courage to post a REAL email address in their electronic flatulation. Makes it sooooo much easier to place them in the electronic waste basket of stupdidity where they belong. At least kunuch has the cajones to use a real email address. ~yawn~ Is that the best you can come up with cracker? good bye, cheesewiz. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
On Feb 11, 9:06 pm, ST wrote:
It is just a skewed reading of what is mostly an issue of acceptance to force a massive socialized lifestyle change.. To even have a country like China come out and say WE have to bear the burden of ripping our economy to shreds to do something that they will NOT do and surpass our emissions anyway is a bunch of crap...... Dumbass - Ripping our economy to shreds? Would you rather pay American engineers from General Electric to build windfarms or pay Saudi Arabian princes $70/barrel for oil? Exxon tried an oil shale project, the Colony 2 project in the 70s and 80s, in Colorado. The Saudis didn't like the threat to their cash cow and raised production to such a high level (they have a 12 million barrel/day capacity) that Exxon had to close the project at a cost of $5 billion in 1980 dollars. Wind farms and solar are viable at a price of $60-70/barrel, but only if the price stays up there long term. The investors know that a repeat of the Colony 2 project will happen if they try that. So they don't go for it and I don't blame them. There is only one entity that can change that: our government, by doing a price support the same way the do for butter and sugar. But it won't happen. The energy interests that don't have alternative energy subsidiaries will throw their lobbying against it. In the meantime, idiots such as yourself will be against alternative power produced by domestic producers and instead you'd rather give it to Hugo Chavez of Venezuela or King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. And, as such, we have to get involved in ****holes like Iraq, a place where we've already spent $400 billion and wasted our good soldiers' lives when we could just let them fight amongst themselves, like we do with the entire continent of Africa. Nice job of patriotism, you ****ing moron. thanks, K. Gringioni. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
On Feb 11, 9:44 pm, ST wrote:
On 2/11/07 9:32 PM, in article . com, "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote: On Feb 11, 9:06 pm, ST wrote: It is just a skewed reading of what is mostly an issue of acceptance to force a massive socialized lifestyle change.. To even have a country like China come out and say WE have to bear the burden of ripping our economy to shreds to do something that they will NOT do and surpass our emissions anyway is a bunch of crap...... Dumbass - Ripping our economy to shreds? Would you rather pay American engineers from General Electric to build windfarms or pay Saudi Arabian princes $70/barrel for oil? Exxon tried an oil shale project, the Colony 2 project in the 70s and 80s, in Colorado. The Saudis didn't like the threat to their cash cow and raised production to such a high level (they have a 12 million barrel/day capacity) that Exxon had to close the project at a cost of $5 billion in 1980 dollars. Wind farms and solar are viable at a price of $60-70/barrel, but only if the price stays up there long term. The investors know that a repeat of the Colony 2 project will happen if they try that. So they don't go for it and I don't blame them. There is only one entity that can change that: our government, by doing a price support the same way the do for butter and sugar. But it won't happen. The energy interests that don't have alternative energy subsidiaries will throw their lobbying against it. In the meantime, idiots such as yourself will be against alternative power produced by domestic producers and instead you'd rather give it to Hugo Chavez of Venezuela or King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. And, as such, we have to get involved in ****holes like Iraq, a place where we've already spent $400 billion and wasted our good soldiers' lives when we could just let them fight amongst themselves, like we do with the entire continent of Africa. Nice job of patriotism, you ****ing moron. thanks, K. Gringioni. You do not know what I want you piece of ****....... You KNOW me and where to find me. I am through wasting my time..... Go try to convince the Chinese, etal. of your vast knowledge Moron - You stated that clean energy would "rip our economy to shreds". I gave you an example of how it wouldn't. Domestic wind power. Made by Americans, paid for by Americans. Instead you want the status quo, giving the money to Venezuela, Mexico, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia in exchange for their oil. Nice job of patriotism, you idiot. thanks, K. Gringioni. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anybody care to say something intelligent about Landis' web defense ? | [email protected] | Racing | 21 | October 14th 06 02:15 PM |
[totally OT] NYT Article about Intelligent Design | Ernst Noch | Racing | 63 | September 1st 05 06:25 PM |
Intelligent comment | Mikefule | Unicycling | 25 | July 21st 05 03:05 AM |
more intelligent computers | Miles | General | 7 | December 8th 04 12:52 AM |
The Neanderthals: More Intelligent than Mountain Bikers! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 7 | September 30th 03 04:55 PM |