A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Racing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tyler won't forget all you doubters...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old November 15th 04, 06:47 PM
B. Lafferty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message
oups.com...

B. Lafferty wrote:

Tyler, this is not the best way to build good will for the bike shop

you'll
be opening in Marblehead.




Dumbass -

lol.

Actually, I'll bet his bike shop would do OK. There's that diehard
contingent that believes that he's innocent because he's a nice guy.
K. Gringioni.


After five years he'd be scraping to make a decent living like all the other
guys in the retail side of the industry.


Ads
  #12  
Old November 15th 04, 08:08 PM
MagillaGorilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:

B. Lafferty wrote:

Tyler, this is not the best way to build good will for the bike shop


you'll

be opening in Marblehead.





Dumbass -

lol.

Actually, I'll bet his bike shop would do OK. There's that diehard
contingent that believes that he's innocent because he's a nice guy.
K. Gringioni.


Most people believe he's innocent because the concept of homologous
bloood transfusions defies empirical knowledge (why not auto-transfuse
since you know it's not detectable? how do you type the blood? how do
you find a donor? who helps you do this complex procedure?) and because
the test results have to be "interpreted by experts after it is labeled
'suspicious.'" Not exactly a mass spec result, now is it?

You still don't know the science behind the test and your blind
acceptance of it is a disgrace to the concept of due process.

Magilla
  #13  
Old November 15th 04, 08:08 PM
MagillaGorilla
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:

B. Lafferty wrote:

Tyler, this is not the best way to build good will for the bike shop


you'll

be opening in Marblehead.





Dumbass -

lol.

Actually, I'll bet his bike shop would do OK. There's that diehard
contingent that believes that he's innocent because he's a nice guy.
K. Gringioni.


Most people believe he's innocent because the concept of homologous
bloood transfusions defies empirical knowledge (why not auto-transfuse
since you know it's not detectable? how do you type the blood? how do
you find a donor? who helps you do this complex procedure?) and because
the test results have to be "interpreted by experts after it is labeled
'suspicious.'" Not exactly a mass spec result, now is it?

You still don't know the science behind the test and your blind
acceptance of it is a disgrace to the concept of due process.

Magilla
  #14  
Old November 15th 04, 08:29 PM
Kurgan Gringioni
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


MagillaGorilla wrote:

Most people believe he's innocent because the concept of homologous
bloood transfusions defies empirical knowledge (why not

auto-transfuse
since you know it's not detectable? how do you type the blood? how

do
you find a donor? who helps you do this complex procedure?) and

because
the test results have to be "interpreted by experts after it is

labeled
'suspicious.'" Not exactly a mass spec result, now is it?

You still don't know the science behind the test and your blind
acceptance of it is a disgrace to the concept of due process.




Dumbass -

If the test is that bad, why did he fail 3 out of 3 and no one else
except his teamate got even 1 positive?

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

  #15  
Old November 15th 04, 08:29 PM
Kurgan Gringioni
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


MagillaGorilla wrote:

Most people believe he's innocent because the concept of homologous
bloood transfusions defies empirical knowledge (why not

auto-transfuse
since you know it's not detectable? how do you type the blood? how

do
you find a donor? who helps you do this complex procedure?) and

because
the test results have to be "interpreted by experts after it is

labeled
'suspicious.'" Not exactly a mass spec result, now is it?

You still don't know the science behind the test and your blind
acceptance of it is a disgrace to the concept of due process.




Dumbass -

If the test is that bad, why did he fail 3 out of 3 and no one else
except his teamate got even 1 positive?

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

  #20  
Old November 15th 04, 11:54 PM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:

Dumbass -

If the test is that bad, why did he fail 3 out of 3 and no one else
except his teamate got even 1 positive?

thanks,

K. Gringioni.


Did all the samples get tested for homologous blood transfusion or only
those that looked "suspicious" for some reason?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Marital discord - Hamilton crit pro Racing 9 September 27th 04 12:42 PM
Tyler Not Cleared, Lab Blunder never_doped Racing 2 September 25th 04 06:33 AM
Why condemn Tyler so fast? Ronde Chump Racing 8 September 25th 04 05:22 AM
Olympic Pick Contest: finaler Dan Connelly Racing 2 August 19th 04 04:44 AM
Tyler Hamilton Foundation Kick-Off Richard Adams Racing 0 November 10th 03 08:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.