|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message oups.com... B. Lafferty wrote: Tyler, this is not the best way to build good will for the bike shop you'll be opening in Marblehead. Dumbass - lol. Actually, I'll bet his bike shop would do OK. There's that diehard contingent that believes that he's innocent because he's a nice guy. K. Gringioni. After five years he'd be scraping to make a decent living like all the other guys in the retail side of the industry. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
B. Lafferty wrote: Tyler, this is not the best way to build good will for the bike shop you'll be opening in Marblehead. Dumbass - lol. Actually, I'll bet his bike shop would do OK. There's that diehard contingent that believes that he's innocent because he's a nice guy. K. Gringioni. Most people believe he's innocent because the concept of homologous bloood transfusions defies empirical knowledge (why not auto-transfuse since you know it's not detectable? how do you type the blood? how do you find a donor? who helps you do this complex procedure?) and because the test results have to be "interpreted by experts after it is labeled 'suspicious.'" Not exactly a mass spec result, now is it? You still don't know the science behind the test and your blind acceptance of it is a disgrace to the concept of due process. Magilla |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
B. Lafferty wrote: Tyler, this is not the best way to build good will for the bike shop you'll be opening in Marblehead. Dumbass - lol. Actually, I'll bet his bike shop would do OK. There's that diehard contingent that believes that he's innocent because he's a nice guy. K. Gringioni. Most people believe he's innocent because the concept of homologous bloood transfusions defies empirical knowledge (why not auto-transfuse since you know it's not detectable? how do you type the blood? how do you find a donor? who helps you do this complex procedure?) and because the test results have to be "interpreted by experts after it is labeled 'suspicious.'" Not exactly a mass spec result, now is it? You still don't know the science behind the test and your blind acceptance of it is a disgrace to the concept of due process. Magilla |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
MagillaGorilla wrote: Most people believe he's innocent because the concept of homologous bloood transfusions defies empirical knowledge (why not auto-transfuse since you know it's not detectable? how do you type the blood? how do you find a donor? who helps you do this complex procedure?) and because the test results have to be "interpreted by experts after it is labeled 'suspicious.'" Not exactly a mass spec result, now is it? You still don't know the science behind the test and your blind acceptance of it is a disgrace to the concept of due process. Dumbass - If the test is that bad, why did he fail 3 out of 3 and no one else except his teamate got even 1 positive? thanks, K. Gringioni. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
MagillaGorilla wrote: Most people believe he's innocent because the concept of homologous bloood transfusions defies empirical knowledge (why not auto-transfuse since you know it's not detectable? how do you type the blood? how do you find a donor? who helps you do this complex procedure?) and because the test results have to be "interpreted by experts after it is labeled 'suspicious.'" Not exactly a mass spec result, now is it? You still don't know the science behind the test and your blind acceptance of it is a disgrace to the concept of due process. Dumbass - If the test is that bad, why did he fail 3 out of 3 and no one else except his teamate got even 1 positive? thanks, K. Gringioni. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Alex Rodriguez wrote: In article . com, says... If the test is that bad, why did he fail 3 out of 3 and no one else except his teamate got even 1 positive? If the test is bad, who knows what it is detecting? Could be there is something different in the blood of those that got positives. Dumbass - I can think of 1 thing: someone else's blood cells. K. Gringioni. RBR hematologist |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Alex Rodriguez wrote: In article . com, says... If the test is that bad, why did he fail 3 out of 3 and no one else except his teamate got even 1 positive? If the test is bad, who knows what it is detecting? Could be there is something different in the blood of those that got positives. Dumbass - I can think of 1 thing: someone else's blood cells. K. Gringioni. RBR hematologist |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
Dumbass - If the test is that bad, why did he fail 3 out of 3 and no one else except his teamate got even 1 positive? thanks, K. Gringioni. Did all the samples get tested for homologous blood transfusion or only those that looked "suspicious" for some reason? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Marital discord - Hamilton | crit pro | Racing | 9 | September 27th 04 12:42 PM |
Tyler Not Cleared, Lab Blunder | never_doped | Racing | 2 | September 25th 04 06:33 AM |
Why condemn Tyler so fast? | Ronde Chump | Racing | 8 | September 25th 04 05:22 AM |
Olympic Pick Contest: finaler | Dan Connelly | Racing | 2 | August 19th 04 04:44 AM |
Tyler Hamilton Foundation Kick-Off | Richard Adams | Racing | 0 | November 10th 03 08:25 PM |