Republicans: Nancy Pelosi Was Mean To Us - Petty Sissies Vote No

In article s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article ,
Aratzio wrote:

On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:10:09 -0700, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
rand mair fheal got double secret probation for
writing:

In article ,
Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:05:31 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks, ah
bloviated:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article
s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article
s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article
s.com,
ah wrote:

Matt Stawicki wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio

wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in
alt.usenet.kooks,
bloviated:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies

wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy
Pelosi
for
the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made
a
partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have
been
any
partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan
speech
on
the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate
sensibilities
of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote
no
against
the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the
economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the
republicans
all
started
handing her their balls since they would not be
needing
them
anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation.
That's
40%
of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for
the
economy."

2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill.

Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the
REPUBLICANS
voted
no
on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the
Republican
president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of
the
house
Republican leaders.

The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted
no.
Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes.

So the current Republican presidential nominee who was
working
so
very
hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the
house
could
not
get even ONE of his own state's congressional
representatives
to
vote
for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership
displayed
by
the
nominee.

The current Republican President could not deliver even
20%
of
his
own
supposed home state.

The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100%
congressmen
who
are either behind in the polls or in a tight race.

And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to
them.
Poor
little delicate flowers.

So just what makes you think that just because a handful
fo
replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest
of
the
republicans are supppose to vote for it?

Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are
supposed to
vote the party line?

Well, that's pretty-much what they do all the time . . .
why
should
we
expect
anything different, now?

party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable

You can say that again, Bro-Sis.

party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable

Amen, Bro-Sis!

so you dont want ne to sat that again

Yr a fee agent, no?

tendonitits in the wrist again
i sometimes have to type one handed

Lucky *******!

We were lucky to have hands.

sometimes i wonder about that

Me specifically or us in general?

when my specific hands hurt

PLS?

intermittent carpal tunnel syndrome

arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call
its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang

In article s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article
s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article
s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article
s.com,
ah wrote:

Matt Stawicki wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio

wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in
alt.usenet.kooks,
bloviated:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies

wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy
Pelosi
for
the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made
a
partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have
been
any
partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan
speech
on
the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate
sensibilities
of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote
no
against
the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the
economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the
republicans
all
started
handing her their balls since they would not be
needing
them
anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation.
That's
40%
of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for
the
economy."

2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill.

Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the
REPUBLICANS
voted
no
on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the
Republican
president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the
house
Republican leaders.

The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted
no.
Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes.

So the current Republican presidential nominee who was
working
so
very
hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house
could
not
get even ONE of his own state's congressional
representatives
to
vote
for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership
displayed
by
the
nominee.

The current Republican President could not deliver even
20%
of
his
own
supposed home state.

The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100%
congressmen
who
are either behind in the polls or in a tight race.

And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to
them.
Poor
little delicate flowers.

So just what makes you think that just because a handful
fo
replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of
the
republicans are supppose to vote for it?

Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are
supposed
to
vote the party line?

Well, that's pretty-much what they do all the time . . .
why
should
we
expect
anything different, now?

party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable

You can say that again, Bro-Sis.

party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable

Amen, Bro-Sis!

so you dont want ne to sat that again

Yr a fee agent, no?

tendonitits in the wrist again
i sometimes have to type one handed

Lucky *******!

lucky i now recognize the precursors
so i dont again have the entire arm turn intp a single jangled nerve
screaming in pain

Tennis injury?

typing injuries

I never learned to type. Is it that bas?

its a relief

arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call
its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang

On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:24:07 -0400, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
ah got double secret probation for writing:

Gunner wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:18:49 GMT, Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of
Confusion
ballista.org wrote:

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:58:09 +0100, Guido attempted to confuse the issue
further by squeaking:
The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:27:24 -0700, Gunner did the cha-cha, and
screamed:

Barney Frank's Bankrupt Ideas

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Monday, October 06, 2008 4:20 PM
PT
snip ****

So now you're spamming your plagiarism. Not bad enough you're spamming
lies, you're spamming *someone else's* lies.

Ha! Bambi has never had an original thought in his head. It may have taken
10 or more years but at least now he gives the source of his crap. He used
to pretend it was his own.

Unfortunately, he provides no links, and still loses. Mind you, AFAICT,
he abuses "Fair Use", too.


Investors business daily is not a link? Oh...you mean something you
can mindlessly point and click on.


Isnt it cute how the Leftists start trotting out Fair Use, when a
reputable news article is posted that shows how perfidious the Left
is?

They actually want to censor the news, removing anything bad reported
about the Left.

Here...try this one on for size

ACORN Vegas Office Raided in Voter Fraud Investigation
ACORN’s Las Vegas headquarters has been raided by Nevada authorities
looking for evidence of voter fraud.

Nevada state authorities seized records and computers Tuesday from the
Las Vegas office of an organization that tries to get low-income
people registered to vote, after fielding complaints of voter fraud.

Bob Walsh, spokesman for the Nevada secretary of state’s office, told
FOXNews.com the raid was prompted by ongoing complaints about
“erroneous” registration information being submitted by the
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, also called
ACORN.

The group was submitting the information through a voter sign-up drive
known as Project Vote.

“Some of them used nonexistent names, some of them used false
addresses and some of them were duplicates of previously filed
applications,” Walsh said, describing the complaints, which largely
came from the registrar in Clark County, Nev.

Secretary of State Ross Miller said the fraudulent registrations
included forms for the starting lineup of the Dallas Cowboys football
team.

“Tony Romo is not registered to vote in the state of Nevada, and
anybody trying to pose as Terrell Owens won’t be able to cast a ballot
on Nov. 4,” Miller said.

Walsh said agents from both the secretary of state’s office and Nevada
attorney general’s office conducted the raid at 9:30 a.m. local time,
and “took a bunch of stuff.” Miller’s office reported seizing eight
computer hard drives and about 20 boxes of documents.

Bertha Lewis, interim chief organizer for ACORN, released a statement
saying the group has for months been turning over any suspicious
registration information to elections officials. She said those
officials routinely ignored their tips, and called the raid a “stunt.”
“When we have identified suspicious applications, we have separated
them out and flagged them for election officials. We have zero
tolerance for fraudulent registrations. We immediately dismiss
employees we suspect of submitting fraudulent registrations,” she
said. “Today’s raid by the secretary of state’s office is a stunt that
serves no useful purpose other than discredit our work registering
Nevadans and distracting us from the important work ahead of getting
every eligible voter to the polls.”

Neither the group, which hires canvassers to register voters, nor any
employees have been charged or arrested for fraud or other crimes,
said Miller, a Democrat.

But it’s not the first time ACORN’s been under investigation for
registration irregularities. The raid is the latest of at least nine
investigations into possible fraudulent voter registration forms
submitted by ACORN — the probes have involved ACORN workers in
Wisconsin, New Mexico, Indiana and other states.

In response to the Las Vegas raid, Republican Nevada Sen. John Ensign
and seven other senators penned a letter to the Federal Housing
Finance Agency calling for the suspension of taxpayer dollars to
“controversial groups like ACORN.” The letter referred to
contributions that potentially could come from Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008.

In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.

More recently, 27,000 registrations handled by the group from January
to July 2008 “went into limbo because they were incomplete,
inaccurate, or fraudulent,” said James Terry, chief public advocate at
the Consumers Rights League.


In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.

Dude!

Yer teh guy behind those weird "Anonymous" replies on washingtonpost.com!

I gots a query:

If the peeps get registered, does that mean the peeps be votin'? Or do
it just mean some ACORN hack was makin' their quota and gettin' a
check?

See the problem with the ACORN kerfluffle is the even though the names
go on the role, there is probably not a body to vote. The ID
requirements at the poll are generally sufficient to prevent any
organized fraud. So while there may be names there isn't a vote. Ergo
it is a typical distraction from the issues.

On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:30:44 -0400, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
ah got double secret probation for writing:

Aratzio wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:05:31 -0400, in alt.usenet.kooks, ah
bloviated:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article s.com,
ah wrote:

rand mair fheal wrote:
In article s.com,
ah wrote:

Matt Stawicki wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:44:47 -0700, Aratzio

wrote:

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT), in alt.usenet.kooks,
bloviated:

On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, Republicans Are Sissies

wrote:
Yes, the republicans are blaming house speaker Nancy Pelosi for
the
failure of the Bailout to pass. Why? Because she made a
partisan
speech.

We can't have people voting for a bill if there have been any
partisan
speeches. The devastation of listening to a partisan speech on
the
floor of the house was just too much for the delicate
sensibilities
of
the sissies on the right. So they were forced to vote no
against
the
bill, regardless of whether it was good for the economy.

As Nancy Pelosi walked from the lectern the republicans all
started
handing her their balls since they would not be needing them
anymore.

Democrats voted 140 to 95 in favor of the legislation. That's
40%
of
Dems voting NO "regardless of whether it was good for the
economy."

2/3 of the Democrats voted FOR the bill.

Now, one more time for the slow kids, 2/3 of the REPUBLICANS voted
no
on a REPUBLICAN proposed bill. A bill supported by the Republican
president, Republican presidential nominee and ALL of the house
Republican leaders.

The Arizona republican house representatives ALL voted no.
Only 3 Texas republican (out of 19?) voted yes.

So the current Republican presidential nominee who was working so
very
hard (by phoning it in) to get the bill through the house could
not
get even ONE of his own state's congressional representatives to
vote
for a bill he favored. Whqt effective leadership displayed by the
nominee.

The current Republican President could not deliver even 20% of his
own
supposed home state.

The list of Republicans who voted no is almost 100% congressmen
who
are either behind in the polls or in a tight race.

And then they blame Nancy Pelosi because she was mean to them.
Poor
little delicate flowers.

So just what makes you think that just because a handful fo
replblicans came up with this 'act', that all the rest of the
republicans are supppose to vote for it?

Do you honestly believe that our congress critters are supposed to
vote the party line?

Well, that's pretty-much what they do all the time . . . why should
we
expect
anything different, now?

party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable

You can say that again, Bro-Sis.

party loyality is the last refuge of the unelectable

Amen, Bro-Sis!

so you dont want ne to sat that again

Yr a fee agent, no?

tendonitits in the wrist again
i sometimes have to type one handed

Lucky *******!

We were lucky to have hands.

And you try and tell the young people of today that ..... they won't believe you.

We were lucky to have been born young.

In article ,
Aratzio wrote:

I gots a query:

If the peeps get registered, does that mean the peeps be votin'? Or do
it just mean some ACORN hack was makin' their quota and gettin' a
check?

See the problem with the ACORN kerfluffle is the even though the names
go on the role, there is probably not a body to vote. The ID
requirements at the poll are generally sufficient to prevent any
organized fraud. So while there may be names there isn't a vote. Ergo
it is a typical distraction from the issues.

more simply the county either has a valid address for an absentee ballot
or they show up in person at the polling place
either case the sheriff can arrest for voter fraud
and prosecution proceed

how many prosecution have there been?
how many accusations of fraud have there been?

arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call
its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang

Hail Eris! On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:30:59 -0700, Aratzio sang, "If I were
a Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, bloody,
bloody, blub...", and then randomly typed out:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:24:07 -0400, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, ah
got double secret probation for writing:
Gunner wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:18:49 GMT, Demon Lord Benedict Snodgrass Jr of
Confusion wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:58:09 +0100, Guido attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:27:24 -0700, Gunner did the cha-cha, and
screamed:

Barney Frank's Bankrupt Ideas

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Monday, October 06, 2008
4:20 PM PT
snip ****

So now you're spamming your plagiarism. Not bad enough you're
spamming lies, you're spamming *someone else's* lies.

Ha! Bambi has never had an original thought in his head. It may have
taken 10 or more years but at least now he gives the source of his
crap. He used to pretend it was his own.

Unfortunately, he provides no links, and still loses. Mind you,
AFAICT, he abuses "Fair Use", too.


Investors business daily is not a link? Oh...you mean something you
can mindlessly point and click on.


Isnt it cute how the Leftists start trotting out Fair Use, when a
reputable news article is posted that shows how perfidious the Left
is?

They actually want to censor the news, removing anything bad reported
about the Left.

Here...try this one on for size

ACORN Vegas Office Raided in Voter Fraud Investigation ACORNÂ’s Las
Vegas headquarters has been raided by Nevada authorities looking for
evidence of voter fraud.

Nevada state authorities seized records and computers Tuesday from the
Las Vegas office of an organization that tries to get low-income
people registered to vote, after fielding complaints of voter fraud.

Bob Walsh, spokesman for the Nevada secretary of stateÂ’s office, told
FOXNews.com the raid was prompted by ongoing complaints about
“erroneous” registration information being submitted by the
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, also called
ACORN.

The group was submitting the information through a voter sign-up drive
known as Project Vote.

“Some of them used nonexistent names, some of them used false
addresses and some of them were duplicates of previously filed
applications,” Walsh said, describing the complaints, which largely
came from the registrar in Clark County, Nev.

Secretary of State Ross Miller said the fraudulent registrations
included forms for the starting lineup of the Dallas Cowboys football
team.

“Tony Romo is not registered to vote in the state of Nevada, and
anybody trying to pose as Terrell Owens wonÂ’t be able to cast a
ballot on Nov. 4,” Miller said.

Walsh said agents from both the secretary of stateÂ’s office and
Nevada attorney generalÂ’s office conducted the raid at 9:30 a.m.
local time, and “took a bunch of stuff.” Miller’s office reported
seizing eight computer hard drives and about 20 boxes of documents.

Bertha Lewis, interim chief organizer for ACORN, released a statement
saying the group has for months been turning over any suspicious
registration information to elections officials. She said those
officials routinely ignored their tips, and called the raid a
“stunt.” “When we have identified suspicious applications, we have
separated them out and flagged them for election officials. We have
zero tolerance for fraudulent registrations. We immediately dismiss
employees we suspect of submitting fraudulent registrations,” she
said. “Today’s raid by the secretary of state’s office is a stunt
that serves no useful purpose other than discredit our work
registering Nevadans and distracting us from the important work ahead
of getting every eligible voter to the polls.”

Neither the group, which hires canvassers to register voters, nor any
employees have been charged or arrested for fraud or other crimes,
said Miller, a Democrat.

But itÂ’s not the first time ACORNÂ’s been under investigation for
registration irregularities. The raid is the latest of at least nine
investigations into possible fraudulent voter registration forms
submitted by ACORN — the probes have involved ACORN workers in
Wisconsin, New Mexico, Indiana and other states.

In response to the Las Vegas raid, Republican Nevada Sen. John Ensign
and seven other senators penned a letter to the Federal Housing
Finance Agency calling for the suspension of taxpayer dollars to
“controversial groups like ACORN.” The letter referred to
contributions that potentially could come from Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008.

In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s
history. In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter
registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.

More recently, 27,000 registrations handled by the group from January
to July 2008 “went into limbo because they were incomplete,
inaccurate, or fraudulent,” said James Terry, chief public advocate
at the Consumers Rights League.


In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam
Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s
history. In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter
registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake. In
2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed
called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration
forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake. In 2006, ACORN
also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed called the
“worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history. In the case,
ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all
but six of the 1,800 names were fake. In 2006, ACORN also committed
what Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed called the “worse case of
election fraud” in the state’s history. In the case, ACORN submitted
just over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all but six of the
1,800 names were fake. In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington
Secretary of State Sam Reed called the “worse case of election
fraud” in the state’s history. In the case, ACORN submitted just
over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800
names were fake. In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington
Secretary of State Sam Reed called the “worse case of election
fraud” in the state’s history. In the case, ACORN submitted just
over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800
names were fake. In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington
Secretary of State Sam Reed called the “worse case of election
fraud” in the state’s history. In the case, ACORN submitted just
over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800
names were fake. In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington
Secretary of State Sam Reed called the “worse case of election
fraud” in the state’s history. In the case, ACORN submitted just
over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800
names were fake. In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington
Secretary of State Sam Reed called the “worse case of election
fraud” in the state’s history. In the case, ACORN submitted just
over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800
names were fake. In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington
Secretary of State Sam Reed called the “worse case of election
fraud” in the state’s history. In the case, ACORN submitted just
over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800
names were fake. In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington
Secretary of State Sam Reed called the “worse case of election
fraud” in the state’s history. In the case, ACORN submitted just
over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800
names were fake. In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington
Secretary of State Sam Reed called the “worse case of election
fraud” in the state’s history. In the case, ACORN submitted just
over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800
names were fake. In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington
Secretary of State Sam Reed called the “worse case of election
fraud” in the state’s history. In the case, ACORN submitted just
over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800
names were fake.

Dude!

Yer teh guy behind those weird "Anonymous" replies on
washingtonpost.com!

I gots a query:

If the peeps get registered, does that mean the peeps be votin'? Or do
it just mean some ACORN hack was makin' their quota and gettin' a check?

See the problem with the ACORN kerfluffle is the even though the names
go on the role, there is probably not a body to vote. The ID
requirements at the poll are generally sufficient to prevent any
organized fraud. So while there may be names there isn't a vote. Ergo it
is a typical distraction from the issues.

You're just trying to distract from teh *REAL* issues, 'cause you hate
Gunner's phreedumb!!!1 Just like that *lying partisan coward*
Branchflower.

Or not.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
TEH USENETS BULLIE -- Snarky bin Bloggin'
http://www.runescape.com/
Join my RuneScape clan!
http://z11.invisionfree.com/Holy_Pre...abal/index.php
Full name of clan: Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet
And Usenet Terrorist Pretzel

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2008
Hammer of Thor, July 2008

"But the other thing about her, she does know about international
relations because she is right up there in Alaska right next door to
Russia." -- Steve Doocy of FOX News was obviously a football player in
his early adulthood.

Hey, Aggie! Does this sound familiar?
Message-ID:

"Marcella proves once again that she's an ignorant racist bigot." -- OK,
what race are Greeks, again? Aggie's so much more knowledgeable than I
about that sort of thing. Message-ID:


"It could be several." -- Aggie answers marc_CH's question about which
drugs Jamaican athletes such as Powell and Bolt have been taking.
Message-ID:

"Only athletes on drugs win meddles. [...]

"And the funny thing is the Greek weightlifters were not winning meddles
even while on drugs. Clearly every single weightlifter that beat a Greek
weightlifter was taking more drugs than they were." -- Yeah, that's the
ticket, Aggie! Message-ID:


"Do Usenet posters on drugs not know how to spell 'medals'?" -- They
really don't, marc_CH. Message-ID:


"Not supporting me is equivalent to forfeiting your own rights." --
John D. Wentzky: Warrior For Your Freedumb! Message-ID:


"You cognatatively challenged fool!" -- According to Agamemnon, Stephen
Wilson is, apparently, highly ignorant about cognates, and so is anyone
who dares to disagree with him, in Message-ID:


"Is it still necrophilia if I'm conscious?" -- Owen Harper, "Dead Man
Walking", Torchwood (20/207)

Eric "Reality Check©"/"Vox"/"_ Prof. Jonez _" Ross is a racist and
homophobic liar, k00k, and paedophile, as well as a coprophage.

On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:44:41 -0700, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
rand mair fheal got double secret probation for
writing:

In article ,
Aratzio wrote:

I gots a query:

If the peeps get registered, does that mean the peeps be votin'? Or do
it just mean some ACORN hack was makin' their quota and gettin' a
check?

See the problem with the ACORN kerfluffle is the even though the names
go on the role, there is probably not a body to vote. The ID
requirements at the poll are generally sufficient to prevent any
organized fraud. So while there may be names there isn't a vote. Ergo
it is a typical distraction from the issues.

more simply the county either has a valid address for an absentee ballot
or they show up in person at the polling place
either case the sheriff can arrest for voter fraud
and prosecution proceed

how many prosecution have there been?
how many accusations of fraud have there been?

registration fraud has almost no connection to voter fraud unless the
organization that does the polling is involved.

ACORN is an inefficient organization with limited worker oversight.
The workers are usually either low income or unemployed hired to
canvas for voters. ACORN has nothing to do with the actual voting
process other than the registration drives.

Imagine the logistics that are required for organized voter fraud.
Imagine then the logistics of voter disenfranchisement. It is MUCH
easier to stop people from voting than it is to create fraudulent
voters. A couple of well placed people can keep 10s of thousands of
people from voting. It requires 10s of thousands of individual votes
to have the opposite effect with fraud.

The Republican machine is losing. They need a way to claim they
actually won and that the Democratic vote was in fact illegitimate. So
they are hanging their hats on *proving* that registration equates to
voting.

Bizarre.

(You will note that it is unlikely any wingtard will actually try to
refute the above with facts or commentary that does not consist of ad
hominem or non sequitur)

On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:18:37 GMT, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
"The Demon of Mockery & Silliness, Chas. E. Pemberton"
got double secret
probation for writing:

I gots a query:

If the peeps get registered, does that mean the peeps be votin'? Or do
it just mean some ACORN hack was makin' their quota and gettin' a check?

See the problem with the ACORN kerfluffle is the even though the names
go on the role, there is probably not a body to vote. The ID
requirements at the poll are generally sufficient to prevent any
organized fraud. So while there may be names there isn't a vote. Ergo it
is a typical distraction from the issues.

You're just trying to distract from teh *REAL* issues, 'cause you hate
Gunner's phreedumb!!!1 Just like that *lying partisan coward*
Branchflower.

Or not.

There is the other issue that if the registration fraud was organized,
why would the local county officials, both republican and democrat, be
raising the issue. You would think an organization as powerful as is
ascribed to ACORN would own these local officials or their
subordinates to keep this from occurring.

If you are going to influence an election via voter fraud, you
disenfranchise rather than register. There are very few examples of
actual quantitative voter fraud (dead, multiple etc) and their are
many examples of voter disenfranchisement (see blacks in US South).

This is all pre-election posing by the losers so that they can claim
that the incoming party is illegitimate and that the mandate for the
incoming party does not exist.

Sad really.

In article ,
Aratzio wrote:

registration fraud has almost no connection to voter fraud unless the
organization that does the polling is involved.

most telling is the dearth of successful prosecutions
its not that hard to prove
especially the kind of massive fraud that republicans claim

in california voter registration is public information
which means anyone can get the lists and canvass neighborhoods
if the kidn of massive fraud really existed
wheres the evidence

arf meow arf - cats and dogs living together - who ya goin call
its the end of the world as you know it - filler text goes here
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang
this is how the world ends - not with a whimper but with a bang

On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:25:14 -0400, ah wrote:

lucky i now recognize the precursors
so i dont again have the entire arm turn intp a single jangled nerve
screaming in pain

Tennis injury?

typing injuries

I never learned to type. Is it that bas?
--
ah


Just noticeable