|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement? They would severely cut down on the spray on a wet motorway.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 19:20:28 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement? They would severely cut down on the spray on a wet motorway. What the **** do you care about legal requirements? You don't even stick to speed limits! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
In article , sick old nazoid pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "****sack Moishe Goldbergsky") wrote: What the **** do you care about legal requirements? Sigh. Look, you dirty, inferior sub-louse... I have, repeatedly, ordered you to be polite to humans. Please follow. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why is sick old nazoid pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron now forging as "NEMO"? ( Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?)
In article , sick old nazoid pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (forging as "NEMO") wrote: [flush] Forging those superior to you? But you are STILL inferior, Andrzej. You will ALWAYS be inferior. It's genetic. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
On 27/04/2019 19.20, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?* They would severely cut down on the spray on a wet motorway. Get some decent windscreen wipers you pikey. Honestly, welcome to the 21st century. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:37:49 +0100, Tosspot wrote:
On 27/04/2019 19.20, Commander Kinsey wrote: Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement? They would severely cut down on the spray on a wet motorway. Get some decent windscreen wipers you pikey. Honestly, welcome to the 21st century. So your wipers magically remove the spray that's metres in front of you? Idiot. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?
On 28/04/2019 08:00, Commander Kinsey wrote:
* Idiot. Thanks greatly for that excellent comment being spewed by YOU. Especially by YOU. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Troll-feeding Senile Idiot Alert!
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 21:25:40 +1200, Peter Keller wrote:
* Idiot. Thanks greatly for that excellent comment being spewed by YOU. Especially by YOU. Great to see that you felt PERSONALLY addressed when he said "idiot"! BG |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Troll-feeding Senile Idiot Alert!
On 28/04/2019 21:41, Peeler wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 21:25:40 +1200, Peter Keller wrote: Â* Idiot. Thanks greatly for that excellent comment being spewed by YOU. Especially by YOU. Great to see that you felt PERSONALLY addressed when he said "idiot"! BG You can label me what you like. I LOVE it. And I can carry on labelling Phucker an idiotic arse despite your interference. Don't you think Phucker is an idiotic arse? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cycle bell / car horn requirement | Tough Guy no. 1265 | UK | 2 | June 23rd 15 11:04 AM |
3ft passing requirement revisited | Mike Jacoubowsky | General | 83 | August 26th 08 09:26 PM |
36" Unicycle Inseam Requirement | 1-wheeled-grape | Unicycling | 3 | July 3rd 08 02:28 AM |
Add on mudflaps - any ideas ? | [email protected] | UK | 8 | January 16th 06 03:43 PM |
Front Mudflaps (Fender Flaps?) | MSA | Techniques | 11 | August 3rd 05 07:28 PM |