A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Mountain Biking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RR: Double Squish vs Rigid SS - rambling observations



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 19th 05, 06:07 PM
Paladin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RR: Double Squish vs Rigid SS - rambling observations

This is probably boring, but my observations between going from no
suspension, on old school geometry, to full suspension with good, 4-bar
American made geometry.

Well, last night and the night before, I did pretty good rides on the
new switchblade, a pretty plush double squish. Jumping into full
suspension was a big leap for me, as some of you know I'm a retro-fart
who mostly rides a fully rigid SS, and for longer trips or climbs, I
have a short-travel hardtail.

Observations. I can climb longer without stopping, because the RF
crankset has me spinning at 22x34, so I can drag more weight up the
hill and get royally exhausted. however, when I stand up on climbs,
like I always do on the SS, my efficiency is cut at least in half.

I can turn around very sharply on the blade without losing balance.
Might be the bike geometry or just how well Titus puts it all together.


Cornering at speed is a new thing for me, with the front and rear
working together to double my normal speed and control. wowza, that's
a dangerous hootie and the blowfish goin on.

A long descent last night with the intermittent water bars were fun,
catching air off each one, and landing solid, in control.

Finally tried this rock drop that had been tempting me for years, but
fear of busting a frame (or the rider) kept me from it. It's only
about 3 feet, but it's rock to rock and the landing is slimy from the
creek running across it, the landing is flat, and it looks scary...
The first try was a little goofy, and by the 3rd I was nailing it like
a troo mtndood.

I can go faster without thinking, but just point, shoot and start
grinning. Is that a good thing? A bad thing? Just different, and the
main change I noticed is that the bike really is bearing the brunt of
the abuse, where after 18 pretty tough miles Monday nt, I felt fine.
Not wasted, beat up and drug in by the cat like I normally would had I
done the same thing on the fully rigid SS.

So, it's nice to have an option, and to take the suspending job off my
aging spine and lay that responsibility on inanimate shocks and springs
for a change.

But I'll never forsake the Gray Lady, who's aging beautifully, and
still my favorite.. really.

CDB

Ads
  #2  
Old October 19th 05, 06:28 PM
G.T.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Double Squish vs Rigid SS - rambling observations


"Paladin" wrote in message
oups.com...
This is probably boring, but my observations between going from no
suspension, on old school geometry, to full suspension with good, 4-bar
American made geometry.

Well, last night and the night before, I did pretty good rides on the
new switchblade, a pretty plush double squish. Jumping into full
suspension was a big leap for me, as some of you know I'm a retro-fart
who mostly rides a fully rigid SS, and for longer trips or climbs, I
have a short-travel hardtail.

Observations. I can climb longer without stopping, because the RF
crankset has me spinning at 22x34, so I can drag more weight up the
hill and get royally exhausted. however, when I stand up on climbs,
like I always do on the SS, my efficiency is cut at least in half.


You'd be surprised about that. It may feel like half but if you ride with
someone on a rigid with the same standing climbing ability as you you'll see
that it's nowhere near that bad.

Greg


  #3  
Old October 19th 05, 06:54 PM
JD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Double Squish vs Rigid SS - rambling observations


G.T. wrote:
"Paladin" wrote in message
oups.com...
This is probably boring, but my observations between going from no
suspension, on old school geometry, to full suspension with good, 4-bar
American made geometry.

Well, last night and the night before, I did pretty good rides on the
new switchblade, a pretty plush double squish. Jumping into full
suspension was a big leap for me, as some of you know I'm a retro-fart
who mostly rides a fully rigid SS, and for longer trips or climbs, I
have a short-travel hardtail.

Observations. I can climb longer without stopping, because the RF
crankset has me spinning at 22x34, so I can drag more weight up the
hill and get royally exhausted. however, when I stand up on climbs,
like I always do on the SS, my efficiency is cut at least in half.


You'd be surprised about that. It may feel like half but if you ride with
someone on a rigid with the same standing climbing ability as you you'll see
that it's nowhere near that bad.

Greg



It all depends on the terrain. In technical singletrack climbing, a
well designed squish takes a lot less energy than a rigid or hardtail
because you're having to wrestle and wrangle a lot less, especially vs
a rigid singlespeed. A well designed squish will keep that rear wheel
planted and grabbing, whereas a rigid will bounce a bit, depending on
how smoothly you are going over the obstacles. On a smooth climb with
a somewhat light grade, I'll take the rigid SS over the squish any day
though.

JD

  #4  
Old October 19th 05, 11:31 PM
Paladin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Double Squish vs Rigid SS - rambling observations

I agree. My first ride out on the squish I stalled out on a rocky
section of a sidehill climb, with some scary esposure. I expected to
lose it and fall over. I resisted the urge to cash it in, or panic
bail, and I somehow rolled over and through it. Hard to explain, but
it definitely held me onto the terrain and a little effort on my part
pulled us through.

Your other point isn't too bad, either. I did a stout but fairly
smooth climb, about a 3rd of a mile up. It's pretty steep, but I've
made it on the SS standing the whole way, working the bar and really
getting into the boogy of the whole thing. On the squish, though,. I
was really bushed cleaning the hill sitting and spinning like a tired
old hamster.

CDB

  #5  
Old October 21st 05, 08:56 PM
Chris G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Double Squish vs Rigid SS - rambling observations


"Paladin" wrote in message
oups.com...

Observations. I can climb longer without stopping, because the RF
crankset has me spinning at 22x34, so I can drag more weight up the
hill and get royally exhausted. however, when I stand up on climbs,
like I always do on the SS, my efficiency is cut at least in half.


In half?? Sounds like you want to spend some time tuning that shock.
Assuming it is one of the platform shocks that seem to be on everything
these days, you should be able to dial it in so that it is close to the
efficiency of the hard tail.


  #6  
Old October 22nd 05, 08:43 AM
JD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Double Squish vs Rigid SS - rambling observations


Chris Crosscountry wrote:
"Paladin" wrote in message
oups.com...

Observations. I can climb longer without stopping, because the RF
crankset has me spinning at 22x34, so I can drag more weight up the
hill and get royally exhausted. however, when I stand up on climbs,
like I always do on the SS, my efficiency is cut at least in half.


In half?? Sounds like you want to spend some time tuning that shock.
Assuming it is one of the platform shocks that seem to be on everything
these days, you should be able to dial it in so that it is close to the
efficiency of the hard tail.



Tell us all then Chris Crosscountry, when was the last time you rode a
smooth trail on a rigid bicycle? Better yet, tell us all about your
vast experience that allows you to make such judgements. Get this, a
rigid bike accelerates much more quickly on smooth trails and is a much
more stable platform for these conditions than any suspended bike, FS
or HT. What do you ride? I want to know what your opinions are based
on.

JD

  #7  
Old October 22nd 05, 10:27 PM
Chris G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Double Squish vs Rigid SS - rambling observations


"JD" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chris Crosscountry wrote:
"Paladin" wrote in message
oups.com...

Observations. I can climb longer without stopping, because the RF
crankset has me spinning at 22x34, so I can drag more weight up the
hill and get royally exhausted. however, when I stand up on climbs,
like I always do on the SS, my efficiency is cut at least in half.


In half?? Sounds like you want to spend some time tuning that shock.
Assuming it is one of the platform shocks that seem to be on everything
these days, you should be able to dial it in so that it is close to the
efficiency of the hard tail.



Tell us all then Chris Crosscountry, when was the last time you rode a
smooth trail on a rigid bicycle? Better yet, tell us all about your
vast experience that allows you to make such judgements. Get this, a
rigid bike accelerates much more quickly on smooth trails and is a much
more stable platform for these conditions than any suspended bike, FS
or HT. What do you ride? I want to know what your opinions are based
on.

JD


The last time would have been a few days ago. I have both hard tail and FS
xc/trail bikes I have been riding these types of bikes (among others) for
quite a few years (mid 90's). I have a great deal on experience setting up
most of the available platform shocks. I personally use and own 2 Manitou
swingers, a Fox DHX 5.0 and a few custom valved Romics. I ride a steel hard
tail allot as well. I have ridden all over British Columbia and Utah as well
as some riding in Eastern Canada and USA. So I guess I would say I base my
opinions on mostly my own personal experience. Which FS bike do you ride?


  #8  
Old October 23rd 05, 01:42 AM
JD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Double Squish vs Rigid SS - rambling observations


Chris G wrote:
"JD" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chris Crosscountry wrote:
"Paladin" wrote in message
oups.com...

Observations. I can climb longer without stopping, because the RF
crankset has me spinning at 22x34, so I can drag more weight up the
hill and get royally exhausted. however, when I stand up on climbs,
like I always do on the SS, my efficiency is cut at least in half.

In half?? Sounds like you want to spend some time tuning that shock.
Assuming it is one of the platform shocks that seem to be on everything
these days, you should be able to dial it in so that it is close to the
efficiency of the hard tail.



Tell us all then Chris Crosscountry, when was the last time you rode a
smooth trail on a rigid bicycle? Better yet, tell us all about your
vast experience that allows you to make such judgements. Get this, a
rigid bike accelerates much more quickly on smooth trails and is a much
more stable platform for these conditions than any suspended bike, FS
or HT. What do you ride? I want to know what your opinions are based
on.

JD


The last time would have been a few days ago. I have both hard tail and FS
xc/trail bikes I have been riding these types of bikes (among others) for
quite a few years (mid 90's). I have a great deal on experience setting up
most of the available platform shocks. I personally use and own 2 Manitou
swingers, a Fox DHX 5.0 and a few custom valved Romics. I ride a steel hard
tail allot as well. I have ridden all over British Columbia and Utah as well
as some riding in Eastern Canada and USA. So I guess I would say I base my
opinions on mostly my own personal experience. Which FS bike do you ride?



So, you rode a rigid bicycle on a smooth trail a few days ago? Where,
pray tell?

Define "great deal of experience". Do you work at a bike shop?

Were you live and ride mostly is what I was really asking, not a
resume' of where you have been a tourist. Experience starts at home if
you ride enough.

JD

  #9  
Old October 23rd 05, 02:31 AM
Chris G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Double Squish vs Rigid SS - rambling observations


"JD" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chris G wrote:
"JD" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chris Crosscountry wrote:
"Paladin" wrote in message
oups.com...

Observations. I can climb longer without stopping, because the RF
crankset has me spinning at 22x34, so I can drag more weight up the
hill and get royally exhausted. however, when I stand up on climbs,
like I always do on the SS, my efficiency is cut at least in half.

In half?? Sounds like you want to spend some time tuning that shock.
Assuming it is one of the platform shocks that seem to be on
everything
these days, you should be able to dial it in so that it is close to
the
efficiency of the hard tail.


Tell us all then Chris Crosscountry, when was the last time you rode a
smooth trail on a rigid bicycle? Better yet, tell us all about your
vast experience that allows you to make such judgements. Get this, a
rigid bike accelerates much more quickly on smooth trails and is a much
more stable platform for these conditions than any suspended bike, FS
or HT. What do you ride? I want to know what your opinions are based
on.

JD


The last time would have been a few days ago. I have both hard tail and
FS
xc/trail bikes I have been riding these types of bikes (among others) for
quite a few years (mid 90's). I have a great deal on experience setting
up
most of the available platform shocks. I personally use and own 2 Manitou
swingers, a Fox DHX 5.0 and a few custom valved Romics. I ride a steel
hard
tail allot as well. I have ridden all over British Columbia and Utah as
well
as some riding in Eastern Canada and USA. So I guess I would say I base
my
opinions on mostly my own personal experience. Which FS bike do you ride?



So, you rode a rigid bicycle on a smooth trail a few days ago? Where,
pray tell?

Define "great deal of experience". Do you work at a bike shop?

Were you live and ride mostly is what I was really asking, not a
resume' of where you have been a tourist. Experience starts at home if
you ride enough.

JD


You asked about my expierience, so i told you.

Which FS bike do you ride again?


  #10  
Old October 23rd 05, 06:32 AM
JD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Double Squish vs Rigid SS - rambling observations


Chris G wrote:
"JD" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chris G wrote:
"JD" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chris Crosscountry wrote:
"Paladin" wrote in message
oups.com...

Observations. I can climb longer without stopping, because the RF
crankset has me spinning at 22x34, so I can drag more weight up the
hill and get royally exhausted. however, when I stand up on climbs,
like I always do on the SS, my efficiency is cut at least in half.

In half?? Sounds like you want to spend some time tuning that shock.
Assuming it is one of the platform shocks that seem to be on
everything
these days, you should be able to dial it in so that it is close to
the
efficiency of the hard tail.


Tell us all then Chris Crosscountry, when was the last time you rode a
smooth trail on a rigid bicycle? Better yet, tell us all about your
vast experience that allows you to make such judgements. Get this, a
rigid bike accelerates much more quickly on smooth trails and is a much
more stable platform for these conditions than any suspended bike, FS
or HT. What do you ride? I want to know what your opinions are based
on.

JD


The last time would have been a few days ago. I have both hard tail and
FS
xc/trail bikes I have been riding these types of bikes (among others) for
quite a few years (mid 90's). I have a great deal on experience setting
up
most of the available platform shocks. I personally use and own 2 Manitou
swingers, a Fox DHX 5.0 and a few custom valved Romics. I ride a steel
hard
tail allot as well. I have ridden all over British Columbia and Utah as
well
as some riding in Eastern Canada and USA. So I guess I would say I base
my
opinions on mostly my own personal experience. Which FS bike do you ride?



So, you rode a rigid bicycle on a smooth trail a few days ago? Where,
pray tell?

Define "great deal of experience". Do you work at a bike shop?

Were you live and ride mostly is what I was really asking, not a
resume' of where you have been a tourist. Experience starts at home if
you ride enough.

JD


You asked about my expierience, so i told you.



No, you keep dodging questions and spinning weak answers without
specifics on the ones you choose to "answer".

Which FS bike do you ride again?



How about I answer your question like you might answer mine?

I ride a Marzocchi Z100 XFly, a Marzocchi Z150 QR20, Fox Float R and a
custom sprung Romic.

I should go into a huge semi-narcissistic back-patting session about
how great I am at tuning my shocks and ride for the platforms these are
on, but I'll leave that to the dweebs.

JD

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Todays ride (which GPS?) ... elyob UK 26 August 1st 05 02:02 PM
First double century of the year 15 January 2005 Zach Recumbent Biking 13 February 19th 05 04:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.