|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
How to get speeding drivers to slow down.
On 11 May, 17:25, Judith Smith wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT), RudiL wrote: snip However I was surprised how relatively few replies there were apart from the obvious ones from Judith, Thaksin, Nuxx Bar, etc. Perhaps others also realised it was a ****e idea but thought that it would be impolite to tell you so. Honesty on this group is relatively rare. Actually I suspect it is because most of the people who used to post here have left for other forums. Anyway as I said I will still implement my proposal (assuming there is an student who is interested) and then offer people the chance to use it. Those who wish to will, those who don't won't. Rudi |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
How to get speeding drivers to slow down.
On Mon, 11 May 2009 10:38:59 -0700 (PDT), RudiL
wrote: On 11 May, 17:25, Judith Smith wrote: On Mon, 11 May 2009 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT), RudiL wrote: snip However I was surprised how relatively few replies there were apart from the obvious ones from Judith, Thaksin, Nuxx Bar, etc. Perhaps others also realised it was a ****e idea but thought that it would be impolite to tell you so. Honesty on this group is relatively rare. Actually I suspect it is because most of the people who used to post here have left for other forums. Anyway as I said I will still implement my proposal (assuming there is an student who is interested) and then offer people the chance to use it. Those who wish to will, those who don't won't. Rudi Why not get the student to do something useful? -- "Primary position" the middle of a traffic lane. To take the "primary position" : to ride a bike in the middle of the lane in order to obstruct other road vehicles from overtaking. A term invented by and used by psycholists and not recognised in the Highway Code. Highway Code Rule 168 : "Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass." |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
How to get speeding drivers to slow down.
On Mon, 11 May 2009 10:45:28 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote: This works every time. A car coming towards you is obviously speeding and you, being a responsible law abiding citizen, wish it to slow down lest it kills someone down the road. All you do is point behind you and shout "speed trap", then watch as they slam on their brakes and stick to the limit. Some even thank you! They can't be going all that fast if they can not only hear you from inside a moving car, but can take the time to thank you as well...... |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
How to get speeding drivers to slow down.
"Judith Smith" wrote in message I have an interest in cycling. I have no (or little) interest in motoring. I have an interest in sociology and the interaction between people Interesting, so why did you choose to use this NG for your sociology experiment over all of the 1000's of others? Was it your colleague who said that there was an interesting strata (sic) of society here and what do you get out of finding little (sometimes non existent) flaws in people's posts and going after them like a bulldog? -- Simon Mason http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/ |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
How to get speeding drivers to slow down.
spindrift wrote:
On May 11, 3:00 pm, thaksin wrote: spindrift wrote: On May 11, 12:18 pm, "Simon Mason" wrote: "spindrift" wrote in message ... A Safespeed supporter who recklessly and illegally overtakes and then threatens a lone female, class! It puzzles me as to why there are so many pro motoring lobbyists on a cycling NG; surely they have more than enough forums of their own. -- Simon Masonhttp://www.simonmason.karoo.net/ I don't mind them , call it the very public exposure of the kind of mindset among the pro-speeding lobby. nuxxy and judith and the others serve as a warning that the kind of people who demand the right to drive as fast as they like are precisely the least suitable people to whom this benefit ought be applied. Borderline sociopaths. I've been reading some of your history. The only borderline sociopath in this group is the one that looks at you out of the mirror in the morning, you demented ****. Now FOAD, you posionous little scrote - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I have an opinion and can back it up with calm, sourced and referenced posts. And where that fails, you can just slag off a widows freshy buried husband, eh? **** me, you're right, you really are a 'big' man. I support cyclists and oppose irrational private interest fraudsters like safespeed, whose supporters' only response is abuse, death threats, legal threats that come to nothing and swearwords. Thank you for proving my point so well! Rational? LOL, I think you've forgotten what Google remembers of you. Still, like I said before about Glug, what goes around comes around. You carry right on with your demented agenda, right up until that SMIDSY makes you nothing but a stain on the floor. A bit like you are now, then |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
How to get speeding drivers to slow down.
RudiL wrote:
On 11 May, 14:20, "Simon Mason" wrote: "francis" wrote in message ... On 11 May, 12:18, "Simon Mason" wrote: "spindrift" wrote in message ... A Safespeed supporter who recklessly and illegally overtakes and then threatens a lone female, class! It puzzles me as to why there are so many pro motoring lobbyists on a cycling NG; surely they have more than enough forums of their own. -- Simon Masonhttp://www.simonmason.karoo.net/ Why is it in your oponion that a cyclist can not be pro-motoring. Is it that you believe that a cyclist can not be a motorist? I am a motorist myself. I am puzzled though as to why the two most prolific posters on here are not cyclists themselves and just post anti-cycling pro-motoring threads. Why do they not stay away from here and subscribe to motoring newsgroups instead. -- Simon Masonhttp://www.simonmason.karoo.net/ Yes it is really odd obsessive behaviour. I've lost count of the armchair psychologists in this group of late. Absolutely every rabid cyclist in this group brings it up every time they refer disdainfully at the 'cagers' who post here - its become almost as common a label as 'troll'. It'd ****ing *amaze* me if but a single one of these sad ****wits had the remotest understanding of the conditions they allege with gay abandon. By the way I have just discovered the Cycle Chat forum (mentioned in earlier posts). It looks pretty good and free of Safe Speed madness etc. "Madness"? Oh, right, so a nice balanced discussion group then? BWAHAHAA you really are rather pathetic, old son. *Thousands* of posts and nearly all to do with cycling and what cyclists experience. No excessive helmet pushing, although not anti-helmet either. I may switch. And good advice on primary position and related road positioning matters. And lots of technical stuff etc etc Sounds like they need a good dose of reality check, then. PS I will comment properly soon on the replies to my post about providing a filtered version of urc. Just been too busy - in essence I think I'll probably make it an undergraduate final year project taking on some of the comments made here. It would be a good project for a student whether or not it gets to be used here. Its been more than a little while since I was an undergrad, but I'm sodding sure I remember my lecturer going on about the perils of only looking for evidence which supports your hypothesis and abandoning all else. You must have been off that day, then? However I was surprised how relatively few replies there were apart from the obvious ones from Judith, Thaksin, Nuxx Bar, etc. I wonder if the posters you mentioned were among the tiny few who felt happy to voice an opinion that it was a crap idea, without fear that they'd be labelled a 'motorist supporter'? Oh no, hang on, that doesn't fit your preset conclusion, wouldn't it? Better ignore it then, eh? Can I have a fiver on you getting a lower second? I'd say a Third, but first degrees have become so diluted nowadays that you seem to get a second just for spelling your name right, so I guess you'll manage that far... |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
How to get speeding drivers to slow down.
Sir Jeremy wrote:
On 11 May, 13:21, spindrift wrote: On May 11, 1:11 pm, Sir Jeremy wrote: On 11 May, 12:08, spindrift wrote: A Safespeed supporter who recklessly and illegally overtakes and then threatens a lone female, class! Not at all- a safe overtake. She gave me the dickhead sign and I wanted to ask what her problem was. Nothing threatening- she shouldn't make rude gestures if she doesn't want to get involved You admitted you broke the law. You exceeded the speed limit. Did you go back and interview every other road user, pedestrian, cyclist, child and old person to see if they thought your erratic, aggressive driving was 'safe'? Thought not. Just get out of bed earlier or leave more time for your journey, and if you habitually get out of your car and approach women on their own I look forward to you getting a tyre iron wrapped round your skull. FOAD. I've never had an accident or conviction of any sort in almost 40 years of driving Dont rise to the ****s bait - this is just the sort of twisting replies that got the stupid cnut banned from his beloved forums |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
How to get speeding drivers to slow down.
Simon Mason wrote:
This works every time. A car coming towards you is obviously speeding and you, being a responsible law abiding citizen, wish it to slow down lest it kills someone down the road. All you do is point behind you and shout "speed trap", then watch as they slam on their brakes and stick to the limit. Some even thank you! If I was driving at much of a speed I doubt I'd even notice if a cyclist across the road and coming the other way gestured at me. I certainly wouldn't hear them shout anything. -- ){:|:&};: |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
How to get speeding drivers to slow down.
On Mon, 11 May 2009 19:07:49 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote: "Judith Smith" wrote in message I have an interest in cycling. I have no (or little) interest in motoring. I have an interest in sociology and the interaction between people Interesting, so why did you choose to use this NG for your sociology experiment over all of the 1000's of others? Was it your colleague who said that there was an interesting strata (sic) of society here and what do you get out of finding little (sometimes non existent) flaws in people's posts and going after them like a bulldog? I originally came here with a genuine question. I was very quickly made aware of the fact that my views were out of line - and took some of the usual abuse directed at non-regulars (as per johannes recently) I did indeed mention some of my observations to a colleague - who agreed - and hence the bet. Chapman was particularly vitriolic and made a number of "lies" about me. The rest is history (and the present, and the future) Why did you use the phrase "strata (sic)" -- "Primary position" the middle of a traffic lane. To take the "primary position" : to ride a bike in the middle of the lane in order to obstruct other road vehicles from overtaking. A term invented by and used by psycholists and not recognised in the Highway Code. Highway Code Rule 168 : "Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass." |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
How to get speeding drivers to slow down.
"Judith Smith" wrote in message Why did you use the phrase "strata (sic)" The sentence "there was an interesting strata of society" is incorrect as strata is the plural of stratum, so the sentence should read "There was an interesting stratum of society". -- Simon Mason http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Speeding! | Unicorn | Unicycling | 19 | September 4th 08 03:14 PM |
drivers speeding away | nash | General | 68 | February 15th 07 07:13 PM |
Another speeding idiot | Zog The Undeniable | UK | 23 | January 3rd 05 08:25 PM |
Too slow in Italy. How slow? | DaveB | Australia | 2 | February 28th 04 10:38 PM |
speeding ticket | salmoneous | General | 16 | October 18th 03 02:19 AM |