|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Disk brakes and wheel ejection - Manitou's answer?
There have been several recent discussions regarding wheel
ejection forces caused by front disk brakes. In the discussions, several possible design changes have been suggested to mitigate the potential for wheel ejection. One of the suggested changes was to re-orient the dropout axle slot to face forward, so the slot would be perpendicular to the wheel ejection force. Manitou, a prominent maker of disk brake compatible suspension forks, appears to have done just that. In the May and June editions of "Mountain Bike Action" magazine there is an advertisement by Manitou for their new fork, the 2005 Nixon Platinum. The photograph of the fork shows that the axle slot is oriented at an angle of about 45 degrees forward of the steering axis, which is just about at the same angle as the line between the disk brake and the axle. With a typical mountain bike head angle of about 70 degrees, the axle slot on this fork would be at angle of about 65 degrees forward from the vertical. It is unlikely that Manitou will admit that the new drop-out design is in response to disk brake safety issues posed by their previous designs, but I can't see what other reason there could be for this new design. Mark McMaster |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Disk brakes and wheel ejection - Manitou's answer?
Mark McMaster wrote:
There have been several recent discussions regarding wheel ejection forces caused by front disk brakes. In the discussions, several possible design changes have been suggested to mitigate the potential for wheel ejection. One of the suggested changes was to re-orient the dropout axle slot to face forward, so the slot would be perpendicular to the wheel ejection force. Manitou, a prominent maker of disk brake compatible suspension forks, appears to have done just that. In the May and June editions of "Mountain Bike Action" magazine there is an advertisement by Manitou for their new fork, the 2005 Nixon Platinum. The photograph of the fork shows that the axle slot is oriented at an angle of about 45 degrees forward of the steering axis, which is just about at the same angle as the line between the disk brake and the axle. With a typical mountain bike head angle of about 70 degrees, the axle slot on this fork would be at angle of about 65 degrees forward from the vertical. It is unlikely that Manitou will admit that the new drop-out design is in response to disk brake safety issues posed by their previous designs, but I can't see what other reason there could be for this new design. Mark McMaster Sturdy fork design with huge " lawyer lips" and a strong well secured Q will also help. I suspect we will see others who want to follow th trend towards disc brakes to make similar design changes. It will als be interesting to see if the industry will adopt a wider spacing t provide for a front wheel that has better spoke support angles - |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Disk brakes and wheel ejection - Manitou's answer?
why do people want to wail & beat their breasts over mere conjecture,
yet have absolutely _no_ interest in confronting fact? my own posting showing _zero_ evidence of any slippage over a considerable period of use elicited only one response; that of carl fogel wondering why no one had bothered to comment in view of previous 500# threads on the same subject!!! http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...com%26rnum%3D5 carl, if you're reading this, perhaps you have some thoughts on the perversity of human nature. jb Mark McMaster wrote: There have been several recent discussions regarding wheel ejection forces caused by front disk brakes. In the discussions, several possible design changes have been suggested to mitigate the potential for wheel ejection. One of the suggested changes was to re-orient the dropout axle slot to face forward, so the slot would be perpendicular to the wheel ejection force. Manitou, a prominent maker of disk brake compatible suspension forks, appears to have done just that. In the May and June editions of "Mountain Bike Action" magazine there is an advertisement by Manitou for their new fork, the 2005 Nixon Platinum. The photograph of the fork shows that the axle slot is oriented at an angle of about 45 degrees forward of the steering axis, which is just about at the same angle as the line between the disk brake and the axle. With a typical mountain bike head angle of about 70 degrees, the axle slot on this fork would be at angle of about 65 degrees forward from the vertical. It is unlikely that Manitou will admit that the new drop-out design is in response to disk brake safety issues posed by their previous designs, but I can't see what other reason there could be for this new design. Mark McMaster |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Disk brakes and wheel ejection - Manitou's answer?
On Sun, 09 May 2004 04:42:29 GMT, jim beam wrote:
why do people want to wail & beat their breasts over mere conjecture, yet have absolutely _no_ interest in confronting fact? my own posting showing _zero_ evidence of any slippage over a considerable period of use elicited only one response; that of carl fogel wondering why no one had bothered to comment in view of previous 500# threads on the same subject!!! http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...com%26rnum%3D5 carl, if you're reading this, perhaps you have some thoughts on the perversity of human nature. jb Mark McMaster wrote: There have been several recent discussions regarding wheel ejection forces caused by front disk brakes. In the discussions, several possible design changes have been suggested to mitigate the potential for wheel ejection. One of the suggested changes was to re-orient the dropout axle slot to face forward, so the slot would be perpendicular to the wheel ejection force. Manitou, a prominent maker of disk brake compatible suspension forks, appears to have done just that. In the May and June editions of "Mountain Bike Action" magazine there is an advertisement by Manitou for their new fork, the 2005 Nixon Platinum. The photograph of the fork shows that the axle slot is oriented at an angle of about 45 degrees forward of the steering axis, which is just about at the same angle as the line between the disk brake and the axle. With a typical mountain bike head angle of about 70 degrees, the axle slot on this fork would be at angle of about 65 degrees forward from the vertical. It is unlikely that Manitou will admit that the new drop-out design is in response to disk brake safety issues posed by their previous designs, but I can't see what other reason there could be for this new design. Mark McMaster Dear Jim, My thoughts on human nature are too perverse for publication. Here are those two pictures that you took of your disk-brake and fork. Judging by the tooth-marks of the quick-reelase washers in the front axle slot, no ejection force was great enough to even begin to drag the teeth out of position: http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/d...d/Img_3199.jpg http://home.comcast.net/~carlfogel/d...d/Img_3196.jpg If I followed your theory in that thread, the flaw in the notion that the disk brake would lever a quick-release and its wheel out of a fork was that most calculations failed to consider the tremendously greater resistance provided when normal serrated washers bite even a tiny bit into the fork. Here's the tinyurl version of your post: http://tinyurl.com/yutgy or http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e....pr odigy.com If anyone has pictures of disk-brake forks that show marks of such serrated washers being dragged out of position, I'd be glad to host them. Some people who posted in the ejection thread indicated that they were going to mark quick-releases and watch for movement, so if they have pictures of whatever happened, I can host them, too. Carl Fogel |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Disk brakes and wheel ejection - Manitou's answer?
jim beam wrote:
why do people want to wail & beat their breasts over mere conjecture, yet have absolutely _no_ interest in confronting fact? What is conjecture and what is fact? That current (front) disk brake designs generate very large forces tending to pull the axle out of the dropout? Anyone who can construct a free body diagram or conduct a simple experiment can see that these forces exist. That Manitou has redesigned the dropouts on their latest fork in a way which reduces the chances that the disk brake forces pull the wheel out? The photographic evidence of their redesign is in national publications. While no explanation is given for the design change, I doubt that it was for ease of use, as it will be more difficult to insert a wheel into these forward facing dropouts than fir traditional vertical dropouts. (Note: Manitou probably knows better than many about the forces exerted on dropouts, after having endured a costly product recall of their Mach 5 forks due to the breakage of improperly designed and manufactured dropouts.) my own posting showing _zero_ evidence of any slippage over a considerable period of use elicited only one response; that of carl fogel wondering why no one had bothered to comment in view of previous 500# threads on the same subject!!! http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...com%26rnum%3D5 Here is where the larger conjecture lay. You seem to contend that just because you have not seen evidence of wheel pull-out in a sample of one (and not a particularly well controlled sample at that), that it can't exist with any combination of axle/dropout/skewer. How do you account for others who have experienced dropout axle movement with disk brake equipped bikes? There have been several reports in the press about occurrences of axle slippage with quick release brakes. For example, Lennerd Zinn (frame builder, technical editor, and author of several books on bicycle repair and maintenance) reports having seen this phenomenon on several bikes: http://www.velonews.com/tech/report/...es/5432.0.html Here is an account of Missy Giove (professional mountain bike racer and former world champion) having her front quick release inexplicably loosen up on a disk brake equipped bike. http://www.cyclingforums.com/t25255-15-1.html There have been several others that have been in the national press as well. It is difficult to chalk these occurrences up simply to improper usage of quick releases skewers - if anyone should know how to tighten a quick release, you would expect at least Zinn should (and his experiences with axle slippage appears to be repeatable). Of course, I am not asserting that there will be axle slippage with all (front) disk brakes equipped wheel, or even the majority of them. But it can not be denied that the potential exists for slippage or ejection with some axle/dropout/skewer combinations, and that skewer tightness becomes far more critical with the current disk brake mounting design. The present configuration of vertical dropout and disk brake caliper mounted behind the fork leg is a poor design, or at least much less than ideal. I don't think that this particular design was consciously thought out, it simply metamorphosed by the addition of disk brakes to traditional bicycles. It can only be seen as a sign of good engineering if Manitou or other fork manufacturers choose to further evolve their fork/dropout designs to mitigate the increased possibility of wheel ejection with disk brakes. (Note: there is a reference in the Zinn/Velonews web page cited about Kelly Bicycles also redesigning the dropouts of their disk brake forks, orienting the dropout slots to face forward.) Mark McMaster |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Disk brakes and wheel ejection - Manitou's answer?
Mark McMaster wrote:
The present configuration of vertical dropout and disk brake caliper mounted behind the fork leg is a poor design, or at least much less than ideal. I don't think that this particular design was consciously thought out, it simply metamorphosed by the addition of disk brakes to traditional bicycles. It can only be seen as a sign of good engineering if Manitou or other fork manufacturers choose to further evolve their fork/dropout designs to mitigate the increased possibility of wheel ejection with disk brakes. I doubt that anybody here argues this point. Surely, let good engineering, design and technology evolve and make bicycles better and safer for all. The issue discussed ad nauseam in this n.g. over the past year or two was whether or not the sky was falling and whether a REVOLUTION was required. The answer is that is was NOT. As Zinn says, although the issue is real, it is "perhaps overstated in bicycle chat rooms." The CPSC was advised and decided not to pursue it. No flood of injuries or lawsuits have appeared. The number of injuries which have appeared - assuming they were actually caused by this problem - are miniscule as compared to the number of disc brake equipped bicycles in use. A good QR that is inspected frequently solves the problem. Eventually, design and engineering will evolve and there will be no problem. End of Story. --dt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Disk brakes and wheel ejection - Manitou's answer?
"Doug Taylor" wrote in message
... Mark McMaster wrote: The present configuration of vertical dropout and disk brake caliper mounted behind the fork leg is a poor design, or at least much less than ideal. I don't think that this particular design was consciously thought out, it simply metamorphosed by the addition of disk brakes to traditional bicycles. It can only be seen as a sign of good engineering if Manitou or other fork manufacturers choose to further evolve their fork/dropout designs to mitigate the increased possibility of wheel ejection with disk brakes. I doubt that anybody here argues this point. Surely, let good engineering, design and technology evolve and make bicycles better and safer for all. The issue discussed ad nauseam in this n.g. over the past year or two was whether or not the sky was falling and whether a REVOLUTION was required. The answer is that is was NOT. As Zinn says, although the issue is real, it is "perhaps overstated in bicycle chat rooms." The CPSC was advised and decided not to pursue it. No flood of injuries or lawsuits have appeared. Lawsuits take some time to prepare and then even longer to process and may well be setled complete with gagging order. Just because you haven't heard about them don't assume they're not happening. They are !! The number of injuries which have appeared - assuming they were actually caused by this problem - are miniscule as compared to the number of disc brake equipped bicycles in use. A good QR that is inspected frequently solves the problem. Nope - it may mitigate the problem it doesn't solve it Eventually, design and engineering will evolve and there will be no problem. Ah yes - at last you're talking real sense. The revolution is happening - albeit rather an evolution - but without all the talk "perhaps overstated in bicycle chat rooms." there'd be no evolution and the danger of the poor design would continue. Or maybe it's the very real fear of the lawsuits............... Or maybe the fear follows the knowledge Who knows - at least the change is starting though. An ex disc user |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Disk brakes and wheel ejection - Manitou's answer?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Disk brakes and wheel ejection - Manitou's answer?
On Tue, 11 May 2004 09:41:48 -0400, Doug Taylor
wrote: (Ex Disc User) wrote: good QR that is inspected frequently solves the problem. Nope - it may mitigate the problem it doesn't solve it If "solve" means that the wheel does not eject under braking force, then a good QR that is inspected frequently absolutely solves the problem. At least for me, Leonard Zinn, Carl Fogel and the vast majority of countless other cyclists using discs. An ex disc user "Most likely you'll go your way and I'll go mine" - Robert Zimmerman --dt Dear Doug, Alas, I remain agnostic about it all (and cannot imagine my opinion counting for much--I ride on pavement and use rim brakes). From what I've read, a trailing arm disk brake does indeed produce a force that would tend to eject an unsecured front wheel, but something seems to keep the vast majority of front wheels in place. Jim Beam has suggested that the calculations of the ejection forces have overlooked the massive frictional resistance of typical serrated axle washers that actually dent the surface of the fork. His pictures show the tiny dents from the serrated washers, which seem to have remained frimly in place instead of dragging grooves through the metal of the fork. If all that it takes to resist a trailing disk brake is a firmly clamped quick-release and serrated washers, then the problem and its solution are about the same as preventing wheel nuts from coming loose on car wheels by using conical instead of flat lug nuts. So far, no one has posted a follow-up about marking their front axles, Carl Fogel |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Disk brakes and wheel ejection - Manitou's answer?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Actually you are the first person to bring up this issue" | James Annan | Techniques | 848 | April 6th 04 08:49 PM |
Disc brake front wheel ejection: fact or fantasy? | John Morgan | Mountain Biking | 76 | September 8th 03 09:04 PM |
More on disk brakes and wheel ejection | Chris Zacho The Wheelman | Techniques | 54 | August 16th 03 10:16 PM |
Disc Brakes on Touring Bikes | Pheonix Ribbon | Techniques | 19 | July 23rd 03 10:01 PM |