|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Moderators being rather picky?
On 19 Jun 2014 16:58:18 +0100 (BST), David Damerell
wrote: Quoting Scion : If you came to the group today, as an unknown, posted two or three replies and maybe started a new topic, then received a message saying that you were 'on probation' therefore your posts had been rejected, you would probably not feel the same. If that ever happens to a bona-fide new poster, let us know. It gets worse. So a new poster turns up, and you look in to the URCM crystal ball and try and ascertain whether this is a "bon-fide" new poster or a "mala-fide" new poster - and then take a different action depending on your infallible method and considered opinion, rather than just moderating the post on its content. Perhaps ULM should take up this novel approach: it's certainly made URCM a very successful group. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Moderators being rather picky?
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:24:56 -0300, Bertie Wooster
wrote: On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:14:33 +0100, Judith wrote: On 19 Jun 2014 16:58:18 +0100 (BST), David Damerell wrote: Quoting Scion : If you came to the group today, as an unknown, posted two or three replies and maybe started a new topic, then received a message saying that you were 'on probation' therefore your posts had been rejected, you would probably not feel the same. If that ever happens to a bona-fide new poster, let us know. It gets worse. So a new poster turns up, and you look in to the URCM crystal ball and try and ascertain whether this is a "bon-fide" new poster or a "mala-fide" new poster - and then take a different action depending on your infallible method and considered opinion, rather than just moderating the post on its content. Perhaps ULM should take up this novel approach: it's certainly made URCM a very successful group. Please keep this in uk.net.news.moderation, where it belongs; and not in uk.rec.cycling, where it does not. Thanks forger. [urc put back in] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Moderators being rather picky?
On 20 Jun 2014 00:08:07 +0100 (BST), David Damerell
wrote: Quoting Judith : wrote: If that ever happens to a bona-fide new poster, let us know. Perhaps ULM should take up this novel approach: it's certainly made URCM a very successful group. Certainly it has. There was a long period when it attracted more new posters than any other uk.* group Very good: I am sure that you will be able to substantiate this claim in some way. Or did you just make it up? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Moderators being rather picky?
Quoting Judith :
wrote: Certainly it has. There was a long period when it attracted more new posters than any other uk.* group Very good: I am sure that you will be able to substantiate this claim in some way. You posted the articles (and the articles here from the sock complaining about the rejections); count 'em up for yourself. -- David Damerell If we aren't perfectly synchronised this corncob will explode! Today is Teleute, Presuary. Tomorrow will be Oneiros, Presuary. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Moderators being rather picky?
On 20 Jun 2014 12:22:05 +0100 (BST), David Damerell
wrote: Quoting Judith : wrote: Certainly it has. There was a long period when it attracted more new posters than any other uk.* group Very good: I am sure that you will be able to substantiate this claim in some way. You posted the articles (and the articles here from the sock complaining about the rejections); count 'em up for yourself. Interesting - you count multiple personas of one poster as separate posters? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Moderators being rather picky?
On 20 Jun 2014 12:22:05 +0100 (BST), David Damerell
wrote: Quoting Judith : wrote: Certainly it has. There was a long period when it attracted more new posters than any other uk.* group Very good: I am sure that you will be able to substantiate this claim in some way. You posted the articles (and the articles here from the sock complaining about the rejections); count 'em up for yourself. Oh - so you claim that there was a period when URCM attracted more new posters than *any* other uk group - but you cannot back up that claim. I am sure people will understand. Or was that period something like between 0100 and 0130 on a particular date - when one new poster posted to URCM - and no new posters posted to any other uk group? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moderators being rather picky? | Judith[_4_] | UK | 35 | June 19th 14 05:29 AM |
Up yours from the URCM Moderators | Judith[_4_] | UK | 0 | February 22nd 13 12:22 PM |
URCM Moderators are learning | Judith in England | UK | 4 | November 1st 12 07:58 PM |
Nominations invited for new moderators | JMS | UK | 5 | September 18th 10 11:14 AM |
CN not picky about advertizers | Ewoud Dronkert | Racing | 1 | August 18th 06 08:48 PM |