|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Commuting / New Bike Question
On 30/03/2015 20:07, Tosspot wrote:
I use a similar bike. It has been fine, but my previous similar Trek only lasted 4 years before its frame broke (rear chain stay) due to the pounding it got. Yes, but not many people commute over the Pennines. Wtf did you do to it? London roads, potholes, high pressure tyres. I've always figured it is safer to ride through rather than try to avoid potholes. I didn't impact damage the wheels so nothing I was doing was that severe. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Commuting / New Bike Question
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:27:34 -0700, voyager1space wrote:
Thanks all. My commute at the moment is 12 miles so not too bad. I think using a "clunker" might be best. "Clunkers" are also usually fairly rugged. Not brittle like carbon bikes. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Commuting / New Bike Question
On 31/03/15 09:20, Nick wrote:
On 30/03/2015 20:07, Tosspot wrote: I use a similar bike. It has been fine, but my previous similar Trek only lasted 4 years before its frame broke (rear chain stay) due to the pounding it got. Yes, but not many people commute over the Pennines. Wtf did you do to it? London roads, potholes, high pressure tyres. I've always figured it is safer to ride through rather than try to avoid potholes. I didn't impact damage the wheels so nothing I was doing was that severe. Not a great advert for Trek welding then. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Commuting / New Bike Question
On 31/03/2015 18:25, Tosspot wrote:
On 31/03/15 09:20, Nick wrote: On 30/03/2015 20:07, Tosspot wrote: I use a similar bike. It has been fine, but my previous similar Trek only lasted 4 years before its frame broke (rear chain stay) due to the pounding it got. Yes, but not many people commute over the Pennines. Wtf did you do to it? London roads, potholes, high pressure tyres. I've always figured it is safer to ride through rather than try to avoid potholes. I didn't impact damage the wheels so nothing I was doing was that severe. Not a great advert for Trek welding then. It wasn't a weld it was the actual chain stay, close to the seat post but not the weld. Aluminium tube failure. That's why my current bike is a Specialized not a Trek. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Commuting / New Bike Question
On 31/03/15 19:50, Nick wrote:
On 31/03/2015 18:25, Tosspot wrote: On 31/03/15 09:20, Nick wrote: On 30/03/2015 20:07, Tosspot wrote: I use a similar bike. It has been fine, but my previous similar Trek only lasted 4 years before its frame broke (rear chain stay) due to the pounding it got. Yes, but not many people commute over the Pennines. Wtf did you do to it? London roads, potholes, high pressure tyres. I've always figured it is safer to ride through rather than try to avoid potholes. I didn't impact damage the wheels so nothing I was doing was that severe. Not a great advert for Trek welding then. It wasn't a weld it was the actual chain stay, close to the seat post but not the weld. Aluminium tube failure. Blimey. That's why my current bike is a Specialized not a Trek. I must say, I like me steel touring frames, currently three Surlies. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Commuting / New Bike Question
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:52:15 +0200, Tosspot wrote:
On 31/03/15 19:50, Nick wrote: It wasn't a weld it was the actual chain stay, close to the seat post but not the weld. Aluminium tube failure. Blimey. That's why my current bike is a Specialized not a Trek. I must say, I like me steel touring frames, currently three Surlies. The only frame failure I've had was on a steel framed early-1990s Dawes Galaxy. It was about 4 years old. The head tube detached from the down tube. I noticed it when I got on the bike and saw the front wheel roll forwards while the rest of the frame was stationary. It was replaced by Dawes, but was a whole lot more aggro than it should have been - it was clearly and obviously defective, there was no crash damage or any abuse. It took Dawes an age to agree to replace the frame, and then another age to actually supply the replacement. regards, Ian SMith -- |\ /| no .sig |o o| |/ \| |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Commuting / New Bike Question
On 01/04/2015 13:30, Ian Smith wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:52:15 +0200, Tosspot wrote: On 31/03/15 19:50, Nick wrote: It wasn't a weld it was the actual chain stay, close to the seat post but not the weld. Aluminium tube failure. Blimey. That's why my current bike is a Specialized not a Trek. I must say, I like me steel touring frames, currently three Surlies. The only frame failure I've had was on a steel framed early-1990s Dawes Galaxy. It was about 4 years old. The head tube detached from the down tube. I noticed it when I got on the bike and saw the front wheel roll forwards while the rest of the frame was stationary. It was replaced by Dawes, but was a whole lot more aggro than it should have been - it was clearly and obviously defective, there was no crash damage or any abuse. It took Dawes an age to agree to replace the frame, and then another age to actually supply the replacement. The firm was a dog's breakfast around that time, passing between venture capitalists. Settling warranty claims would have been pretty far down their list of priorities I'd expect. -- Cheers, Rob |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buying a bike mostly for commuting | [email protected] | UK | 3 | December 31st 14 09:24 AM |
SM+ question: 700x35c -or- 700x38c for Chicago year round commuting? | Jay[_2_] | Techniques | 36 | April 5th 08 09:23 PM |
Commuting by bike | Gavin Watkinson | UK | 20 | June 16th 06 03:20 PM |
Commuting Question | [email protected] | General | 38 | May 25th 06 01:55 AM |
A bad bike commuting day | dgk | General | 23 | January 27th 05 01:52 AM |