58-year-old Dies while Mountain Biking!

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On 4 Sep 2006 07:05:10 -0700, "CanopyCo" wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:
More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???

Mike


He died of a heart attack.
That can happen during any kind of exercise.

But it didn't. He didn't die from running marathons. He died from
MOUNTAIN BIKING. Face the facts!


I have faced the facts.
The fact is, your an idiot.

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:29:25 -0400, Environ
wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:

On 4 Sep 2006 07:05:10 -0700, "CanopyCo" wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:

More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???

Mike


He died of a heart attack.
That can happen during any kind of exercise.

But it didn't. He didn't die from running marathons. He died from
MOUNTAIN BIKING. Face the facts!


And if he died hiking, swimming, cutting the lawn or having dinner with
his family therein *we* may ascertain *you* would consider those
activities negative activities... interesting how to attempt to link
things negative to the mountain bike sport.


He didn't. He died from MOUNTAIN BIKING.


But you do indeed accept there are some health benefits to riding a
mountain bike


Yes, but no NET benefit. In otherwise, the disadvantages far outweigh
the advantages.

The same could be said of
leaving the house every day.
Moron.

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:21:52 -0400, pmhilton wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:
It's OBVIOUS!


Your opinion that a given conclusion is obvious is very nearly worthless
as an assumption uless some form of mental rigor is brought to bear. In
this instance, you have brought nothing to the discussion but a single
hastily formed opinion.


CONSPICUOUSLY ABSENT is YOUR assessment of why he died. OBVIOUSLY, you
are afraid to ADMIT that he died from mountain biking, which he
OBVIOUSLY did.

No, he died of a heart attack.
Idiot.


Make all the claims you wish. In support of that

opinion you must offer objective data & logically sound reasoning. You
have offered neither.

Seems to me this fundamental lack, along with your monomaniacle
androgeny has been mentioned hundreds of times by scores of posters.

PH

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:53:43 GMT, Artoi wrote:


In article ,
Mike Vandeman wrote:


Simply asserting that doesn't make it true. Prove that there is a NET
benefit from mountain biking (that couldn't be gotten by hiking or
other exercise)! You CAN'T. That's because mountain biking is one of
the most dangerous activities. People die or get seriously injured
from it all the time.

He didn't die of specific mountain biking related activity


Prove it. Liar.


The burden of proof is on you,
fool.

but an

intrinsic cause. He could have died the same way if he sat there and
found out his share portfolio just crashed 90%.

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:00:03 GMT, Artoi wrote:


In article ,
Mike Vandeman wrote:


On 4 Sep 2006 07:05:10 -0700, "CanopyCo" wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:

More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???

He died of a heart attack.
That can happen during any kind of exercise.

But it didn't. He didn't die from running marathons. He died from
MOUNTAIN BIKING. Face the facts!

Mike, you are ignoring the root cause of his death, which is a heart
attack of some form.


Yes, DUE TO MOUNTAIN BIKING.

Due to physical exertion. Any
number of activities involve
the level of physical exertion
involved in mountain biking.



Otherwise per your logic, we can equally say that guy died of LIVING ON
EARTH. Yep, net benefit is dust to dust...

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:57:32 GMT, Artoi wrote:


In article .com,
"CanopyCo" wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:

More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???

He died of a heart attack.
That can happen during any kind of exercise.
I presume that you are a fat turd that never exercises?
If so, then you also can die due to the excess fat.
If not, then you also can die from a heart attack while doing your
exercise.

Some of your posts make you look like an idiot.
That will not help your cause.

Correct, or even acute mental stress just sitting at a desk can start a
so called heart attack.


But it didn't. He died from mountain biking. You are just afraid to
admit the truth!

Considering the semantic
masturbation you are so keen
on, I would expect you to not
make such a ridiculous
statement. You cannot die from
mountain biking any more than
you can die from walking down
the street.

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:05:30 -0700, cc wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:53:43 GMT, Artoi wrote:


In article ,
Mike Vandeman wrote:


Simply asserting that doesn't make it true. Prove that there is a NET
benefit from mountain biking (that couldn't be gotten by hiking or
other exercise)! You CAN'T. That's because mountain biking is one of
the most dangerous activities. People die or get seriously injured
from it all the time.

He didn't die of specific mountain biking related activity


Prove it. Liar.


The burden of proof is on you,
fool.

Nope, you just made a claim. Prove it (hint: you CAN'T!).

but an

intrinsic cause. He could have died the same way if he sat there and
found out his share portfolio just crashed 90%.

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:06:46 -0700, cc wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:00:03 GMT, Artoi wrote:


In article ,
Mike Vandeman wrote:


On 4 Sep 2006 07:05:10 -0700, "CanopyCo" wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:

More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???

He died of a heart attack.
That can happen during any kind of exercise.

But it didn't. He didn't die from running marathons. He died from
MOUNTAIN BIKING. Face the facts!

Mike, you are ignoring the root cause of his death, which is a heart
attack of some form.


Yes, DUE TO MOUNTAIN BIKING.

Due to physical exertion. Any
number of activities involve
the level of physical exertion
involved in mountain biking.

You missed the point. Several marathons didn't kill him. MOUNTAIN
BIKING did.

Otherwise per your logic, we can equally say that guy died of LIVING ON
EARTH. Yep, net benefit is dust to dust...

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:08:06 -0700, cc wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:57:32 GMT, Artoi wrote:


In article .com,
"CanopyCo" wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:

More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???

He died of a heart attack.
That can happen during any kind of exercise.
I presume that you are a fat turd that never exercises?
If so, then you also can die due to the excess fat.
If not, then you also can die from a heart attack while doing your
exercise.

Some of your posts make you look like an idiot.
That will not help your cause.

Correct, or even acute mental stress just sitting at a desk can start a
so called heart attack.


But it didn't. He died from mountain biking. You are just afraid to
admit the truth!

Considering the semantic
masturbation you are so keen
on, I would expect you to not
make such a ridiculous
statement. You cannot die from
mountain biking any more than
you can die from walking down
the street.

It happens all the time! It just happened again. Ride off a cliff, and
then tell me you can't die from mountain biking.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:05:02 -0700, cc wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:21:52 -0400, pmhilton wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:
It's OBVIOUS!


Your opinion that a given conclusion is obvious is very nearly worthless
as an assumption uless some form of mental rigor is brought to bear. In
this instance, you have brought nothing to the discussion but a single
hastily formed opinion.


CONSPICUOUSLY ABSENT is YOUR assessment of why he died. OBVIOUSLY, you
are afraid to ADMIT that he died from mountain biking, which he
OBVIOUSLY did.

No, he died of a heart attack.
Idiot.

Triggered by mountain biking, but NOT by running marathons.
Interesting....


Make all the claims you wish. In support of that

opinion you must offer objective data & logically sound reasoning. You
have offered neither.

Seems to me this fundamental lack, along with your monomaniacle
androgeny has been mentioned hundreds of times by scores of posters.

PH

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande