58-year-old Dies while Mountain Biking!

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:21:08 -0700, cc wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:05:02 -0700, cc wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:

On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:21:52 -0400, pmhilton wrote:



Mike Vandeman wrote:
It's OBVIOUS!


Your opinion that a given conclusion is obvious is very nearly worthless
as an assumption uless some form of mental rigor is brought to bear. In
this instance, you have brought nothing to the discussion but a single
hastily formed opinion.

CONSPICUOUSLY ABSENT is YOUR assessment of why he died. OBVIOUSLY, you
are afraid to ADMIT that he died from mountain biking, which he
OBVIOUSLY did.
No, he died of a heart attack.
Idiot.

Triggered by mountain biking, but NOT by running marathons.
Interesting....
You don't even know it was
triggered by mountain biking.
All you know is that it
occurred while he was mountain
biking,

What a coincidence! It was probably the latte he drank before mountain
biking that killed him! Right. Idiot.

You didn't refute anything of what I said.


making whatever
connections you wish to draw
untenable. As usual.


Make all the claims you wish. In support of that


opinion you must offer objective data & logically sound reasoning. You
have offered neither.

Seems to me this fundamental lack, along with your monomaniacle
androgeny has been mentioned hundreds of times by scores of posters.

PH
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:27:05 -0700, cc wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:06:46 -0700, cc wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:

On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:00:03 GMT, Artoi wrote:



In article ,
Mike Vandeman wrote:



On 4 Sep 2006 07:05:10 -0700, "CanopyCo" wrote:



Mike Vandeman wrote:


More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???
He died of a heart attack.
That can happen during any kind of exercise.
But it didn't. He didn't die from running marathons. He died from
MOUNTAIN BIKING. Face the facts!
Mike, you are ignoring the root cause of his death, which is a heart
attack of some form.

Yes, DUE TO MOUNTAIN BIKING.
Due to physical exertion. Any
number of activities involve
the level of physical exertion
involved in mountain biking.

You missed the point. Several marathons didn't kill him. MOUNTAIN
BIKING did.

No, you missed the point.
Mountain biking did not kill
him, and you really have no
way of showing it was even he
exertion due to mountain biking.

He didn't die sipping a latte. He died mountain biking. DUH!

You spew on logical fallacy after another. If I get hit by a car while
drinking a latte, is it because of the latte?

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:28:44 -0700, cc wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:08:06 -0700, cc wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:

On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:57:32 GMT, Artoi wrote:



In article .com,
"CanopyCo" wrote:



Mike Vandeman wrote:


More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???
He died of a heart attack.
That can happen during any kind of exercise.
I presume that you are a fat turd that never exercises?
If so, then you also can die due to the excess fat.
If not, then you also can die from a heart attack while doing your
exercise.

Some of your posts make you look like an idiot.
That will not help your cause.
Correct, or even acute mental stress just sitting at a desk can start a
so called heart attack.

But it didn't. He died from mountain biking. You are just afraid to
admit the truth!
Considering the semantic
masturbation you are so keen
on, I would expect you to not
make such a ridiculous
statement. You cannot die from
mountain biking any more than
you can die from walking down
the street.

It happens all the time! It just happened again. Ride off a cliff, and
then tell me you can't die from mountain biking.
You, sir, are an idiot. If you
ride a bike off a cliff, you
may die from breaking your
neck, but not from mountain
biking.

So if you are shot to death, I guess the shooter had nothing to do
with it! It was all the bullet's fault. Right.

The difference being that the only way to get a bullet into your heart
is from a gun. You can have a heart attack walking down the street. Idiot.


It's so clear how
muddy your mental waters are .
. seek help.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:04:37 -0400, "Fole Haafstra"
reply.to.group.not.me wrote:


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
.. .
More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???

Mike

You are simply pathetic.
The man died breathing Rocky Mountain air. I guess that mountain air is bad
for one's health.
You also express no human decency, compassion, or respect in such matters.

Please explain what "respect" an environmental rapist such as a
mountain biker is due.... This should be good!
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:04:37 -0400, "Fole Haafstra"
reply.to.group.not.me wrote:


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
. ..

More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???

Mike


You are simply pathetic.
The man died breathing Rocky Mountain air. I guess that mountain air is bad
for one's health.
You also express no human decency, compassion, or respect in such matters.


Please explain what "respect" an environmental rapist such as a
mountain biker is due.... This should be good!

A mountain biker is still a
person. It's obvious you have
no idea what humanity and
respect are, as evidenced by
your consistently pathological
indecency.

On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:53:36 -0700, cc wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:04:37 -0400, "Fole Haafstra"
reply.to.group.not.me wrote:


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...

More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???

Mike


You are simply pathetic.
The man died breathing Rocky Mountain air. I guess that mountain air is bad
for one's health.
You also express no human decency, compassion, or respect in such matters.


Please explain what "respect" an environmental rapist such as a
mountain biker is due.... This should be good!

A mountain biker is still a
person.

So is a rapist. Now tell me what respect they are due.

It's obvious you have
no idea what humanity and
respect are, as evidenced by
your consistently pathological
indecency.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:53:36 -0700, cc wrote:


Mike Vandeman wrote:

On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:04:37 -0400, "Fole Haafstra"
reply.to.group.not.me wrote:



"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
m...


More evidence that mountain biking's alleged "health benefits" are
exaggerated. If you die, where is the net benefit???

Mike


You are simply pathetic.
The man died breathing Rocky Mountain air. I guess that mountain air is bad
for one's health.
You also express no human decency, compassion, or respect in such matters.


Please explain what "respect" an environmental rapist such as a
mountain biker is due.... This should be good!

A mountain biker is still a
person.


So is a rapist. Now tell me what respect they are due.


A better example would be how
I treat you. Sure, I patronize
you, but I still treat you as
if you were human.

It's obvious you have

no idea what humanity and
respect are, as evidenced by
your consistently pathological
indecency.

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Good point.

Artoi wrote:
He didn't die of specific mountain biking related activity but an
intrinsic cause. He could have died the same way if he sat there and
found out his share portfolio just crashed 90%.
--

On 2 Oct 2006 21:35:48 -0700, "
wrote:

Good point.

Artoi wrote:
He didn't die of specific mountain biking related activity but an
intrinsic cause. He could have died the same way if he sat there and
found out his share portfolio just crashed 90%.

You don't know that. The MOST LIKELY explanation is the he died from
mountain biking.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On 2 Oct 2006 21:35:48 -0700, "
wrote:


Good point.

Artoi wrote:

He didn't die of specific mountain biking related activity but an
intrinsic cause. He could have died the same way if he sat there and
found out his share portfolio just crashed 90%.


You don't know that. The MOST LIKELY explanation is the he died from
mountain biking.

Judged by who? You? Don't you
get it? Your opinion is worse
than useless...