Trains

Susan Walker wrote:

There are some wackos out there.

That's undeniably true but ours are particularly wackilicious.

Robert Chung wrote:
wackilicious.

I would congratulate you on first use, were that a real word.

Robert Chung wrote:
Susan Walker wrote:

There are some wackos out there.

That's undeniably true but ours are particularly wackilicious.



You leftists think it's OK for our president to indoctrinate children
with socialist ideas like "work hard" and "stay in school"?

I can't say I wasn't warned.

Susan Walker wrote:
Robert Chung wrote:
wackilicious.

I would congratulate you on first use, were that a real word.

You one-worlders refuse to see the truth.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/...82775#32682775

On Sep 4, 9:00*am, "Robert Chung"
wrote:
Susan Walker wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/04/us/04school.html

There are some wackos out there.

That's undeniably true but ours are particularly wackilicious.

I object. This is a typical USanian attempt to take credit
for Canadian accomplishments.

"Mark Steyn, a Canadian author and political commentator,
speaking on the Rush Limbaugh show on Wednesday, accused
Mr. Obama of trying to create a cult of personality, comparing
him to Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong-il, the North Korean leader."

But Mark Steyn will have to watch his mouth once we
annex Canadia for a rest area and pancake shop on the
NAFTA Superhighway. That is, assuming he isn't first
in line to welcome his new multiracial overlords.

Ben

Robert Chung wrote:
wackilicious.

Susan Walker wrote:
I would congratulate you on first use, were that a real word.

Don't play scrabble unless you're bigger than your opponent.

On Sep 4, 9:22*am, Fred Fredburger
wrote:
Robert Chung wrote:
Susan Walker wrote:

There are some wackos out there.

That's undeniably true but ours are particularly wackilicious.

You leftists think it's OK for our president to indoctrinate children
with socialist ideas like "work hard" and "stay in school"?

I can't say I wasn't warned.

Stooge who'll believe anything,

That wasn't what it was about.

http://news.aol.com/article/obama-sc...roversy/655701

"Critics are particularly upset about lesson plans the administration
created to accompany the speech. The lesson plans, available online,
originally recommended having students 'write letters to themselves
about what they can do to help the president.'"

They changed it after every one other than the true believers saw it
for what it was: a creepy cult-of-personality *lesson plan* from the
central government to teachers on a local level.

On Sep 4, 9:28*am, "Robert Chung"
wrote:
Susan Walker wrote:
Robert Chung wrote:
wackilicious.

I would congratulate you on first use, were that a real word.

You one-worlders refuse to see the truth.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/...82775#32682775

Gee, that must be the same Glenn Beck that made Van Jones go away.
You're such an ignorant stooge.

On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:55:49 -0700 (PDT), SLAVE of THE STATE
wrote:

On Sep 4, 9:22*am, Fred Fredburger
wrote:
Robert Chung wrote:
Susan Walker wrote:

There are some wackos out there.

That's undeniably true but ours are particularly wackilicious.

You leftists think it's OK for our president to indoctrinate children
with socialist ideas like "work hard" and "stay in school"?

I can't say I wasn't warned.

Stooge who'll believe anything,

That wasn't what it was about.

http://news.aol.com/article/obama-sc...roversy/655701

"Critics are particularly upset about lesson plans the administration
created to accompany the speech. The lesson plans, available online,
originally recommended having students 'write letters to themselves
about what they can do to help the president.'"

That's a bad thing? Helping the person who is charged with leading
our government in the face of a range of huge problems?

That's offensive?

Why?

"Johnny Twelve-Point presented by JFT" wrote in
message ...
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:55:49 -0700 (PDT), SLAVE of THE STATE
wrote:

"Critics are particularly upset about lesson plans the administration
created to accompany the speech. The lesson plans, available online,
originally recommended having students 'write letters to themselves
about what they can do to help the president.'"

That's a bad thing? Helping the person who is charged with leading
our government in the face of a range of huge problems?

That's offensive?

Why?

If you truly believe that grade school children could "help the President"
then perhaps you don't need anyone to explain anything to you.