|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Disabled" Guy - "pepper sprayed" at 2012
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 01:47:23 +0100, Phil W Lee wrote:
GB considered Mon, 30 Jul 2012 22:26:22 +0100 the perfect time to write: Obstructing the police is. What if they are, as in this case, being over zealous or do you consider everything the uniformed police do is perfect. All I have seen is that single video. There is no evidence there that the police were being over-zealous. If you have other evidence, what is it? The statement made by the police themselves, which cited an act that has already been held not to apply to CM and claimed powers that the police do not posess. You talk absolute ********. The Law Lords did not decide that the act as a whole did not apply to Critical Mass; feel free to highlight the part of the judgment which shows otherwise. They decided that as it was a customary procession , then there was no need to inform the police and seek permission as required by section 11 alone. No more - no less. Just because you have read this ****e on the Critical Mass web-site does not make it true. I thought that you were a qualified Queen's Counsel - are you now telling us that you aren't? |
Ads |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
"Disabled" Guy - "pepper sprayed" at 2012
On Jul 31, 9:38*am, GB wrote:
On 30/07/2012 23:59, thirty-six wrote: On Jul 30, 10:38 pm, "Zapp Brannigan" wrote: "thirty-six" wrote in message .... I didn't see a relevant insignia, the protest of arrest is excusable if the constable refused to show his warrant. Utter dribble. *There is no requirement for a constable to produce a warrant card before making an arrest. It's a reasonable request in the situation. You'll clutch at any straw to defend these yobs, evidently. I don't believe the constable for the railway was acting with any authority on the highway. *His fancy-dress means eff-all to me, particularly as he was identifiable as BTP.. Why don't you believe that? I posted evidence that he did have authority. But you are so prejudiced that you don't care and just keep posting the same rubbish. There was no emergency, no risk to life or limb, except perhaps in a warped mind. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
"Disabled" Guy - "pepper sprayed" at 2012
On Jul 31, 9:30*am, "Tired" wrote:
Phil W Lee wrote: :: "James Allen" considered Mon, 30 Jul 2012 :: 20:21:47 +0100 the perfect time to write: :: ::: :::::: "Tired" *wrote in ... ::: ::: :::: she should get some recognition there standing up to an angry mob :::: like that, without the protection of a stab vest or truncheon) ::: ::: Looks to me like she's holding an ASP at one point? ::: ::: This video makes me feel quite confused actually, on the one hand I ::: often find myself looking at videos of the police in situations ::: like this and thinking they "are" just violent thugs who get off on ::: the power they have, but OTOH I can't help thinking that these ::: cyclists, especially the so-called disabled guy and the **** in the ::: green t-shirt who joined him on the bonnet deserved a good beating. ::: :: Who will be left to complain when they come for you? They didnt come for anyone, dont be so stupid. Would you like to clarify "no-one of consequence" ;-) |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
"Disabled" Guy - "pepper sprayed" at 2012
On 31/07/2012 03:53, Phil W Lee wrote:
"James Allen" considered Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:21:47 +0100 the perfect time to write: "Tired" wrote in message ... she should get some recognition there standing up to an angry mob like that, without the protection of a stab vest or truncheon) Looks to me like she's holding an ASP at one point? This video makes me feel quite confused actually, on the one hand I often find myself looking at videos of the police in situations like this and thinking they "are" just violent thugs who get off on the power they have, but OTOH I can't help thinking that these cyclists, especially the so-called disabled guy and the **** in the green t-shirt who joined him on the bonnet deserved a good beating. Who will be left to complain when they come for you? You mean the thug in the green T shirt or the 'disabled' thug? I hope the police will help me. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
"Disabled" Guy - "pepper sprayed" at 2012
On Jul 30, 10:38*pm, "Zapp Brannigan" wrote:
"thirty-six" wrote in message ... I didn't see a relevant insignia, the protest of arrest is excusable if the constable refused to show his warrant. Utter dribble. *There is no requirement for a constable to produce a warrant card before making an arrest. You'll clutch at any straw to defend these yobs, evidently. But the yobs were in uniform, you grasp at any passing straw to defend them, the crowd were obviously hostile if the cop wasn't bent on being a bully he could have handled things in a different way, sadly modern policing is orientated towards confrontation. The wrong type or recruit finds the job attractive. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
"Disabled" Guy - "pepper sprayed" at 2012
On 31/07/2012 09:46, thirty-six wrote:
On Jul 31, 9:38 am, GB wrote: On 30/07/2012 23:59, thirty-six wrote: On Jul 30, 10:38 pm, "Zapp Brannigan" wrote: "thirty-six" wrote in message ... I didn't see a relevant insignia, the protest of arrest is excusable if the constable refused to show his warrant. Utter dribble. There is no requirement for a constable to produce a warrant card before making an arrest. It's a reasonable request in the situation. You'll clutch at any straw to defend these yobs, evidently. I don't believe the constable for the railway was acting with any authority on the highway. His fancy-dress means eff-all to me, particularly as he was identifiable as BTP.. Why don't you believe that? I posted evidence that he did have authority. But you are so prejudiced that you don't care and just keep posting the same rubbish. There was no emergency, no risk to life or limb, except perhaps in a warped mind. Well, I suggest that you re-read the WP extract again and again until you have understood it. Perhaps you can get someone to explain it to you? |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
"Disabled" Guy - "pepper sprayed" at 2012
I thought that you were a qualified Queen's Counsel - are you now telling us that you aren't? Oh come on! |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
"Disabled" Guy - "pepper sprayed" at 2012
On Jul 31, 10:08*am, GB wrote:
On 31/07/2012 09:46, thirty-six wrote: On Jul 31, 9:38 am, GB wrote: On 30/07/2012 23:59, thirty-six wrote: On Jul 30, 10:38 pm, "Zapp Brannigan" wrote: "thirty-six" wrote in message .... I didn't see a relevant insignia, the protest of arrest is excusable if the constable refused to show his warrant. Utter dribble. *There is no requirement for a constable to produce a warrant card before making an arrest. It's a reasonable request in the situation. You'll clutch at any straw to defend these yobs, evidently. I don't believe the constable for the railway was acting with any authority on the highway. *His fancy-dress means eff-all to me, particularly as he was identifiable as BTP.. Why don't you believe that? I posted evidence that he did have authority. But you are so prejudiced that you don't care and just keep posting the same rubbish. There was no emergency, no risk to life or limb, except perhaps in a warped mind. Well, I suggest that you re-read the WP extract again and again until you have understood it. Perhaps you can get someone to explain it to you? I suggest you go and boil your nuts. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
"Disabled" Guy - "pepper sprayed" at 2012
On 31/07/2012 10:17, thirty-six wrote:
On Jul 31, 10:08 am, GB wrote: On 31/07/2012 09:46, thirty-six wrote: On Jul 31, 9:38 am, GB wrote: On 30/07/2012 23:59, thirty-six wrote: On Jul 30, 10:38 pm, "Zapp Brannigan" wrote: "thirty-six" wrote in message ... I didn't see a relevant insignia, the protest of arrest is excusable if the constable refused to show his warrant. Utter dribble. There is no requirement for a constable to produce a warrant card before making an arrest. It's a reasonable request in the situation. You'll clutch at any straw to defend these yobs, evidently. I don't believe the constable for the railway was acting with any authority on the highway. His fancy-dress means eff-all to me, particularly as he was identifiable as BTP.. Why don't you believe that? I posted evidence that he did have authority. But you are so prejudiced that you don't care and just keep posting the same rubbish. There was no emergency, no risk to life or limb, except perhaps in a warped mind. Well, I suggest that you re-read the WP extract again and again until you have understood it. Perhaps you can get someone to explain it to you? I suggest you go and boil your nuts. Ah, so you agree I'm right then. First class! |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
"Disabled" Guy - "pepper sprayed" at 2012
On Jul 31, 10:47*am, GB wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:17, thirty-six wrote: On Jul 31, 10:08 am, GB wrote: On 31/07/2012 09:46, thirty-six wrote: On Jul 31, 9:38 am, GB wrote: On 30/07/2012 23:59, thirty-six wrote: On Jul 30, 10:38 pm, "Zapp Brannigan" wrote: "thirty-six" wrote in message ... I didn't see a relevant insignia, the protest of arrest is excusable if the constable refused to show his warrant. Utter dribble. *There is no requirement for a constable to produce a warrant card before making an arrest. It's a reasonable request in the situation. You'll clutch at any straw to defend these yobs, evidently. I don't believe the constable for the railway was acting with any authority on the highway. *His fancy-dress means eff-all to me, particularly as he was identifiable as BTP.. Why don't you believe that? I posted evidence that he did have authority. But you are so prejudiced that you don't care and just keep posting the same rubbish. There was no emergency, no risk to life or limb, except perhaps in a warped mind. Well, I suggest that you re-read the WP extract again and again until you have understood it. Perhaps you can get someone to explain it to you? I suggest you go and boil your nuts. Ah, so you agree I'm right then. First class! Have you done it yet? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"John "Cho" Gilmer keeps publishing his "Manifesto" over and over." | Hoodini | Racing | 0 | April 23rd 07 12:38 AM |
Vandeman calls mountain bikers "liars" and "criminals" then surprised by hate mail! | Bill Baka | General | 0 | May 29th 06 12:10 AM |
Vandeman calls mountain bikers "liars" and "criminals" then surprisedby hate mail! | ChainSmoker | Mountain Biking | 0 | May 27th 06 05:39 PM |
R.I.P. Jim Price (aka. "biker_billy", "sydney", "Boudreaux") | spin156 | Techniques | 15 | November 28th 05 07:21 PM |