|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Winning Trifecta! [Was: Small Time Terrorists destroy ParisianUtopian Bike Program]
On Nov 5, 11:57*am, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
Paul O wrote: For the first time I can remember, our newsgroups have been honored with the Super Crank, Flamer, Troll Trifecta! We have Bill Baka commenting on a post from Edward Dolan on a thread started by ComandanteBanana. Can it get any better than this? "The horror of that moment I shall never forget", said the king. "You will", replied the queen, "if you don't make a memorandum of it". Bill "paraphrasing 'Alice Through The Looking Glass" S. This moment will recorded for history by the people who write the history of the Internet. There must be someone writing that, right? |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Winning Trifecta! [Was: Small Time Terrorists destroy ParisianUtopian Bike Program]
On Nov 5, 12:36*pm, Paul O wrote:
Bill Sornson wrote, On 11/5/2009 11:57 AM: Paul O wrote: For the first time I can remember, our newsgroups have been honored with the Super Crank, Flamer, Troll Trifecta! We have Bill Baka commenting on a post from Edward Dolan on a thread started by ComandanteBanana. Can it get any better than this? "The horror of that moment I shall never forget", said the king. "You will", replied the queen, "if you don't make a memorandum of it". Bill "paraphrasing 'Alice Through The Looking Glass" S. Babble Bill and Ed Comandante chirps his tale Winter is coming I see you are speaking in parables... I always wondered what the hell Jesus was talking about. But I speak in parables too, JUNGLE PARABLES. Important stuff, you know... NEVER, EVER PUSH RED BUTTON in the jungle... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9X7pwsDWRJM&feature=fvw Very important for a cyclist or anyone: BE AWARE OF YOUR SURROUNDINGS! That's what this cop told me about my statement that there were many predators around where I live. See, they stole one of my bikes right under my window. And it's not even the DEEP jungle. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Winning Trifecta! [Was: Small Time Terrorists destroy ParisianUtopian Bike Program]
On Nov 5, 3:53*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"Paul O" wrote in message ... For the first time I can remember, our newsgroups have been honored with the Super Crank, Flamer, Troll Trifecta! We have Bill Baka commenting on a post from Edward Dolan on a thread started by ComandanteBanana. Can it get any better than this? It is not correct to cast Ed Dolan the Great in the same loony bin as Bill Baka and Comandante Banana. The latter two are diamonds in the rough whereas Ed Dolan the Great is a polished diamond of eternal magnificence. When I contemplate Myself I tremble at my own perfection. How is it posssble that such Greatness and Perfection can perish from this earth? Yea, that is what I am constantly asking Myself! "Once I wasn't, then I was, now I ain't again." * * * * *- Epitaph found on tombstone in Ohio graveyard Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Listen Big Ed, you'd have to name yourself EMPEROR to even have a chance to reach my "HIS MAJESTY COMANDANTE BANANA KING OF THE APES I." |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Winning Trifecta! [Was: Small Time Terrorists destroy ParisianUtopian Bike Program]
On Nov 5, 7:37*pm, Tim McNamara wrote:
Talkin' 'bout Hey now Hey now Haiku haiku an nay Jockomo feena ah na nay Jockomo feena nay (with apologies to Sugar Boy Crawford)- Hide quoted text - I'd like to learn Esperanto someday... Meanwhile I can say in Spanish, "Esto es una mierda y una mentira!" Sorry for the language. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Small Time Terrorists destroy Parisian Utopian Bike Program
Simon Lewis wrote:
Bill Baka writes: I'm not just equal. My IQ is well over 140 and I was bored to death in school. College too. I once got into it with my electronics instructor for teaching way too slow. Is it true you once beat Kasparov at chess? Chess is one thing I don't have patience for. Bill Baka |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Small Time Terrorists destroy Parisian Utopian Bike Program
dgk wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:33:36 -0600, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Bill Baka" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] Bush will go down in history as a heroic president who began the war on Islamic extremism. You are a flipping fruitcake if you buy into that. I'm losing any respect for you on this Republican rant. We shall soon see what kind of mess Obama is going to make of Afghanistan and Pakistan. He is going to bungle Iran too. It is what happens when you elect a man-child to the presidency. Enough bull****, Ed. Kennedy was only 43 when he got elected and he did OK until Dallas. It was either a CIA motivated solution to him and Marilyn Monroe or a well oiled job set up by LBJ, the one president I really hated, party not withstanding. JFK, just like Obama, was too young and inexperienced to be president. He essentially bungled our relations with the Soviet Union and handled the Cuban invasion like an idiot. He should have supported the exiles with air power which would have made all the difference. He also got us into Vietnam with no idea of how to win the war. People in their 40s, at least in this country, are still babies. You have to be at least in your 50s in order to have any sense. In fact, I like our presidents to be in their 60s. Before the Bay of Pigs, Russia was faced with Cuba being continuously attacked by the US, and our nuclear missles were on their border. So they moved missles into Cuba. After the resulting hysteria, we promised to stop sending terrorists into Cuba, and took our missles off Russia's border. You would have done what differently? Started a nuclear war? That's a very likely outcome if we had sent planes into Cuba. I followed it on the TV news after school or play time. Perhaps Castro was not the best leader for Cuba, but since we were responsible for Batista, that sort of nullfies our moral capital in the matter. Just like being responsible for the Shah undermines any moral objection we may have for Iran's current government. I think we should have helped Batista and kept the communists out, and then sent some people down there to see what we could do, shadow government or whatever. I believe JFK was killed to prevent him from withdrawing from Vietnam. I know that LBJ was the dimwit that decided to make it a full blown yet limited joke of a war. We did, of course, start the whole war to PREVENT free unifying elections from taking place as required by the 1954 Geneva Convention. We, of course, being so dedicated to democracy, refused to sign those accords because they promised free elections. Ho Chi Minh would have won overwhelmingly. Politics off. Bill Baka |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Small Time Terrorists destroy Parisian Utopian Bike Program
On Nov 6, 8:26*am, dgk wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:33:36 -0600, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Bill Baka" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] Bush will go down in history as a heroic president who began the war on Islamic extremism. You are a flipping fruitcake if you buy into that. I'm losing any respect for you on this Republican rant. We shall soon see what kind of mess Obama is going to make of Afghanistan and Pakistan. He is going to bungle Iran too. It is what happens when you elect a man-child to the presidency. Enough bull****, Ed. Kennedy was only 43 when he got elected and he did OK until Dallas. It was either a CIA motivated solution to him and Marilyn Monroe or a well oiled job set up by LBJ, the one president I really hated, party not withstanding. JFK, just like Obama, was too young and inexperienced to be president. He essentially bungled our relations with the Soviet Union and handled the Cuban invasion like an idiot. He should have supported the exiles with air power which would have made all the difference. He also got us into Vietnam with no idea of how to win the war. People in their 40s, at least in this country, are still babies. You have to be at least in your 50s in order to have any sense. In fact, I like our presidents to be in their 60s. Before the Bay of Pigs, Russia was faced with Cuba being continuously attacked by the US, and our nuclear missles were on their border. So they moved missles into Cuba. After the resulting hysteria, we promised to stop sending terrorists into Cuba, and took our missles off Russia's border. You would have done what differently? Started a nuclear war? That's a very likely outcome if we had sent planes into Cuba. Perhaps Castro was not the best leader for Cuba, but since we were responsible for Batista, that sort of nullfies our moral capital in the matter. Just like being responsible for the Shah undermines any moral objection we may have for Iran's current government. I believe JFK was killed to prevent him from withdrawing from Vietnam. We did, of course, start the whole war to PREVENT free unifying elections from taking place as required by the 1954 Geneva Convention. We, of course, being so dedicated to democracy, refused to sign those accords because they promised free elections. Ho Chi Minh would have won overwhelmingly. Not only that, but upon assuming power, Castro asked the US for support and to trade. The US wanted Castro to return the Casinos, Sugar and tobacco plantations, etc to the the corporations. Since Castro said no, the US started an anti-Cuban campaign and to try to undermine Castro's government and supported counterrevolutionary activity. Castro was forced to ally himself with the Soviet Union. The same happened in Vietnam. When the Vietnamese expelled the French, they established a constitution based on the American one. And they sought alliance with the US. Since the US wanted to inherit France's colonial control over Vietnam, they opposed the government and established an opposing government in Saigon. They had little support from the Vietnamese people and caused a huge mess, murdered tons of people and eventually left, but continued a cold war for decades after. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Small Time Terrorists destroy Parisian Utopian Bike Program
On Nov 6, 3:41*pm, Bill Baka wrote:
dgk wrote: On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:33:36 -0600, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Bill Baka" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] Bush will go down in history as a heroic president who began the war on Islamic extremism. You are a flipping fruitcake if you buy into that. I'm losing any respect for you on this Republican rant. We shall soon see what kind of mess Obama is going to make of Afghanistan and Pakistan. He is going to bungle Iran too. It is what happens when you elect a man-child to the presidency. Enough bull****, Ed. Kennedy was only 43 when he got elected and he did OK until Dallas. It was either a CIA motivated solution to him and Marilyn Monroe or a well oiled job set up by LBJ, the one president I really hated, party not withstanding. JFK, just like Obama, was too young and inexperienced to be president. He essentially bungled our relations with the Soviet Union and handled the Cuban invasion like an idiot. He should have supported the exiles with air power which would have made all the difference. He also got us into Vietnam with no idea of how to win the war. People in their 40s, at least in this country, are still babies. You have to be at least in your 50s in order to have any sense. In fact, I like our presidents to be in their 60s. Before the Bay of Pigs, Russia was faced with Cuba being continuously attacked by the US, and our nuclear missles were on their border. So they moved missles into Cuba. After the resulting hysteria, we promised to stop sending terrorists into Cuba, and took our missles off Russia's border. You would have done what differently? Started a nuclear war? That's a very likely outcome if we had sent planes into Cuba. I followed it on the TV news after school or play time. Perhaps Castro was not the best leader for Cuba, but since we were responsible for Batista, that sort of nullfies our moral capital in the matter. Just like being responsible for the Shah undermines any moral objection we may have for Iran's current government. I think we should have helped Batista and kept the communists out, and then sent some people down there to see what we could do, shadow government or whatever. I believe JFK was killed to prevent him from withdrawing from Vietnam. I know that LBJ was the dimwit that decided to make it a full blown yet limited joke of a war. We did, of course, start the whole war to PREVENT free unifying elections from taking place as required by the 1954 Geneva Convention. We, of course, being so dedicated to democracy, refused to sign those accords because they promised free elections. Ho Chi Minh would have won overwhelmingly. Politics off. Bill Baka- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They used to be enemies but now they need each other. To break with the status quo is always hard and unpredictable. That's why we can't have a real revolution here. But hey, we can have in Cuba! Any Banana Republic for that matter. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Small Time Terrorists destroy Parisian Utopian Bike Program
"dgk" wrote in message ... On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:33:36 -0600, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Bill Baka" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] Bush will go down in history as a heroic president who began the war on Islamic extremism. You are a flipping fruitcake if you buy into that. I'm losing any respect for you on this Republican rant. We shall soon see what kind of mess Obama is going to make of Afghanistan and Pakistan. He is going to bungle Iran too. It is what happens when you elect a man-child to the presidency. Enough bull****, Ed. Kennedy was only 43 when he got elected and he did OK until Dallas. It was either a CIA motivated solution to him and Marilyn Monroe or a well oiled job set up by LBJ, the one president I really hated, party not withstanding. JFK, just like Obama, was too young and inexperienced to be president. He essentially bungled our relations with the Soviet Union and handled the Cuban invasion like an idiot. He should have supported the exiles with air power which would have made all the difference. He also got us into Vietnam with no idea of how to win the war. People in their 40s, at least in this country, are still babies. You have to be at least in your 50s in order to have any sense. In fact, I like our presidents to be in their 60s. Before the Bay of Pigs, Russia was faced with Cuba being continuously attacked by the US, and our nuclear missles were on their border. So they moved missles into Cuba. After the resulting hysteria, we promised to stop sending terrorists into Cuba, and took our missles off Russia's border. You would have done what differently? Started a nuclear war? That's a very likely outcome if we had sent planes into Cuba. I would have supported the Cuban exiles in their attempt to overthrow Castro. The Soviet Union was never going to go to war with the US over a third world country. Get real! JFK and his bunch were sissies and cowards who had no stomach for war. LBJ and his bunch were the exact same as JFK - good at getting us into a war, but then not knowing how to win it. Perhaps Castro was not the best leader for Cuba, but since we were responsible for Batista, that sort of nullfies our moral capital in the matter. Just like being responsible for the Shah undermines any moral objection we may have for Iran's current government. I believe JFK was killed to prevent him from withdrawing from Vietnam. We did, of course, start the whole war to PREVENT free unifying elections from taking place as required by the 1954 Geneva Convention. We, of course, being so dedicated to democracy, refused to sign those accords because they promised free elections. Ho Chi Minh would have won overwhelmingly. The above is spoken like a true communist sympathizer, but that is what I have been saying about liberals all of my life. All liberals are treasonous wretches at heart. They are also cowards who never met a war they liked. Note well how Obama and the liberal Dems are looking for ways to back out of Afghanistan. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Small Time Terrorists destroy Parisian Utopian Bike Program
wrote in message ... On Nov 6, 8:26 am, dgk wrote: "Bill Baka" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: [...] Bush will go down in history as a heroic president who began the war on Islamic extremism. You are a flipping fruitcake if you buy into that. I'm losing any respect for you on this Republican rant. We shall soon see what kind of mess Obama is going to make of Afghanistan and Pakistan. He is going to bungle Iran too. It is what happens when you elect a man-child to the presidency. Enough bull****, Ed. Kennedy was only 43 when he got elected and he did OK until Dallas. It was either a CIA motivated solution to him and Marilyn Monroe or a well oiled job set up by LBJ, the one president I really hated, party not withstanding. JFK, just like Obama, was too young and inexperienced to be president. He essentially bungled our relations with the Soviet Union and handled the Cuban invasion like an idiot. He should have supported the exiles with air power which would have made all the difference. He also got us into Vietnam with no idea of how to win the war. People in their 40s, at least in this country, are still babies. You have to be at least in your 50s in order to have any sense. In fact, I like our presidents to be in their 60s. Before the Bay of Pigs, Russia was faced with Cuba being continuously attacked by the US, and our nuclear missles were on their border. So they moved missles into Cuba. After the resulting hysteria, we promised to stop sending terrorists into Cuba, and took our missles off Russia's border. You would have done what differently? Started a nuclear war? That's a very likely outcome if we had sent planes into Cuba. Perhaps Castro was not the best leader for Cuba, but since we were responsible for Batista, that sort of nullfies our moral capital in the matter. Just like being responsible for the Shah undermines any moral objection we may have for Iran's current government. The Cubans were responsible for Batista just like the Iranians were responsible for the Shah. The Cubans are also responsible for Castro just like the Iranians are responsible for the Mullahs. Jeez, how do you get to be so stupid! Are you born that way or do you have to work at it? I believe JFK was killed to prevent him from withdrawing from Vietnam. We did, of course, start the whole war to PREVENT free unifying elections from taking place as required by the 1954 Geneva Convention. We, of course, being so dedicated to democracy, refused to sign those accords because they promised free elections. Ho Chi Minh would have won overwhelmingly. Not only that, but upon assuming power, Castro asked the US for support and to trade. The US wanted Castro to return the Casinos, Sugar and tobacco plantations, etc to the the corporations. Since Castro said no, the US started an anti-Cuban campaign and to try to undermine Castro's government and supported counterrevolutionary activity. Castro was forced to ally himself with the Soviet Union. The same happened in Vietnam. When the Vietnamese expelled the French, they established a constitution based on the American one. And they sought alliance with the US. Since the US wanted to inherit France's colonial control over Vietnam, they opposed the government and established an opposing government in Saigon. They had little support from the Vietnamese people and caused a huge mess, murdered tons of people and eventually left, but continued a cold war for decades after. The above type of argument assumes that the US has more power in world affairs than it actually has. Foreign leaders have minds of their own and are never "forced" to do anything they do not want to do. Castro and Ho Chi Minh were committed communists and were only too anxious to ally themselves with the Soviet Union. In any event, the history of how the Vietnam War came about has next to nothing to do with the above explanation. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Armstrong seizes small time gain | Nobody | Racing | 23 | July 28th 09 01:07 AM |
bike shop idiots destroy bitchin bolts! | evilewan | Unicycling | 15 | February 5th 04 07:33 PM |