|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Manitou Six Failures
I purchased a Gary Fisher Marlin recently which came with the Manitou Six front shock. Bike had great reviews with the exception of the shock. Apparently, there is tendency for the cast aluminum arch to break on the right side.
Reports of a dozen or so breaks he http://www.mtbreview.com/reviews/200...t_121936.shtml This shock has a history of problems: http://www.answerproducts.com/safetynotice.htm http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml02/02236.html I'm wondering, should I be concerned? I'm a big guy and plan on riding trails where there are 2'-3' drops. After reading about all these breaks, I now have confidence issues just commuting. I'm going to back to the LBS where the bike was purchased and relay my concerns. I'm hoping they will sympathize and offer to change out the shock for one of equal or greater worth. I don't mind ponying up for the difference if it turns out to be an upgrade. Which begs the question: What's a good entry level shock I can use with confidence? The Marzocchi MX Comp ETA has gotten stellar reviews http://mountainbikereview.com/review...t_122114.shtml and seems to be a great bang for the bean. But it's hard to find (possibly due to all those giddy testimonials). Their Dirt Jumper III and MX Comp also come highly rated. Do users of these springs concur? Hugh in Tallahappy Just Say NO! To Gravity .. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Manitou Six Failures
"JSNTG" wrote in rich text, apparently, in message
... * I purchased a Gary Fisher Marlin recently which came with the Manitou Six front shock. Bike had great reviews with the exception of the shock. Apparently, there is tendency for the cast aluminum arch to break on the right side. I'm wondering, should I be concerned? I'm a big guy and plan on riding trails where there are 2'-3' drops. After reading about all these breaks, I now have confidence issues just commuting. I'm going to back to the LBS where the bike was purchased and relay my concerns. I'm hoping they will sympathize and offer to change out the shock for one of equal or greater worth. I don't mind ponying up for the difference if it turns out to be an upgrade. * ************************** You can ask, I guess, but the time to ask for a component swap/upgrade is BEFORE you buy the bike. The shop can't sell your shock as new any more, because, well, it's not. (Cut steer-tube for one thing.) They'll gladly sell you something better, though, and you could keep the Six for when you break THAT! If I were you I'd stop reading MTBR and just ride the bike. If you can get the shock set up for your weight, then just go abuse the hell out of it and upgrade if/when it starts giving you problems. (Hell, break it while it's still under warranty and THEN pay the difference to trade up.) Bill "and please complain in plain text next time" S. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Manitou Six Failures
Bill, thanks for the mature response. In fact I HAVE been riding the bike (a
couple hours today - arse is way sore). Had planned on upgrading the shock later but sooner might be better. Figured I would do some research first. Silly me. Apparently you're not big on informed consumption. Shock works great. No complaints there. It's the bad track record that has be wondering. Thinking confidence might be a GOOD thing during those white knuckle descents. My post was as much a troll for positive testimonials on this bugga as it was a solicitation for suggestions on a replacement. Goes to risk assessment. Perhaps others have something more constructive to offer. Hugh " ************************** You can ask, I guess, but the time to ask for a component swap/upgrade is BEFORE you buy the bike. The shop can't sell your shock as new any more, because, well, it's not. (Cut steer-tube for one thing.) They'll gladly sell you something better, though, and you could keep the Six for when you break THAT! If I were you I'd stop reading MTBR and just ride the bike. If you can get the shock set up for your weight, then just go abuse the hell out of it and upgrade if/when it starts giving you problems. (Hell, break it while it's still under warranty and THEN pay the difference to trade up.) Bill "and please complain in plain text next time" S. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Manitou Six Failures
JSNTG wrote:
Bill, thanks for the mature response. In fact I HAVE been riding the bike (a couple hours today - arse is way sore). Had planned on upgrading the shock later but sooner might be better. Figured I would do some research first. Silly me. Apparently you're not big on informed consumption. Shock works great. No complaints there. It's the bad track record that has be wondering. Thinking confidence might be a GOOD thing during those white knuckle descents. My post was as much a troll for positive testimonials on this bugga as it was a solicitation for suggestions on a replacement. Goes to risk assessment. Perhaps others have something more constructive to offer. Hugh those mtbr reviews do suck. I thought Bill's reply was very nice and helpful, sorry you didn't get what you wanted... Penny -- me and my bike: www.specialtyoutdoors.com/biking.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Manitou Six Failures
"JSNTG" wrote in message
... Bill, thanks for the mature response. In fact I HAVE been riding the bike (a couple hours today - arse is way sore). Had planned on upgrading the shock later but sooner might be better. Figured I would do some research first. Silly me. Apparently you're not big on informed consumption. But you didn't say that. You said (it's gone now because you top-posted your reply to my reply AND cut that to which I was replying) that you wanted the shop to take your shock back and get something better. Shock works great. No complaints there. It's the bad track record that has be wondering. Thinking confidence might be a GOOD thing during those white knuckle descents. That's what you get for readiing MTBR. (Seriously, it won't just "fail" on you without warning.) My post was as much a troll for positive testimonials on this bugga as it was a solicitation for suggestions on a replacement. Goes to risk assessment. Perhaps others have something more constructive to offer. Try saying what you mean, then, and you might get the answers you seek. Hugh Jass. You can ask, I guess, but the time to ask for a component swap/upgrade is BEFORE you buy the bike. The shop can't sell your shock as new any more, because, well, it's not. (Cut steer-tube for one thing.) They'll gladly sell you something better, though, and you could keep the Six for when you break THAT! If I were you I'd stop reading MTBR and just ride the bike. If you can get the shock set up for your weight, then just go abuse the hell out of it and upgrade if/when it starts giving you problems. (Hell, break it while it's still under warranty and THEN pay the difference to trade up.) Bill "and please complain in plain text next time" S. Well, you did THAT, at least. Bill "stands by my recommendation to just ride the thing" S. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Manitou Six Failures
Penny, understand any review is to be taken with a few grains of salt, but
are you suggesting one throw out the baby with the bath water? Consumer reviews have traditionally worked very well for me. In fact I would go so far as to say that my experience of items purchased over the years ($10K+ in windsurfing equipment, $3k+ in snowboards, skateboards and other sporting equipment, $5k+ in electronics, etc.) correlates directly with consumer reviews of these items. If survey said: 'It doesn't suck', it didn't. On the contrary, I have made purchases based on the shop's 'expert' recommendation and been less than satisfied. The purchase of the Martin is not one however. Its a great bang for the bean. Frame geometry fits like it grew on me. Components with the exception of the shock are worthy of a more expensive bike. It's not that difficult to discern the puff or vent reviews from the legitimate ones. Throwing out the ends of the bell curve and paying attention to the mean, gives one direction among the myriad choices. Throwing out the review forum altogether, as a basis for decision making would violate Franklin's maxim that experience is the dearest school. alt.mountain-bike is evidence that Franklin's maxim is alive and spinnin'. Is there something about mtbr reviews I don't know? Is there a shadowy figure lurking on the rocky knoll? Hugh "Penny S" wrote those mtbr reviews do suck. I thought Bill's reply was very nice and helpful, sorry you didn't get what you wanted... Penny -- me and my bike: www.specialtyoutdoors.com/biking.htm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Manitou Six Failures
Bill, sorry if I wasn't more explicit or violated any posting protocol. As
for MTBR and review forums in general, see my response to Penny above. What's up with your reader btw? Mine, outlook express, displays things just fine. Jass? Please elaborate. Hugh "Sorni" wrote in message . .. "JSNTG" wrote in message ... Bill, thanks for the mature response. In fact I HAVE been riding the bike (a couple hours today - arse is way sore). Had planned on upgrading the shock later but sooner might be better. Figured I would do some research first. Silly me. Apparently you're not big on informed consumption. But you didn't say that. You said (it's gone now because you top-posted your reply to my reply AND cut that to which I was replying) that you wanted the shop to take your shock back and get something better. Shock works great. No complaints there. It's the bad track record that has be wondering. Thinking confidence might be a GOOD thing during those white knuckle descents. That's what you get for readiing MTBR. (Seriously, it won't just "fail" on you without warning.) My post was as much a troll for positive testimonials on this bugga as it was a solicitation for suggestions on a replacement. Goes to risk assessment. Perhaps others have something more constructive to offer. Try saying what you mean, then, and you might get the answers you seek. Hugh Jass. You can ask, I guess, but the time to ask for a component swap/upgrade is BEFORE you buy the bike. The shop can't sell your shock as new any more, because, well, it's not. (Cut steer-tube for one thing.) They'll gladly sell you something better, though, and you could keep the Six for when you break THAT! If I were you I'd stop reading MTBR and just ride the bike. If you can get the shock set up for your weight, then just go abuse the hell out of it and upgrade if/when it starts giving you problems. (Hell, break it while it's still under warranty and THEN pay the difference to trade up.) Bill "and please complain in plain text next time" S. Well, you did THAT, at least. Bill "stands by my recommendation to just ride the thing" S. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Manitou Six Failures
"JSNTG" wrote in message
... Bill, sorry if I wasn't more explicit or violated any posting protocol. As for MTBR and review forums in general, see my response to Penny above. What's up with your reader btw? Mine, outlook express, displays things just fine. Jass? Please elaborate. Hugh Sigh. Someone wanna step in here? I hate long explanations... OK, Hugh, first of all I was trying to give you honest advice about your situation; namely, that it's unlikely the shop will take your front shock back at this point, and that if I were you I'd just ride it until there's a problem. (And yes, I still say the time to read MTBR for "trends" like breakage is BEFORE you buy, not after.) Then, after not liking my reply, you said you really meant you were just looking for upgrade advice and/or reassurance that the Six is OK As for "posting protocol", it's generally expected that newsgroup posts be made in "plain text"; your initial one was in "rich text", which made quoting you difficult (but no big deal). What's worse is "top-posting", where you place your reply at the top of a message (and also delete key text, by the way), which makes the thread VERY difficult to follow (especially for others who may not see all the messages). Maybe someone can explain all this better (and I believe top-posting is covered in the FAQ, wherever that is Finally, I'll just have to keep jass to myself (it was merely a little funny -- very little.) Bill "Hugh Jass* Memorial Snippage Below" S. *used it long before you came along, so don't get panties in a(nother) bunch |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Manitou Six Failures
JSNTG said...
Bill, sorry if I wasn't more explicit or violated any posting protocol. As for MTBR and review forums in general, see my response to Penny above. What's up with your reader btw? Mine, outlook express, displays things just fine. Jass? Please elaborate. Hugh I don't think Sorni's response warranted an angry comeback. I have been reading all the posts here for months and I don't remember any posts about this fork, but maybe someone will de-lurk and give you some advice. IMO, you sort of answered your own question. If someone posted that theirs was fine, would that nullify all the warnings you read on MTBR? I don't own one, but it is a low end fork with skinny stanchion tubes and you are a big guy. Sounds like bad medicine to me. It isn't worth much as a trade-in, so I would keep it as a spare and buy a coil Fox or Marzocchi ASAP. Even if you never break the Six, the performance difference will be very noticeable. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Manitou Six Failures
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
dual presta/schraeder inflator head failures. | Max | General | 4 | February 27th 04 09:46 PM |
Manitou QL Rear Shock Air Pressure | swhite44 | Mountain Biking | 1 | August 1st 03 01:07 AM |
New Manitou Black Comp 100-120mm.. | Edwards | Mountain Biking | 5 | July 26th 03 10:53 PM |