two-wheeled scum murdering pedestrians again

On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 10:59:53 -0700 (PDT), Simon Mason wrote:

On Apr 5, 6:51*pm, The Medway Handyman
wrote:

Same here, plus 300 quid on two tyres.
But in the black/white world of the Medway Man and his ilk, cyclists
do not own cars or drive. They are *all* non tax paying, law breaking
scum, so I was trying to keep things simple. ;-)

You obviously need to keep things simple.

Cyclists are sponging freeloaders when they cycle. *When driving they
have paid an 'extra' tax for using that vehicle on the road. *When
cycling they have not paid an 'extra' tax to use that vehicle on the road.

Even you should be able to grasp that.

See Janet in her car.
Janet has never paid a penny for fuel, VED, tyres, MOTs, insurance,
repairs etc in her life.
Her cycling husband John has paid every last penny of it all.
Janet is a free loading driving scum.
John is a thick ****er who people take the **** out of.


--
Simon Mason - who cycles at 25mph in 20mph limits just because the limits do not apply to cyclists.
A total disreagrd for the well-being of vulnerable road users.

John is a thick ****er who people take the **** out of.


Woops! Thick ****er!

Copy the following corrected version of your posting 156 times!


"John is a thick ****er out of whom people take the ****".

On 06/04/2011 07:35, Simon Weaseltemper wrote:
On 05/04/2011 23:29, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/04/2011 12:21, Simon Mason wrote:

I have just put 80 quids worth in and here is the receipt, but I don't
waste it commuting.

£95 to fill mine on Monday. Eye-wateringly expensive! Just as well it's
not my money!

I still think that there is a long way to go before we see a really good
decrease in traffic and better respect for fuel use. I guess the price
needs to get to around £10 a litre. If the net result is a cost of one
pound per mile for fuel, people will really start to consider how
necessary their journeys are.

They will also starve to death or end up with a fatal disease. At that
price the entire western economy would collapse as would life as you
know it.

****.


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On 05/04/2011 18:59, Simon Mason wrote:
On Apr 5, 6:51 pm, The Medway
wrote:

Same here, plus 300 quid on two tyres.
But in the black/white world of the Medway Man and his ilk, cyclists
do not own cars or drive. They are *all* non tax paying, law breaking
scum, so I was trying to keep things simple. ;-)

You obviously need to keep things simple.

Cyclists are sponging freeloaders when they cycle. When driving they
have paid an 'extra' tax for using that vehicle on the road. When
cycling they have not paid an 'extra' tax to use that vehicle on the road.

Even you should be able to grasp that.

See Janet in her car.
Janet has never paid a penny for fuel, VED, tyres, MOTs, insurance,
repairs etc in her life.
Her cycling husband John has paid every last penny of it all.
Janet is a free loading driving scum.

Did you take evening classes in being a thick ****?

The point is that 'someone' paid the EXTRA tax so she could drive on the
road.

Cyclists don't pay an EXTRA tax.

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:29:46 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?" wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/04/2011 12:21, Simon Mason wrote:

I have just put 80 quids worth in and here is the receipt, but I don't
waste it commuting.

£95 to fill mine on Monday. Eye-wateringly expensive! Just as well it's
not my money!


ffs - priceless as ever.

Do you think anyone is interested in how much a second hand Volvo takes to fill?

And what is this **** about "not my money" - not a little piglet I hope - I have never known a
company car arrangement for salesmen which pays for all their fuel (including own use) -
particularly when it isn't even a company car.

(Even if they pay for own use - there is the matter of benefit in kind - so he claim is a piglet
however you look at it)

--

"I have never said that I encourage my children to wear helmets. I would challenge judith
to find the place where I said I encourage my children to wear helmets." Guy Chapman
Judith then produced the web page where he said "I encourage my children to wear helmets."
Later that day Chapman immediately added the following to the web page:
"This page is out of date and preserved only for convenience" but he left the date last updated as 31/08/2004.

On Apr 6, 6:14*pm, The Medway Handyman
wrote:
On 05/04/2011 18:59, Simon Mason wrote:





On Apr 5, 6:51 pm, The Medway
wrote:

Same here, plus 300 quid on two tyres.
But in the black/white world of the Medway Man and his ilk, cyclists
do not own cars or drive. They are *all* non tax paying, law breaking
scum, so I was trying to keep things simple. ;-)

You obviously need to keep things simple.

Cyclists are sponging freeloaders when they cycle. *When driving they
have paid an 'extra' tax for using that vehicle on the road. *When
cycling they have not paid an 'extra' tax to use that vehicle on the road.

Even you should be able to grasp that.

See Janet in her car.
Janet has never paid a penny for fuel, VED, tyres, MOTs, insurance,
repairs etc in her life.
Her cycling husband John has paid every last penny of it all.
Janet is a free loading driving scum.

Did you take evening classes in being a thick ****?

The point is that 'someone' paid the EXTRA tax so she could drive on the
road.

Correct - I do.
She doesn't.


Cyclists don't pay an EXTRA tax.

The person who actually paid the VED on Janet's car is a cyclist.
Therefore a cyclist has paid the extra tax.
Simple enough now?

--
Simon Mason

On 06/04/2011 18:55, Simon Mason wrote:
On Apr 6, 6:14 pm, The Medway
wrote:
On 05/04/2011 18:59, Simon Mason wrote:





On Apr 5, 6:51 pm, The Medway
wrote:

Same here, plus 300 quid on two tyres.
But in the black/white world of the Medway Man and his ilk, cyclists
do not own cars or drive. They are *all* non tax paying, law breaking
scum, so I was trying to keep things simple. ;-)

You obviously need to keep things simple.

Cyclists are sponging freeloaders when they cycle. When driving they
have paid an 'extra' tax for using that vehicle on the road. When
cycling they have not paid an 'extra' tax to use that vehicle on the road.

Even you should be able to grasp that.

See Janet in her car.
Janet has never paid a penny for fuel, VED, tyres, MOTs, insurance,
repairs etc in her life.
Her cycling husband John has paid every last penny of it all.
Janet is a free loading driving scum.

Did you take evening classes in being a thick ****?

The point is that 'someone' paid the EXTRA tax so she could drive on the
road.

Correct - I do.
She doesn't.


Cyclists don't pay an EXTRA tax.

The person who actually paid the VED on Janet's car is a cyclist.
Therefore a cyclist has paid the extra tax.
Simple enough now?

A cyclist has paid the EXTRA tax so a CAR can be used on the road NOT A
****ING PUSH BIKE.

Retard.


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/04/2011 07:35, Simon Weaseltemper wrote:
On 05/04/2011 23:29, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/04/2011 12:21, Simon Mason wrote:

I have just put 80 quids worth in and here is the receipt, but I don't
waste it commuting.

£95 to fill mine on Monday. Eye-wateringly expensive! Just as well it's
not my money!

I still think that there is a long way to go before we see a really good
decrease in traffic and better respect for fuel use. I guess the price
needs to get to around £10 a litre. If the net result is a cost of one
pound per mile for fuel, people will really start to consider how
necessary their journeys are.

Hmmmm. It seems to me that a large number of journeys are in company
funded vehicles (either directly or via mileage allowances).

- --
Guy Chapman, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed
to be worth at least what you paid for them.
PGP public key at http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/pgp-public.key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNnL7EAAoJEJx9ogI8T+W/U14H/22tfRznwviv2T/TbzDTPyuv
LwlzWdqf99aLR8qaQr2/AXEs0mypR1WrtiCL83X5CdS28lwK2w99gY7+JDYbDR97
MaVQtm4xJ0DqvOlNjs8kXP8kwi9Byby9lh5fE+I7qxmKB4CmT4 ng+gYhIu6wAjh0
Zgam8PHC7vsWq5SLqW5fqXyqBdvPpMP9Epc5Jv4qeFce+us9qG a1VCKgsp0I/faR
WyJfQx1BSh1TNgVuvvYb3CyMr5h573PoP1mLQZrEgqIA0AmwT0 kOgOLwnRn29vbh
1mBsyq+Q1XiGTFaWmc6eGhWonPoIpta3KDe3h72B4Nv7zbOqac jpsl6z2kH0Lgs=
=fSLx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:14:28 +0100, The Medway Handyman wrote:

On 05/04/2011 18:59, Simon Mason wrote:
On Apr 5, 6:51 pm, The Medway
wrote:

Same here, plus 300 quid on two tyres. But in the black/white world
of the Medway Man and his ilk, cyclists do not own cars or drive.
They are *all* non tax paying, law breaking scum, so I was trying to
keep things simple. ;-)

You obviously need to keep things simple.

Cyclists are sponging freeloaders when they cycle. When driving they
have paid an 'extra' tax for using that vehicle on the road. When
cycling they have not paid an 'extra' tax to use that vehicle on the
road.

Even you should be able to grasp that.

See Janet in her car.
Janet has never paid a penny for fuel, VED, tyres, MOTs, insurance,
repairs etc in her life.
Her cycling husband John has paid every last penny of it all. Janet is
a free loading driving scum.

Did you take evening classes in being a thick ****?

Thick! Now that is better.
Also warm, wriggly, pulsating, massaging?



--
67.4% of statistics are made up.

On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:38:09 +0100, The Medway Handyman wrote:


A cyclist has paid the EXTRA tax so a CAR can be used on the road NOT A
****ING PUSH BIKE.

Retard.

It is a great honor to be retarded by the Meds.
Next in line is the greater honour of putrescent mass



--
67.4% of statistics are made up.