|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand - what is this for?
Corvus Corvax wrote:
On Aug 4, 1:16 pm, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman" ""sunsetss0003\"@invalida .com" wrote: What is the deal with single-speed anyway? To think I missed this flamewar! http://www.dirtragmag.com/web/articl...egory=web_only Ride what you want. Life is good. Ride what you want. Flame everyone that rides something different on Usenet. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Ads |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand - what is this for?
On Aug 6, 3:59 pm, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman"
wrote: JD WHO? wrote: On Aug 6, 4:01 am, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman" wrote: JD wrote: On Aug 5, 4:34 pm, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman" wrote: Have any professional level MTB races been won on fixed or single-speed bikes? (Actual, not rhetorical, question) A typical douchebag question because racing doesn't have jack **** to do with anything. Racing has nothing to do with which bike (within the rules) is fastest? Thanks for the information! No, racing doesn't have jack **** to do with anything. Yes, you are a douchebag. You have to try harder JD. I have been flamed much better many times on Usenet. With asinine comments and speculations like yours, it's no big surprise. Why don't you go race, count some calories, download your HRM data and then jerk off to it all now. JD |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand - what is this for?
JD wrote:
On Aug 6, 3:59 pm, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman" wrote: JD WHO? wrote: On Aug 6, 4:01 am, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman" wrote: JD wrote: On Aug 5, 4:34 pm, "Tom \"Johnny Sunset\" Sherman" wrote: Have any professional level MTB races been won on fixed or single-speed bikes? (Actual, not rhetorical, question) A typical douchebag question because racing doesn't have jack **** to do with anything. Racing has nothing to do with which bike (within the rules) is fastest? Thanks for the information! No, racing doesn't have jack **** to do with anything. Yes, you are a douchebag. You have to try harder JD. I have been flamed much better many times on Usenet. With asinine comments and speculations like yours, it's no big surprise. Why don't you go race, count some calories, download your HRM data and then jerk off to it all now. Lack of interest in those activities, perhaps? I would rather ride my bikes and argue on Usenet. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand - what is this for?
Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote:
Fred Clydesdale who? wrote: snip-de-dip The force applied to the pedals does need to be kept down to a point where the rider is still using anaerobic power if the climb is of any length. Dude, if the climb is that long and painful, get the feck off the bike and walk it. The flowers smell nicer that way. ;-) |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand - what is this for?
G.T. wrote:
Steve Baker wrote: Michael Press wrote: In article rSnti.348$mw4.286@trndny09, Steve Baker wrote: Why don't you ask a Trek dealer if it is selling? They'll be able to tell much better than this raggedy bunch can. From a plea for sanity and tolerance to mud-slinging in a single bound. I was referring to the rec.bike.* crowd - I know AM-B are FAR less well-dressed than "raggedy" could possibly imply. ;-) Hahaha, I guess I was wrong. Greg You weren't wrong, Greg, he just couldn't see it from his perspective. Steve "inverse snobbery" Baker |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand - what is this for?
Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote (in part):
I would rather ride my bikes and argue on Usenet. Prove it - PLEASE! Like for, say, a month or so..... |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand - what is this for?
Steve Baker wrote:
Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote (in part): I would rather ride my bikes and argue on Usenet. Prove it - PLEASE! Like for, say, a month or so..... I have proved over and over that I like to argue on Usenet. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand - what is this for?
Steve Baker wrote:
Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote: Fred Clydesdale who? wrote: snip-de-dip The force applied to the pedals does need to be kept down to a point where the rider is still using anaerobic power if the climb is of any length. Dude, if the climb is that long and painful, get the feck off the bike and walk it. The flowers smell nicer that way. ;-) I usually walk uphill when I either break traction or can not keep the front wheel on the ground (this happens on slopes that somewhat skilled riders can climb), or when things start to get out of hand downhill (long before decent riders dismount). -- Tom "Sub-Barney" Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
I don't understand - what is this for?
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:21:48 -0700, RonSonic
wrote: Just because something is faster doesn't mean it's more fun. Ron Put that bong down! -- Slack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I don't understand - what is this for? | Tom \Johnny Sunset\ Sherman[_5_] | General | 181 | October 22nd 07 04:46 PM |
Anyone understand Hungarian? | GPW | Australia | 5 | August 4th 06 12:38 AM |
i dont understand... | cruisecontrol | Unicycling | 24 | November 5th 05 04:38 AM |
What you hosers don't seem to understand about LWS | x1134x | Mountain Biking | 67 | September 6th 05 03:40 PM |
?? I Don't Understand Scammers | CycleFit | Marketplace | 0 | January 9th 05 04:20 PM |