|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
On 8/2/08 4:05 PM, in article ,
"Fred Fredburger" wrote: ST wrote: On 8/2/08 11:54 AM, in article , "Fred Fredburger" wrote: ST wrote: These ASSBAGS learned this from their braindead college professors who partied too much during the 60's-70's These morons could pass for their Vietnam era proff's http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b3b_1217630606 OK. Some people don't approve of the war in Iraq. Got it. What annoyed you about this? You disagree! No, I'm trying to understand your issue. All the story says is that people are protesting. There's nothing here about anything illegal happening. It does mention 1 arrest, but the story doesn't say what that was about. Why aren't you out there performing illegal public acts of disobedience It's not illegal to protest. Do you believe it SHOULD be? and destruction of public property Not one word of that story hints that happened. and public humiliation of military members that risk their life to protect yours??? I see. You're making stuff up. OK, but you're not being very creative. Say that they attacked the truck, stole some machine guns and killed some military people and defiled the corpses. It's a better story that way. Did you read the text?? Arrests! Did you watch the video? Police having to fight with protesters! |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
Tom Kunich wrote:
"since when is the war in Iraq about protecting our lives?" When was the last airplane flown into a building again? Bombs in subways? Buses? When was the last time an Iraqi did any of these things... ? My rating of US foreign policy is negative on a scale of 1 to 10... with 1 being the worst I would expect of a freedom-loving democratic republic that had the opportunity, being the only superpower, to be an example for the rest of the world. We totally blew it... We have troops stationed in over a hundred countries and our military budget is more than the rest of the world combined. We overthrow governments (even democratic ones) when they do not behave in our corporate interests, and support oppressive dictatorships when they do. If you really wonder why they hate us... |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
"Ron Ruff" wrote in message
... Tom Kunich wrote: "since when is the war in Iraq about protecting our lives?" When was the last airplane flown into a building again? Bombs in subways? Buses? When was the last time an Iraqi did any of these things... ? I understand that you aren't able to make the connection. Given enough time you might grow smart enough to figure it out. My rating of US foreign policy is negative on a scale of 1 to 10... with 1 being the worst I would expect of a freedom-loving democratic republic that had the opportunity, being the only superpower, to be an example for the rest of the world. We totally blew it... Unless you have some sort of idea what was going on in the middle east. But then that would be expecting you to actually be interested in something other than playing with yourself. We have troops stationed in over a hundred countries and our military budget is more than the rest of the world combined. We overthrow governments (even democratic ones) when they do not behave in our corporate interests, and support oppressive dictatorships when they do. If you really wonder why they hate us... Which democratic government was it that we overthrew because of corporate interests again? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
"ST" wrote in message
... On 8/2/08 3:33 PM, in article Those are NOT "Right Wing" extremists! They are RELIGIOUS extremists, you know....just the Islamic extremists. Talking to that moron is like talking to one of those clown toys with the built in 8 answers. Don't bother because you already know all 8 answers he gives. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
Tom Kunich wrote:
"Fred Fredburger" wrote in message . .. Howard Kveck wrote: In article , ST wrote: Steve, did you miss the part that it was the brigade's *equipment* that they were protesting, not the soldiers? Or is that distinction too subtle for you? And by the way, since when is the war in Iraq about protecting our lives? People ARE equipment. "since when is the war in Iraq about protecting our lives?" When was the last airplane flown into a building again? Bombs in subways? Buses? It appears to be idiotic that Kveck ain't smart enough to have discerned that the terrorists were behind the attacks on the US for 30 years until we fought back. Suddenly Kveck forgets all about it. If everything you say is true then we STILL shouldn't outlaw protests. The right to speak out against government policy is essential to the US being the US. If those doing the speaking are wrong, they will be in the minority. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
ST wrote:
On 8/2/08 4:05 PM, in article , "Fred Fredburger" wrote: ST wrote: On 8/2/08 11:54 AM, in article , "Fred Fredburger" wrote: ST wrote: These ASSBAGS learned this from their braindead college professors who partied too much during the 60's-70's These morons could pass for their Vietnam era proff's http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b3b_1217630606 OK. Some people don't approve of the war in Iraq. Got it. What annoyed you about this? You disagree! No, I'm trying to understand your issue. All the story says is that people are protesting. There's nothing here about anything illegal happening. It does mention 1 arrest, but the story doesn't say what that was about. Why aren't you out there performing illegal public acts of disobedience It's not illegal to protest. Do you believe it SHOULD be? and destruction of public property Not one word of that story hints that happened. and public humiliation of military members that risk their life to protect yours??? I see. You're making stuff up. OK, but you're not being very creative. Say that they attacked the truck, stole some machine guns and killed some military people and defiled the corpses. It's a better story that way. Did you read the text?? Arrests! One (1) arrest. What for? They didn't say. In the middle of the night, one of the protesters had to go pee, so he went behind a bush. The Police busted him for indecent exposure. Or maybe one grabbed a cop, threw them to the ground and performed an illegal abortion on them. Maybe one of the protesters smoked some dope. Which of these was it? The report doesn't say. You can speculate that babies were eaten, but I'm not buying it. Did you watch the video? Police having to fight with protesters! The video was FROM A DIFFERENT PROTEST! Last year's protest. You had to watch and listen. You also had to understand that last year is not this year. This year is this year. What this report says to me is that they sent a reporter out to cover a story. The reporter found nothing. So they speculated about maybe why nothing much was happening and showed clips from the previous year to show why one might reasonably have expected to have found something. Since it was a slow news night, they used the "Huh, nothing much going on" story as filler. Nobody humiliated anyone. The fight they showed was a re-run from a previous year. You're just wound up over nothing. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
"Fred Fredburger" wrote in
message . .. Tom Kunich wrote: It appears to be idiotic that Kveck ain't smart enough to have discerned that the terrorists were behind the attacks on the US for 30 years until we fought back. Suddenly Kveck forgets all about it. If everything you say is true then we STILL shouldn't outlaw protests. The right to speak out against government policy is essential to the US being the US. If those doing the speaking are wrong, they will be in the minority. What part of the conversation said anything about outlawing protests? I like it when these protestors speak their minds. Usually it demonstrates that they don't have any. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
On 8/2/08 8:03 PM, in article ,
"Fred Fredburger" wrote: ST wrote: On 8/2/08 4:05 PM, in article , "Fred Fredburger" wrote: ST wrote: On 8/2/08 11:54 AM, in article , "Fred Fredburger" wrote: ST wrote: These ASSBAGS learned this from their braindead college professors who partied too much during the 60's-70's These morons could pass for their Vietnam era proff's http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b3b_1217630606 OK. Some people don't approve of the war in Iraq. Got it. What annoyed you about this? You disagree! No, I'm trying to understand your issue. All the story says is that people are protesting. There's nothing here about anything illegal happening. It does mention 1 arrest, but the story doesn't say what that was about. Why aren't you out there performing illegal public acts of disobedience It's not illegal to protest. Do you believe it SHOULD be? and destruction of public property Not one word of that story hints that happened. and public humiliation of military members that risk their life to protect yours??? I see. You're making stuff up. OK, but you're not being very creative. Say that they attacked the truck, stole some machine guns and killed some military people and defiled the corpses. It's a better story that way. Did you read the text?? Arrests! One (1) arrest. What for? They didn't say. In the middle of the night, one of the protesters had to go pee, so he went behind a bush. The Police busted him for indecent exposure. Or maybe one grabbed a cop, threw them to the ground and performed an illegal abortion on them. Maybe one of the protesters smoked some dope. Which of these was it? The report doesn't say. You can speculate that babies were eaten, but I'm not buying it. Did you watch the video? Police having to fight with protesters! The video was FROM A DIFFERENT PROTEST! Last year's protest. You had to watch and listen. You also had to understand that last year is not this year. This year is this year. What this report says to me is that they sent a reporter out to cover a story. The reporter found nothing. So they speculated about maybe why nothing much was happening and showed clips from the previous year to show why one might reasonably have expected to have found something. Since it was a slow news night, they used the "Huh, nothing much going on" story as filler. Nobody humiliated anyone. The fight they showed was a re-run from a previous year. You're just wound up over nothing. Who cares what the ****in date is assbag!! It is a REAL video! Multiple arrests! Did you read this statement?? Tacoma police lined the route, even cutting-off roads leading into the port. Still, the small group had a message. "We want to stop this cycle, anytime there is militarism in our community," said Jeff Berryhill. Sounds just like the wacko SF crowd doesn't it? They want NOTHING to do with anything involving military at all! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Liberals hard at work | DI | General | 19 | June 25th 07 07:16 PM |