A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Games Lanes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old July 31st 12, 07:30 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal
Dave - Cyclists VOR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,703
Default Games Lanes

On 31/07/2012 19:25, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 17:14, NM wrote:
On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote:



On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM

wrote:

On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:

Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you
now show up as
a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils
of the
working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know
what you are
all about?

The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been
since 2
February
2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059

Do keep up!

Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough.

Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal
Greenwich? If you
were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were
referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other
"Greenwich".

I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and
work in,
situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of
the
river thames.

I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire
borough
had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I
accept you
were misguided and hear your apology.

The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton.

I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal
district. I
cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case,
I am
not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal
Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory
glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your
reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to
know that
you were referring to parts of Lewisham?

Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you
really
think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you
seek?

Just trying to be clear.

And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal
Borough,
live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who
lives in
the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough.

Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford?

And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and
Bromley.

My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10
(Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been
approaching double.

House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never
heard of such a huge difference by postcode.

Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned,

http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann...


Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it
was in Lewisham.


It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished.


You are suggesting the Deptford has some sort of social status?


Of course Deptford has social status. Very low social status....

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster
University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking
and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail
to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their
lives, certainly on a regular basis."
Ads
  #132  
Old July 31st 12, 08:33 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal
NM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,854
Default Games Lanes

On Jul 31, 7:25*pm, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 17:14, NM wrote:



On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote:


On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:


Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you now show up as
a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils of the
working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know what you are
all about?


The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been since 2
February 2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059


Do keep up!


Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough.


Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal Greenwich? If you
were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were
referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other "Greenwich".


I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and work in,
situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of the
river thames.


I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire borough
had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I accept you
were misguided and hear your apology.


The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton.


I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal district. I
cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case, I am
not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal
Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory
glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your
reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to know that
you were referring to parts of Lewisham?


Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you really
think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you seek?


Just trying to be clear.


And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal Borough,
live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who lives in
the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough.


Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford?


And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and
Bromley.


My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10
(Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been
approaching double.


House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never
heard of such a huge difference by postcode.


Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned,


http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann....


Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it
was in Lewisham.


It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished.


You are suggesting the Deptford has some sort of social status?

--
Moving things in still pictures


Sadly these days yes, it has a history stretching back much further
than its relatively new Greenwich neighbour, shipbuilding, dockyard,
major port facilities etc. WW2 bombing of the docks and the resultant
social housing that do gooders and left wing loonies erected in the
flattened spaces plus the changing face of the man in the street have
all contributed to its descent. As I said when I moved out, and that
was years ago, "If I wanted to live in Kingston Jamacia I would move
there", that applies equally to Rawlpindi, Istanbul. Baghdad and a
myriad other places where our feast of cultural diversity originate
from.

I live in Cornwall now, nominally its part of England (though many
Cornish would not agree), London appears now as a different country.
  #133  
Old July 31st 12, 08:33 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal
NM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,854
Default Games Lanes

On Jul 31, 7:30*pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:
On 31/07/2012 19:25, ®i©ardo wrote:



On 31/07/2012 17:14, NM wrote:
On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote:


On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM

wrote:


On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:


Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you
now show up as
a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils
of the
working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know
what you are
all about?


The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been
since 2
February
2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059


Do keep up!


Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough.


Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal
Greenwich? If you
were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were
referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other
"Greenwich".


I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and
work in,
situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of
the
river thames.


I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire
borough
had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I
accept you
were misguided and hear your apology.


The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton.


I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal
district. I
cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case,
I am
not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal
Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory
glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your
reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to
know that
you were referring to parts of Lewisham?


Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you
really
think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you
seek?


Just trying to be clear.


And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal
Borough,
live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who
lives in
the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough.


Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford?


And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and
Bromley.


My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10
(Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been
approaching double.


House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never
heard of such a huge difference by postcode.


Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned,


http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann....


Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it
was in Lewisham.


It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished.


You are suggesting the Deptford has some sort of social status?


Of course Deptford has social status. *Very low social status....

About on par with the Medway towns

  #134  
Old July 31st 12, 08:41 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal
NM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,854
Default Games Lanes

On Jul 31, 7:19*pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:41:24 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:



On Jul 31, 6:03 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:14:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, i ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote:


On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:


Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you now show up as
a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils of the
working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know what you are
all about?


The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been since 2
February 2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059


Do keep up!


Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough.


Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal Greenwich? If you
were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were
referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other "Greenwich".


I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and work in,
situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of the
river thames.


I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire borough
had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I accept you
were misguided and hear your apology.


The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton.


I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal district. I
cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case, I am
not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal
Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory
glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your
reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to know that
you were referring to parts of Lewisham?


Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you really
think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you seek?


Just trying to be clear.


And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal Borough,
live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who lives in
the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough.


Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford?


And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and
Bromley.


My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10
(Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been
approaching double.


House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never
heard of such a huge difference by postcode.


Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned,


http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann...


Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it
was in Lewisham.


It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished.


Blackheath (most of it anyway) is in the LB of Lewisham.


A two bedroom townhouse in SE3 can go for anything up to 650,000.http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-...-34983076.html


Compare with Deptford, 250,000 for a comparable property:http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-...-34007608.html


Though I do note that the floor area in the Blackheath house is a
massive 110 square metres. The Deptford one is probably 60-80 sq
metres.


Nothing would ever induce me to move back there again.


My Deptford chum, who lives in Royal Greenwich, has one of these:http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-...-23433003.html


Well I'm ****ed, your mates flat is built on what was for many years a
scrapyard, we had a yard on the other side of the creek at Dreadnought
Wharf which has probably been redeveloped by now.
  #135  
Old July 31st 12, 10:23 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal
Bertie Wooster[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,958
Default Games Lanes

On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:41:16 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 31, 7:19*pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:41:24 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:



On Jul 31, 6:03 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:14:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, i ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote:


On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:


Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you now show up as
a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils of the
working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know what you are
all about?


The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been since 2
February 2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059


Do keep up!


Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough.


Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal Greenwich? If you
were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were
referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other "Greenwich".


I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and work in,
situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of the
river thames.


I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire borough
had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I accept you
were misguided and hear your apology.


The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton.


I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal district. I
cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case, I am
not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal
Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory
glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your
reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to know that
you were referring to parts of Lewisham?


Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you really
think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you seek?


Just trying to be clear.


And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal Borough,
live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who lives in
the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough.


Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford?


And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and
Bromley.


My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10
(Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been
approaching double.


House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never
heard of such a huge difference by postcode.


Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned,


http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann...


Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it
was in Lewisham.


It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished.


Blackheath (most of it anyway) is in the LB of Lewisham.


A two bedroom townhouse in SE3 can go for anything up to 650,000.http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-...-34983076.html


Compare with Deptford, 250,000 for a comparable property:http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-...-34007608.html


Though I do note that the floor area in the Blackheath house is a
massive 110 square metres. The Deptford one is probably 60-80 sq
metres.


Nothing would ever induce me to move back there again.


My Deptford chum, who lives in Royal Greenwich, has one of these:http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-...-23433003.html


Well I'm ****ed, your mates flat is built on what was for many years a
scrapyard, we had a yard on the other side of the creek at Dreadnought
Wharf which has probably been redeveloped by now.


650 luxury riverside flats:
http://www.newcapitalquay.com/Default.aspx

The big bonus for cyclists is that there is to be a shared use bascule
cycle/footbridge spanning Deptford Creek.

The development is probably 2 years from completion.

But that is nothing... The other side of the Pepys Estate, at Convoy's
Wharf, there are plans for 3,500 new homes.
  #136  
Old July 31st 12, 10:26 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal
Bertie Wooster[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,958
Default Games Lanes

On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:33:49 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 31, 7:30*pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:
On 31/07/2012 19:25, ®i©ardo wrote:



On 31/07/2012 17:14, NM wrote:
On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote:


On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM

wrote:


On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:


Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you
now show up as
a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils
of the
working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know
what you are
all about?


The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been
since 2
February
2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059


Do keep up!


Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough.


Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal
Greenwich? If you
were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were
referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other
"Greenwich".


I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and
work in,
situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of
the
river thames.


I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire
borough
had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I
accept you
were misguided and hear your apology.


The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton.


I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal
district. I
cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case,
I am
not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal
Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory
glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your
reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to
know that
you were referring to parts of Lewisham?


Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you
really
think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you
seek?


Just trying to be clear.


And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal
Borough,
live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who
lives in
the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough.


Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford?


And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and
Bromley.


My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10
(Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been
approaching double.


House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never
heard of such a huge difference by postcode.


Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned,


http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann...


Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it
was in Lewisham.


It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished.


You are suggesting the Deptford has some sort of social status?


Of course Deptford has social status. *Very low social status....

About on par with the Medway towns


Except Deptford has some pockets of charm.
  #137  
Old August 1st 12, 12:54 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal
Dave - Cyclists VOR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,703
Default Games Lanes

On 31/07/2012 22:26, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:33:49 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 31, 7:30 pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:
On 31/07/2012 19:25, ®i©ardo wrote:



On 31/07/2012 17:14, NM wrote:
On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote:

On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:

On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM

wrote:

On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:

Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you
now show up as
a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils
of the
working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know
what you are
all about?

The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been
since 2
February
2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059

Do keep up!

Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough.

Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal
Greenwich? If you
were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were
referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other
"Greenwich".

I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and
work in,
situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of
the
river thames.

I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire
borough
had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I
accept you
were misguided and hear your apology.

The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton.

I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal
district. I
cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case,
I am
not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal
Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory
glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your
reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to
know that
you were referring to parts of Lewisham?

Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you
really
think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you
seek?

Just trying to be clear.

And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal
Borough,
live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who
lives in
the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough.

Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford?

And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and
Bromley.

My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10
(Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been
approaching double.

House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never
heard of such a huge difference by postcode.

Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned,

http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann...

Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it
was in Lewisham.

It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished.

You are suggesting the Deptford has some sort of social status?

Of course Deptford has social status. Very low social status....

About on par with the Medway towns


Except Deptford has some pockets of charm.


Indeed it does. Deptford Castle, the finest Norman keep in the UK.
Deptford cathedral, built by Bishop Gundulf in 1083, Deptford High
Street home to a number of important historic buildings, the most
prominent of which are the Guildhall, the Corn Exchange, Restoration
House, Eastgate House. Many of the buildings in Deptford town centre
date from the 18th century or as early as the 14th century. The chapel
of St. Bartholomew's Hospital dates from the hospital's founding in 1078.

Not to mention Deptford Historic Dockyard which has played a vital role
supporting the Royal Navy for over 400 years.

From the Spanish Armada to the Falklands Crisis ships built, repaired
and manned from Deptford secured and maintained Britain’s command of the
world ocean’s and the global position it has today.

Ah yes, Deptford is the place to be - if you are a total ****wit like
Cwispie.

Not a history teacher obviously.

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster
University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking
and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail
to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their
lives, certainly on a regular basis."
  #138  
Old August 1st 12, 12:55 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal
Dave - Cyclists VOR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,703
Default Games Lanes

On 31/07/2012 20:33, NM wrote:
On Jul 31, 7:30 pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:
On 31/07/2012 19:25, ®i©ardo wrote:



On 31/07/2012 17:14, NM wrote:
On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote:


On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM

wrote:


On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:


Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you
now show up as
a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils
of the
working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know
what you are
all about?


The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been
since 2
February
2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059


Do keep up!


Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough.


Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal
Greenwich? If you
were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were
referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other
"Greenwich".


I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and
work in,
situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of
the
river thames.


I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire
borough
had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I
accept you
were misguided and hear your apology.


The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton.


I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal
district. I
cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case,
I am
not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal
Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory
glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your
reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to
know that
you were referring to parts of Lewisham?


Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you
really
think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you
seek?


Just trying to be clear.


And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal
Borough,
live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who
lives in
the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough.


Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford?


And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and
Bromley.


My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10
(Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been
approaching double.


House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never
heard of such a huge difference by postcode.


Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned,


http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann...


Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it
was in Lewisham.


It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished.


You are suggesting the Deptford has some sort of social status?


Of course Deptford has social status. Very low social status....

About on par with the Medway towns


And what paradise do you exist in ****wit?



--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster
University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking
and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail
to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their
lives, certainly on a regular basis."
  #139  
Old August 1st 12, 08:04 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal
NM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,854
Default Games Lanes

On Aug 1, 12:55*am, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:
On 31/07/2012 20:33, NM wrote:



On Jul 31, 7:30 pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:
On 31/07/2012 19:25, ®i©ardo wrote:


On 31/07/2012 17:14, NM wrote:
On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote:


On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM

wrote:


On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:


Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you
now show up as
a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils
of the
working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know
what you are
all about?


The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been
since 2
February
2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059


Do keep up!


Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough.


Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal
Greenwich? If you
were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were
referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other
"Greenwich".


I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and
work in,
situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of
the
river thames.


I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire
borough
had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I
accept you
were misguided and hear your apology.


The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton.


I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal
district. I
cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case,
I am
not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal
Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory
glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your
reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to
know that
you were referring to parts of Lewisham?


Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you
really
think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you
seek?


Just trying to be clear.


And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal
Borough,
live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who
lives in
the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough.


Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford?


And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and
Bromley.


My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10
(Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been
approaching double.


House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never
heard of such a huge difference by postcode.


Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned,


http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann...


Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it
was in Lewisham.


It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished.


You are suggesting the Deptford has some sort of social status?


Of course Deptford has social status. *Very low social status....


About on par with the Medway towns


And what paradise do you exist in ****wit?


Well as one ****wit to another I can tell you I live in two places.
one on my boat in a West Cornwall harbour and some of the time in
Amsterdam where we have a flat.
  #140  
Old August 1st 12, 08:45 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal
Dave - Cyclists VOR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,703
Default Games Lanes

On 01/08/2012 08:04, NM wrote:
On Aug 1, 12:55 am, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:
On 31/07/2012 20:33, NM wrote:



On Jul 31, 7:30 pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:
On 31/07/2012 19:25, ®i©ardo wrote:


On 31/07/2012 17:14, NM wrote:
On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, ®i©ardo wrote:
On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote:


On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM
wrote:


On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM

wrote:


On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster
wrote:


Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you
now show up as
a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils
of the
working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know
what you are
all about?


The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been
since 2
February
2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059


Do keep up!


Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough.


Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal
Greenwich? If you
were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were
referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other
"Greenwich".


I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and
work in,
situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of
the
river thames.


I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire
borough
had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I
accept you
were misguided and hear your apology.


The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton.


I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal
district. I
cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case,
I am
not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal
Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory
glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your
reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to
know that
you were referring to parts of Lewisham?


Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you
really
think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you
seek?


Just trying to be clear.


And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal
Borough,
live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who
lives in
the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough.


Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford?


And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and
Bromley.


My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10
(Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been
approaching double.


House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never
heard of such a huge difference by postcode.


Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned,


http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann...


Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it
was in Lewisham.


It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished.


You are suggesting the Deptford has some sort of social status?


Of course Deptford has social status. Very low social status....


About on par with the Medway towns


And what paradise do you exist in ****wit?


Well as one ****wit to another I can tell you I live in two places.
one on my boat in a West Cornwall harbour and some of the time in
Amsterdam where we have a flat.

Oh. A pikey. Makes sense.

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster
University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking
and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail
to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their
lives, certainly on a regular basis."
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
200 quid fine for cycling in 'Games Lanes' Mrcheerful[_2_] UK 27 June 22nd 11 03:22 PM
Free online Games play and free download – Intelligent games [email protected] UK 0 February 29th 08 11:38 AM
Free online Games play and free download - Intelligent games [email protected] General 0 February 29th 08 09:35 AM
"games lanes" eddiec Australia 6 March 8th 06 11:01 PM
Left Turn Lanes - split lanes or wait behing in the line ?? Ravi General 11 November 3rd 04 11:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.