#141
|
|||
|
|||
Games Lanes
On Aug 1, 8:45*am, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote: On 01/08/2012 08:04, NM wrote: On Aug 1, 12:55 am, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote: On 31/07/2012 20:33, NM wrote: On Jul 31, 7:30 pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote: On 31/07/2012 19:25, i ardo wrote: On 31/07/2012 17:14, NM wrote: On Jul 31, 2:38 pm, i ardo wrote: On 31/07/2012 10:13, NM wrote: On Jul 31, 8:49 am, Bertie Wooster wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:58:44 -0700 (PDT), NM wrote: On Jul 30, 9:22 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:28 -0700 (PDT), NM wrote: On Jul 30, 4:16 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:50:08 -0700 (PDT), NM wrote: On Jul 30, 2:31 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT), NM wrote: On Jul 30, 1:38 pm, Bertie Wooster wrote: Well there you go, I had you marked as a leftie but you now show up as a right wing capitalist looking to profit out of the toils of the working class, do your 'right on' chums in Greenwich know what you are all about? The borough is now known as Royal Greenwich, and has been since 2 February 2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16839059 Do keep up! Why? where does it say I was referring to the borough. Oh! Were you referring to somewhere other than Royal Greenwich? If you were please accept my sincere apologies, I had no idea you were referring to Greenwich Village in New York or some other "Greenwich". I was referring to Greenwich, the place I used to live and work in, situated between Deptford, and Blackheath on the south bank of the river thames. I was not aware the Royal addition to the name of the entire borough had in fact also been applied to the town as well, anyway I accept you were misguided and hear your apology. The SE10 postal district, is also bounded by Charlton. I now assume, that by "Greenwich Town" you mean the postal district. I cannot think of an alternative definition. If that is the case, I am not convinced that "Greenwich Town" falls entirely within Royal Greenwich. Small parts may well be in Lewisham. Indeed, a cursory glance at Street Map confirms that is the case. Therefore your reference to "Greenwich" was doubly befuddling: how was I to know that you were referring to parts of Lewisham? Why are you nitpicking, you know exactly what I meant, do you really think it's worth while to persue this? Is it brownie points you seek? Just trying to be clear. And for the record, most of my "chums" who live in the Royal Borough, live outside the SE10 postal district, including a "chum" who lives in the Deptford postal district but within the Royal Borough. Would you count that as Greenwich, Lewisham or Deptford? And Lee, my postal district, is in Lewisham, Royal Greenwich and Bromley. My old postal address was SE8, 200 yards up the road was SE10 (Greenwich) had my house been in SE10 it's value would have been approaching double. House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never heard of such a huge difference by postcode. Here is a picture of the first house I ever owned, http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/lewish.../deptford/tann... Bloody hell, even then they were in denial and trying to claim that it was in Lewisham. It is in Lewisham (LB of) that's why it's value is diminished. You are suggesting the Deptford has some sort of social status? Of course Deptford has social status. *Very low social status.... About on par with the Medway towns And what paradise do you exist in ****wit? Well as one ****wit to another I can tell you I live in two places. one on my boat in a West Cornwall harbour and some of the time in Amsterdam where we have a flat. Oh. *A pikey. *Makes sense. Are you a Silk clone or his sock puppet by any chance? |
Ads |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
Games Lanes
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 8:39:38 AM UTC, Judith wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:49:01 +0100, Bertie Wooster wrote: snip House prices in London can vary enormously by street, but I've never heard of such a huge difference by postcode. Insurance companies base their risk assessments on postcodes. This means that you can have a house on one side of a street in a "high risk" post code area - whereas the houses on the other side of the street are not so at risk. This leads to the change of desirability of houses in one post code area compared with another. Just because you have never heard of it doesn't not mean that it is not true. But we had already concluded that. There has been some debate about your gender, Judith. Do you have a fully functioning vagina or do you only have Dave and Benn? |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Games Lanes
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 03:07:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
snip There has been some debate about your gender, Judith. Do you have a fully functioning vagina or do you only have Dave and Benn? Ah yes - your main interest at last. How's things in alt.swingers? - still posting there on a regular basis? You sad and dirty *******. Are there any other groups you have an "interest" in? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
200 quid fine for cycling in 'Games Lanes' | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 27 | June 22nd 11 03:22 PM |
Free online Games play and free download – Intelligent games | [email protected] | UK | 0 | February 29th 08 11:38 AM |
Free online Games play and free download - Intelligent games | [email protected] | General | 0 | February 29th 08 09:35 AM |
"games lanes" | eddiec | Australia | 6 | March 8th 06 11:01 PM |
Left Turn Lanes - split lanes or wait behing in the line ?? | Ravi | General | 11 | November 3rd 04 11:11 PM |