|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Are we justififed to hate drivers?
Bill Sornson wrote, On 8/24/2009 11:39 PM:
David Green wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:09:13 -0700 (PDT), ComandanteBanana wrote: Could you people please stop replying to this moronic troll? TYVM. fu·til·i·ty * Pronunciation: \fyü-?ti-l?-te-\ * Function: noun 1 : the quality or state of being futile : uselessness 2 : a useless act or gesture 3 : engaging in discourse with anyone who takes his name from a tropical fruit -- Paul D Oosterhout I work for SAIC (but I don't speak for SAIC) |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Are we justified to hate ComandanteBanana?
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:49:23 -0500, Tom Sherman °_°
wrote: Yes indeed we are, for his cross-posted drivel. Hate is rarely justified. Pity, yes, and killfile for sure. Guy -- http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/urc | http://www.nohelmetlaw.org.uk/ "Nullius in Verba" - take no man's word for it. - attr. Horace, chosen by John Evelyn for the Royal Society |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Are we justififed to hate drivers?
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:08:52 -0400, "Still Just Me -"
wrote: Could you people please stop replying to this moronic troll? TYVM. Who, Sornson? Yeah, he is a brainwashed moron, but he can post here if he wants. The funny part is who Bill was replying to. Guy -- http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/urc | http://www.nohelmetlaw.org.uk/ "Nullius in Verba" - take no man's word for it. - attr. Horace, chosen by John Evelyn for the Royal Society |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Are we justififed to hate drivers?
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
The funny part is who Bill was replying to. You changed your user name just to post that? LOL Bill "back to plonkitude, dude" S. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Are we justified to hate ComandanteBanana?
ComandanteBanana wrote:
On Aug 24, 11:49 pm, Tom Sherman °_° wrote: Yes indeed we are, for his cross-posted drivel. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 Celebrity culture is an opposite of community, informing us that these few nonsense-heads matter but that the rest of us do not. - Jay Griffiths Maybe you don't like what I say, huh? We got the point about 500 messages ago. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 Celebrity culture is an opposite of community, informing us that these few nonsense-heads matter but that the rest of us do not. - Jay Griffiths |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Are we justififed to hate drivers?
On Aug 25, 5:48*pm, ComandanteBanana
wrote: On Aug 24, 10:27*pm, David Green wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:09:13 -0700 (PDT), ComandanteBanana wrote: (Psychiatrists advise you to let your frustration and hate out... so you become a man at peace. So here I go, I answer below) Now don't be silly. **No-one* on uk.rec.cycling, except for Doug and David Damerell, hates drivers. *Not in the least. So Guy Chapman supports every single anti-motorist measure, and every single car-related tax increase, and thinks drivers should be prosecuted for making way for emergency vehicles: so what? *He doesn't hate motorists. *He may *seem* to, in every way, but he says he doesn't, so he must be telling the truth (it's not like it's part of his agenda to lie about it). The same with Spindrift: he may always blame the motorist whenever there's a collision, and he may in every way *seem* to hate motorists, but he doesn't; after all, he says he doesn't, and he's such an obviously honest and balanced person that you simply must believe him. No-one on URC hates motorists except Doug 'n' Dave. *Keep saying it to yourself. *Dare to say otherwise and you'll be branded a "troll" for life and censored in the new censored group. *If the car-haters want to lie about hating cars because they believe that they'll get their anti-motorist measures more easily if they pretend they're for "safety" or "the environment" instead, then you'll just have to go along with their deception. *Or else. *You don't want to get on the wrong side of them...they're distinctly unhinged after all. Picture this old man I met at the bike shop. He rides his antique bike on the sidewalk, and this driver cuts him off, scrapes him and... goes to check his paint. Picture all those drivers who casually chat on the phone. Picture all who pass on the "slow" lane. Don't obstructively hog the "fast" lane, then. Can't have it both ways: either the slower ones should keep left and the faster ones should keep right, or neither is the case. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Are we justified to hate ComandanteBanana?
On Aug 25, 10:43*pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:49:23 -0500, Tom Sherman °_° wrote: Yes indeed we are, for his cross-posted drivel. Hate is rarely justified. So when are you going to attempt to justify your hatred of motorists? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Are we justififed to hate drivers?
On Aug 25, 4:41*pm, Paul O wrote:
Bill Sornson wrote, On 8/24/2009 11:39 PM: David Green wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:09:13 -0700 (PDT), ComandanteBanana wrote: Could you people please stop replying to this moronic troll? TYVM. fu·til·i·ty * Pronunciation: \fyü-?ti-l?-te-\ * Function: noun 1 : the quality or state of being futile : uselessness 2 : a useless act or gesture 3 : engaging in discourse with anyone who takes his name from a tropical fruit -- Paul D Oosterhout I work for SAIC (but I don't speak for SAIC) The tropical fruit is because I live in a tropical republic, aka Banana Republic. Also because it appeals to the monkey. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE 'FAST LANE' MEANS?
On Aug 26, 4:03*am, Nuxx Bar wrote:
On Aug 25, 5:48*pm, ComandanteBanana wrote: On Aug 24, 10:27*pm, David Green wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:09:13 -0700 (PDT), ComandanteBanana wrote: (Psychiatrists advise you to let your frustration and hate out... so you become a man at peace. So here I go, I answer below) Now don't be silly. **No-one* on uk.rec.cycling, except for Doug and David Damerell, hates drivers. *Not in the least. So Guy Chapman supports every single anti-motorist measure, and every single car-related tax increase, and thinks drivers should be prosecuted for making way for emergency vehicles: so what? *He doesn't hate motorists. *He may *seem* to, in every way, but he says he doesn't, so he must be telling the truth (it's not like it's part of his agenda to lie about it). The same with Spindrift: he may always blame the motorist whenever there's a collision, and he may in every way *seem* to hate motorists, but he doesn't; after all, he says he doesn't, and he's such an obviously honest and balanced person that you simply must believe him.. No-one on URC hates motorists except Doug 'n' Dave. *Keep saying it to yourself. *Dare to say otherwise and you'll be branded a "troll" for life and censored in the new censored group. *If the car-haters want to lie about hating cars because they believe that they'll get their anti-motorist measures more easily if they pretend they're for "safety" or "the environment" instead, then you'll just have to go along with their deception. *Or else. *You don't want to get on the wrong side of them...they're distinctly unhinged after all. Picture this old man I met at the bike shop. He rides his antique bike on the sidewalk, and this driver cuts him off, scrapes him and... goes to check his paint. Picture all those drivers who casually chat on the phone. Picture all who pass on the "slow" lane. Don't obstructively hog the "fast" lane, then. *Can't have it both ways: either the slower ones should keep left and the faster ones should keep right, or neither is the case.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - When THE FAST AND FURIOUS can be on ANY lane, you get CHAOS AND ANARCHY. And that's NOT very good for cyclists... As I was waiting for the bus with my bike, one of those ROARING BEASTS went by at insane speeds. Well, at least he was on the fast lane. I'd put this question to Americans to see if they know what this means... DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE 'FAST LANE' MEANS? I bet most people would say they heard it in expressions like, "I live in the fast lane," but nothing else. (And now let's get serious with politics --perhaps the only solution out CHAOS AND ANARCHY) The Liberal Lion dies You know who I'm talking about, "Ted" right? The point is that he was a lion of high class, from "cradle," so to speak, and yet he was for the underdog. And then there are "hungry lions," who get filthy rich by muddy means, who don't want to hear about sharing, case in point the debate over healthcare. So the hope is that these liberal lions (or even conservative lions) who are not hungry change the jungle --pretty much like the Europeans did-- before we descend into "chaos and anarchy." Well, we already have that on our roads... Of course, we may also have a revolution and that's a rather optimistic outlook. "Ted Kennedy, liberal lion of US politics" http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090826...20090826071911 |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Are we justified to hate ComandanteBanana?
On Aug 26, 4:04*am, Nuxx Bar wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:43*pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?" wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:49:23 -0500, Tom Sherman °_° wrote: Yes indeed we are, for his cross-posted drivel. Hate is rarely justified. So when are you going to attempt to justify your hatred of motorists? I hate them when they splash water all over me. Do you think it's always, UNintentional? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why drivers really hate cyclists | General Easterly | UK | 14 | April 29th 06 04:08 PM |
Drivers: How can you love something you hate so much? | Zoot Katz | General | 5 | August 16th 04 04:35 PM |