UCI and Doping solution

The following has been drafted by a member of the Eurosport Cycling forums.
It is suggested that it be sent to the UCI . Although we
disagree with doping. This does seem a logical way to instantly clean the
sport up,- while there is still time. Please forward to the the UCI. It
might just work!!

thanks

Jan



I would like to propose an idea of an amnesty for drug takers in the
sport. As is plainly obvious, the current system is not working, with
credibilty in cycling diminishing day by day. Therefore, I feel that an
amnesty would be a good option. It allows those who have doped in the past
to come out and admit it, without fear of being reprimanded and sponsors
pulling out, as is happening right now. Give them until a date to get clean,
then anyone caught should be thrown out of cycling for good. This gives them
no excuse and can make cycling credible again. I would dearly love to see
clean riders battling it out heart and mind against each other in the
knowledge that this is their physical limits and they really are trying.

On May 24, 1:25 pm, "Jan" wrote:
The following has been drafted by a member of the Eurosport Cycling forums.
It is suggested that it be sent to the UCI . Although we
disagree with doping. This does seem a logical way to instantly clean the
sport up,- while there is still time. Please forward to the the UCI. It
might just work!!

thanks

Jan

I would like to propose an idea of an amnesty for drug takers in the
sport. As is plainly obvious, the current system is not working, with
credibilty in cycling diminishing day by day. Therefore, I feel that an
amnesty would be a good option. It allows those who have doped in the past
to come out and admit it, without fear of being reprimanded and sponsors
pulling out, as is happening right now. Give them until a date to get clean,
then anyone caught should be thrown out of cycling for good. This gives them
no excuse and can make cycling credible again. I would dearly love to see
clean riders battling it out heart and mind against each other in the
knowledge that this is their physical limits and they really are trying.

Sounds like a plan to me, but will we ever trust the peloton again?
Let's give it a crack.

On 24 May 2007 05:58:24 -0700, wrote:

Sounds like a plan to me, but will we ever trust the peloton again?
Let's give it a crack.

That crack about crack was subtle...

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

On May 24, 8:25 am, "Jan" wrote:
The following has been drafted by a member of the Eurosport Cycling forums.
It is suggested that it be sent to the UCI . Although we
disagree with doping. This does seem a logical way to instantly clean the
sport up,- while there is still time. Please forward to the the UCI. It
might just work!!

thanks

Jan

I would like to propose an idea of an amnesty for drug takers in the
sport. As is plainly obvious, the current system is not working, with
credibilty in cycling diminishing day by day. Therefore, I feel that an
amnesty would be a good option. It allows those who have doped in the past
to come out and admit it, without fear of being reprimanded and sponsors
pulling out, as is happening right now. Give them until a date to get clean,
then anyone caught should be thrown out of cycling for good. This gives them
no excuse and can make cycling credible again. I would dearly love to see
clean riders battling it out heart and mind against each other in the
knowledge that this is their physical limits and they really are trying.

Who is going to provide the testing?
Perhaps it is not only the Peleton that has lost credibility - or did
LNDD never have credibility in the first place?

-bdbafh

On Thu, 24 May 2007 13:25:30 +0100, "Jan" wrote:

The following has been drafted by a member of the Eurosport Cycling forums.
It is suggested that it be sent to the UCI . Although we
disagree with doping. This does seem a logical way to instantly clean the
sport up,- while there is still time. Please forward to the the UCI. It
might just work!!

thanks

Jan



I would like to propose an idea of an amnesty for drug takers in the
sport. As is plainly obvious, the current system is not working, with
credibilty in cycling diminishing day by day. Therefore, I feel that an
amnesty would be a good option. It allows those who have doped in the past
to come out and admit it, without fear of being reprimanded and sponsors
pulling out, as is happening right now. Give them until a date to get clean,
then anyone caught should be thrown out of cycling for good. This gives them
no excuse and can make cycling credible again. I would dearly love to see
clean riders battling it out heart and mind against each other in the
knowledge that this is their physical limits and they really are trying.

NO.

The "throw 'em out for good" policy is why we've got this goddamn mess in the
first place. We already have that. Look at a calender and a racer's career
expectency the present policy is about the same. By the time a guy is winning
races he's in the fat part of his career and a 2 + 2 ban will have him out of it
and over.

If a doping charge ends a rider's career then no rider will ever admit or give
evidence against another.

How about just develop an intelligent, comprehensive and reasonable policy the
way other professional sports have and enforce it consistently, professionally
and without Dick Pound public accusations without evidence. Leave out the drama.

Ron

RonSonic wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 13:25:30 +0100, "Jan"
wrote:

The following has been drafted by a member of the Eurosport Cycling
forums. It is suggested that it be sent to the UCI .
Although we disagree with doping. This does seem a logical way to
instantly clean the sport up,- while there is still time. Please
forward to the the UCI. It might just work!!

thanks

Jan



I would like to propose an idea of an amnesty for drug takers in the
sport. As is plainly obvious, the current system is not working, with
credibilty in cycling diminishing day by day. Therefore, I feel that
an amnesty would be a good option. It allows those who have doped in
the past to come out and admit it, without fear of being reprimanded
and sponsors pulling out, as is happening right now. Give them until
a date to get clean, then anyone caught should be thrown out of
cycling for good. This gives them no excuse and can make cycling
credible again. I would dearly love to see clean riders battling it
out heart and mind against each other in the knowledge that this is
their physical limits and they really are trying.

NO.

The "throw 'em out for good" policy is why we've got this goddamn
mess in the first place. We already have that. Look at a calender and
a racer's career expectency the present policy is about the same. By
the time a guy is winning races he's in the fat part of his career
and a 2 + 2 ban will have him out of it and over.

I'm not to hot on American- English but
I do believe you are agreeing with us, on that point.



If a doping charge ends a rider's career then no rider will ever
admit or give evidence against another.

That's why we propose an amnesty


How about just develop an intelligent, comprehensive and reasonable
policy the way other professional sports have and enforce it
consistently, professionally and without Dick Pound public
accusations without evidence. Leave out the drama.

Like in Athletics, Baseball and American football? ;-)


Ron

On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:33:14 +0100, "Jan" wrote:

RonSonic wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 13:25:30 +0100, "Jan"
wrote:

The following has been drafted by a member of the Eurosport Cycling
forums. It is suggested that it be sent to the UCI .
Although we disagree with doping. This does seem a logical way to
instantly clean the sport up,- while there is still time. Please
forward to the the UCI. It might just work!!

thanks

Jan



I would like to propose an idea of an amnesty for drug takers in the
sport. As is plainly obvious, the current system is not working, with
credibilty in cycling diminishing day by day. Therefore, I feel that
an amnesty would be a good option. It allows those who have doped in
the past to come out and admit it, without fear of being reprimanded
and sponsors pulling out, as is happening right now. Give them until
a date to get clean, then anyone caught should be thrown out of
cycling for good. This gives them no excuse and can make cycling
credible again. I would dearly love to see clean riders battling it
out heart and mind against each other in the knowledge that this is
their physical limits and they really are trying.

NO.

The "throw 'em out for good" policy is why we've got this goddamn
mess in the first place. We already have that. Look at a calender and
a racer's career expectency the present policy is about the same. By
the time a guy is winning races he's in the fat part of his career
and a 2 + 2 ban will have him out of it and over.

I'm not to hot on American- English but
I do believe you are agreeing with us, on that point.

No, I am very strongly disagreeing with the idea of a permanent ban. It is
counterproductive.

If a doping charge ends a rider's career then no rider will ever
admit or give evidence against another.

That's why we propose an amnesty

And what about next year or the year after and five years after that. A
draconian penalty that is rarely enforced and difficult to enforce will have
poorer results than a mild penalty that is easy to enforce reliably.

How about just develop an intelligent, comprehensive and reasonable
policy the way other professional sports have and enforce it
consistently, professionally and without Dick Pound public
accusations without evidence. Leave out the drama.

Like in Athletics, Baseball and American football? ;-)

Yes. All of those have drug problems - all of humanity has drug problems. But
all of which have far less drug problem than does bike racing. That they are
imperfect and serve up the occasional scandal does not make them bad examples
for a sport that seems to live in a state of perpetual disgrace.

Baseball, Football, Metric Football have nothing like the disaster that cycling
is going through.


Ron

Ron

Effect pedal demo's up at http://www.soundclick.com/ronsonicpedalry

In article ,
RonSonic wrote:

On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:33:14 +0100, "Jan" wrote:

RonSonic wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 13:25:30 +0100, "Jan"
wrote:

Like in Athletics, Baseball and American football? ;-)

Yes. All of those have drug problems - all of humanity has drug problems. But
all of which have far less drug problem than does bike racing. That they are
imperfect and serve up the occasional scandal does not make them bad examples
for a sport that seems to live in a state of perpetual disgrace.

Baseball, Football, Metric Football have nothing like the disaster that
cycling is going through.

I suspect that those other sports may have as much or more drug *use* than cycling
but they certainly have a lesser drug *problem* due to the way they've handled it.
The very public airing of the laundry in cycling hasn't helped the public's view of
the situation at all. I wonder if there are any polls out there that might show how
people feel about it (particularly in Europe).

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

On May 24, 10:17 am, RonSonic wrote:

The "throw 'em out for good" policy is why we've got this goddamn mess in the
first place. We already have that. Look at a calender and a racer's career
expectency the present policy is about the same. By the time a guy is winning
races he's in the fat part of his career and a 2 + 2 ban will have him out of it
and over.

Hmmm. I see where you're going - in utero doping. Get them started
early so when they get suspended, they're only 20.

R

"Jan" a écrit dans le message de news:
...
The following has been drafted by a member of the Eurosport Cycling
forums.
It is suggested that it be sent to the UCI . Although we
disagree with doping. This does seem a logical way to instantly clean the
sport up,- while there is still time. Please forward to the the UCI. It
might just work!!

thanks

Jan



I would like to propose an idea of an amnesty for drug takers in the
sport. As is plainly obvious, the current system is not working, with
credibilty in cycling diminishing day by day. Therefore, I feel that an
amnesty would be a good option. It allows those who have doped in the past
to come out and admit it, without fear of being reprimanded and sponsors
pulling out, as is happening right now. Give them until a date to get
clean, then anyone caught should be thrown out of cycling for good. This
gives them no excuse and can make cycling credible again. I would dearly
love to see clean riders battling it out heart and mind against each other
in the knowledge that this is their physical limits and they really are
trying.


I agree with the idea of the amnesty for the drug takers as soon as the
cheaters give the stolen money back.