|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
Joe Cipale? As if that's your real name. What a dumbass! While your at
it, why not give full disclosure of all your personal information dumbass including your social security number, credit card number, expiration date, PIN, and mother's maiden name. "Joe Cipale" wrote in message ... I do not give a damn what you people say about this post...... It means nothing to my life I love worthless, cowardly POS trolls who dont have the courage to post a REAL email address in their electronic flatulation. Makes it sooooo much easier to place them in the electronic waste basket of stupdidity where they belong. At least kunuch has the cajones to use a real email address. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
This means you are a dumbass!
"Joe Cipale" wrote in message ... Wind energy is a domestic source of energy, produced in the United States. The nation's wind supply is abundant. Especially when Congress is in session... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:31:25 GMT, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com
wrote: That's because you don't understand the issues. And I'm tired of explaining it to you since you don't really want to know anything about it. You only want to pretend that the USA is composed of evil people who should be stopped at everything they're doing. You seem to prefer those nice honest Al Qaida members. And you appear to believe that everyone in the USA is incapable of doing anything that rises above their own self-interest. Frankly, I've never known anyone with such a constant low opinion of US citizens in particular and the human race in general. I'm starting to think that the reason you hold us liberals in such low esteem is that some of them were on a sidewalk on their own time once, protesting for a cause other than their own self-interest, and they slowed you down for a second or two - no doubt enough reason to hold a grudge for a lifetime. At least be consistent. If your issue that nothing is needed to be done and nothing is really all that wrong, don't quote an article that, in fact, proposes action. If it ain't people, then the people can keep right on keeping on, just as they are. I happen to disagree, especially if the concern is that we will only have two TVs in every house rather than three. I think our economy will adapt to all that un-American conservatism. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
On 11 Feb 2007 23:14:25 -0800, "
wrote: it however does not say that "trying to hold down CO2 emission would end up costing millions or even billions of lives". that part is invented by you. If TK had ever shown the inclination towards hyperbole, I could mark it down to that. But every time I made that assumption in the past, he ended up being dead serious (and defending the hyperbole for days if not weeks, maybe years). I guess that he expects to hear sometime in the future a broadcast along the lines of, "Today the loss in lives due to CO2 emissions reduction passed the 900 million mark, but the U.N and its U.S. liberal lackeys have vowed to hold the course..." I think a Chung chart showing worst case intersection between "lost lives" and and resulting reduced CO2 emissions from just the reduction in population alone would be useful. With luck, we can go back to our former ways when only 400 or 500 million are dead. We liberals are an optimistic lot. Curtis L. Russell Practicing liberal asshole... |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
On Feb 11, 10:41 pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
At the basis of the global warming hysteria (snip) Hysteria??? Hysteria??? Here's *your* hysteria right he http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbcctWbC8Q0 --D-y |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
Tom Kunich wrote:
At the basis of the global warming hysteria is the idea that man is causing it and that therefore man is evil. No. The basis of the concern is that the contribution man makes is accelerating the warming. Nobody thinks that man alone is the sole cause of this. -paul |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
Dude, I expect it won't be long before we read about your exploits with an
attack rifle from a bell tower somewhere. Seriously, you are in need of major psychiatric assistance. Hopefully, one of your friends or loved ones will help you get the help that you need. "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote in message k.net... At the basis of the global warming hysteria is the idea that man is causing it and that therefore man is evil. The fact that trying to hold down CO2 emissions would end up costing millions if not billions of lives just doesn't seem to register on the do-gooders who are convinced that all we have to do is turn the therostat down to 68 and we'll all be fine. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0207171745.htm "The science policy experts, writing in the Feb. 8, 2007 issue of Nature, say adapting to the changing climate by building resilient societies and fostering sustainable development would go further in securing a future for humans on a warming planet than just cutting gas emissions." ""To define adaptation as the cost of failed mitigation is to expose millions of poor people in compromised ecosystems to the very dangers that climate policy seeks to avoid," the authors state. "By contrast, defining adaptation in terms of sustainable development, would allow a focus both on reducing emissions and on the vulnerability of populations to climate variability and change, rather than tinkering at the margins of both emissions and impacts." Nahh, I'm pretty sure that the Liberals would much rather just kill off 2/3rds of the world's population. That way their homes in the Marin Redwoods would remain unchanged. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
"Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote in message
k.net... At the basis of the global warming hysteria is the idea that man is causing Caught your limit on that one, Tom. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
"Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in message
oups.com... On Feb 11, 10:26 pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote: Would you rather pay American engineers from General Electric to build windfarms or pay Saudi Arabian princes $70/barrel for oil? In the 1930's the Morgan Company built the world's biggest wind generator. Until a decade ago it was the largest on record. It was also as efficient as the most modern one's today. Dude, you're an idiot. 1930's tech=2000 tech? No, I'm an engineer - what was it you said you do for a living again? Oh, that's right - you're an inheritance baby. That's like saying the propellor of a 1930s plane moves air as efficiently as a modern jet turbine (the same fluid dynamics advances apply to both turbines that move air and turbines that are moved by air). You really don't have a clue do you? Maybe you'd like to explain why most of the early aerodynamic sections in the design book were put there by the Wright brothers? Wait, - obviously because they were stupid and today's air is a lot different from that of 1905. Here's a clue Henry - if you don't understand what you're talking about perhaps you ought to study the subject beyond a wikipedia entry. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
What - Intelligent Thought?
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:12:23 GMT, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com
wrote: Here's a clue Henry - if you don't understand what you're talking about perhaps you ought to study the subject beyond a wikipedia entry. I guess that's why an article in today's online WSJ says that wind-driven turbines (and geothermal generation) are both close to being economically viable even without subsidies and that with economies of larger scale production of the turbines and a reduction in the current financing penalty paid on both, they both may be viable in the near future - without subsidies. Ten barrels to make one - who did our math? Kind of reminds me of the new ESPN commercial, the 'talking out of your ass' one. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anybody care to say something intelligent about Landis' web defense ? | [email protected] | Racing | 21 | October 14th 06 02:15 PM |
[totally OT] NYT Article about Intelligent Design | Ernst Noch | Racing | 63 | September 1st 05 06:25 PM |
Intelligent comment | Mikefule | Unicycling | 25 | July 21st 05 03:05 AM |
more intelligent computers | Miles | General | 7 | December 8th 04 12:52 AM |
The Neanderthals: More Intelligent than Mountain Bikers! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 7 | September 30th 03 04:55 PM |