|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
AG: on controlling the lane
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:06:15 -0500, Duane
wrote: On 12/18/2014 6:10 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:18:27 -0500, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 12/17/2014 7:52 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote: While, hopefully, one can control oneself it is doubtful that one can control outside events, or certainly not consistently. Hmm. I think you may mean "not absolutely perfectly." I've been using "lane control" (i.e. primary position) when necessary since about 1977. It's never gotten me hit, I've never heard anyone coming from behind claim they didn't see me. I'd say it certainly works consistently. My experience is that people do amazingly stupid things and riding, or driving, in front of someone with the thought that, "Oh! He'll see me and he won't hit me", is ludicrous. Well, in a car or on a motorcycle, what do you do when you see another motor vehicle - say, a large truck - approach quickly from behind? As mentioned, a few years ago within about 15 miles of me we had a couple Marines and three recruits killed when a trucker ran into the rear of their car at a stop light. And yet, to this day, I see people driving in front of large trucks, and even sitting stopped at traffic lights when trucks approach from the rear. Maybe those people should be driving off the road? One of the most common statement I read in cases of motor vehicle bicycle confrontations is, "I didn't see him". Good reason to ride in a more visible position. Works for me! As I've said before, my worst close call was back in about 1977, when I was still an edge rider. It was a narrowly averted left hook by a motorist who didn't see me in the roadside clutter of parked cars, etc. After that, I learned to stay where I was conspicuous, and had more room to maneuver. The problem with all the I did this or I did that is, at least in California, the cyclists seem to be the culprits. See: http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/...es-statistics/ Which says that in the cases where the police can establish guilt the cyclist is the guilty party in the majority of the cases. Excerpt: In 2011, officers determined fault in 701 crashes between a bicyclist and a motorist in which a cyclist was hurt or killed, according to the reports, submitted to California's Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. Cyclists were found to be the party most at fault in 390 of those crashes, or 56 percent of the time. In 2012, bicyclists were deemed to be at fault 60 percent of the time, in 2013, 56 percent of the time and as of the date of the report, 57 percent in 2014. Perhaps the battle cry should be "Obey the law" rather than "Take the Lane". And when the law is to not take the lane? Here you can only take the lane if you're merging for a left turn or avoiding obstacles otherwise you must "keep to the extreme right" to quote the highway code. So if you're not to the extreme right, not avoiding an obstacle and not turning and you get hit you would be deemed to be at fault. Which is pretty unusual in that normally when someone is hit from behind, it's the hitter and not the "hittee" who is at fault. To me the legality is secondary. If I think by moving to the center I can be safer in some situation I will do it. Better to fight a ticket than an undertaker. I just don't think it's a panacea. I think in most cases if the idiot is going to run you over in a bike lane where he isn't supposed to be, he's likely going to run you over in the center where you're not supposed to be. We've had two death by trucks here recently. One was a woman run over from behind when in the lane. Driver didn't know he hit her until he hear a thump thump under his car. The other was a right hook where a truck passed a cyclist and then turned right running over the rider. Didn't know he hit the rider until a witness flagged him down blocks later. Would a bike lane have save the first woman? Would taking the lane have saved the second guy? Who knows? While probably denied as anecdotal the "I didn't see 'em" accidents you mention would seem to demonstrate that taking the lane can be a risky endeavor. Perhaps the battle cry should be changed from "Seize the Lane" to "Stay out of their way". -- Cheers, John B. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Speeding cyclist mows down elderly jogger | Mrcheerful | UK | 10 | February 13th 14 11:43 PM |
Cyclist:0 Disabled granny:1 | Mrcheerful[_3_] | UK | 1 | June 13th 13 09:15 PM |
Hit & run cyclist injures elderly woman on pavement | John Benn | UK | 25 | August 19th 12 09:33 AM |
cyclist says injured granny should not be on pavement! | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 5 | June 13th 10 07:37 PM |
Cyclist hits granny in pavement crash in Brighton | [email protected] | UK | 167 | February 1st 09 11:44 AM |