More dumb**** liberals...

On Aug 13, 7:08*pm, ST wrote:


NO WAIT?!?!?!?!

Was the country under attack or was it an inside job by the dumbest
president in history???!???

Damn! I cannot keep you wackjobs theories straight anymore...

Ah yes, what passes for an intelligent comment by a Bush supporter.
No wonder the country is such a mess.
-Paul

On Aug 13, 8:51*pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
"Bill C" wrote in message

...



*Normally I have to pay for this kind of comedy.

He can keep it up as long as you can.

I know, but I'm willing to admit I'm an idiot, and compulsive with
this crap. It's like watching a slow motion train wreck. There's
nothing you can do to prevent, or even alter it, but can't stop
watching it either.
Finished up our kids series, for the year, last Monday and did the
Ma. Special Olympics cycling this last weekend, and that's still the
best race weekend of the year IMO.
Working what should be a pretty good race Saturday, with a good crew.
Be nice to get back out there. Back's been miserable so I'm not riding
much, but had to try and work a race. Looking forward to doing some
cross where I'm not stuck in a car and can work around the back
easier.
That's pretty much why I've been sitting here reading and posting so
much crap for the last week or two. Not capable of a lot else, or even
this for very long at a time.
To combine the politics with the cycling:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalra...dent-bush.html
Bill C

On Aug 13, 7:42*pm, Bill C wrote:
On Aug 13, 8:51*pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:

"Bill C" wrote in message

....

*Normally I have to pay for this kind of comedy.

He can keep it up as long as you can.

I know, but I'm willing to admit I'm an idiot, and compulsive with
this crap.

George Bush's reaction on 9/11 is not crap- it's a historic moment.
You can see the President of the United States being informed that
"America is under attack!" and watch his reaction. It's George Bush's
Chappaquiddick. Here's a still: http://www.nobeliefs.com/politics/BushGetsTheNews.jpg

But this is crap:
" I'm so amused at your babbling about SLBM's and flight time when you
claimed that was BS when I brought that up in the TK was right thread
regarding the relocation of air assets off the coasts."

The SLBM threat is an example of why the President has to react
quickly when informed that "America is under attack." The
interceptor fiasco is irrelevant to Bush's performance.

Suppose you're sitting in a classroom and the teacher tells you
there's a fire. If you're George Bush you just sit there. If you're a
normal person you get off your ass, pull the fire alarm, tell the
teacher to get the kids out and call 911, grab a fire extinguisher and
try to put it out. Suppose the fire extinguisher doesn't work. That's
not your fault. Maybe you grab a wastebasket, get water from a
restroom and put it out that way, or otherwise improvise and do what
seems necessary.

That non-functional fire extinguisher is analogous to the interceptor
situation. What you're saying is that it would be OK if George Bush
sat on his ass in that hypothetical situation because it turned out
that the fire extinguisher didn't work. Bull****. The Marines know
what to do: "Improvise- Adapt- Overcome". They didn't bother to
include "get off your friggin' ass" because for normal people that's a
given.
-Paul

On Aug 14, 12:14*pm, "Paul G." wrote:
On Aug 13, 7:42*pm, Bill C wrote:

On Aug 13, 8:51*pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:

"Bill C" wrote in message

....

*Normally I have to pay for this kind of comedy.

He can keep it up as long as you can.

I know, but I'm willing to admit I'm an idiot, and compulsive with
this crap.


I was referring to my bothing to discuss this crap, nothing more or
less. Bush could've put on a beter show that morning to make you happy
I guess. I'm willing to bet a criticom went out immediately, but
that's classified. They scrambled what they had. Letting the Saudis
fly around and then out was pretty damn close to criminal IMO, but you
really should just get a life size "Flat Daddy" of Al Haig and snuggle
it.
He's your kinda man it would seem.
Bill C
-Paul

On Aug 14, 10:16*am, Bill C wrote:
On Aug 14, 12:14*pm, "Paul G." wrote:

On Aug 13, 7:42*pm, Bill C wrote:

On Aug 13, 8:51*pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:

"Bill C" wrote in message

...

*Normally I have to pay for this kind of comedy.

He can keep it up as long as you can.

I know, but I'm willing to admit I'm an idiot, and compulsive with
this crap.

I was referring to my bothing to discuss this crap, nothing more or
less. Bush could've put on a beter show that morning to make you happy
I guess. I'm willing to bet a criticom went out immediately, but
that's classified. They scrambled what they had. Letting the Saudis
fly around and then out was pretty damn close to criminal IMO, but you
really should just get a life size "Flat Daddy" of Al Haig and snuggle
it.
*He's your kinda man it would seem.

Haig was never president, but he was a take-charge guy, maybe to a
fault. I kind of like Wes Clark- a guy who knows how to win a war.
Petraeus is similarly impressive. George Bush is president, but
wouldn't make a pimple on the ass of any of them.

People used to say of Bush "What a leader!" They'd be talking about
Bush reading a speech someone else wrote, or a stage-managed photo op
choreographed by Karl Rove- the bullhorn on the rubble, dressing up in
a flight suit with a "Mission Accomplished" banner in the background,
etc.

No one says "What a leader!" any more. The beauty of the infamous
"America is under attack" incident is it's pure Bush. Karl Rove isn't
telling Bush what to do. Dick Cheney is not pulling the strings. The
CIA can't be blamed for "bad intel".

It's just George Bush and how he handles the news that "America is
under attack." It's the most pathetic example of "leadership" I've
ever seen. It's as if Cancellara froze in the starting gate of the
time trial.
-Paul

On Aug 14, 2:29*pm, "Paul G." wrote:
On Aug 14, 10:16*am, Bill C wrote:





On Aug 14, 12:14*pm, "Paul G." wrote:

On Aug 13, 7:42*pm, Bill C wrote:

On Aug 13, 8:51*pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:

"Bill C" wrote in message

...

*Normally I have to pay for this kind of comedy.

He can keep it up as long as you can.

I know, but I'm willing to admit I'm an idiot, and compulsive with
this crap.

I was referring to my bothing to discuss this crap, nothing more or
less. Bush could've put on a beter show that morning to make you happy
I guess. I'm willing to bet a criticom went out immediately, but
that's classified. They scrambled what they had. Letting the Saudis
fly around and then out was pretty damn close to criminal IMO, but you
really should just get a life size "Flat Daddy" of Al Haig and snuggle
it.
*He's your kinda man it would seem.

Haig was never president, but he was a take-charge guy, maybe to a
fault. *I kind of like Wes Clark- a guy who knows how to win a war.
Petraeus is similarly impressive. George Bush is president, but
wouldn't make a pimple on the ass of any of them.

People used to say of Bush "What a leader!" *They'd be talking about
Bush reading a speech someone else wrote, or a stage-managed photo op
choreographed by Karl Rove- the bullhorn on the rubble, dressing up in
a flight suit with a "Mission Accomplished" banner in the background,
etc.

No one says "What a leader!" any more. *The beauty of the infamous
"America is under attack" incident is it's pure Bush. *Karl Rove isn't
telling Bush what to do. Dick Cheney is not pulling the strings. *The
CIA can't be blamed for "bad intel".

It's just George Bush and how he handles the news that "America is
under attack." * *It's the most pathetic example of "leadership" I've
ever seen. *It's as if Cancellara froze in the starting gate of the
time trial.
-Paul- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What war did Wes Clark win?

On 8/14/08 1:55 PM, in article
, "Scott"
wrote:

On Aug 14, 2:52*pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
"Scott" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 2:29 pm, "Paul G." wrote:
I kind of like Wes Clark- a guy who knows how to win a war.

What war did Wes Clark win?

You know - the war of words.

I'm guessing Paul was referring to the roaring success of Nato forces
in Kosovo. Not exactly winning a war, but who knows. Paul has a
different standard for leadership that many.


Just like the Russians kickin butt in Georgia. It is an expected result.

"Scott" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 2:29 pm, "Paul G." wrote:
I kind of like Wes Clark- a guy who knows how to win a war.
What war did Wes Clark win?

"Scott" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 2:29 pm, "Paul G." wrote:
I kind of like Wes Clark- a guy who knows how to win a war.

What war did Wes Clark win?

You know - the war of words.

On Aug 14, 2:52*pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:
"Scott" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 2:29 pm, "Paul G." wrote:
I kind of like Wes Clark- a guy who knows how to win a war.

What war did Wes Clark win?

You know - the war of words.

I'm guessing Paul was referring to the roaring success of Nato forces
in Kosovo. Not exactly winning a war, but who knows. Paul has a
different standard for leadership that many.