|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On 22 Jul 2005 22:11:06 -0700, "NYC XYZ" wrote:
Hank Wirtz wrote: You're paying attention to a 4-oz difference in weight, then contemplating putting on a 4-lb saddle? (FWIW, my sister-in-law has that saddle, and I guess she likes it, but it weighs more than her rear wheel). Holy Hell's Angels, that weighs more than my ass! Thanks for the info...hmm...wonder if there are any ergonomic seats that are very light? "In some distant land it is possible that bicycle seats are made out of rainbow and stuffed with cloud. In this world it's easier to just get used to something hard." Heres the deal, upright position puts more weight on your ass it also forces your legs around the saddle at an awkward angle unless you set the seat too low. Which puts yet more weight on your ass and kills your pedalling efficiency. That big sofa-like saddle will require that you set it low. There is no reason for a saddle like that to be light. It simply cannot be fast anyway. Low weight does not equal performance, except maybe psychologically. If you want to shave grams, pee before you ride. That's about the difference we're talking here. Performance is going to come from having a good-fitting bike that you ride a whole bunch. LOL -- of course! But the fit being equal, how do the specs read to you? I don't know why they bother with Shimano this and Bontrager that...do even the "pros" know what it means?? Reads like mattress advertising.... Fit is never equal. As for all the brand names and model numbers, aren't you the guy whining that the components might not be adequate to your demands. If you want to be a weenie and fuss about that sort of thing, then get weenie about it and fuss about that sort of thing. I'm a fast rider...I can keep up with my messenger friend who races on the weekends (though we've never actually raced per se, given our very different bikes). I say this so that you know I'm not stuck on components like they were magic or something. In this particular case, my natural inclination is to get the flat-bar bike, but it seems like the componentry on the drop-bar may be substantially better. Better for WHAT? For WHOM? How good do the parts have to be. Shimano LX is perfectly adequate for pounding through the mountains why won't is suffice for you? Like I say, fit is really the most important thing, and if you say you want comfort and performance, you are not likely to get either from a bike you can't test-ride first. Get yourself into a LBS and have them find you something that is just right for you. They can swap out stems and handlebars and seats (for a small upcharge usually, sometimes they'll do even trades) and get it dialled in. Mail-order shops can't do that for you. Only problem is that these particular bikes sound like real sweet deals and aren't available except online from the manufacturer. You don't know enough about bikes to be buying that way. Bottom line. What's the big deal with the "fit," though? An 18" frame is an 18"...and the seat posts adjust, etc. I really wanted to know what the components of the drop-bar are like compared to those of the flat-bar. No, an 18" mountain bike is not the same as an 18" comfort bike and not at all like an 18" drop bar road bike. The components are different to suit the fact that they are on entirely different styles of bike. They are perfectly good components and work far better than you ride. As far as caliper brakes...why not? These aren't mountain bikes. They're light enough and strong enough for 100% of the TDF field, and those guys descend at 50 mph. The _only_ reason they don't use them on dirt bikes is for tire clearance. I thought the V-brakes stop better? I went from cantilever brakes on a chromoly to the old Trek 7500 (the old one, not the current one -- why did they change the frame geometry? It seems like everyone's hybrid line has got the angled top tube now) with aluminum and V-brakes...cool stuff. How bad do you need to stop? Calipers work fine for what they are. Sorry if you're getting dogpiled here, but you really should do some test rides of both flat- and drop-bar bikes before you try to make your decision based on Ti vs. Al or 18.2 vs. 18.6. I'm sure I won't like drop-bars since I think the typical flat-bar forces me to hunch over as it is! I always raise the headset (correct term?) myself...upright means comfort! Upright means slow and your ass hurts. To answer your overall question, I'd go for the drop-bar bike, but that's because I like drop bars, not because of its componentry or frame material. I suppose I could always raise the drop-bars too? When hunched over, my back really becomes the rear suspension! Use your legs. What's it mean that the Airborne Thunderbolt comes in 10-speed (is that right, only ten speeds????) "double" or 10-speed "triple"???? Ten cogs times whatever's at the front. Ron |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
maxo wrote: A quality steel frame weighs about a pound more than a ti or carbon frame. Not insisting that you go with steel, but go with the frame that's got the feel that you like, no matter what the material. Weight's a hell of a lot more important when it comes to wheels. Ah, another misconception clarified! Thanks...now, how would anyone tell whether it's a "quality" steel frame?? When you see a carbon or ti bike built up with an advertised spec of something crazy like 15 pounds, it's due to all the components being the lightest of of breed, not just the frame. Oh yes, I totally realize that...that aluminum Thunderbolt is actually slightly lighter than the titanium hybrid! Is titanium a better material, generally? I'm thinking of the Thunderbolt Triple now, even though my first impluse was towards the titanium hybrid.... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Gooserider wrote: Aluminum can be SCARY light, and steel isn't 5-10 pounds heavier. Try 1-2 pounds. So what's generally lighter, all other things (frame geometry, etc.) being equal -- ti, carbon fiber, aluminum, or quality steel? I'm sure you couldn't stand to lose 5 pounds off your body, right? Hehehe...5'11" and 230 lbs. -- I was statistically overweight for my age and height even at my best shape of 185 lbs.! If you want to be comfortable, frame material is the least of your concern. Well, part of comfort for me would be not carrying so many pounds, whether portaging over stairs or climbing long New Jersey hills! Tire size and frame geometry have far more to do with it. Frame geometry affects weight?? That being said, don't you wonder why so many touring bikes are STEEL? :-) LOL -- didn't know they were! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Gooserider wrote: Airborne is fine, if you don't mind buying a Chinese bicycle. Indeed! Oddly enough, Airborne notes on its website that although the frame comes from a Chinese aerospace and satellite company (?!), their bikes still qualify under US Trade regulations as American Made! I don't support communist dictatorships. This is so interesting...what Red China products do you do without, and what do you substitute them with? Like everything's made there these days. I own three Taiwanese bikes, and an American bike. The American bike is head and shoulders above the Taiwanese quality wise, but it was far more expensive, too. I wouldn't buy the Airborne, but that's purely on an ethical level. I'm sure the quality is fine. Are you sure those so-called "Taiwanese" bikes aren't perhaps made in some mainland China factory? I understand everybody's got factories in China. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Zoom wrote: I don't mind buying Chinese bikes, I have three of them from this manufacturer. Whether a dictatorship is communist or capitalist is all the same to me. Indeed! As GEN Patton said of the Soviets and Nazis -- "it's just like the Democrats and Republicans!" Seriously...the country winds up going to war whether you care for it or not. My titanium mountain bike has taken a pounding and is still going strong. Is titanium inherently stronger than aluminum or carbon fiber? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
RonSonic wrote: "In some distant land it is possible that bicycle seats are made out of rainbow and stuffed with cloud. In this world it's easier to just get used to something hard." Ah, straight out of the '80s Charmin commercial! Heres the deal, upright position puts more weight on your ass it also forces your legs around the saddle at an awkward angle unless you set the seat too low. Which puts yet more weight on your ass and kills your pedalling efficiency. That big sofa-like saddle will require that you set it low. There is no reason for a saddle like that to be light. It simply cannot be fast anyway. Ah, yes, conventional wisdom. That's why it's so hard for me to find a "comfort bike" with "performance" specs! Fit is never equal. We're talking theory, here, and necessarily so, since there's no exact way to quantify "comfort" and "fit," least not over usenet! As for all the brand names and model numbers, aren't you the guy whining that the components might not be adequate to your demands. If you want to be a weenie and fuss about that sort of thing, then get weenie about it and fuss about that sort of thing. ??? Better for WHAT? For WHOM? How good do the parts have to be. Shimano LX is perfectly adequate for pounding through the mountains why won't is suffice for you? I'm asking the questions, and if you hear them, then I'm obviously soliciting your opinion, as I haven't a clue what Shimano-this and Bontrager-that means. You don't know enough about bikes to be buying that way. Bottom line. It's true I'm a noob when it comes to technical stuff like this, which is why I'm asking here! Thing is, I do know I don't want some pig-heavy Huffy from Walmart, if you take my meaning.... No, an 18" mountain bike is not the same as an 18" comfort bike and not at all like an 18" drop bar road bike. Which is why I'd noted earlier about "all other things being equal" -- an 18" comfort bike is not different in that respect than another 18" comfort bike. Of course, I'm asking about a hybrid and a road bike, and I know there are differences...just wanted to pick your brains for any I may have missed, noob that I am. The components are different to suit the fact that they are on entirely different styles of bike. They are perfectly good components and work far better than you ride. ? On my old Trek 7500, I must have put $500 worth of "work" into it over about eight years...new cables, chains, cranksets, etc. I really wear things out! But I can't imagine riding any other way -- don't see what I might be doing wrong, if I'm prematurely wearing parts out somehow. How bad do you need to stop? Calipers work fine for what they are. Let's put it this way...I was riding like an NYC messenger in midtown rush-hour traffic before I actually did it for a summer spell! =) Upright means slow and your ass hurts. That's intersting! I understand the "slow" part -- but I ain't racing, just wanted as "fast" as possible given how I ride (which means components, etc., to my way of thinking) -- though I don't see how upright means up the ass, either. =) Do you mean "crotch" or literally ass?? My ass rarely hurts...it's the crotch...ouch! Use your legs. I do, but it's the ol' suspenders-and-belt theory: two systems are better than one. After all, I'm already using my legs anyway! And it always gets to your back, in any case, eventually.... Ten cogs times whatever's at the front. OIC! Ron Sorry for the noob questions, but thanks for your feedback! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Gooserider wrote: The problem with buying Chinese goods is the very real possibility that doing so supports our enemy.War with China over Taiwan is not out of the question. Of course, the other school of thought counters that this is precisely why you must keep 'em engaged through trade. As their economy becomes ever more dependent on foreign trade, etc., war becomes more and more "impractical"...if Nixon hadn't gone to China, China might be just another North Korea now. The Chinese have a horrible human rights record, you know. So do many US allies. That doesn't stop us from buying Saudi oil, etc. People there are routinely put in re-education camps, undergo forced sterilization, are placed in forced labor camps, and face other such horrible acts. I totally agree. I just don't think that I can have any more effect on those issues than the US government, which has very limited effect on issues it considers even more important. Every dollar you spend on Chinese goods goes to strengthen them both economically and militarily. I would no more buy Chinese goods than I would buy conflict diamonds. Conflict diamonds? What are these, please? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"NYC XYZ" wrote in message oups.com... Gooserider wrote: Aluminum can be SCARY light, and steel isn't 5-10 pounds heavier. Try 1-2 pounds. So what's generally lighter, all other things (frame geometry, etc.) being equal -- ti, carbon fiber, aluminum, or quality steel? I'm sure you couldn't stand to lose 5 pounds off your body, right? Hehehe...5'11" and 230 lbs. -- I was statistically overweight for my age and height even at my best shape of 185 lbs.! If you want to be comfortable, frame material is the least of your concern. Well, part of comfort for me would be not carrying so many pounds, whether portaging over stairs or climbing long New Jersey hills! Are you serious? An extra 5 pounds on a rider plus bike all up weight of 230+20lb bike weight i.e.250lb is 5/250 =2%!! Have you ever stopped to consider why these bikes are being offered at such a massive discount. There aren't any free lunches. Also if you aren't familiar with -as you put it "Shimano this and Bontrager that", why are we having this discussion?. You really need to buy a copy of Bike 101 and read it. I don't understand your comments caliper brakes. Virtually all performance road bikes have them including ALL the TdeF iders -same thing with drop bars I'm not trying to be rude but are you on the level -or are you trying (-successfully!)to wind us up? Cheers Roy |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
On 22 Jul 2005 21:06:09 -0700, "NYC XYZ" wrote:
di wrote: why would you want a titanium hybrid? I'M SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ******GLAD****** YOU ASKED!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It seems like manufacturers also think there isn't a market out there for folks who like their uprights (or upwrongs, as the 'bent crowd likes to crow!) comfy as well as light and speedy. I'm not into racing, but I do do a lot of bike riding for someone who's not into racing! So I want to be comfortable...but that also means not dealing with that extra five to ten pounds of a non-ti or carb-fi bike.... How old are you? I'm imagining you can't touch your toes and that you haven't ridden a bike for many years. Maybe you need to examine why you're uncomfortable. I switched from a straight bar bike to one with drops. My saddle and the top of the drop bar are the same height (not the typical 4" differenence in height - higher saddle, lower bars). I just got a longer stem that put them at the same height. Straight bar bikes are uncomfortable for the following reasons: 1. Sitting upright puts more weight on the posterior/saddle. This can be very uncomfortable after 20 miles. 2. The hand spacing on straight bar bikes puts your hands further apart then riding a drop bar bike on the tops - this cranks your wrists to an unnatural angle. 3. Straight bar bikes only have one or two hand positions - and uncomfortable ones at that. Drop bar bikes have at least four positions. 4. Sitting upright and holding the straight part of the bar on my drop bar puts me in a more upright position than my straight bar bike. 5. When you improve your riding you will naturally want to be more stretched out on the bike. This will cause most people to feel the handlebars are too close and they'll end up trying a thumbless grip or bar ends to move the hands and arms further forward. So my suggestion to you is to try the drop bar bike but insist they put a taller stem on the bike to raise your handlebars to be level with the seat. When you sit on this bike imagine where your weight is going when riding. It should be 33% on your butt, 33% on the pedals and 33% on your handlebars. You do not want to have 70% of your weight on the saddle, iow. Look at the width of your grip and your arms and see how straight your wrists are when gripping the top of the drop bar - compare to the obtuse angle of your wrists on the straight bar. Second, do some flexibility work after each ride while you're still sweating and warm. Get to the point where you can get in a tuck - touch your toes and if possible touch your forehead to your knees with leg locked. If, on the other hand you've got a logic-tight compartment on this subject - do whatever the hell you want. ;-) I'm seriously doubting that you, sitting upright worried about 'comfort' are able to ride as fast as your bike messenger friend on a drop bar racing bike, btw. jj I CAN'T be the only one who reasons this way...! I went to so many bike shops around NYC, and they all gave me that WTF stare...but it makes perfect sense to me! Why is the world so black-and-white anyway?? I like comfort, but I also like performance! When I lean more towards comfort (actually, when I have more cash) I'll get a recumbent bike...for now, I'm still leaning towards out-and-out performance -- but comfort's still a main, if not *the* main, factor! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need torque specs for Easton EA70 stem | GT | Techniques | 1 | May 30th 05 06:18 PM |
Where can I find torque specs for Easton EC90 Equipe? | GT | Techniques | 2 | May 29th 05 11:05 PM |
specs for your uni(s) | streetrider | Unicycling | 9 | September 12th 04 09:03 AM |
Torque specs | David Kerber | Techniques | 8 | April 25th 04 09:23 PM |
specs for a 1990 Bridgestone MB-5 fork? | Kevin Gammon | Mountain Biking | 1 | July 28th 03 05:20 PM |