|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Cycling demands skills of the very highest order"
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Cycling demands skills of the very highest order"
On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote:
Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers. http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and sadly it is getting worse. Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise 10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased, according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate, Surrey, at about 2am and died ... -- Bod |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Cycling demands skills of the very highest order"
On 09/06/2016 09:29, Bod wrote:
On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote: Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers. http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and sadly it is getting worse. Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise 10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased, according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate, Surrey, at about 2am and died ... Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is? Yes / No [delete as appropriate] If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Cycling demands skills of the very highest order"
On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote:
On 09/06/2016 09:29, Bod wrote: On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote: Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers. http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and sadly it is getting worse. Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise 10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased, according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate, Surrey, at about 2am and died ... Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is? Yes / No [delete as appropriate] If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it? Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission. For clarity; *Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low life. The fact remains (which you deliberately avoided) is that the vast majority are caused by vehicles. Do you deny this fact? -- Bod |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Cycling demands skills of the very highest order"
On 09/06/2016 11:06, Bod wrote:
On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote: On 09/06/2016 09:29, Bod wrote: On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote: Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers. http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and sadly it is getting worse. Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise 10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased, according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate, Surrey, at about 2am and died ... Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is? Yes / No [delete as appropriate] If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it? Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission. For clarity; *Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low life. The fact remains (which you deliberately avoided) is that the vast majority are caused by vehicles. Do you deny this fact? Don't evade the question. Was your answer a "yes" or a "no"? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Cycling demands skills of the very highest order"
On 09/06/2016 11:19, JNugent wrote:
On 09/06/2016 11:06, Bod wrote: On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote: On 09/06/2016 09:29, Bod wrote: On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote: Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers. http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and sadly it is getting worse. Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise 10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased, according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate, Surrey, at about 2am and died ... Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is? Yes / No [delete as appropriate] If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it? Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission. For clarity; *Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low life. The fact remains (which you deliberately avoided) is that the vast majority are caused by vehicles. Do you deny this fact? Don't evade the question. Was your answer a "yes" or a "no"? You are very obtuse (thick, if you like). Try and read again: "*Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low life" obviously means, *they are *all* scum *equally* and *all* includes vehicles AND cyclists*. -- Bod |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Cycling demands skills of the very highest order"
On 09/06/2016 11:30, Bod wrote:
On 09/06/2016 11:19, JNugent wrote: On 09/06/2016 11:06, Bod wrote: On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote: On 09/06/2016 09:29, Bod wrote: On 09/06/2016 09:02, MrCheerful wrote: Cyclist mows down 4 year old and scarpers. http://www.rhyljournal.co.uk/news/16...d-in-rhyl.aspx Yes he is scum, but the fact remains that vehicle drivers (especially cars) cause hundreds more hit & runs per year than cyclists do and sadly it is getting worse. Number Of Hit-And-Run Accidents On The Rise - Sky News news.sky.com/story/1505737/number-of-hit-and-run-accidents-on-the-rise 10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased, according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate, Surrey, at about 2am and died ... Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is? Yes / No [delete as appropriate] If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it? Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission. For clarity; *Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low life. The fact remains (which you deliberately avoided) is that the vast majority are caused by vehicles. Do you deny this fact? Don't evade the question. Was your answer a "yes" or a "no"? You are very obtuse (thick, if you like). Try and read again: "*Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low life" obviously means, *they are *all* scum *equally* and *all* includes vehicles AND cyclists*. Step back and calm down for a few seconds. Then ask yourself whether it is REALLY necessary to lard every condemnation of a chav law-breaking cyclist with a contrived get-out clause to the effect that some other people are just as bad? It doesn't MATTER what other people do. There is absolutely no need to try to spread that cyclist's wrongdoing onto others. Try it again. It's easy. Just condemn that cyclist without mentioning anyone else. Just like you would a driver who was the subject of such a story. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Cycling demands skills of the very highest order"
Bod wrote:
On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote: If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it? Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission. So why continue to deal with him? -- john smith |MA (Hons)|MPhil (Hons)|CAPES (mention très bien)|LLB (Hons) 'It never gets any easier. You just get faster' (Greg LeMond (1961 - )) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Cycling demands skills of the very highest order"
10 Feb 2016 - The number of hit-and-run cases in Britain has increased, according to new figures. ... of claims where the driver did not stop has gone up in the last year. ... He was struck by a car in Reigate, Surrey, at about 2am and died ... Does that make the cyclist any less scum than he is? Yes / No [delete as appropriate] If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it? Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission. For clarity; *Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low life. The fact remains (which you deliberately avoided) is that the vast majority are caused by vehicles. Do you deny this fact? Don't evade the question. Was your answer a "yes" or a "no"? You are very obtuse (thick, if you like). Try and read again: "*Every* hit and run accident perpetrator I class as a low life" obviously means, *they are *all* scum *equally* and *all* includes vehicles AND cyclists*. Step back and calm down for a few seconds. Then ask yourself whether it is REALLY necessary to lard every condemnation of a chav law-breaking cyclist with a contrived get-out clause to the effect that some other people are just as bad? It doesn't MATTER what other people do. There is absolutely no need to try to spread that cyclist's wrongdoing onto others. Try it again. It's easy. Just condemn that cyclist without mentioning anyone else. Just like you would a driver who was the subject of such a story. You will now be known to me as *The Wriggler*. -- Bod |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Cycling demands skills of the very highest order"
On 09/06/2016 11:54, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
Bod wrote: On 09/06/2016 10:37, JNugent wrote: If "No", what is the relevance of your mentioning it? Your diversionary tactics are at the very least, childish and blatantly obvious. You appear a sad individual on a cyclist hating mission. So why continue to deal with him? I find *The Wriggler's* replies as highly amusing ramblings of a sad case. He reminds me of nutters that stand on street corners shouting at cyclists amongst the traffic. -- Bod |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VIDEO: Danny "Mad Skills" MacAskill - Industrial Revolutions | Simon Mason[_4_] | UK | 7 | August 30th 11 01:48 PM |
Ben Goldacre's "Bad Science" covers LV's "increase" in cycling accidents | Alan Braggins | UK | 10 | February 10th 09 12:16 AM |
"I love this site and I appreciate the breadth of skills that areemployed in the various games." | [email protected] | Racing | 0 | March 6th 08 03:18 AM |
Feasible to Ride Seat on Side on a 24" (and 24" vs 20" for other levels skills) | joliger | Unicycling | 3 | April 9th 06 02:12 AM |