#41
|
|||
|
|||
Rock n Roll
On 2017-06-20 19:48, James wrote:
On 21/06/17 12:30, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 6/20/2017 5:56 PM, Joerg wrote: On 2017-06-20 14:38, Frank Krygowski wrote: [...] ... Certainly, I (and IIRC others) tried files on chain pins and got the result I expected, which was slight damage to the file, no discernible change in the chain pin. Those with a knowledge of Rockwell hardness would have easily understood this. Those with knowledge of how to do this stuff and in possession of professional grade tools understand better. Bull****, Joerg. There's no way you have as much time in a machine shop as I have. There's no way you know as much about steel metallurgy, hardness measurements or cutting tools as I do. There's no way your files are better than my files. There's no way you have filed down chain pins with any normal steel file. Sorry, Frank, but I have some doubts about that by now. Now you're asking us to believe you can use your super-speed to dab lube onto chain links at a rate of two per second, using your Q-tip, doing the entire chain in under a minute. I still say it sounds very, very unlikely. And son of a gun! There was a guy posting on September 23, 2016 who claimed that exact same procedure took not one minute, but instead, 10 minutes! You should track him down, because he was using your account and pretending to be you! https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec....8/iOdTYV_FBAAJ "Chain cleaning takes at least 20mins each bike. The MTB chain has caked brown dirt which comes off easy. The road chain bike is fairly clean after lots of bike path riding but grimy soot-black after riding lots of road. Gives me goose bumps thinking that I also breath whatever causes this. I found the disposable interdental brushes to work great for cleaning. First used for my teeth, rinsed, dried, they go into a coin envelope and that is used up in the garage. So they all work two jobs. "Lubing takes 10mins because I carefully dab it onto each link via Q-tip." As happens so often, we're left with a problem: Which version of Joerg to believe? That should have been one min. The 20mins is nearly all taken up by cleaning grime and sticky stuff. I believe the Joerg who said the _cleaning_ takes 20 minutes, and the _lubing_ takes 10 minutes. Or to generalize, I believe you do often tell the truth when you've not backed yourself into a corner by making silly statements. Frank, ever heard about ... progress? As in process improvement? I used to dip and dab every link individually, then wipe the bottom. Yes, that took a long time. Over time I found the soak and dab-dab-dab-...-dab method to be way faster and providing a chain lube as good as the first Q-Tip method. Maybe such progress doesn't happen in your world. In mine it does. But I don't believe the 10 minute estimate was a typo. I don't believe you can file a chain pin down with any normal steel file. I don't believe that you really repair chains by finding steel nails along a trail and smacking things with rocks. I don't believe that your area drivers are far more dangerous than those in most areas of the U.S. I don't believe that your life has been saved several times by disk brakes stopping you just before wildlife collisions. And so on. I _do_ believe you'll now say you never made those claims. And I don't believe it's worth the the time to track them all down, as I did with your Q-tip story. I wrote this reply in the thread "Another IGH, competitor to Rohloff?" To be fair to Joerg, I tried filing a chain pin yesterday afternoon. I managed to take a little metal off the pin and damaged my metal file. Thankfully the file wasn't in good condition to begin with, but the file marks on the pin looked nothing like the picture Joerg posted. Joerg's file must have had real teeth or lumps of diamond - or more likely he used a grinder. No, I did not use a grinder. There is a huge difference between files. The ones bought at a hardware store they are likely of mediocre hardness unless they came from their locked display cabinet. Worse are the ones that come in kits such as "3 for $19.99". The worst are those in impressively large "Best Gift for Father's Day" sets. Mine are professional grade files inherited from my grandpa. Some of which he inherited from great-grandpa. They have serious wear marks and mostly because I sometimes use them "off label", such as for wallowing out large holes for which I do not have a matching drill bit. Or on stuff that is too hard. For a top quality industrial file a regular bicycle chain pin is no match. The filing exercise in the photo took just a few strokes and not a lot of pressu http://analogconsultants.com/ng/bike/Chain1.jpg This is the kind of chain I run on my road bike. Until very recently I did not own a chain breaker yet have replaced and shortened dozens of chains. To me they are a nice to have tool but not an essential one. I have ruined many files over my life in a very short amount of time and those were always cheap ones. Other than watch maker's files I have none left that have a plastic handle. All remaining ones are the old style with large wooden handles. They last and last. While I confess I've not spent hours each week riding offroad, I have done a fair bit over the decades, and never broken or bent a chain. Depends on the turf. We have a lot of loose rocks laying on trails and occasionally one gets into the works. It is an awful sound. Chains don't usually break completely but they bend and one link side pops. Most chains I helped "kludge back together" were from other riders. Some guys are hardcore. Weeks later I noticed the bike of one rider still didn't have a front derailer which had gotten shredded during his chain-pretzeling event. "Is that still the same old chain?" ... "Yup!". He used the redneck shifter, a piece of Manzanita stuck in with his water bottle to nudge the chain over to the other chain ring. Making sure never to get too close to large-large because his chain was now too short. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Rock n Roll
On 6/21/2017 10:13 AM, Joerg wrote:
For a top quality industrial file a regular bicycle chain pin is no match. The filing exercise in the photo took just a few strokes and not a lot of pressu http://analogconsultants.com/ng/bike/Chain1.jpg I invite other readers to try filing their chain pins. I think you'll find (as James and I did) that no steel file will put significant cuts in the pin. Abrasives (e.g. aluminum oxide sandpaper, grinding wheels, diamond "files") will cut the pin; but unless motorized, they'll cut it pretty slowly. Again: For at least a century, "file hard" has been a rough description of practical hardness commonly used in machine shops. Steel that is "file hard" is too hard to be cut with a file. It's even in dictionaries: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/file-hard I can't say that no file in the world will cut a chain pin. There may be some exotic and rare files out there that I'm not familiar with. But having worked in three machine shops for various lengths of time, I can say that any normal "professional grade" steel file attacking a chain pin will give you scratches in the file and no significant change in the chain pin. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Rock n Roll
On 2017-06-21 08:06, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 6/21/2017 10:13 AM, Joerg wrote: For a top quality industrial file a regular bicycle chain pin is no match. The filing exercise in the photo took just a few strokes and not a lot of pressu http://analogconsultants.com/ng/bike/Chain1.jpg I invite other readers to try filing their chain pins. I think you'll find (as James and I did) that no steel file will put significant cuts in the pin. Abrasives (e.g. aluminum oxide sandpaper, grinding wheels, diamond "files") will cut the pin; but unless motorized, they'll cut it pretty slowly. Again: For at least a century, "file hard" has been a rough description of practical hardness commonly used in machine shops. Steel that is "file hard" is too hard to be cut with a file. It's even in dictionaries: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/file-hard I can't say that no file in the world will cut a chain pin. There may be some exotic and rare files out there that I'm not familiar with. But having worked in three machine shops for various lengths of time, I can say that any normal "professional grade" steel file attacking a chain pin will give you scratches in the file and no significant change in the chain pin. I suggest to all readers to do this with a decent file. Professional brand-name products from companies like this and not some generic hardware store file: https://www.pferdusa.com/products/201j/ My tool cabinet contains about 20 files which are mostly Pferd and Black Diamond. If you buy new you need to be prepared to shell out $30-$50 per file plus handle. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Rock n Roll
On 2017-06-21 11:01, Joerg wrote:
On 2017-06-21 08:06, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 6/21/2017 10:13 AM, Joerg wrote: For a top quality industrial file a regular bicycle chain pin is no match. The filing exercise in the photo took just a few strokes and not a lot of pressu http://analogconsultants.com/ng/bike/Chain1.jpg I invite other readers to try filing their chain pins. I think you'll find (as James and I did) that no steel file will put significant cuts in the pin. Abrasives (e.g. aluminum oxide sandpaper, grinding wheels, diamond "files") will cut the pin; but unless motorized, they'll cut it pretty slowly. Again: For at least a century, "file hard" has been a rough description of practical hardness commonly used in machine shops. Steel that is "file hard" is too hard to be cut with a file. It's even in dictionaries: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/file-hard I can't say that no file in the world will cut a chain pin. There may be some exotic and rare files out there that I'm not familiar with. But having worked in three machine shops for various lengths of time, I can say that any normal "professional grade" steel file attacking a chain pin will give you scratches in the file and no significant change in the chain pin. I suggest to all readers to do this with a decent file. Professional brand-name products from companies like this and not some generic hardware store file: https://www.pferdusa.com/products/201j/ My tool cabinet contains about 20 files which are mostly Pferd and Black Diamond. If you buy new you need to be prepared to shell out $30-$50 per file plus handle. Disclaimer: I shall not be responsible if you ruin your file. Don't try this with one that is sub-par. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Rock n Roll
On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 2:01:40 PM UTC-4, Joerg wrote:
On 2017-06-21 08:06, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 6/21/2017 10:13 AM, Joerg wrote: For a top quality industrial file a regular bicycle chain pin is no match. The filing exercise in the photo took just a few strokes and not a lot of pressu http://analogconsultants.com/ng/bike/Chain1.jpg I invite other readers to try filing their chain pins. I think you'll find (as James and I did) that no steel file will put significant cuts in the pin. Abrasives (e.g. aluminum oxide sandpaper, grinding wheels, diamond "files") will cut the pin; but unless motorized, they'll cut it pretty slowly. Again: For at least a century, "file hard" has been a rough description of practical hardness commonly used in machine shops. Steel that is "file hard" is too hard to be cut with a file. It's even in dictionaries: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/file-hard I can't say that no file in the world will cut a chain pin. There may be some exotic and rare files out there that I'm not familiar with. But having worked in three machine shops for various lengths of time, I can say that any normal "professional grade" steel file attacking a chain pin will give you scratches in the file and no significant change in the chain pin. I suggest to all readers to do this with a decent file. Professional brand-name products from companies like this and not some generic hardware store file: https://www.pferdusa.com/products/201j/ My tool cabinet contains about 20 files which are mostly Pferd and Black Diamond. If you buy new you need to be prepared to shell out $30-$50 per file plus handle. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ In other words you want bicyclists to buy a file that costs more than the chain they're trying to fix. You have more excusess for stuff than what Caerter's had little liver pills. Also, the images you showed are indicative ofthe results of a GRNDER and not a file. Cheers |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Rock n Roll
On 21/06/17 08:16, jbeattie wrote:
On Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 3:02:33 PM UTC-7, James wrote: Cooking in a hot wax/oil bath is much more effective. What is your formula, exactly. I'll be the tester. Just like with my dynamo. I cannot be exact because I didn't measure what I used. I started with a very large candle. I warmed it up in a pot on the stove to liquify it, and added about 30-40% EP gear oil. There is a recipe on the internet that uses paraffin wax and clear paraffin oil in a 50/50 ratio. A mate uses that and it works fine and is less smelly than the EP oil. -- JS |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Rock n Roll
On 22/06/17 01:06, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 6/21/2017 10:13 AM, Joerg wrote: For a top quality industrial file a regular bicycle chain pin is no match. The filing exercise in the photo took just a few strokes and not a lot of pressu http://analogconsultants.com/ng/bike/Chain1.jpg I invite other readers to try filing their chain pins. I think you'll find (as James and I did) that no steel file will put significant cuts in the pin. Abrasives (e.g. aluminum oxide sandpaper, grinding wheels, diamond "files") will cut the pin; but unless motorized, they'll cut it pretty slowly. Again: For at least a century, "file hard" has been a rough description of practical hardness commonly used in machine shops. Steel that is "file hard" is too hard to be cut with a file. It's even in dictionaries: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/file-hard I can't say that no file in the world will cut a chain pin. There may be some exotic and rare files out there that I'm not familiar with. But having worked in three machine shops for various lengths of time, I can say that any normal "professional grade" steel file attacking a chain pin will give you scratches in the file and no significant change in the chain pin. But Joerg's files are "professional grade files inherited from my grandpa. Some of which he inherited from great-grandpa." They made steel much harder back then don't you know? -- JS |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Rock n Roll
On 6/22/2017 12:26 AM, James wrote:
On 22/06/17 01:06, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 6/21/2017 10:13 AM, Joerg wrote: For a top quality industrial file a regular bicycle chain pin is no match. The filing exercise in the photo took just a few strokes and not a lot of pressu http://analogconsultants.com/ng/bike/Chain1.jpg I invite other readers to try filing their chain pins. I think you'll find (as James and I did) that no steel file will put significant cuts in the pin. Abrasives (e.g. aluminum oxide sandpaper, grinding wheels, diamond "files") will cut the pin; but unless motorized, they'll cut it pretty slowly. Again: For at least a century, "file hard" has been a rough description of practical hardness commonly used in machine shops. Steel that is "file hard" is too hard to be cut with a file. It's even in dictionaries: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/file-hard I can't say that no file in the world will cut a chain pin. There may be some exotic and rare files out there that I'm not familiar with. But having worked in three machine shops for various lengths of time, I can say that any normal "professional grade" steel file attacking a chain pin will give you scratches in the file and no significant change in the chain pin. But Joerg's files are "professional grade files inherited from my grandpa. Some of which he inherited from great-grandpa." They made steel much harder back then don't you know? I wondered about that too. I wear out a first rate American made file in 4 to 6 months of frame repair and nothing I work on is hardened. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Rock n Roll
On 2017-06-21 12:58, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 2:01:40 PM UTC-4, Joerg wrote: On 2017-06-21 08:06, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 6/21/2017 10:13 AM, Joerg wrote: For a top quality industrial file a regular bicycle chain pin is no match. The filing exercise in the photo took just a few strokes and not a lot of pressu http://analogconsultants.com/ng/bike/Chain1.jpg I invite other readers to try filing their chain pins. I think you'll find (as James and I did) that no steel file will put significant cuts in the pin. Abrasives (e.g. aluminum oxide sandpaper, grinding wheels, diamond "files") will cut the pin; but unless motorized, they'll cut it pretty slowly. Again: For at least a century, "file hard" has been a rough description of practical hardness commonly used in machine shops. Steel that is "file hard" is too hard to be cut with a file. It's even in dictionaries: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/file-hard I can't say that no file in the world will cut a chain pin. There may be some exotic and rare files out there that I'm not familiar with. But having worked in three machine shops for various lengths of time, I can say that any normal "professional grade" steel file attacking a chain pin will give you scratches in the file and no significant change in the chain pin. I suggest to all readers to do this with a decent file. Professional brand-name products from companies like this and not some generic hardware store file: https://www.pferdusa.com/products/201j/ My tool cabinet contains about 20 files which are mostly Pferd and Black Diamond. If you buy new you need to be prepared to shell out $30-$50 per file plus handle. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ In other words you want bicyclists to buy a file that costs more than the chain they're trying to fix. You have more excusess for stuff than what Caerter's had little liver pills. Also, the images you showed are indicative ofthe results of a GRNDER and not a file. No. The orgininal discussion was whether a link pin can be filed down. My statement was simply that if you have a decent file it can be done. If you do not have a decent file buy a chain tool. It's cheaper. What I meant was that someone who is equipped with the proper high quality tools can do this job. Those who have cheap hobby tools can't. If was no done with a grinder. If you accuse me of lying then further discussion is meaningless. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Rock n Roll
On 2017-06-22 05:45, AMuzi wrote:
On 6/22/2017 12:26 AM, James wrote: On 22/06/17 01:06, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 6/21/2017 10:13 AM, Joerg wrote: For a top quality industrial file a regular bicycle chain pin is no match. The filing exercise in the photo took just a few strokes and not a lot of pressu http://analogconsultants.com/ng/bike/Chain1.jpg I invite other readers to try filing their chain pins. I think you'll find (as James and I did) that no steel file will put significant cuts in the pin. Abrasives (e.g. aluminum oxide sandpaper, grinding wheels, diamond "files") will cut the pin; but unless motorized, they'll cut it pretty slowly. Again: For at least a century, "file hard" has been a rough description of practical hardness commonly used in machine shops. Steel that is "file hard" is too hard to be cut with a file. It's even in dictionaries: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/file-hard I can't say that no file in the world will cut a chain pin. There may be some exotic and rare files out there that I'm not familiar with. But having worked in three machine shops for various lengths of time, I can say that any normal "professional grade" steel file attacking a chain pin will give you scratches in the file and no significant change in the chain pin. But Joerg's files are "professional grade files inherited from my grandpa. Some of which he inherited from great-grandpa." They made steel much harder back then don't you know? I wondered about that too. I wear out a first rate American made file in 4 to 6 months of frame repair and nothing I work on is hardened. They made excellent files in the olden days. The ones I have are quite worn. That is because grandpa was a steam locomotive engineer and he bought tools that the railroad shop kicked out as too worn. He also bought new ones but then only the best just like the railroad shop did. Until recently I had no chain tool and over my lifetime have swapped out dozens of chains via this method: 1. Lay down the bike. 2. File down a pin so the punch or hardened nail would not slip (which could result in a major ouch situation). 3. Place link on a large metal block, anvil, whatever. Place steel nut underneath link. Nut must be larger than pin. 4. Drive out pin with punch and hammer or hardened nail and hammer. 5. Do same with new chain to bring to required length. Mount chain, push in the last pin, "caress" it with the hammer so it is firmly holding but not too tight. The only bikes that had removable links back in the old days in Europe were single-gear classic ones. Road bikes usually didn't and that was my favorite kind of bike (until mountain bikes appeared). -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to roll out, and ROCK IT | vanpaun | Unicycling | 3 | April 26th 08 03:25 AM |
How to roll out, and ROCK IT | The UniSLAB | Unicycling | 1 | April 26th 08 01:22 AM |
RR: Rock Islands Rock-n-Roll Pictorial | Paladin | Mountain Biking | 0 | March 18th 07 04:28 AM |
FA: Burley Rock n Roll MTB Tandem | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | December 12th 04 03:29 PM |
Rock n Roll Lubes | Mark \(UK\) | Mountain Biking | 12 | January 14th 04 02:26 PM |