Driver gets year ban for hitting cyclist

On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:02:43 AM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote:


I don't suffer from the absence of a major portion. I assume you do.


So why do you dig ditches for minimum wage and live in a slum?

On 13/12/2015 00:22, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:02:43 AM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote:


I don't suffer from the absence of a major portion. I assume you do.


So why do you dig ditches for minimum wage and live in a slum?

I don't. And what has that got to do with cycling?

Other than proving that I've got you so cross you have to resort to ad
hominem?

Mission accomplished.

--
Dave
Dedicated to finding a cure for cycling.

On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 10:28:21 AM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote:

Other than proving that I've got you so cross you have to resort to ad
hominem?


To get cross with you I would first have to take you seriously.

Besides it is unbecoming a gentleman to get angry at his social inferiors.

On 13/12/2015 17:05, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 10:28:21 AM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote:

Other than proving that I've got you so cross you have to resort to ad
hominem?


To get cross with you I would first have to take you seriously.

You seem to do so, judging by the amount of posts you make.

Besides it is unbecoming a gentleman to get angry at his social inferiors.

I shall stop getting angry with you in that case. Thanks for the advise.

Off to the cellar with you.

--
Dave
Dedicated to finding a cure for cycling.

On 13/12/2015 17:05, Simon Jester wrote:

On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 10:28:21 AM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote:

Other than proving that I've got you so cross you have to resort to ad
hominem?

To get cross with you I would first have to take you seriously.
Besides it is unbecoming a gentleman to get angry at his social inferiors.

Surely Cycle-Ops was *not* angry with you?

He's been angry with me in the (distant) past. I can assure you that
there's a difference.

On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 14:42:01 -0800 (PST), Simon Jester
wrote:

On Saturday, December 12, 2015 at 10:36:47 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote:
On 12/12/2015 22:27, Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, December 12, 2015 at 9:13:16 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote:

Reconstructive surgery isn't a hobby of mine.


Pity, You could operate on your own Anencephaly.


Assuming I had one.


So you don't have a brain.


I think he was pointing out that you are a knob - and he succeeded.

You did not say "You could operate on your own brain" - what you said was
very, very different. But obviously you had no idea what the word meant when
you used it - whereas Dave did when he answered.

On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:28:22 +0000, Cycle-Ops
wrote:

On 13/12/2015 00:22, Simon Jester wrote:
On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:02:43 AM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote:


I don't suffer from the absence of a major portion. I assume you do.


So why do you dig ditches for minimum wage and live in a slum?

I don't. And what has that got to do with cycling?

Other than proving that I've got you so cross you have to resort to ad
hominem?

Mission accomplished.

Yes - but it was quite easy for you - don't you think. He's certainly not
brightest of the resident ****wits.