|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
"The Stability of the Bicycle"
I asked a simple question about the relative effect of the two.
Bill Patterson wrote: Check the equations on my web site http://www.calpoly.edu/~wpatters/ Most bikes have little moment of inertia on the front wheel. Therefore, the torque trasmitted up the steer tube is small. The primary torque coming up the steering column is from the vertical normal force and sideward friction force on the front wheel contact point. These forces generate a torque acting through the trail vector that is then dot producted (?) with a vector up the steer tube. Motorcycles and bikes with heavy rims are exceptions. In my opinion, stability is not a suitable design goal. No fighter aircarft was designed to be stable. The airplane guys started "doing" stability when they started flying instruments and didn't have good situational awareness. You don't want a stable bike. You want a bike the responds properly to your intentions. I agree. Your comments caught my eye with the word "stable" because I had never considered that a virtue. This year, I was asked several times by customers for a "stable" bicycle, including a gentleman who specified that as his prime motivation for buying a custom touring frame. I am at a loss to explain this. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
Ads |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
"The Stability of the Bicycle"
wrote in message ... When walking a bicycle, holding it by the saddle, lean angles are trivially small and cause steering by gyroscopic action I don't see how you get that conclusion from the below. the test for which you have apparently not done. Take the wheel out of the bicycle, turn it at "walking speed" and tilt it to the left and right in your hands. You will notice a quick and relatively forceful steering response. Yep. It is this force that allows the bicycle to be steered by slight lean angles Very slight indeed. I have an alternative experiment I'd like you to comment on: Take whole bike, put back wheel on a brick so it can be held horizontally. Tip bike slightly to one side, and see the way the steering goes. I did this for: a) wheels stationary - steering flops to one side. b) wheel going at 20 kph - could not see any difference. c) wheel going at 20kph BACKWARDS - very slight effect of steering going opposite direction. With several attempts I only saw this happen once, and it was soon overcome by a similar "flop" to (a). No Maths for the above, but it shows the gyroscope effect is easily swamped by other effects. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
"The Stability of the Bicycle"
Actually, this report URL: http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark...32/pyfair.html contradicts Jobst. It says that 'He reversed the front fork to nullify the caster action, and he fitted a counter-rotating wheel on the front fork to effectively followed by.... Here's the relevant quote from the paper: ,---- | Gingerly, and with great trepidation, I tried the | experiment -- | downhill, to avoid complicating the effort with pedalling. URB | I is not an easy bicycle to ride "hands off" even with the front | wheel static; it somehow lacks balance and responsiveness. In | the disrotatory mode it was almost impossible and invited | continual disaster, but it could, just, be done. `---- havn't you guys given thought to the fact that the forks were reversed to remove the caster action? this would make it a total bitch to ride no-hands for sure. to my mind the gyro forces don't even come close to the caster action forces, at any speed. I balance (and steer) my bicycle by moving the contact point around to change the top heavy weight distribution. I'm sure I do this. To go left I first steer right, sort of a wobble, to move the contact patch to the right so the system is unbalanced, then I steer left to counter that force, and by countering it only anough to prevent falling, I go round a corner. to straighten up again one steers MORE left to get the wheels back under your weight and balance the system. I don't see where gyro forces come in at all, EXCEPT when no-hands riding, MAYBE. I believe that is all leansteer/caster angle acting. it is harder at low speed, but if you lean forward you'll find it easier, this increases caster action. go try it swarf, steam and wind -- David Forsyth -:- the email address is real /"\ http://terrapin.ru.ac.za/~iwdf/welcome.html \ / ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail - - - - - - - X If you receive email saying "Send this to everyone you know," / \ PLEASE pretend you don't know me. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
"The Stability of the Bicycle"
Benjamin Lewis scribed in
: You misunderstand me. The bicycle with a "counter gyroscopic wheelset" has been tried by someone other than Jobst (I don't remember the reference, but someone posted a link to an academic paper the other day), and found by this person to be almost impossible to ride no hands, as Jobst has claimed. but it was quoted that the forks were reversed to remove the caster action. that alone would make it very scary to no-hands ride. in that context the gyro effects are meaningless swarf, steam and wind -- David Forsyth -:- the email address is real /"\ http://terrapin.ru.ac.za/~iwdf/welcome.html \ / ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail - - - - - - - X If you receive email saying "Send this to everyone you know," / \ PLEASE pretend you don't know me. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
"The Stability of the Bicycle"
Bill Patterson scribed in
. net: In my opinion, stability is not a suitable design goal. No fighter aircarft was designed to be stable. The airplane guys started "doing" stability when they started flying instruments and didn't have good situational awareness. yup, Sopwith Pup was a total bitch to fly for this reason. You don't want a stable bike. You want a bike the responds properly to your intentions. yes, for some things. I used to have a Peugot bike. I called it a 'cruiser'. The head angle, in fact the whole frame, was stable in the extreme, much more so than the 10 speed 'racer' I'd had before (stolen). perfect for ambling along or ordinary commuting (I rode it to school for years), maybe touring with panniers. nice bike, no surprises my current bike, a Nishiki 'Graffiti' MTB, is much less stable, has a higher head angle etc. tricky to no hands at low speed unless one leans forward to increase the caster forces. I have slicks on it, the knobblies I wore out were worse. But I'm happy with it, as it is responsive. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
"The Stability of the Bicycle"
DejaVU writes:
Benjamin Lewis scribed in : You misunderstand me. The bicycle with a "counter gyroscopic wheelset" has been tried by someone other than Jobst (I don't remember the reference, but someone posted a link to an academic paper the other day), and found by this person to be almost impossible to ride no hands, as Jobst has claimed. but it was quoted that the forks were reversed to remove the caster action. that alone would make it very scary to no-hands ride. in that context the gyro effects are meaningless Just so. And yet is was 'very difficult but not impossible' to ride no hands. -- (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/ ;; in faecibus sapiens rheum propagabit |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
"The Stability of the Bicycle"
John Dacey writes:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:05:16 GMT, Simon Brooke esquire, metapedant wrote: P.P.S. Double-dare ya' all to top this for linguistic pedantry! ITYMHM '_I_ _challenge_ _you_ to _better_ this for linguistic pedantry'. The phrase 'you all' is a deprected colonial form; the 'all is redundent and may be elided. 'Double-dare' is slang, and, worse, vulgar. Your spellchecker is broke. Touche! -- (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/ ;; in faecibus sapiens rheum propagabit |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
"The Stability of the Bicycle"
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
"The Stability of the Bicycle"
Simon Brooke wrote:
DejaVU writes: Benjamin Lewis scribed in : You misunderstand me. The bicycle with a "counter gyroscopic wheelset" has been tried by someone other than Jobst (I don't remember the reference, but someone posted a link to an academic paper the other day), and found by this person to be almost impossible to ride no hands, as Jobst has claimed. but it was quoted that the forks were reversed to remove the caster action. that alone would make it very scary to no-hands ride. in that context the gyro effects are meaningless Just so. Says the man who hasn't read the article. And yet is was 'very difficult but not impossible' to ride no hands. Sorry, it was a different bicycle on which the forks were reversed. This bicycle had normal forks, and yet was nearly impossible to ride no hands due to the lack of gyroscopic effects. http://tinyurl.com/pswa -- Benjamin Lewis Everything that can be invented has been invented. -- Charles Duell, Director of U.S. Patent Office, 1899 |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
"The Stability of the Bicycle"
"W K" wrote in message ...
wrote in message ... When walking a bicycle, holding it by the saddle, lean angles are trivially small and cause steering by gyroscopic action I don't see how you get that conclusion from the below. the test for which you have apparently not done. Take the wheel out of the bicycle, turn it at "walking speed" and tilt it to the left and right in your hands. You will notice a quick and relatively forceful steering response. Yep. It is this force that allows the bicycle to be steered by slight lean angles Very slight indeed. I have an alternative experiment I'd like you to comment on: Take whole bike, put back wheel on a brick so it can be held horizontally. Tip bike slightly to one side, and see the way the steering goes. I did this for: a) wheels stationary - steering flops to one side. b) wheel going at 20 kph - could not see any difference. c) wheel going at 20kph BACKWARDS - very slight effect of steering going opposite direction. With several attempts I only saw this happen once, and it was soon overcome by a similar "flop" to (a). No Maths for the above, but it shows the gyroscope effect is easily swamped by other effects. I'm not picturing what you did exactly but you bring up an interesting point. The front wheel turning backwards. If a bicycle is wheeled backwards, and I assume according to Jobst's hypothesis, the gyroscopic effect should steer the front wheel in the opposite direction. I haven't done the test yet but for some, it may bring clarity to the situation as to which is the dominant force......or not. Phil Holman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A song for Carla | John Harlow | Mountain Biking | 3 | May 10th 04 02:29 PM |
Those bicycle builders big mistake! | Garrison Hilliard | General | 30 | December 23rd 03 07:03 AM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | General | 17 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | Social Issues | 14 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |