Pavement cyclist to face charges.

A 17-year-old cyclist is facing a charge of riding on a pavement after
knocking down a pedestrian in Spalding earlier today.

Police in Spalding are putting together a file for the Crown Prosecution
Service to decide whether the cyclist, who can’t be named for legal
reasons, should face charges in connection with the accident in Abbey
Passage at about 9.25am.

MONDAY 11AM: A pedestrian has been taken to hospital with as yet unknown
injuries after colliding with a cyclist in Spalding.

It happened in Abbey Passage at 9.25am when the pedestrian was hit by a
bicycle.


http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/news/...ding-1-6190171

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:20:28 +0100, Mrcheerful wrote:

A 17-year-old cyclist is facing a charge of riding on a pavement after
knocking down a pedestrian in Spalding earlier today.

Police in Spalding are putting together a file for the Crown Prosecution
Service to decide whether the cyclist, who can’t be named for legal
reasons, should face charges in connection with the accident in Abbey
Passage at about 9.25am.

MONDAY 11AM: A pedestrian has been taken to hospital with as yet unknown
injuries after colliding with a cyclist in Spalding.

It happened in Abbey Passage at 9.25am when the pedestrian was hit by a
bicycle.


http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/news/...ding-1-6190171



The title of your post mis-represents the truth.

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:11:16 -0300, Carl Baxter wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:20:28 +0100, Mrcheerful
wrote:

A 17-year-old cyclist is facing a charge of riding on a pavement after
knocking down a pedestrian in Spalding earlier today.

Police in Spalding are putting together a file for the Crown Prosecution
Service to decide whether the cyclist, who canÂ’t be named for legal
reasons, should face charges in connection with the accident in Abbey
Passage at about 9.25am.

MONDAY 11AM: A pedestrian has been taken to hospital with as yet unknown
injuries after colliding with a cyclist in Spalding.

It happened in Abbey Passage at 9.25am when the pedestrian was hit by a
bicycle.


http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/news/...pedestrian-in-
hospital-after-collision-with-cyclist-in-spalding-1-6190171



The title of your post mis-represents the truth.

Why?
The article clearly states

UPDATE MONDAY 1PM: A 17-year-old cyclist is facing a charge of riding on
a pavement after knocking down a pedestrian in Spalding earlier today.

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:11:16 -0300, Carl Baxter wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:20:28 +0100, Mrcheerful wrote:

A 17-year-old cyclist is facing a charge of riding on a pavement after
knocking down a pedestrian in Spalding earlier today.

Police in Spalding are putting together a file for the Crown Prosecution
Service to decide whether the cyclist, who can’t be named for legal
reasons, should face charges in connection with the accident in Abbey
Passage at about 9.25am.

MONDAY 11AM: A pedestrian has been taken to hospital with as yet unknown
injuries after colliding with a cyclist in Spalding.

It happened in Abbey Passage at 9.25am when the pedestrian was hit by a
bicycle.


http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/news/...ding-1-6190171



The title of your post mis-represents the truth.


Do you have a reading difficulty?

The cyclist was on the pavement: therefore he was a "Pavement cyclist"

The cyclist is facing charges.

Therefore : a Pavement cyclist is to face charges.

If you cannot follow that - you could ask your teacher to explain.

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:19:07 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:11:16 -0300, Carl Baxter wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:20:28 +0100, Mrcheerful
wrote:

A 17-year-old cyclist is facing a charge of riding on a pavement after
knocking down a pedestrian in Spalding earlier today.

Police in Spalding are putting together a file for the Crown Prosecution
Service to decide whether the cyclist, who can?t be named for legal
reasons, should face charges in connection with the accident in Abbey
Passage at about 9.25am.

MONDAY 11AM: A pedestrian has been taken to hospital with as yet unknown
injuries after colliding with a cyclist in Spalding.

It happened in Abbey Passage at 9.25am when the pedestrian was hit by a
bicycle.


http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/news/...pedestrian-in-
hospital-after-collision-with-cyclist-in-spalding-1-6190171



The title of your post mis-represents the truth.

Why?
The article clearly states

UPDATE MONDAY 1PM: A 17-year-old cyclist is facing a charge of riding on
a pavement after knocking down a pedestrian in Spalding earlier today.

No charges have been laid yet - hence the cyclist does NOT "face charges".

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:19:07 +0000 (UTC)
Peter Keller wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:11:16 -0300, Carl Baxter wrote:

The title of your post mis-represents the truth.

Why?
The article clearly states

UPDATE MONDAY 1PM: A 17-year-old cyclist is facing a charge of riding
on a pavement after knocking down a pedestrian in Spalding earlier
today.

"for the Crown Prosecution Service to decide whether the cyclist ...
should face charges"

On 22/07/2014 12:12, Emanuel Labour wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:19:07 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:11:16 -0300, Carl Baxter wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:20:28 +0100, Mrcheerful
wrote:

A 17-year-old cyclist is facing a charge of riding on a pavement after
knocking down a pedestrian in Spalding earlier today.

Police in Spalding are putting together a file for the Crown Prosecution
Service to decide whether the cyclist, who can?t be named for legal
reasons, should face charges in connection with the accident in Abbey
Passage at about 9.25am.

MONDAY 11AM: A pedestrian has been taken to hospital with as yet unknown
injuries after colliding with a cyclist in Spalding.

It happened in Abbey Passage at 9.25am when the pedestrian was hit by a
bicycle.


http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/news/...pedestrian-in-
hospital-after-collision-with-cyclist-in-spalding-1-6190171



The title of your post mis-represents the truth.

Why?
The article clearly states

UPDATE MONDAY 1PM: A 17-year-old cyclist is facing a charge of riding on
a pavement after knocking down a pedestrian in Spalding earlier today.

No charges have been laid yet - hence the cyclist does NOT "face charges".

Is the plural a problem?

Using the plural form ("charges") is pretty common English usage, even
when there is only one charge.

And describing the cyclist's position as "facing" charges is also pretty
standard stuff.

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:24:21 +0100, Judith wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:11:16 -0300, Carl Baxter wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:20:28 +0100, Mrcheerful
wrote:

A 17-year-old cyclist is facing a charge of riding on a pavement after
knocking down a pedestrian in Spalding earlier today.

Police in Spalding are putting together a file for the Crown
Prosecution Service to decide whether the cyclist, who canÂ’t be named
for legal reasons, should face charges in connection with the accident
in Abbey Passage at about 9.25am.

MONDAY 11AM: A pedestrian has been taken to hospital with as yet
unknown injuries after colliding with a cyclist in Spalding.

It happened in Abbey Passage at 9.25am when the pedestrian was hit by a
bicycle.


http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/news/...pedestrian-in-
hospital-after-collision-with-cyclist-in-spalding-1-6190171



The title of your post mis-represents the truth.


Do you have a reading difficulty?

The cyclist was on the pavement: therefore he was a "Pavement cyclist"

The cyclist is facing charges.

Therefore : a Pavement cyclist is to face charges.

If you cannot follow that - you could ask your teacher to explain.

I said the same thing, but without your utterly obnoxious personal
confrontational derogatory insulting approach.