|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Shimano Wireless on Rear Wheel
Will a Shimano wireless sensor (SM-6501) work on the rear wheel of my
bike? I have a wired sensor now, but that only reaches the front wheel and I want to use the computer for my stationary trainer. (I actually have a 2nd computer mounted, but I'd like to remove that one.) Thanks. -- Daniel Norton |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt O'Toole" wrote: I don't see why it wouldn't work. Give it a try. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I can see a reason why it MIGHT not work, or might not work reliably. The transmitter will be farther than normal from the receiver, so the signal may not be strong enough to trigger the computer. Many wireless cyclometers are fussy even when used in the recommended location. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
No, it doesn't work. I attached the rear sensor/transmitter at the top
of the rear fork and attached the magnet to a spoke. I then moved the computer (mounted in the receiver bracket) towards and away from the transmitter and found the that it's about a foot (30 cm) short. Why does Shimano make it so difficult to provide what seems to me to be such a basic capability!? -- Daniel Norton |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
None wrote: Why does Shimano make it so difficult to provide what seems to me to be such a basic capability!? Just a guess but I imagine that on these wireless units they have to worry about having a larger transmission distance because otherwise there will be crossed signals in any pack and all the info will be useless. Same thing happens with HR monitors. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
None wrote:
No, it doesn't work. I attached the rear sensor/transmitter at the top of the rear fork and attached the magnet to a spoke. I then moved the computer (mounted in the receiver bracket) towards and away from the transmitter and found the that it's about a foot (30 cm) short. Why does Shimano make it so difficult to provide what seems to me to be such a basic capability!? -- Daniel Norton Transmitting a stronger signal means more power sucked out of the battery and that means shorter battery life. It also increases the liklihood of erroneous readings from/to nearby riders. I doubt anybody's wireless computer will do what you want, so picking on Shimano is kind of pointless. -- My bike blog: http://diabloscott.blogspot.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I'm picking on Shimano because they provide no method of using the rear
wheel for sensing speed. This is a fundamental flaw with the Flight Deck. I regret ever having purchased it. Hopefully this thread will help others avoid making the same mistake. -- Daniel Norton |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Basics of Wheel Alignment and Wheelbuilding | Jeff Napier | Techniques | 338 | August 23rd 04 09:17 PM |
Shimano rear derailer compatibility | Hal | Techniques | 6 | June 23rd 04 02:03 AM |
Attaching rear wheel | Roger Zoul | General | 10 | October 21st 03 11:35 AM |
ICYCLES Inventory List | ICYCLES | Marketplace | 0 | July 26th 03 08:25 PM |
Braking Technique | asqui | Racing | 55 | July 25th 03 04:16 PM |