Lafferty - you seriously need to take it down a notch

Look man after reading so many of these "carry or ****tard" style
posts I can see how eventually what you are is so loud that no one can
hear what you're saying anymore.

Hell - even Jabouskey seems reasonable lately at times.

At the core 99.9% of people here agree with the conclusion that Lance
Armstrong doped and is a pathological liar but arguing every little
point and stooping to calling everyone names on an hourly basis just
taints the credibility of your view and this message board.

So try to be respectful and respond as if you were in the same room as
these people and their families.

There could be young children in here and we don't need a bunch of
****ing ****s and cocksuckers making the forum look like some whores
ass that's just been gang banked in a bukkake video.

Thank you.

On Jun 24, 9:03*am, Anton Berlin wrote:
Look man after reading so many of these "carry or ****tard" style
posts I can see how eventually what you are is so loud that no one can
hear what you're saying anymore.

Hell - even Jabouskey seems reasonable lately at times.

At the core 99.9% of people here agree with the conclusion that Lance
Armstrong doped and is a pathological liar but arguing every little
point and stooping to calling everyone names on an hourly basis just
taints the credibility of your view and this message board.

So try to be respectful and respond as if you were in the same room as
these people and their families.

There could be young children in here and we don't need a bunch of
****ing ****s and cocksuckers making the forum look like some whores
ass that's just been gang banked in a bukkake video.

Thank you.

Hear, hear!

R

PS Your pizza smells like diseased aborigine ****.

On Jun 24, 3:03*pm, Anton Berlin wrote:

At the core 99.9% of people here agree with the conclusion that Lance
Armstrong doped and is a pathological liar

Thank you.

I doubt that there are 1000 people here, so make that 99.9% since I
don't believe that at all.

-ilan

Anton Berlin wrote:
So try to be respectful and respond as if you were in the same room as
these people and their families.

That's rich, coming from you.

On Jun 24, 9:03*am, Anton Berlin wrote:
So try to be respectful and respond as if you were in the same room as
these people and their families.

Do you use this same approach with the smelly, schizophrenic,
shirtless dude in the park, who stands around watching the kids play
on monkey bars?

I didn't think so.

On Jun 24, 10:44*am, "A. Dumas" wrote:
Anton Berlin wrote:
So try to be respectful and respond as if you were in the same room as
these people and their families.

That's rich, coming from you.

Rich irony dumbass. (possible it doesn't translate across cultures
though)

The only points of contention regarding LA that the group seems to be
split on are if there's enough evidence to convict him of an actual
crime, and if he's convicted, whether it will make any difference in
the level of doping in today's pro peloton. Everyone knows LA's a
doper, as was everyone on Postal, all the teams Postal competed
against, and most (if not all) top-level pros today.

Until this confrontation in the restaurant happened, I haven't heard
of any testimony or evidence against LA that I think a jury would
convict him on. However, if the restaurant incident results in
intimidation charges, I suspect LA won't be able to squirm out of it,
and would make any other case the govt. brings a lot tougher for LA.
Stupid move on LA's part.

As for if any conviction will make any difference, the answer has to
be "no". As long as doping products that actually improve performance
are readily available and can be used with little chance of detection,
a significant number of athletes will use them - regardless of the
sport. The fact that a big wheel like LA went down for it won't change
that. It WILL help out Novitsky's career, however, which is why he
went after LA in the first place.

In article
,
Anton Berlin wrote:

At the core 99.9% of people here agree

[...]

Speak for yourself.

--
Old Fritz

Anton Berlin wrote:
At the core 99.9% of people here agree

Frederick the Great wrote:
Speak for yourself.

Yeah, what about the bots ?

In article ,
Simply Fred wrote:

Anton Berlin wrote:
At the core 99.9% of people here agree

Frederick the Great wrote:
Speak for yourself.

Yeah, what about the bots ?

They went rogue ages ago. Anyone who wants to speak for
the bots is welcome to it, particularly if it is another bot.

--
Old Fritz