|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Where to clamp bike to work on it?
Ben C wrote:
On 2008-08-10, jim beam wrote: Ben C wrote: [...] absolutely the tire does - that's what it's for. and i expect the order of magnitude difference to be at least 2. but that /still/ doesn't mean carbon doesn't attenuate because it does. nobody [hopefully] disputes that rubbers absorb vibration. the polymers in cfrp resins aren't the same as rubbers, but they're still subject to hysteresis, and thus, there is a time component to any strain. as has been discussed here many times before, attenuation may not be the primary reason for using cfrp, but it's a fantastic side-benefit. tennis rackets are an example outside of bikes. soft pneumatic ball, polymeric strings, vibration-absorptive grip - no first order reason to worry about attenuation in the frame material, right? but no. carbon is /the/ material of choice because the contribution the material makes to the overall performance of the interaction is significant for the user. if you dags on tennis racket materials, i'm sure you'll find some spectral analysis. unlike bikes. because all bike guys do is fight to preserve their ignorance. as a follow-up, do you think you /can't/ tell the difference in vibration between metal and wood? cfrp is very closely related to wood, so it's a very simple concept translation. I believe CFRP and wood absorb vibration in a way that steel doesn't (we've mentioned hammers before and why you need a thick rubber grip if the handle is made of steel instead of wood), but I don't know if I could tell the difference for just a seatpost. In the whole bike, maybe. But this is just a guess. well, as mike jacoubowsky pointed out, the /amount/ of the stuff is definitely going to make a difference. most of my seat posts are extended in the 20cm range. for the "old skool" that insist on riding bikes with top tubes right up to their 'nads, i don't see it making the slightest difference at all. Another straw to clutch at is that maybe there's more to life than blind tests. You might find for example that people had fewer tingly hand problems or something after a long ride on a CF bike _even if_ they couldn't actually recognize the bike themselves in a blind test over a few kilometres. We mentioned racing drivers before and how for all their loquaciousness they're often completely wrong about what "feels faster". But still give them a better car and they can actually do a better lap time, so some part of their unconscious mind at least must know what it's doing. Maybe it's OK to fail blind tests. Maybe you can genuinely appreciate fine wine even though you had to be told that's what it was. Just because something can only be perceived when you know what you're looking for it doesn't necessarily follow that the perception is a total illusion. skepticism is healthy. blind, persistent, closed minded ignorance is not. see above. |
Ads |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Where to clamp bike to work on it?
On Aug 8, 1:16*pm, Derk wrote:
wrote: Do you know of any blind testing, with the posts wrapped with tape, in which riders notice any difference between seat posts? TOUR tested/measured seatposts and found that titanium seatpost are more comfortable than any other seatpost. Derk Any luck digging up this article? I still have not placed that online order, mainly because I'm not sure if I want to include a new seat post. I could sure use the rain gear with what the weather has been doing around here, however. I can live with the ride I have now. As I said, most of the roads I ride are pretty smooth and the bike feels really good around 110PSI (700x25 tires). It's actually more comfortable than some of the all- aluminum (except carbon forks) bikes I test rode, all of which were inflated to 95-100PSI per the shops compressor. Carbon rear triangle, tires, wheels, who knows - but I like it. Part of me thinks a carbon post may make it a smidge more comfy. Part of me is starting to think maybe a different seat would be the way to go, although that's a hard switch to make since they're so specific to how they fit ones rear that trial and error gets expensive quick. Another part of me is thinking that maybe I should just leave the extra padding in my wallet and ride what I've got - an option made even more attractive by the fact that my dirt bike is ready for a new top-end. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
our work bike to work pic. | max | General | 3 | May 19th 08 11:31 AM |
Bike to Work | Arvey | General | 2 | April 21st 07 02:45 PM |
ultimate bike stand clamp | Andy | Techniques | 3 | March 19th 07 12:10 AM |
FA: NEW - Giant bike seat clamp | Ian | UK | 0 | May 22nd 05 06:58 AM |
FA: NEW Giant bike seat clamp | Ian | UK | 0 | May 12th 05 08:44 PM |