#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bravo UCI
For calling that dirty doper's bluff and having the B-Sample tested
before the lab shuts down for the rest of the month. Froid and his lawyers would have loved to wait until September for the second positive. Only after the UCI acts does Froid fax the request for the B-Sample testing - to try and save face. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bravo UCI
"DA74" wrote: For calling that dirty doper's bluff and having the B-Sample tested before the lab shuts down for the rest of the month. Froid and his lawyers would have loved to wait until September for the second positive. Only after the UCI acts does Froid fax the request for the B-Sample testing - to try and save face. It just sems amazing to me that the "B" sample is being tested at the same lab as the "A" sample. I would insist that another lab test my "B" sample if I thought there was a mistake in my first test. just my thoughts on this matter. Ro |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bravo UCI
Ro wrote: "DA74" wrote: For calling that dirty doper's bluff and having the B-Sample tested before the lab shuts down for the rest of the month. Froid and his lawyers would have loved to wait until September for the second positive. Only after the UCI acts does Froid fax the request for the B-Sample testing - to try and save face. It just sems amazing to me that the "B" sample is being tested at the same lab as the "A" sample. I would insist that another lab test my "B" sample if I thought there was a mistake in my first test. just my thoughts on this matter. Ro Froid already said that he expects the result of the B sample to be identical to the first. So maybe he knows there was no mistake on the first test. But I tend to agree with you. I'd be peeing into every container within arms reach and express mailing them to every lab in the world. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bravo UCI
"Ro" a écrit dans le message de news: ... "DA74" wrote: For calling that dirty doper's bluff and having the B-Sample tested before the lab shuts down for the rest of the month. Froid and his lawyers would have loved to wait until September for the second positive. Only after the UCI acts does Froid fax the request for the B-Sample testing - to try and save face. It just sems amazing to me that the "B" sample is being tested at the same lab as the "A" sample. I would insist that another lab test my "B" sample if I thought there was a mistake in my first test. just my thoughts on this matter. Ro I desagree. 1 - The samples can't be manipulated as if it were some kind of luggage. Suppose the B sample to be corrupted due the transportation. 2 - You will have to accept some attendant of the first Lab + some attendant of the second Lab to follow the sample during the transportation. Of course if you challenge his reputation you have to accept it. 3 - You will have to accept some attendant of the first Lab to be present during the test. 4 - Have you any idea how many test are done by the AMA. Could you imagine all the logistic behind all the A test and B test. 5 - Suppose the result is not the same, suppose the Lab of the A test contest the Lab of the B test by telling that the equipment is not the same, that the level of competence is not the same etc. 6 - And what Lab to choose ? It can't be French of course. An American one ? Of course no, the French Lab can't accept it because Iraq. A Spanish one ? Of course no will say the American because a Spanish is in second place and if Landis lost.. A British one ? The French will not agree because Jeanne D'arc. A Swiss one ? Come on, the UCI is biased. etc... AMA choose the best solution : the agreement of the Lab. They have the way to check the level of professionalism of the Lab. If you admit that it is necessary to check the job done by one Lab, better to change the Lab. And now, tell me WHY do you suspect the French Lab ? Because they are French do you believe they are incompetent ? Because they are French do you think they prefer to see a Spanish as winner better than an American ? Do you believe a Lab with such international prestige will put his reputation in check because Landis is American. ? Come on. The French are not so stupid. Of course we have had our disagreement, but we have much more important problems. We don't wake-up every morning thinking : What bad can I do against the Americans... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bravo UCI
Montesquiou a écrit dans le message de news:
... "Ro" a écrit dans le message de news: ... "DA74" wrote: For calling that dirty doper's bluff and having the B-Sample tested before the lab shuts down for the rest of the month. Froid and his lawyers would have loved to wait until September for the second positive. Only after the UCI acts does Froid fax the request for the B-Sample testing - to try and save face. It just sems amazing to me that the "B" sample is being tested at the same lab as the "A" sample. I would insist that another lab test my "B" sample if I thought there was a mistake in my first test. just my thoughts on this matter. Ro I desagree. 1 - The samples can't be manipulated as if it were some kind of luggage. Suppose the B sample to be corrupted due the transportation. 2 - You will have to accept some attendant of the first Lab + some attendant of the second Lab to follow the sample during the transportation. Of course if you challenge his reputation you have to accept it. 3 - You will have to accept some attendant of the first Lab to be present during the test. 4 - Have you any idea how many test are done by the AMA. Could you imagine all the logistic behind all the A test and B test. 5 - Suppose the result is not the same, suppose the Lab of the A test contest the Lab of the B test by telling that the equipment is not the same, that the level of competence is not the same etc. 6 - And what Lab to choose ? It can't be French of course. An American one ? Of course no, the French Lab can't accept it because Iraq. A Spanish one ? Of course no will say the American because a Spanish is in second place and if Landis lost.. A British one ? The French will not agree because Jeanne D'arc. A Swiss one ? Come on, the UCI is biased. etc... The lab has to be Icelandic. Halfway between Europe and US. Not a member of the EU, but participating in Schengen. No riders in the ProTour. Won't be influenced by bordering countries. Yep, Iceland. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bravo UCI
"Ro" wrote in message ... "DA74" wrote: For calling that dirty doper's bluff and having the B-Sample tested before the lab shuts down for the rest of the month. Froid and his lawyers would have loved to wait until September for the second positive. Only after the UCI acts does Froid fax the request for the B-Sample testing - to try and save face. It just sems amazing to me that the "B" sample is being tested at the same lab as the "A" sample. I would insist that another lab test my "B" sample if I thought there was a mistake in my first test. just my thoughts on this matter. Ro This is why the testee or his/her representative has the right to be present for the testing of the B sample. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bravo UCI
Montesquiou wrote:
6 - And what Lab to choose ? It can't be French of course. An American one ? Of course no, the French Lab can't accept it because Iraq. A Spanish one ? Of course no will say the American because a Spanish is in second place and if Landis lost.. A British one ? The French will not agree because Jeanne D'arc. A Swiss one ? Come on, the UCI is biased. etc... trg wrote: The lab has to be Icelandic. Halfway between Europe and US. Not a member of the EU, but participating in Schengen. No riders in the ProTour. Won't be influenced by bordering countries. Yep, Iceland. But if its Miller or Wiggins or some other British rider involved then the result might be a bit fishy. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bravo UCI
Montesquiou wrote: "Ro" a écrit dans le message de news: ... "DA74" wrote: For calling that dirty doper's bluff and having the B-Sample tested before the lab shuts down for the rest of the month. Froid and his lawyers would have loved to wait until September for the second positive. Only after the UCI acts does Froid fax the request for the B-Sample testing - to try and save face. It just sems amazing to me that the "B" sample is being tested at the same lab as the "A" sample. I would insist that another lab test my "B" sample if I thought there was a mistake in my first test. just my thoughts on this matter. Ro I desagree. 1 - The samples can't be manipulated as if it were some kind of luggage. Suppose the B sample to be corrupted due the transportation. 2 - You will have to accept some attendant of the first Lab + some attendant of the second Lab to follow the sample during the transportation. Of course if you challenge his reputation you have to accept it. 3 - You will have to accept some attendant of the first Lab to be present during the test. 4 - Have you any idea how many test are done by the AMA. Could you imagine all the logistic behind all the A test and B test. 5 - Suppose the result is not the same, suppose the Lab of the A test contest the Lab of the B test by telling that the equipment is not the same, that the level of competence is not the same etc. 6 - And what Lab to choose ? It can't be French of course. An American one ? Of course no, the French Lab can't accept it because Iraq. A Spanish one ? Of course no will say the American because a Spanish is in second place and if Landis lost.. A British one ? The French will not agree because Jeanne D'arc. A Swiss one ? Come on, the UCI is biased. etc... AMA choose the best solution : the agreement of the Lab. They have the way to check the level of professionalism of the Lab. If you admit that it is necessary to check the job done by one Lab, better to change the Lab. And now, tell me WHY do you suspect the French Lab ? Because they are French do you believe they are incompetent ? Because they are French do you think they prefer to see a Spanish as winner better than an American ? Do you believe a Lab with such international prestige will put his reputation in check because Landis is American. ? Come on. The French are not so stupid. Of course we have had our disagreement, but we have much more important problems. We don't wake-up every morning thinking : What bad can I do against the Americans... Joan D'Arc ? That's funny. Andre |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bravo UCI
DA74 wrote: For calling that dirty doper's bluff and having the B-Sample tested before the lab shuts down for the rest of the month. Froid and his lawyers would have loved to wait until September for the second positive. Only after the UCI acts does Froid fax the request for the B-Sample testing - to try and save face. Dumbass, Landis had 10 days to arrange for an observer of the B-Sample testing under UCI rules. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bravo UCI
Ro wrote: "DA74" wrote: For calling that dirty doper's bluff and having the B-Sample tested before the lab shuts down for the rest of the month. Froid and his lawyers would have loved to wait until September for the second positive. Only after the UCI acts does Froid fax the request for the B-Sample testing - to try and save face. It just sems amazing to me that the "B" sample is being tested at the same lab as the "A" sample. I would insist that another lab test my "B" sample if I thought there was a mistake in my first test. just my thoughts on this matter. Landis has no right to pick the lab. He does have the right to observe the B sample test. Ro |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bravo Bob Schwartz Bravo!!! | Clint Torus | Racing | 1 | May 26th 06 04:07 AM |
FS: 661 Bravo XC Bike Helmet NEW | Midnight Cyclist | Marketplace | 2 | January 7th 06 12:30 AM |
Bravo WADA | B Lafferty | Racing | 16 | February 3rd 05 11:13 AM |
Bravo Bobby | Bill | Racing | 5 | August 19th 04 02:27 PM |
Bravo Freddy | B. Lafferty | Racing | 24 | June 8th 04 02:47 AM |