|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
MTB frame size question
Hi all,
At 6' + change, I currently ride a 21" hardtail. I am not sure of my inseam; 34" jeans/pants tend to be a bit too short for my liking. I weigh in around 190 (dropping to 180). I am considering moving down to a 19" frame for my next bike. Reasons: 1) Smaller size = easier to store/transport 2) Less weight (negligible) 3) Relative strength of smaller triangles 4) Better handling?? 5) More standover (not really an issue) 6) More aero position (higher saddle relative to bars) Problems I see a 1) Saddle height...will probably need a longer seatpost 2) ?? Should I be considering anything else? What are some strong reasons *not* to go with a smaller frame? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
MTB frame size question
Dave, since I'm 6'7" myself I feel inclined to respond to your request.
Until a few months ago I was riding a stock XL frame. Since then I have switched to a custom build bike and it makes a _lot_ of difference. My advise is to use a bike that has an optimal fit for your body. It's not just the saddle height but also the top-tube that's important. If the top-tube is to short you lean to much over the front wheel which makes steering very instable. It also puts more weight on your arms. The position of your saddle in relation to your pedals will be incorrect. Go to a good bike shop and have them advise you on a bike that fits your dimensions. If you are concerned about weight then buy a lighter weight bike (light-weight components, wheels, frame, etc). And from a storage/transport perspective it will make a minor difference. schreef: Hi all, At 6' + change, I currently ride a 21" hardtail. I am not sure of my inseam; 34" jeans/pants tend to be a bit too short for my liking. I weigh in around 190 (dropping to 180). I am considering moving down to a 19" frame for my next bike. Reasons: 1) Smaller size = easier to store/transport 2) Less weight (negligible) 3) Relative strength of smaller triangles 4) Better handling?? 5) More standover (not really an issue) 6) More aero position (higher saddle relative to bars) Problems I see a 1) Saddle height...will probably need a longer seatpost 2) ?? Should I be considering anything else? What are some strong reasons *not* to go with a smaller frame? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
MTB frame size question
wrote: Reasons: 1) Smaller size = easier to store/transport ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ A difference which will make the bike significantly easier to store and handle will surely be larger than your body will like. 2) Less weight (negligible) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ As you say, negligible. 3) Relative strength of smaller triangles ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Triangles are inherently strong. Are you riding a bike that feels too flexible? Or too weak? If not, the tiny gain in strength of a smaller frame will not be noticed. 4) Better handling?? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ No reason to expect better handling from a smaller frame. Handling is the result of a lot of variables, controlled mostly by the designer. You will be able to test ride smaller bikes, some of which may handle better than your present one, and some of which will handle WORSE. In any case, this will not be so much good handling vs bad handling, as handling which suits your riding needs, vs handling which does not suit your needs. 5) More standover (not really an issue) 6) More aero position (higher saddle relative to bars) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This can be adjusted by seat height and stem geometry. More important is the length of the top tube, which controls how you must lean to sit on the bike and hold the bars. A smaller frame could put you in a bad position. Problems I see a 1) Saddle height...will probably need a longer seatpost ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ A longer seatpost is weaker--the loss here is far greater than any gain due to a smaller frame. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
MTB frame size question
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
MTB frame size question
3Hank wrote: Dave, since I'm 6'7" myself I feel inclined to respond to your request. Until a few months ago I was riding a stock XL frame. Since then I have switched to a custom build bike and it makes a _lot_ of difference. So what did you get? How long is it in the top tube, and how long in the chainstay? Chalo Colina |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
MTB frame size question
A web search returns many frame calculators. Can anyone recommend a
reputable and accurate one? 3Hank wrote: Dave, since I'm 6'7" myself I feel inclined to respond to your request. Until a few months ago I was riding a stock XL frame. Since then I have switched to a custom build bike and it makes a _lot_ of difference. My advise is to use a bike that has an optimal fit for your body. It's not just the saddle height but also the top-tube that's important. If the top-tube is to short you lean to much over the front wheel which makes steering very instable. It also puts more weight on your arms. The position of your saddle in relation to your pedals will be incorrect. Go to a good bike shop and have them advise you on a bike that fits your dimensions. If you are concerned about weight then buy a lighter weight bike (light-weight components, wheels, frame, etc). And from a storage/transport perspective it will make a minor difference. schreef: Hi all, At 6' + change, I currently ride a 21" hardtail. I am not sure of my inseam; 34" jeans/pants tend to be a bit too short for my liking. I weigh in around 190 (dropping to 180). I am considering moving down to a 19" frame for my next bike. Reasons: 1) Smaller size = easier to store/transport 2) Less weight (negligible) 3) Relative strength of smaller triangles 4) Better handling?? 5) More standover (not really an issue) 6) More aero position (higher saddle relative to bars) Problems I see a 1) Saddle height...will probably need a longer seatpost 2) ?? Should I be considering anything else? What are some strong reasons *not* to go with a smaller frame? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
MTB frame size question
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
MTB frame size question
Thanks for all the responses. Admittedly, none of the reasons I gave
are strong motivation FOR reducing frame size. I recently bought a decent road bike, which could be fueling my thought process here. I am satisfied with the trail capabilities of my MTB, but I have been using it as transportation more and more frequently. It is heavy and the seating position is so damn upright (ok, but inefficient)! When on pavement, I raise my seat to the MIL, which puts my bars below my saddle. On the trails, my saddle height is determined by the terrain. My next MTB will be significantly lighter than my current ride. I was thinking frame size would be an easy way ($$-wise) to lose some (not much) weight....obviously, a good fit is far more valuable than a few grams. I guess I was hoping that someone had tried this, and could provide feedback (positive or negative) based on their experience. Cheers, Dave |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
MTB frame size question
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Madone 5.2 SL | Hans C. | Techniques | 35 | September 21st 05 12:35 AM |
Stupid MTB vs. Road Bike frame sizing question | Mark Hickey | Techniques | 3 | August 11th 05 05:07 PM |
help with frame size | pingin | UK | 10 | March 8th 05 10:19 PM |
Frame sizing question | alex887 | Mountain Biking | 6 | March 23rd 04 08:22 AM |
Newbie / ludite - weight & size question! | Clippy | Mountain Biking | 3 | January 20th 04 02:55 PM |