Decanio Sounding Coherent

"B. Lafferty" wrote:


All dishonest people lie about things that are significant to them . Even
the worst of them can be perceived as a nice guy--Buindy being one of the
most extreme examples. As to the more mundane world of cycling, a cheat is
a cheat and the cheat sucks as a role model for kids no matter how good he
is in the other areas.

As I stated, I will lie to get you a job at WADA, provided you will stfu here.
However, I don't know that I am perceived as a nice guy or a role model. And I
expect you not to lie about your contract to stfu in rbr.

**** yourself, asshole.

lol. You said fu to the Ben Meister.

Casey Kerrigan wrote:

In article et, B
Lafferty wrote:


Casey, if you see someone do something improper and are willing to testify
about it, that IS evidence.

Yes a witness stating XYZ is considered
evidence but basing a case on only evidence like this
is how we end up with innocent people on death row.

Hmmm... Now I'm wondering how to frame a certain rbr'er.

Only in good fun of course. After he met Bubba for a night I would let out the
truth. I promise, I would never lie.

B. Lafferty wrote:

I'm quite aware of that posting, thank you. An IV is different from
an
injection. That's why those in authority need to interview Matt.
It's
called analysis and critical thinking, higher order thinking skills
that
you clearly lack.

Sorry, an injection, not an IV. Do you have a reference that alleges
a connection between Klasna and EPO, or was it that story, which
doesn't mention EPO. Or can I take your sidestepping of my question
as a concession that you conflated the Brooks and Klasna stories,
Counselor?

You need some better researchers on that crack legal staff.
Ben
Hmm, maybe "crack" is the operative word here

**** yourself, asshole.

Bring the smack-talk, Laff. Is that the best you can do?
If you talk to everyone as if they were Pappy, eventually
you may only have Pappy to talk to. Oh, but I forgot there's
always Kunich for an intelligent conversation.

Ben

gwhite wrote:
Bob Schwartz wrote:

Please be more concise.

Never!