I am so terrified

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:11:22 +0000, Simon Weaseltemper
wrote:

On 20/11/2011 15:54, Mrcheerful wrote:
by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering
starting a suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

I look forward to hearing how someone called Mrcheerful is being
harassed. As far as I can tell you are trying to be anonymous.
Perhaps you should look up the meaning of "Norwich Pharmacal orders".

Let's see if Cheerless tries to "do a Nuxx" and delete his offensive
outpourings from the Google archive.

I would not know how to, nor have any need.

Guy Chapman is one of the people who voted for the moderated group. Why
doesn't he go and use it if he doesn't like reading opposing opinions?
Apparently this group is "unusable" but he still posts here.

Threatening legal action against someone because you don't like what they
say is pathetic.

On Nov 22, 1:21*am, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:


Or maybe they might realise the game's up and go and do something
productive instead, that would save everyone a lot of time and effort.
But I suspect that is the triumph of hope over experience.



I would much rather them still waste vast chunks of their own spare
time while I am on pay.
Mugs the lot of them.

--
Simon Mason

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:21:33 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:11:22 +0000, Simon Weaseltemper
wrote:

On 20/11/2011 15:54, Mrcheerful wrote:
by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering starting a
suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

I look forward to hearing how someone called Mrcheerful is being
harassed. As far as I can tell you are trying to be anonymous. Perhaps
you should look up the meaning of “Norwich Pharmacal orders”.

Let's see if Cheerless tries to "do a Nuxx" and delete his offensive
outpourings from the Google archive. It won't help of course, any more
than it will help Nuxx.

It's almost worth staying up this late to finish printing off the
submissions for my next court hearing. Who, you ask? Now that would be
telling! ;-)

My word - you are busy - I bet your colleagues at Dell are very impressed - or
they will be after the myriad of court cases you say that you are preparing hit
the news.

I currently hold over 3,500 messages posted by Nuxx using 160
different addresses, over 16,500 by JMS using nearly 240 identities,
just shy of 3,500 from Cheerless, and well over 6,500 from Medjobs.

It's just a question of scoring them and filing the paperwork. And I'm
not the only one doing this.

Or maybe they might realise the game's up and go and do something
productive instead, that would save everyone a lot of time and effort.
But I suspect that is the triumph of hope over experience.

Guy



**** off - am I bothered? What do you think?

Will Mr Cheerless be bothered - what do you think?

Did he call you a **** - or was that me?

Why do they call you Porky - is it because you **** pigs?

No - it is because you tell lies.


I can see it in the Reading Flyer now:

Local Dell IT expert Mr Porky fails in his court attempt to accuse someone of
harassing him on usenet. He accused Judith Smith of harassing him by
repeatedly taking the **** out of him and calling him a ****wit. As a direct
result of this Mr Porky said that there were now in excess of 347 people
taking the **** out of him on usenet - and 193 different people had called him
a ****wit, (and they were just the ones not in his kill-file). There may be
more. When pressed Mr Porky admitted that usenet was the only contact JMSmith
had ever had with him He had never met her in real life, he had had no other
communications either email or telephone with her. He admitted that he had
exchanged emails with other people who were trying to gather personal
information about her (where she lived, where she worked etc) - but that was
him about her - not her about him.

She had not set up a web page in order to harass him She had never mentioned
him on twitter or Facebook. Mr Porky also admitted that JMSmith was in his
kill-file - and he repeatedly told people this - and that he did not actually
read what anyone else said about him. He acknowledged that he had not put
JMSmith on his web page of famous people he had met - but that he had devoted
another of couple of pages solely to her on his web-site. He had to admit that
this was in order to harass her - as they could serve no other purpose. He said
that she had caught him out lying about his children and cycle helmets -and
this was what really had got up his snout.

Mr Porky had at one time made webpages of various people - including JMSmith -
as he said at the time "to get my own back". Mr Porky was unable to explain
exactly what he meant by that.

Under cross-examination Mr Porky admitted that whilst he was working for his
previous company (********* - but named in court) where he was considered a
thought leader by the toilet cleaner - he registered a false email account, and
then posted a message purely in order to be abusive to another third party. Mr
Porky, when pressed, had to admit that it was indeed he who had posted the
false email - and that JMSmith - who not an IT expert had made a fool of him.
It is believed that ******, since this came to light in this case, are now
investigating the whole use of their IT systems by Mr Porky in case there were
other such activities he carried out.

Mr Porker was cross-examined, and admitted that he suffered from brain damage
as a result of banging his head after falling off his pushbike. He confirmed
that he had himself waged all sorts of wars against other internet users - and
he had often said - "I will always give as good as I get - and you can too if
you wish"

The court was adjourned for psychiatric tests on Mr Porker. He is expected to
be closely cross-examined by JMSmith on his return when she will produce
"reams of evidence" of Mr Porky's own actions on usenet, the internet in
general, and on various third party web-sites.

It is believed that Mr Porky will be asked about such phrases as "You can ****
right off", "You are a ****" "The likes of you do not bother me". "I am
considered a thought leader", "And I am a very evil and heartless person in
that once my natural tendency to assume the best of people has been beaten
down, I very rarely change my mind about them." "I consider you an evil
underhand spiteful ****-stirring weasel".
(These are the most inoffensive ones that we can print in a family newspaper).
As a result of JMSmith earlier publicising the case on the internet, there are
51 people waiting to give character references/assassinations of Mr Porky who
will all be called as witnesses. For some unknown reason, they have all
offered to pay their own costs in travelling to court.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Oh - by the way Porky - have I and others ever said : " Get a ****ing life"


PS You say that you have evidence of "JMS using nearly 240 identities" - I
think I registered - but I cannot remember
if I have used it. Can you look it up and tell me please?


--

Total number of posts to URC from
IP Address:80.254.146.36 over 6 years = 7

Guy Chapman : 5
Lou Knee: 2

Coincidence?
(Guy Chapman Dell Magnet)

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:16:58 -0000, "Mr. Benn" wrote:

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
...
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:11:22 +0000, Simon Weaseltemper
wrote:

On 20/11/2011 15:54, Mrcheerful wrote:
by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering
starting a suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

I look forward to hearing how someone called Mrcheerful is being
harassed. As far as I can tell you are trying to be anonymous.
Perhaps you should look up the meaning of "Norwich Pharmacal orders".

Let's see if Cheerless tries to "do a Nuxx" and delete his offensive
outpourings from the Google archive.

I would not know how to, nor have any need.

Guy Chapman is one of the people who voted for the moderated group. Why
doesn't he go and use it if he doesn't like reading opposing opinions?
Apparently this group is "unusable" but he still posts here.

Threatening legal action against someone because you don't like what they
say is pathetic.


I have copied this to uk.legal - perhaps he would like to discuss his "legal
actions" over there.

I wonder if he dare tell his wife and work colleagues about these "legal
actions" he is threatening to take?

I wonder what *they* think of him?

--

Total number of posts to URC from
IP Address:80.254.146.36 over 6 years = 7

Guy Chapman : 5
Lou Knee: 2

Coincidence?
(Guy Chapman Dell Magnet)

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:33:11 -0800 (PST), Simon Mason
wrote:

On Nov 22, 1:21*am, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:


Or maybe they might realise the game's up and go and do something
productive instead, that would save everyone a lot of time and effort.
But I suspect that is the triumph of hope over experience.



I would much rather them still waste vast chunks of their own spare
time while I am on pay.
Mugs the lot of them.


archived

On Nov 20, 4:11*pm, Simon Weaseltemper
wrote:
On 20/11/2011 15:54, Mrcheerful wrote:

by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering starting a
suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

I look forward to hearing how someone called Mrcheerful is being
harassed. As far as I can tell you are trying to be anonymous. Perhaps
you should look up the meaning of “Norwich Pharmacal orders”.

--
Simon
For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.

Aw diddums, Cheerless.
Did nasty Simon W upset you?
Now you know how all of those grieving families you have mocked for
the last two years feel.
Wait until the Hull court case is completed soon, then you can cry
over your HGV driver hero getting banged away as well for killing that
granny.
Won't be long now.

--
Simon Mason

On 22/11/2011 16:28, Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 20, 4:11 pm, Simon
wrote:
On 20/11/2011 15:54, Mrcheerful wrote:

by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering starting a
suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

I look forward to hearing how someone called Mrcheerful is being
harassed. As far as I can tell you are trying to be anonymous. Perhaps
you should look up the meaning of “Norwich Pharmacal orders”.

--
Simon
For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.

Aw diddums, Cheerless.
Did nasty Simon W upset you?
Now you know how all of those grieving families you have mocked for
the last two years feel.
Wait until the Hull court case is completed soon, then you can cry
over your HGV driver hero getting banged away as well for killing that
granny.
Won't be long now.


Once the Hull case is over, cheerless might be joining him.


--
Simon
For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.

"Simon Weaseltemper" wrote in message
...
On 22/11/2011 16:28, Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 20, 4:11 pm, Simon
wrote:
On 20/11/2011 15:54, Mrcheerful wrote:

by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering
starting a
suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

I look forward to hearing how someone called Mrcheerful is being
harassed. As far as I can tell you are trying to be anonymous. Perhaps
you should look up the meaning of “Norwich Pharmacal orders”.

--
Simon
For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.

Aw diddums, Cheerless.
Did nasty Simon W upset you?
Now you know how all of those grieving families you have mocked for
the last two years feel.
Wait until the Hull court case is completed soon, then you can cry
over your HGV driver hero getting banged away as well for killing that
granny.
Won't be long now.


Once the Hull case is over, cheerless might be joining him.

Have any documents been served on Mr. Cheerful. If not, it is highly
unlikely there will be any court case this year. If at all.

On Nov 22, 5:00*pm, Simon Weaseltemper
wrote:
On 22/11/2011 16:28, Simon Mason wrote:





On Nov 20, 4:11 pm, Simon
wrote:
On 20/11/2011 15:54, Mrcheerful wrote:

by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering starting a
suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

I look forward to hearing how someone called Mrcheerful is being
harassed. As far as I can tell you are trying to be anonymous. Perhaps
you should look up the meaning of Norwich Pharmacal orders .

--
Simon
For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.

Aw diddums, Cheerless.
Did nasty Simon W upset you?
Now you know how all of those grieving families you have mocked for
the last two years feel.
Wait until the Hull court case is completed soon, then you can cry
over your HGV driver hero getting banged away as well for killing that
granny.
Won't be long now.

Once the Hull case is over, cheerless might be joining him.

--
Simon
For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, some of the stuff Cheerless has posted down the years had been
callous and hateful at best.
It is akin to those sad trolls who desecrate dead kids' Facebook pages
with their hate filled bile.

--
Simon Mason

On 22/11/2011 17:02, Mr. Benn wrote:
"Simon Weaseltemper" wrote in message
...
On 22/11/2011 16:28, Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 20, 4:11 pm, Simon
wrote:
On 20/11/2011 15:54, Mrcheerful wrote:

by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering
starting a
suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

I look forward to hearing how someone called Mrcheerful is being
harassed. As far as I can tell you are trying to be anonymous. Perhaps
you should look up the meaning of “Norwich Pharmacal orders”.

--
Simon
For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.

Aw diddums, Cheerless.
Did nasty Simon W upset you?
Now you know how all of those grieving families you have mocked for
the last two years feel.
Wait until the Hull court case is completed soon, then you can cry
over your HGV driver hero getting banged away as well for killing that
granny.
Won't be long now.


Once the Hull case is over, cheerless might be joining him.

Have any documents been served on Mr. Cheerful. If not, it is highly
unlikely there will be any court case this year. If at all.

You'll need to ask him.

--
Simon
For personal replies, please use my reply-to address.