I am so terrified

On 23/11/2011 15:42, Simon Mason wrote:
On Nov 23, 12:00 pm, "Lieutenant wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:54:50 -0000, wrote:
by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering starting a
suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

Is it just me or does this original post look like a windup?


Cheerless is free to go to the cops and whine that he is being bullied
by Simon W.
He can then hand over all of his posts that celebrate cyclists'
deaths in great detail and let them be the judge.
Well, until it goes to court before a real judge that is.
Tattoo, spotting the seaplane approaching the island, runs up a tower
and excitedly yells, with a French accent, "Ze Plane! Ze Plane!" and
rings a bell.
--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:09:27 -0000, Judith wrote:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:00:03 -0000, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote:

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:54:50 -0000, Mrcheerful wrote:

by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering starting a
suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

Is it just me or does this original post look like a windup?


I do not think so.

Porky Chapman and Simple Simon Mason are threatening to take to court, anyone
who calls them a ****.

They are both ****s.

It's just that "I am so terrified" sounds sarcastic to me.


--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

For the really paranoid who want to destroy data there's nothing like taking the lid off the disk drive and rearranging the sectors with a hammer.

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:09:27 +0000, Judith stammered:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:00:03 -0000, "Lieutenant Scott"
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:54:50 -0000, Mrcheerful
wrote:

by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering
starting a suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

Is it just me or does this original post look like a windup?


I do not think so.

Porky Chapman and Simple Simon Mason are threatening to take to court,
anyone who calls them a ****.

What a pair of ****s.





--
Mike P

"Lieutenant Scott" wrote in message
newsp.v5e2b9t5ytk5n5@i7-940...
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:09:27 -0000, Judith
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:00:03 -0000, "Lieutenant Scott"
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:54:50 -0000, Mrcheerful
wrote:

by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering
starting a
suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

Is it just me or does this original post look like a windup?


I do not think so.

Porky Chapman and Simple Simon Mason are threatening to take to court,
anyone
who calls them a ****.

They are both ****s.

It's just that "I am so terrified" sounds sarcastic to me.

Irony, dear.. irony!

--
http://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:28:12 -0800 (PST), Simon Mason
wrote:

On Nov 23, 11:58*am, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:53:15 -0000, Mr. Benn wrote:
"Simon Mason" wrote in message
...
On Nov 23, 11:03 am, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:52:39 -0000, Man at B&Q
wrote:

So there is a law titled "you must not be a spoilt brat" is there? *If
you don't like someone, press the killfile button and grow up. *Stop
wasting the time of the legal profession. *They are there for REAL
crimes.

Such as sending a malicious letter to my HR department using two false
names in an attempt to get me into trouble in the real world and not
on Usenet where I could not give a toss? That crossed the line I am
afraid.

If the contents of the letter are true, I cannot see anything wrong. *Am I
missing something?

I can see plenty wrong. *You ain't supposed to meddle in other people's business like that.


The police agreed with you.
That overstepped the mark from cyberstalking into harassment and
threatening behaviour.


You haven't told us what they are doing about it?

Perhaps they just "agreed" with you so that you would **** off. They then
****ed themselves laughing once you had gone.

What exactly did this letter say?

Have you got a copy to show us?

No? - Now that *is* odd.
--
"You get a real feeling of elation just for the simple act of cycling past the local hospital
where there are people of my age who have abused their bodies and suffered all sorts of ailments"

Simon Mason

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:15:16 +0000 (UTC), Mike P
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:09:27 +0000, Judith stammered:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:00:03 -0000, "Lieutenant Scott"
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:54:50 -0000, Mrcheerful
wrote:

by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering
starting a suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

Is it just me or does this original post look like a windup?


I do not think so.

Porky Chapman and Simple Simon Mason are threatening to take to court,
anyone who calls them a ****.

What a pair of ****s.

Would be if it were true, anyway. The truth is that I am in the middle
of legal proceedings against someone who called me a murderer and a
paedophile, visited my property and made nuisance phone calls.

There are also two anonymous cowards whose anonymity is now under
threat. One is a person who posts gleeful reports of deaths and
injuries (like the Facebook troll who was recently convicted); the
other has been obsessing about people's families and jobs and has
openly admitted sending letters to someone's HR department to cause
them trouble (and then been too spineless to hold to that admission
after the event). And it's this latter person who is now blustering
here in an attempt to distract from the real issue.

People who just use abusive language are a stable feature of Usenet,
always have been. Cyberstalkers are different.

Guy
--
Guy Chapman, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed
to be worth at least what you paid for them.

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:28:09 -0800 (PST), al Mossah
wrote:

On Nov 23, 2:23*pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 04:11:57 -0800 (PST), al Mossah

wrote:
On Nov 22, 11:36*pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:
over 16,500 posts using nearly 300 different nyms,

Is this true? I must confess I can't be bothered to keep track, but
300 displays a fantastic, er, commitment to his cause. *Care to list
some of them?

This list may include some false positives but with most of them there
is no real doubt. These are the ones from uk.rec.cycling only, 212
nyms, 13,204 posts, last updated earlier today but not yet fully up to
date.


Notice how "nearly 300" suddenly becomes 212.

It's called a mark II piglet.


snip



Wow. Displays an excellent range. One wonders why, having gone to the
trouble to create a nym, many are used only once or twice.
Lou Knee? Shome mishtake, shurely :-)


Ask him how he *knows* it was me?




--

Total number of posts to URC from
IP Address:80.254.146.36 over 6 years = 7

Guy Chapman : 5
Lou Knee: 2

Coincidence?
(Guy Chapman Dell Magnet)

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:37:32 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:28:09 -0800 (PST), al Mossah
wrote:

Wow. Displays an excellent range.

Aye, all the way from barking to bat****.

Guy



Hello Porker.

Now how about telling people how you *know* that they were from me?

IP addresses :-) Your favourite subject?

Clue: You have no ****ing idea.


--

Total number of posts to URC from
IP Address:80.254.146.36 over 6 years = 7

Guy Chapman : 5
Lou Knee: 2

Coincidence?
(Guy Chapman Dell Magnet)

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:32:17 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:15:16 +0000 (UTC), Mike P
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:09:27 +0000, Judith stammered:

On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:00:03 -0000, "Lieutenant Scott"
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:54:50 -0000, Mrcheerful
wrote:

by these threats of legal action against me that I am considering
starting a suit claiming harrassment aginst the guilty parties.

Is it just me or does this original post look like a windup?


I do not think so.

Porky Chapman and Simple Simon Mason are threatening to take to court,
anyone who calls them a ****.

What a pair of ****s.

Would be if it were true, anyway. The truth is that I am in the middle
of legal proceedings against someone who called me a murderer and a
paedophile, visited my property and made nuisance phone calls.

There are also two anonymous cowards whose anonymity is now under
threat.

Oh really - "under threat eh?" - do tell us more.

(You must not believe the ****e which you read on your own web page.)

One is a person who posts gleeful reports of deaths and
injuries (like the Facebook troll who was recently convicted);

ffs - you really do need to get a life.

the
other has been obsessing about people's families and jobs and has
openly admitted sending letters to someone's HR department to cause
them trouble

I assume that you are talking about me - as you have accused me before. I am
not obsessing about people's families at all.

Please provide *evidence* that I posted any letters - I see that a little
porker has crept in - and it is now plural.

If Simple Simon Mason tells us that his wife weighs 16 stone, is fat, and
sweats a lot then I am sorry but he is inviting comment. (I could have called
her a Porker - but that would have been incorrect. I assume that she is quite
honest)

If Simple Simon Mason insists on telling us that he is posting in BP's time -
whilst we are wasting our own time, then Simple Simon Mason is going to get the
**** taken out of him.

If The Porker tells us that he has a web page of famous people that he has met,
then The Porker is going to get the **** taken out of him.

Understand?

The problem Porky - is that you are a known liar.

I have told you this so many times before : produce your evidence to back up
your accusations - or just **** off.

--

Total number of posts to URC from
IP Address:80.254.146.36 over 6 years = 7

Guy Chapman : 5
Lou Knee: 2

Coincidence?
(Guy Chapman Dell Magnet)

On 23/11/2011 22:28, Judith wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:28:12 -0800 (PST), Simon
wrote:

On Nov 23, 11:58 am, "Lieutenant wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:53:15 -0000, Mr. wrote:
"Simon wrote in message
...
On Nov 23, 11:03 am, "Lieutenant wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:52:39 -0000, Man at
wrote:

So there is a law titled "you must not be a spoilt brat" is there? If
you don't like someone, press the killfile button and grow up. Stop
wasting the time of the legal profession. They are there for REAL
crimes.

Such as sending a malicious letter to my HR department using two false
names in an attempt to get me into trouble in the real world and not
on Usenet where I could not give a toss? That crossed the line I am
afraid.

If the contents of the letter are true, I cannot see anything wrong. Am I
missing something?

I can see plenty wrong. You ain't supposed to meddle in other people's business like that.


The police agreed with you.
That overstepped the mark from cyberstalking into harassment and
threatening behaviour.


You haven't told us what they are doing about it?

**** all I expect. The police are used to dealing with nutters.

Perhaps they just "agreed" with you so that you would **** off. They then
****ed themselves laughing once you had gone.

I reckon it went around Hull nick so they could all have a good laugh.

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University