George W. Bush

Eat **** and die Mike V.

I MTB 2004

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 18:04:59 -0500, "Birdman42"
wrote:

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
.. .
The saddest thing about this election is that so many Americans support a
"president" who (1) was not legitimately elected, (2) violates binding
treaties,

Let me guess what Mikie actually did in this recent election:

" "

or in math terms, ~0

You forgot the environment just got royally screwed...again.

Some of the people trashing the environment, believe that the world is
about to end, as forecast in the Book of Revelations.

If the world is about to end, there is no need to preserve it, because
the Battle of Armageddon will destroy it all anyway, then the true
believers go to heaven.

Some consider this fiction, others consider it next week's news.

Happy trails,
Gary (net.yogi.bear)
------------------------------------------------
at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence

Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom

"Mike Vandeman" wrote

BS. I am sure that the election was rigged by Republican secretaries of
state
etc.

And I am sure that you are a stark raving loon.

Only one of us is right.

Pete

The saddest thing about this election is that so many Americans support a
"president" who (1) was not legitimately elected,

You need to open your eyes....It took over three weeks to recount the votes to
make sure it was correct. But most Liberals can't see the forest for the
trees.
At least Kerry and the back bone to not make the county go through that again.

November 4, 2004

[ca.environment removed]

See how easy that is?

Jason wrote:

Actually no he doesnt have the right to post whatever he wants where
ever he want Thomas and neither does anyone else just read your ISP TOS.



And you have every right to broadcast your stupidity to the world by
proclaiming your inability to use a filter file. Use Firefox, it's got a
vastly improved filter manager.

And no thank god I'm not an american.



Then why are you complaining to a US ISP rather than simply filtering a
poster who never changes his handle and never posts anonymously? I know,
you're a moronic driveling idiot, your ignorance is incurable, you have
an IQ of 50 and you live in Canada, a nation of climate change denyers
and scientific illiterates. It must be a North American problem, not
just a US problems. Hell, it looks like a global problem, but I admit,
bicycles are part of the solution..

Thus, you have every right to use your freedom of speech to protest
against the freedom of speech. ISPs are a dime a dozen, I'm sure there
will be many to replace the one he loses, and you apparently have
nothing better to do than spam ISPs with emails proclaiming your
dissasatifaction with your fundamental right to freedom of speech, since
you seem incapable of editing headers as well as managing a filter file.

Your usenet posting history isn't pristine either, shall we spam your
ISP too?

http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&l...3E&btnG=Search

X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:

Go ahead everybody, spam this address with abuse complaints, it's your fundamental ... ability.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:21:00 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:

Despite that fact, Mike is talking about the Kyoto (did I spell it wrong
earier?) treaty.

Kyoto is the correct spelling, after the city in Japan where they met
to write it.

Much easier to look things up with the correct spelling.

Complex issue, and approving it vs not approving it has more
ramifications than how much poluution there will be.

There is inconsistent treatment of different countries in there, based
more on politics than technology.

Happy trails,
Gary (net.yogi.bear)
------------------------------------------------
at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence

Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...

BS. I am sure that the election was rigged by Republican secretaries of
state

There was always the thought in the back of my mind, that you believed the
unsupportable garbage you spew on Usenet. Now I'm sure you're just another
troll who has alot of spare time to perfect your craft.

RW

Steve Schulin says:

snip-de-dip

Saddam spent heavily on militarily significant projects, and
they provide stark contrast with the apparent neglect of the ordinary
folks. Superhighways with no local access. Crumbling schools and clinics
in the cities and villages, contrasted with gargantuan modern military
hospital.

Sounds familiar.... wonder why...
Oh, yeah, I just looked out of my window.

Steve

Ian Sinjun blathered:

You mispelled 'delusion'.

And you misspelt "misspelled"

;-)

Steve "so now you're even..."

It doesn't matter, the Kyoto treaty simply put's limits on how much CO2
is produced in a year. In the end, all of the CO2 we can produce, will
be produced. Kyoto addresses only the rate, not the final product. In
the end it makes no difference.

Jack Dingler

Gary S. wrote:

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:21:00 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:



Despite that fact, Mike is talking about the Kyoto (did I spell it wrong
earier?) treaty.



Kyoto is the correct spelling, after the city in Japan where they met
to write it.

Much easier to look things up with the correct spelling.

Complex issue, and approving it vs not approving it has more
ramifications than how much poluution there will be.

There is inconsistent treatment of different countries in there, based
more on politics than technology.

Happy trails,
Gary (net.yogi.bear)
------------------------------------------------
at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence

Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom