A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Racing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Scott Cr1 Vs Kestrel Talon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 15th 04, 01:38 PM
Gurrie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Scott Cr1 Vs Kestrel Talon


I am considering these two bikes for Triathlon (IM and half IM) races.

Can anyone provide any pros and cons on these two and why I should go one
over the other?

Thanks,

Craig


  #2  
Old November 5th 04, 11:57 AM
Peter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well scott are good bikes so i recommend that you buy that one, but
the kestrel i have never heard of so do some further research before
you decide to buy it.
  #3  
Old November 5th 04, 08:53 PM
psycholist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter" wrote in message
om...
Well scott are good bikes so i recommend that you buy that one, but
the kestrel i have never heard of so do some further research before
you decide to buy it.


Kestrel has been around building quality carbon frames for many years. The
Scott CR1 is an awesome frame, but may cross the line into the "stupid
light" category. I've seen it. I have a friend who is riding one now. He
loves it. But I wonder how well it's going to hold up. The tubes are
absolutely whisper thin and word is they can easily be destroyed by mistake
in a shop stand. I'm not sure I'd want to entrust my welfare to a frame
that's quite so fragile.

Do plenty of homework.

Bob C.


  #6  
Old November 7th 04, 07:15 PM
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"JayofMontreal" wrote in message
...
And where do you think Kestrel frames are made????

Wake up -- most stuff is made in China and Taiwain.


Watsonville California up until recently. They may still be made there, I
just don't know for certain.





"Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message
...
In article , says...



"Peter" wrote in message
.com...
Well scott are good bikes so i recommend that you buy that one, but
the kestrel i have never heard of so do some further research before
you decide to buy it.

Kestrel has been around building quality carbon frames for many years.
The
Scott CR1 is an awesome frame, but may cross the line into the "stupid
light" category. I've seen it. I have a friend who is riding one now.
He
loves it. But I wonder how well it's going to hold up. The tubes are
absolutely whisper thin and word is they can easily be destroyed by
mistake
in a shop stand. I'm not sure I'd want to entrust my welfare to a frame
that's quite so fragile.


Many frames nowadays are super thin and a ham fisted wrench could crush
them. That is why most shops will not clamp on a frame tube. They

clamp
on the seat post. I would buy from Kestrel because they have a long

track
record and make their own frames. Some how I think Scott is a "ship the
design specs off to China to see who can make it the cheapest" company
-----------------
Alex



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/3/2004




  #7  
Old November 7th 04, 07:15 PM
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"JayofMontreal" wrote in message
...
And where do you think Kestrel frames are made????

Wake up -- most stuff is made in China and Taiwain.


Watsonville California up until recently. They may still be made there, I
just don't know for certain.





"Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message
...
In article , says...



"Peter" wrote in message
.com...
Well scott are good bikes so i recommend that you buy that one, but
the kestrel i have never heard of so do some further research before
you decide to buy it.

Kestrel has been around building quality carbon frames for many years.
The
Scott CR1 is an awesome frame, but may cross the line into the "stupid
light" category. I've seen it. I have a friend who is riding one now.
He
loves it. But I wonder how well it's going to hold up. The tubes are
absolutely whisper thin and word is they can easily be destroyed by
mistake
in a shop stand. I'm not sure I'd want to entrust my welfare to a frame
that's quite so fragile.


Many frames nowadays are super thin and a ham fisted wrench could crush
them. That is why most shops will not clamp on a frame tube. They

clamp
on the seat post. I would buy from Kestrel because they have a long

track
record and make their own frames. Some how I think Scott is a "ship the
design specs off to China to see who can make it the cheapest" company
-----------------
Alex



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/3/2004




  #10  
Old November 5th 04, 08:53 PM
psycholist
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter" wrote in message
om...
Well scott are good bikes so i recommend that you buy that one, but
the kestrel i have never heard of so do some further research before
you decide to buy it.


Kestrel has been around building quality carbon frames for many years. The
Scott CR1 is an awesome frame, but may cross the line into the "stupid
light" category. I've seen it. I have a friend who is riding one now. He
loves it. But I wonder how well it's going to hold up. The tubes are
absolutely whisper thin and word is they can easily be destroyed by mistake
in a shop stand. I'm not sure I'd want to entrust my welfare to a frame
that's quite so fragile.

Do plenty of homework.

Bob C.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.