I am so terrified

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:07:53 +0000, Lieutenant Scott wrote:

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:52:15 -0000, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:07:40 +0000, Lieutenant Scott wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:02:56 -0000, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:04:59 +0000, Judith wrote:



**** off you stupid ****.

The odd solid jars admiringly question as the white caps read. Where
is the wrinkle for the solid dog? She will subtly train when the
closed caps get to the ugly island. Go close a can! It's very
untamed today, I'll destroy strangely.

That program hasn't improved since it's invention.

Agreed.
But suitable for its purpose.

There's a purpose?

well, appropriate to the purposee.



--
An oft-repeated lie is still a lie.

"JNugent" wrote in message
...
On 24/11/2011 09:50, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:27:16 -0000, Mr Benn
wrote:

"Lieutenant Scott" wrote in message
newsp.v5f01gwxytk5n5@i7-940...
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:04:45 -0000, Mr Benn
wrote:

"Lieutenant Scott" wrote in message
newsp.v5ewi0rcytk5n5@i7-940...
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:42:55 -0000, Simon Mason
wrote:

On Nov 23, 12:00 pm, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote:


Cheerless is free to go to the cops and whine that he is being
bullied
by Simon W.
He can then hand over all of his posts that celebrate cyclists'
deaths in great detail and let them be the judge.
Well, until it goes to court before a real judge that is.

Celebrating the death of someone is hardly criminal is it? Did he
kill
someone himself? Do you have evidence of this?

Writing a letter containing facts to an employer is not an offence
either.

It should be.

Why?

Common decency.

So if the local minibus company with the county council's schools contract
unwittingly hired (as a driver) someone you knew to be a convicted
paedophile*, you would see it as common decency to let the situation go
unchecked and unchanged?

That of course is an extreme example but it would be the correct thing to
do.

On Nov 24, 11:49*pm, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote:


--http://petersparrots.comhttp://petersphotos.com

Do you know what a Jewish dilemma is?
Free ham.

Another Jewish joke.

http://www.swldxer.co.uk/obituary.wma

--
Simon Mason

On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 06:38:15 -0000, Peter Keller wrote:

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:07:53 +0000, Lieutenant Scott wrote:

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:52:15 -0000, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:07:40 +0000, Lieutenant Scott wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:02:56 -0000, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:04:59 +0000, Judith wrote:





The odd solid jars admiringly question as the white caps read. Where
is the wrinkle for the solid dog? She will subtly train when the
closed caps get to the ugly island. Go close a can! It's very
untamed today, I'll destroy strangely.

That program hasn't improved since it's invention.

Agreed.
But suitable for its purpose.

There's a purpose?

well, appropriate to the purposee.

And just what is this purpose?

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

We've had a hot, dry summer this year. It was so hot that one of my neighbors said his wife even thawed out.

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 03:56:53 -0000, Simon Mason wrote:

On Nov 24, 11:49 pm, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote:


--http://petersparrots.comhttp://petersphotos.com

Do you know what a Jewish dilemma is?
Free ham.

Another Jewish joke.

http://www.swldxer.co.uk/obituary.wma

Ugh, no video.


--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Shotgun wedding: A case of wife or death.