#21
|
|||
|
|||
BringYouToLife wrote:
no, the pedal lever, asshole, leverage increases power. the longer the lever, the greater the power. I"m talking about increasing the length of the pedal lever. The thought of telling an asshole like you a great idea makes me sick however. Well, for a complete idiot you got ONE THING RIGHT. Bill "and it ain't about pedals or levers" S. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Dear MR. complete idiot, angular velocity is why you have gear
differentials, freak, you talk like you're all smart and ****, you make the ****in torgue sprocket larger, you would need to increase the radius of the sprocket 5 times to get the same angular velocity, which would mean you would need to increase the diameter 5/3.14 or 1.66 times it's original size. jesus christ, what ****in planet are you from, "i'm a ****head who thinks he knows it all' planet? If you had read my ****ing post, you would have saw that i explained that. And if you try and view the patents on the US patent website, a warning, you might have to download some .tiff viewer to see them as there is alot of bugs with these newfangled software programs. You need to download the activex control at www.alternatiff.com, and it is a great activex control. If we add modern hydrolics principles to the propulsion of bicycles, with their much higher pressure seals and such, and we apply such forgotten, simple principles as complex levers. There are compound levers, such as nutcrackers and scissors, but complex levers are are used in throwing a baseball. In fact, our human bodies are based entirely upon the simple principles of levers and mechanic advantage, that magnifies the infinitessimal stimulus in the brain, into a powerful movement that a weight lifter thrusts 300 lbs above his head. If a person where to throw a baseball, keeping his wrist perfectly stiff, he could probably throw it about 20 mph. When he flings his wrist hard, at the maximum velocity of his arm rotation, he combines the two forces, producing a pitch that is 50 or 60 mph. Apply this principle to pedalling, think of it as a pedal on a pedal, a lever on a lever. Also, add things like hydrolics, pullies and such to the concept of human powered machinery and there's no reason people couldn't power safe machines at a reasonable speed, replacing cars. What a concept though, the idea that most of our energy needs could be produced by the human will. The record for human powered flight is something like 30 miles, but that is for one person. Two people, i believe could propel the plane farther than a mere 60 miles, because you wouldn't have double the weight of two planes, they would be sharing the same load of one plane. 3 people could maybe fly over 100 miles, 30 maybe 1000 miles, at a higher rate of speed. Plus, not to mention the fact that you have no weight of the engine in a human powered car or plane. Consider the fact that these planes carry 700 people, if you could link all their leg and arm power to a propellers, they could all power an aircraft with comfortable effort indefinately. After all, it is ultimately atomic energy we use when we use hydraulics and torque, we are using the elasticity in the bonds of the atoms in the substance to propel us like a sling shot, no differently and much more elegantly than nuclear fusion reactors. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
and if you can increase the power by 5 times, you can increase the
circumference of the main sprocket 5 times by increasing the diameter of the main drive sprocket by (d*3.14=circumference). That is why bigger gears turn slower, duh. what a moron you are, i can't believe I'm even talking to you. and as for wind resistance, if you were using the increased leverage to haul things, that would not be a problem, i'm thinking of future transportation after oil runs out. But if you wanted to go 50 or 60 mph, then you could add little things like motorcycle windshields, which you can duck down behind, or rather make it into a narrow, small car, more recumbant style. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, of course, a drive sprocket with 35 inch diameter might seem
unwieldy, but you can use a combination of smaller sprockets the same way you use pulleys, to get the same effect as one large circumference drive sprocket. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
BringYouToLife wrote:
and if you can increase the power by 5 times, you can increase the circumference of the main sprocket 5 times by increasing the diameter of the main drive sprocket by (d*3.14=circumference). That is why bigger gears turn slower, duh. what a moron you are, i can't believe I'm even talking to you. I think I should feel the same about you, given your apparent confusions about angular velocity vs. the tangential velocity of the edge of a rotating circle, but maybe someone else will learn from what I say to you. and as for wind resistance, if you were using the increased leverage to haul things, that would not be a problem, i'm thinking of future transportation after oil runs out. But if you wanted to go 50 or 60 mph, then you could add little things like motorcycle windshields, which you can duck down behind, or rather make it into a narrow, small car, more recumbant style. The record for flat-surface pedalling on a bicycle is over 150 mph, set on a bike with a very large chainwheel and a very small cog, travelling behind an automobile with a special fairing built on the back to surround the front of the rider and shield him and his bike from all wind effects. Fairings also exist that are part of the bicycle and don't require a separate vehicle. They look like short sections of a wing stood on end, with the bike and rider inside. Cyclists have gone over 60 mph in those. However, they're useless in any sort of crosswind, and they're useless unless you have a chase team to pick you up when the inevitable crosswind knocks you onto ground. Face it. When the oil is gone, we'll have either electric cars powered by batteries charged with energy produced in coal and nuke plants, or we'll be hooked on hydrogen. --Blair "And I might be over 25 mph." |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
one problem however, would be your tires slipping from too fast
acceleration, but this could easily be corrected by a slip-gear system, to slip alittle if the torque reaches slipping strenght, Like 'burning rubber' in a car, but a 'problem' I'd love to have. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
BringYouToLife wrote:
Dear MR. complete idiot, angular velocity is why you have gear differentials, freak, you talk like you're all smart and ****, you make the ****in torgue sprocket larger... {snip for sanity's sake} Hey Dip**** -- if you don't include any quoted material, no one knows WTF you're talking about. (Which is appropriate, come to think of it, since you obviously don't know WTF you're talking about, either.) Bill "another AOHeller darkens the cyber doorway" S. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Look at that asshole, Tim trying to sell people 'patents', that are
totally free at the patent website. Here are all the free patents you can print up for free, with the word 'bicycle' in the title of the patent. This is a much better search than 'bicycle' in all fields. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...FIELD2=&d=ptxt I know what you are saying about angular velocity, but still, you would be applying your effort at the maximum torque angle over the 'meat' of the rotation, maximizing power to turn a larger sprocket faster than you could. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
and Bill, how could I have guessed your one of those net snobs who hate aol?
AOL IS FREE ASSHOLE, HA HA, THE JOKE IS ON YOU!! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
published helmet research - not troll | Frank Krygowski | General | 1927 | October 24th 04 06:39 AM |
AOL is protecting Lance | tom tank | Racing | 4 | July 20th 04 10:39 PM |
Bicycle Bad Welds Problem | carlfogel | Techniques | 6 | February 13th 04 02:49 PM |
Non-Motor Bicycle Accidents (Survey for People Residing in USA) | Vijaysimha Seelam | Techniques | 24 | February 5th 04 11:37 AM |
Reports from Sweden | Garry Jones | Social Issues | 14 | October 14th 03 05:23 PM |