|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NY1\Bikes Returned, But Critical Mass Riders Remain Angry
http://www.ny1.com/ny/TopStories/Sub...entintid=49710
[There is TV footage on the above weblink.] Bikes Returned, But Critical Mass Riders Remain Angry NY1 | 04-Apr-2005 A group of Critical Mass riders get their bikes back from police, but they're not exactly happy about it. The bikes were among 50 that were seized during last month's ride. Most were returned last Friday, but a few remaining bikers didn't get their rides back until Monday. The riders say they were never charged or even issued a summons, and so they're considering a lawsuit for illegal seizure. "I was not arrested and I was not doing anything illegal, but the police still cut my lock with a saw and confiscated my property," said Critical Mass rider Jamie Favaro. "The police were basically told by a federal judge they cannot take property without linking it to an arrest, and they're basically in contempt of court for disobeying a federal judge's orders," said fellow rider Michael Green. For its part, the NYPD says the bikes were seized because they were chained illegally. A spokesman for the department says while they recognize the inconvenience of having a bike seized, it can be avoided by not chaining a bike illegally in the city. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Jym Dyer" wrote in message om... snip emotionware "The bikes were seized because they were chained illegally." " A spokesman for the department says while they recognize the inconvenience of having a bike seized, it can be avoided by not chaining a bike illegally in the city." Sounds like your own Damn Fault, Critical Ass Morons. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Jonny wrote:
"The bikes were seized because they were chained illegally." " A spokesman for the department says while they recognize the inconvenience of having a bike seized, it can be avoided by not chaining a bike illegally in the city." Translation: Here's a law that is never enforced at any time except when we want to harass people who we think are involved with something that we don't like, but don't have any legal standing to do anything about it. -- Steven O'Neill |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Although I currently have a car, I have chosen for the last 40 years to
commute, shop and get around NYC by bike and I have always chained my bike up to any public poll if no bike poll was available which is for the most part 99.9% of the city. I didn't know that there is a statute that makes this illegal. Does anyone know what the statute actually says? How long has it been on the books? Also were the police targeting critical mass participants when they saw them chaining their bikes up or were they clipping any chained bike they saw in that area? Although I never participated in a CM ride, I would hate to think the police would have grabbed my bike if I happened to be in the area at the time. Steven M. O'Neill wrote: Jonny wrote: "The bikes were seized because they were chained illegally." " A spokesman for the department says while they recognize the inconvenience of having a bike seized, it can be avoided by not chaining a bike illegally in the city." Translation: Here's a law that is never enforced at any time except when we want to harass people who we think are involved with something that we don't like, but don't have any legal standing to do anything about it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Jonny" writes:
"Jym Dyer" wrote in message om... snip emotionware "The bikes were seized because they were chained illegally." " A spokesman for the department says while they recognize the inconvenience of having a bike seized, it can be avoided by not chaining a bike illegally in the city." Sounds like your own Damn Fault, Critical Ass Morons. Since the reason for chaining a bike to something is to park it with some modest assurance that the bike will not be stolen when you get back, it sounds to me like "Jonny" and the NYPD are in cahoots with the city's criminal element, even if unwittingly. If there is a law that makes bike parking effectively impossible in New York, that law should be repealed ASAP, and it has nothing to do with "Critical Mass": you can't participate in a Critical Mass bike ride if your bike is parked. Bill -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Critical Mass Riders Remain Angry"
Isn't that a redundancy? CM riders seem to be perpetually angry, so this is nothing new. GG "Jym Dyer" wrote in message om... http://www.ny1.com/ny/TopStories/Sub...entintid=49710 [There is TV footage on the above weblink.] Bikes Returned, But Critical Mass Riders Remain Angry NY1 | 04-Apr-2005 A group of Critical Mass riders get their bikes back from police, but they're not exactly happy about it. The bikes were among 50 that were seized during last month's ride. Most were returned last Friday, but a few remaining bikers didn't get their rides back until Monday. The riders say they were never charged or even issued a summons, and so they're considering a lawsuit for illegal seizure. "I was not arrested and I was not doing anything illegal, but the police still cut my lock with a saw and confiscated my property," said Critical Mass rider Jamie Favaro. "The police were basically told by a federal judge they cannot take property without linking it to an arrest, and they're basically in contempt of court for disobeying a federal judge's orders," said fellow rider Michael Green. For its part, the NYPD says the bikes were seized because they were chained illegally. A spokesman for the department says while they recognize the inconvenience of having a bike seized, it can be avoided by not chaining a bike illegally in the city. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
snip emotionware
"The bikes were seized because they were chained illegally." " A spokesman for the department says while they recognize the inconvenience of having a bike seized, it can be avoided by not chaining a bike illegally in the city." =v= How remarkable. You snip out the part of the story where real people step forward and have their say, but the deliberately-spun (and inaccurate) soundbite from the P.R. department is your idea of gospel truth. =v= None of these people chained their bike illegally. =v= There is no law against chaining up a bike in NYC, unless it impedes pedestrian or vehicle traffic. Thousands of bikes are locked up in exactly the same way and locations every day in NYC. =v= The NYPD uses an "abandoned property" statute as a pretext, despite the fact that the bikes are clearly not abandoned. This was demonstrated in federal court last December, and a Federal judge issued an injunction against the NYPD doing this. Did you not follow the news on that, or do you generally ignore anything that's not rote spin from the NYPD's P.R. flacks? _Jym_ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"wk" wrote in message ... On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:56:28 GMT, (Bill Z.) wrote: snip Since the reason for chaining a bike to something is to park it with some modest assurance that the bike will not be stolen when you get back, If there is a law that makes bike parking effectively impossible in New York, you can't participate in a Critical Mass bike ride if your bike is parked. just get the bicycles out of the city and your problems are over. Critical Mass = bunch of teenager angsts trying to cause accidents with cars, trucks, pedestrians whatever by blocking roads and access to hospitals. = they only **** people off at CM and then never support CM's causes. morons |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Halloween Critical Mass Pictures from New York City | Don Wiss | General | 10 | October 31st 04 04:23 AM |
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 | Mike Iglesias | General | 4 | October 29th 04 07:11 AM |
Critical Mass Tunnel Freaks | Zoot Katz | General | 111 | July 20th 04 04:34 PM |
Alaska's first Critical Mass | Dennis P. Harris | General | 3 | September 13th 03 08:57 AM |
Can somebody fill me in on Critical Mass? | dwj444 | General | 3 | September 7th 03 06:36 PM |