|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
A few weeks ago I was off the bike and had to endure the misery of driving
to work for a few days. The law breaking I saw shocked me into writing this letter to our local newspaper: http://www.swldxer.co.uk/zletter2.jpg -- Simon Mason http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/ |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
S Mason wrote:
A few weeks ago I was off the bike and had to endure the misery of driving to work for a few days. The law breaking I saw shocked me into writing this letter to our local newspaper: http://www.swldxer.co.uk/zletter2.jpg Did all the speeding that you witnessed result in the mass-carnage that you would have expected to see if the speed limit zealots' predictions are to be believed? -- John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
"John" wrote in message ... S Mason wrote: A few weeks ago I was off the bike and had to endure the misery of driving to work for a few days. The law breaking I saw shocked me into writing this letter to our local newspaper: http://www.swldxer.co.uk/zletter2.jpg Did all the speeding that you witnessed result in the mass-carnage that you would have expected to see if the speed limit zealots' predictions are to be believed? 10 people dead every day? Is that mass carnage? No, but a crying shame for those families involved in such unnecessary deaths. If our city has learned anything from having had 120 separate 20 mph zones for the past decade it is that slowing traffic down has had a dramatic effect on the deaths on our streets, especially deaths and serious injuries among children. As far as cameras go, I don't care if they are on every street - the more the merrier. I have a clean licence for one good reason, I don't exceed the speed limit. I find that if I don't shoplift I don't get caught by the shop's CCTV either. I can't see why people have such a big problem with cameras, I don't give them a second thought. -- Simon Mason http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
Simon Mason wrote:
As far as cameras go, I don't care if they are on every street - the more the merrier. I have a clean licence for one good reason, I don't exceed the speed limit. I find that if I don't shoplift I don't get caught by the shop's CCTV either. I can't see why people have such a big problem with cameras, I don't give them a second thought. I have just one problem with that position: although shoplifting can be detected by cameras, shops also use security staff. A growing number of police forces have all but scrapped traffic policing in favour of speed cameras. Consequently, it has become all too easy for road users to behave recklessly. As far as I'm concerned, speed cameras (for that is what they are, they are emphatically not safety cameras as they only check one aspect of road safety) should only ever be an extra. Cheers, Luke -- Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in exile in Lancashire http://www.shrimper.org.uk |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
Simon Mason wrote:
"John" wrote in message ... S Mason wrote: A few weeks ago I was off the bike and had to endure the misery of driving to work for a few days. The law breaking I saw shocked me into writing this letter to our local newspaper: http://www.swldxer.co.uk/zletter2.jpg Did all the speeding that you witnessed result in the mass-carnage that you would have expected to see if the speed limit zealots' predictions are to be believed? 10 people dead every day? Is that mass carnage? 3,650 per year - where was that? No, but a crying shame for those families involved in such unnecessary deaths. Absolutely. I'd be extremely surprised if anyone anywhere, let alone UK motorists, who make up the thick-end of the casualty figures in the UK, would disagree with that. It appears to me that the debate over what the solution for this might be is polarised, as is the bicycle helmet debate, with the "establishment" and "road safety" lobbyists coming down on the side of helmets and speed cameras, whilst those with the wherewithal to analyse the data dispassionately, and resort to a bit of lateral thinking, can see the weaknesses in the data, and in the arguments purporting to "prove" that helmets or speed cameras are the panacea. If our city has learned anything from having had 120 separate 20 mph zones for the past decade it is that slowing traffic down has had a dramatic effect on the deaths on our streets, especially deaths and serious injuries among children. Has independent scientific studies been carried out of before and after data, and comparisons made with similar locations that haven't applied 20 mph speed limits, and current downward trends accommodated, which proves that any drop in KSIs has definitely been *caused* by the introduction of lower limits? As far as cameras go, I don't care if they are on every street - the more the merrier. I have a clean licence for one good reason, I don't exceed the speed limit. A clean licence is one thing, and an obsession with speed limits is another, but are you therefore necessarily a "safe" driver? Do you ever drive "too fast for the conditions"? It is implicitly speed within the limit, and it is a larger factor in injury collisions than speeding (speed above the limit). It is an increasingly dangerous phenomena which may well be the result of the presence of speed cameras which condone and practically encourage it. I find that if I don't shoplift I don't get caught by the shop's CCTV either. Or is it just a coincidence? I don't speed, yet have been flashed by a speed camera. Many dangerous drivers don't get caught by speed cameras - simply because they are being dangerous, but within the speed limit. I can't see why people have such a big problem with cameras, I don't give them a second thought. The problem is that they brain-wash drivers into believing that they are safe and, more importantly, legal, no matter how dangerously they drive - so long as they don't break the speed limit within range of a speed camera. -- John |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
"Ekul Namsob" wrote in message news:1iotcgl.962gxjgvrx9wN%notmyaddress.1.ekulnams ... A growing number of police forces have all but scrapped traffic policing in favour of speed cameras. Consequently, it has become all too easy for road users to behave recklessly. As far as I'm concerned, speed cameras (for that is what they are, they are emphatically not safety cameras as they only check one aspect of road safety) should only ever be an extra. A couple of months ago, I drove to Romania, Moldova and Ukraine and I can assure you that the local police cameras are not marked with big signs, painted yellow or advertised in the local news media. Nor are there any speed limit signs anywhere. They hide behind bushes with their cameras. In many other countries in Europe, such as France, UK drivers are picked off as easy prey as they are not use to the strict policing of speed limits there, so if you think our safety cameras are sneaky and unfair, wait until you have driven in a few other countries before you judge on the "unfairness" of our policing of motoring laws. -- Simon Mason http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:46:44 +0100, S Mason wrote:
A few weeks ago I was off the bike and had to endure the misery of driving to work for a few days. The law breaking I saw shocked me into writing this letter to our local newspaper: http://www.swldxer.co.uk/zletter2.jpg It doesn't surprise me - I ride down a hill most mornings which has a 30 mph speed limit at the bottom as it's a residential area and is where 2 bus loads of children wait every morning. I'm usually doing bang on 30 mph when I get to the signs but still get overtaken by people doing 40-50 mph in cars. The speed limit just before is only 40! peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
"John" wrote in message ... 3,650 per year - where was that? You are correct - it is now below 3000 dead per year (2,940) for the first time since records began in 1926. My mistake! ROSPA put this down to: "Local authority road safety programs, police, "government-led strategies" and technological advances in vehicles." Has independent scientific studies been carried out of before and after data, and comparisons made with similar locations that haven't applied 20 mph speed limits, and current downward trends accommodated, which proves that any drop in KSIs has definitely been *caused* by the introduction of lower limits? Yes. A clean licence is one thing, and an obsession with speed limits is another, but are you therefore necessarily a "safe" driver? Do you ever drive "too fast for the conditions"? It is implicitly speed within the limit, and it is a larger factor in injury collisions than speeding (speed above the limit). It is an increasingly dangerous phenomena which may well be the result of the presence of speed cameras which condone and practically encourage it. No. The speed limit is not a "target" to aim for but an absolute limit when conditions are optimal. Speed should be reduced accordingly with adverse conditions. That is obvious, or should be. I find that if I don't shoplift I don't get caught by the shop's CCTV either. Or is it just a coincidence? I don't speed, yet have been flashed by a speed camera. Many dangerous drivers don't get caught by speed cameras - simply because they are being dangerous, but within the speed limit. I can't see why people have such a big problem with cameras, I don't give them a second thought. The problem is that they brain-wash drivers into believing that they are safe and, more importantly, legal, no matter how dangerously they drive - so long as they don't break the speed limit within range of a speed camera. Not at all. The driver who killed 4 club cyclists in Wales a few years ago was driving within the speed limit on black ice which he failed to take into account. He was only fined £180 for having 3 faulty tyres. Had there been a safety camera on that road maybe he would have *thought* more about his speed and the 4 people may not have died. -- Simon Mason http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
Simon Mason wrote:
"Ekul Namsob" wrote in message news:1iotcgl.962gxjgvrx9wN%notmyaddress.1.ekulnams ... A growing number of police forces have all but scrapped traffic policing in favour of speed cameras. Consequently, it has become all too easy for road users to behave recklessly. As far as I'm concerned, speed cameras (for that is what they are, they are emphatically not safety cameras as they only check one aspect of road safety) should only ever be an extra. A couple of months ago, I drove to Romania, Moldova and Ukraine and I can assure you that the local police cameras are not marked with big signs, painted yellow or advertised in the local news media. Nor are there any speed limit signs anywhere. They hide behind bushes with their cameras. In many other countries in Europe, such as France, UK drivers are picked off as easy prey as they are not use to the strict policing of speed limits there, so if you think our safety cameras are sneaky and unfair, wait until you have driven in a few other countries before you judge on the "unfairness" of our policing of motoring laws. Have I /ever/ suggested that there is anything unfair about speed cameras? Cheers, Luke -- Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in exile in Lancashire http://www.shrimper.org.uk |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Off the bike - speeding cars shock.
Simon Mason wrote:
"John" wrote in message ... I can't see why people have such a big problem with cameras, I don't give them a second thought. The problem is that they brain-wash drivers into believing that they are safe and, more importantly, legal, no matter how dangerously they drive - so long as they don't break the speed limit within range of a speed camera. Not at all. The driver who killed 4 club cyclists in Wales a few years ago was driving within the speed limit on black ice which he failed to take into account. He was only fined £180 for having 3 faulty tyres. Had there been a safety camera on that road maybe he would have *thought* more about his speed and the 4 people may not have died. Really? How on earth would a speed camera have encouraged the driver with 3 faulty tyres to do anything about his speed? As you state, he was obeying the speed limit. Would an actual traffic copper have been more likely to spot the 3 faulty tyres? Would the copper have been more likely to see someone who may have been driving too fast for the conditions? Cheers, Luke -- Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in exile in Lancashire http://www.shrimper.org.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OT] Reducing the amount of speeding cars on the road. | Martin Dann | UK | 34 | June 6th 07 11:10 AM |
Regular bike vs shock fork front bike on city streets ? | [email protected] | Techniques | 7 | August 16th 05 03:25 AM |
Bike fork/shock? | catalyst | Unicycling | 4 | August 5th 05 05:37 PM |
FS: Shock spring for Manitou Swinger rear shock | Todd | Marketplace | 0 | February 8th 05 04:51 AM |
Mountain bike rider fined for speeding | Harry Potty | Australia | 26 | April 23rd 04 10:46 PM |