A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Global warming OT)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 8th 09, 09:28 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
PatTX[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 119
Default Global warming OT)

Dan O wrote:
::
:: Dude, you are *such* a dumbass!

Well, his initials say it all. But, really, what we should wonder is just
why the Republican Party is investing so much of their time and efforts into
trying to debunk all the scientists on Global Warming. Geez, they found a
weatherman to align with their views!

Pat


Ads
  #12  
Old February 8th 09, 09:59 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Bill Sornson[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,541
Default Global warming OT)

DI wrote:
"Dan O" wrote in message
...
On Feb 7, 8:21 pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
wrote:
This is just to toss some fuel into the fire and see how my
namesake and others respond. Notice an article in the journal
Science, that ice melting in the poles could lead to overflow of
coasts to a much greater detriment than previously predicted. Of
course this was published in the gossip column "Science" and not
in the more respected literature that was previously quoted in
this group by global warming foes. So, take it with the due
skepticism.

When a coast -- ANY coast -- floods due to melting ice, think how
proud you'll be.

Meantime, keep drinking the Koolaid.

BS


Dude, you are *such* a dumbass!


Why? because he doesn't buy the propoganda BS that is being but out
by the likes if Al Gore


Oh-Dan is one of the whinier ideologues to appear recently. Sticks his nose
in other people's exchanges, routinely attacking the "other side" personally
and snidely and then hiding under a rock until the next opportunity arises
weeks later.

I have a simple question for the GW Alarmists: if the earth is in such
peril, then why did President Obama take AIR FORCE ONE from Washington DC to
Williamsburg VA (less than 150 miles) a few days ago? Is he selfish,
elitist, hypocritical, or just plain (plane) unthinking?

He could have taken a chopper for a small fraction of the cost and --
gasp -- carbon footprint.

I eagerly await a reasonable answer. (Won't hold breath.)

BS (called)


  #13  
Old February 8th 09, 11:32 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Philip Holman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 46
Default Global warming OT)


"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
...
DI wrote:
"Dan O" wrote in message
...
On Feb 7, 8:21 pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
wrote:
This is just to toss some fuel into the fire and see how my
namesake and others respond. Notice an article in the journal
Science, that ice melting in the poles could lead to overflow of
coasts to a much greater detriment than previously predicted. Of
course this was published in the gossip column "Science" and not
in the more respected literature that was previously quoted in
this group by global warming foes. So, take it with the due
skepticism.

When a coast -- ANY coast -- floods due to melting ice, think how
proud you'll be.

Meantime, keep drinking the Koolaid.

BS

Dude, you are *such* a dumbass!


Why? because he doesn't buy the propoganda BS that is being but out
by the likes if Al Gore


Oh-Dan is one of the whinier ideologues to appear recently. Sticks
his nose in other people's exchanges, routinely attacking the "other
side" personally and snidely and then hiding under a rock until the
next opportunity arises weeks later.

I have a simple question for the GW Alarmists: if the earth is in
such peril, then why did President Obama take AIR FORCE ONE from
Washington DC to Williamsburg VA (less than 150 miles) a few days ago?
Is he selfish, elitist, hypocritical, or just plain (plane)
unthinking?

He could have taken a chopper for a small fraction of the cost and --
gasp -- carbon footprint.

I eagerly await a reasonable answer. (Won't hold breath.)

BS (called)

What has a new president flying AF1 150 miles got to do with the cause
of climate change. Don't you think more scientifically based data would
be appropriate, unless you think the pres knows something we don't (I
doubt he does).

Phil H (not convinced of the reason for GW)


  #14  
Old February 8th 09, 11:49 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
[email protected][_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,594
Default Global warming OT)

On Feb 8, 1:59*pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
DI wrote:
"Dan O" wrote in message
....
On Feb 7, 8:21 pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
wrote:
This is just to toss some fuel into the fire and see how my
namesake and others respond. Notice an article in the journal
Science, that ice melting in the poles could lead to overflow of
coasts to a much greater detriment than previously predicted. Of
course this was published in the gossip column "Science" and not
in the more respected literature that was previously quoted in
this group by global warming foes. So, take it with the due
skepticism.


When a coast -- ANY coast -- floods due to melting ice, think how
proud you'll be.


Meantime, keep drinking the Koolaid.


BS


Dude, you are *such* a dumbass!


Why? *because he doesn't buy the propoganda BS that is being but out
by the likes if Al Gore


Oh-Dan is one of the whinier ideologues to appear recently. *Sticks his nose
in other people's exchanges, routinely attacking the "other side" personally
and snidely and then hiding under a rock until the next opportunity arises
weeks later.

I have a simple question for the GW Alarmists: *if the earth is in such
peril, then why did President Obama take AIR FORCE ONE from Washington DC to
Williamsburg VA (less than 150 miles) a few days ago? *Is he selfish,
elitist, hypocritical, or just plain (plane) unthinking?

He could have taken a chopper for a small fraction of the cost and -- *
gasp -- carbon footprint.

I eagerly await a reasonable answer. *(Won't hold breath.)

BS (called)


I have no idea about Obama's travel decisions, and I don't really
care, nor I see the relevance. All I said was that there was an
article in Science Journal stating that melting of ice is pretty
significant and worrisome. Just for background, there are two major
scientific journals that publish major scientific research from all
over the world. These journals combine the leading research from a
combination of scientific fields. They are not associated with Bush,
Gore, Obama or anyone else. They are peer reviewed journals that
publish leading research. They are Nature (GB) and Science (US).
Things that get published in those journals are considered the leading
scientific knowledge.

There are other journals that publish scientific knowledge but
specialize in one area. My point was that if someone wants to debate
scientific research they need to ground their knowledge on stuff
published in a respected journal in the field, with notes and
references. That is the way scientific knowledge is often debated. A
post by someone who disagrees, in the internet has as much meaning as
an add from weight watchers.
  #15  
Old February 9th 09, 12:52 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Woland99
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 434
Default Global warming OT)

On Feb 8, 4:49*pm, " wrote:
There are other journals that publish scientific knowledge but
specialize in one area. My point was that if someone wants to debate
scientific research they need to ground their knowledge on stuff
published in a respected journal in the field, with notes and
references. That is the way scientific knowledge is often debated. A
post by someone who disagrees, in the internet has as much meaning as
an add from weight watchers.


Andres - don't you know that global warming is
"just a theory"??? wink Bill is probably right when he
wants to limit discussion to "facts" which according to
him are publication by "ground-breaking meteorologist"
(ROFL ROFL ROFL).
  #17  
Old February 9th 09, 02:18 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Bill Sornson[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,541
Default Global warming OT)

Woland99 wrote:
Bill is probably right when he
wants to limit discussion to "facts" which according to
him are publication by "ground-breaking meteorologist"
(ROFL ROFL ROFL).


If Coleman is such a joke, why won't Al Gore debate him? (Or ANYONE.)

Bill "deafening silence goes here" S.


  #18  
Old February 9th 09, 02:39 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Andre Jute[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,422
Default Global warming OT)

On Feb 9, 1:18*am, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
Woland99 wrote:
Bill is probably right when he
wants to limit discussion to "facts" which according to
him are publication by "ground-breaking meteorologist"
(ROFL ROFL ROFL).


If Coleman is such a joke, why won't Al Gore debate him? *(Or ANYONE.)

Bill "deafening silence goes here" S.


Would you expect the Pope to debate skeptics of the Virgin Birth, eh
Bill? *Of course* Gore won't debate. He's the leader of a religion.
Scientists debate (when they haven't debauched their science for
politics) but high priests issue obiter dicta.

Andre Jute
Visit Jute on Thisthatandtheother
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/...20ARISING.html

  #19  
Old February 9th 09, 04:41 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Woland99
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 434
Default Global warming OT)

On Feb 8, 7:18*pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
Woland99 wrote:
Bill is probably right when he
wants to limit discussion to "facts" which according to
him are publication by "ground-breaking meteorologist"
(ROFL ROFL ROFL).


If Coleman is such a joke, why won't Al Gore debate him? *(Or ANYONE.)

Bill "deafening silence goes here" S.


Simply because Coleman IS a joke. Getting into debate requires
some degree of credibility it is something you EARN by producing
well researched papers. If I will decide tomorrow that Moon is made
out of blue cheese I may try all I want to get some top astronomers
to debate me but unless I can produce few peer reviewed papers
proving my point then well... you get the point.
If you never worked in science you probably believe that there is
some sort of conspiracy among them to bring in one world government
etc. It is about as probable that riders in Tour de France conspired
7 times in a row to let Lance win - because of .... well exactly why?
Why would ALL the scientist in the world want ONE world government.
Here you have people that fight to advance their own theories on
all other subject but suddenly they go hand in hand on GW....
  #20  
Old February 9th 09, 05:05 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Tom Sherman[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,890
Default Global warming OT)

Woland99 wrote:
[...]
Simply because Coleman IS a joke. Getting into debate requires
some degree of credibility it is something you EARN by producing
well researched papers. If I will decide tomorrow that Moon is made
out of blue cheese I may try all I want to get some top astronomers
to debate me but unless I can produce few peer reviewed papers
proving my point then well... you get the point.[...]


Indeed, everyone knows the moon is made of GREEN cheese.

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
LOCAL CACTUS EATS CYCLIST - datakoll
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Global Warming Tom Kunich Racing 308 May 10th 08 03:54 PM
A little global warming WeaselPoopPower Racing 1 November 16th 07 07:47 AM
Global Warming Tom Kunich Racing 212 November 16th 07 03:41 AM
Global Warming and RBR Experts Tom Kunich Racing 69 June 26th 07 04:55 PM
Global Warming Richard Bates UK 84 July 25th 04 11:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.