#11
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming OT)
Dan O wrote:
:: :: Dude, you are *such* a dumbass! Well, his initials say it all. But, really, what we should wonder is just why the Republican Party is investing so much of their time and efforts into trying to debunk all the scientists on Global Warming. Geez, they found a weatherman to align with their views! Pat |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming OT)
DI wrote:
"Dan O" wrote in message ... On Feb 7, 8:21 pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote: wrote: This is just to toss some fuel into the fire and see how my namesake and others respond. Notice an article in the journal Science, that ice melting in the poles could lead to overflow of coasts to a much greater detriment than previously predicted. Of course this was published in the gossip column "Science" and not in the more respected literature that was previously quoted in this group by global warming foes. So, take it with the due skepticism. When a coast -- ANY coast -- floods due to melting ice, think how proud you'll be. Meantime, keep drinking the Koolaid. BS Dude, you are *such* a dumbass! Why? because he doesn't buy the propoganda BS that is being but out by the likes if Al Gore Oh-Dan is one of the whinier ideologues to appear recently. Sticks his nose in other people's exchanges, routinely attacking the "other side" personally and snidely and then hiding under a rock until the next opportunity arises weeks later. I have a simple question for the GW Alarmists: if the earth is in such peril, then why did President Obama take AIR FORCE ONE from Washington DC to Williamsburg VA (less than 150 miles) a few days ago? Is he selfish, elitist, hypocritical, or just plain (plane) unthinking? He could have taken a chopper for a small fraction of the cost and -- gasp -- carbon footprint. I eagerly await a reasonable answer. (Won't hold breath.) BS (called) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming OT)
"Bill Sornson" wrote in message ... DI wrote: "Dan O" wrote in message ... On Feb 7, 8:21 pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote: wrote: This is just to toss some fuel into the fire and see how my namesake and others respond. Notice an article in the journal Science, that ice melting in the poles could lead to overflow of coasts to a much greater detriment than previously predicted. Of course this was published in the gossip column "Science" and not in the more respected literature that was previously quoted in this group by global warming foes. So, take it with the due skepticism. When a coast -- ANY coast -- floods due to melting ice, think how proud you'll be. Meantime, keep drinking the Koolaid. BS Dude, you are *such* a dumbass! Why? because he doesn't buy the propoganda BS that is being but out by the likes if Al Gore Oh-Dan is one of the whinier ideologues to appear recently. Sticks his nose in other people's exchanges, routinely attacking the "other side" personally and snidely and then hiding under a rock until the next opportunity arises weeks later. I have a simple question for the GW Alarmists: if the earth is in such peril, then why did President Obama take AIR FORCE ONE from Washington DC to Williamsburg VA (less than 150 miles) a few days ago? Is he selfish, elitist, hypocritical, or just plain (plane) unthinking? He could have taken a chopper for a small fraction of the cost and -- gasp -- carbon footprint. I eagerly await a reasonable answer. (Won't hold breath.) BS (called) What has a new president flying AF1 150 miles got to do with the cause of climate change. Don't you think more scientifically based data would be appropriate, unless you think the pres knows something we don't (I doubt he does). Phil H (not convinced of the reason for GW) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming OT)
On Feb 8, 1:59*pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
DI wrote: "Dan O" wrote in message .... On Feb 7, 8:21 pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote: wrote: This is just to toss some fuel into the fire and see how my namesake and others respond. Notice an article in the journal Science, that ice melting in the poles could lead to overflow of coasts to a much greater detriment than previously predicted. Of course this was published in the gossip column "Science" and not in the more respected literature that was previously quoted in this group by global warming foes. So, take it with the due skepticism. When a coast -- ANY coast -- floods due to melting ice, think how proud you'll be. Meantime, keep drinking the Koolaid. BS Dude, you are *such* a dumbass! Why? *because he doesn't buy the propoganda BS that is being but out by the likes if Al Gore Oh-Dan is one of the whinier ideologues to appear recently. *Sticks his nose in other people's exchanges, routinely attacking the "other side" personally and snidely and then hiding under a rock until the next opportunity arises weeks later. I have a simple question for the GW Alarmists: *if the earth is in such peril, then why did President Obama take AIR FORCE ONE from Washington DC to Williamsburg VA (less than 150 miles) a few days ago? *Is he selfish, elitist, hypocritical, or just plain (plane) unthinking? He could have taken a chopper for a small fraction of the cost and -- * gasp -- carbon footprint. I eagerly await a reasonable answer. *(Won't hold breath.) BS (called) I have no idea about Obama's travel decisions, and I don't really care, nor I see the relevance. All I said was that there was an article in Science Journal stating that melting of ice is pretty significant and worrisome. Just for background, there are two major scientific journals that publish major scientific research from all over the world. These journals combine the leading research from a combination of scientific fields. They are not associated with Bush, Gore, Obama or anyone else. They are peer reviewed journals that publish leading research. They are Nature (GB) and Science (US). Things that get published in those journals are considered the leading scientific knowledge. There are other journals that publish scientific knowledge but specialize in one area. My point was that if someone wants to debate scientific research they need to ground their knowledge on stuff published in a respected journal in the field, with notes and references. That is the way scientific knowledge is often debated. A post by someone who disagrees, in the internet has as much meaning as an add from weight watchers. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming OT)
On Feb 8, 4:49*pm, " wrote:
There are other journals that publish scientific knowledge but specialize in one area. My point was that if someone wants to debate scientific research they need to ground their knowledge on stuff published in a respected journal in the field, with notes and references. That is the way scientific knowledge is often debated. A post by someone who disagrees, in the internet has as much meaning as an add from weight watchers. Andres - don't you know that global warming is "just a theory"??? wink Bill is probably right when he wants to limit discussion to "facts" which according to him are publication by "ground-breaking meteorologist" (ROFL ROFL ROFL). |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming OT)
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming OT)
Woland99 wrote:
Bill is probably right when he wants to limit discussion to "facts" which according to him are publication by "ground-breaking meteorologist" (ROFL ROFL ROFL). If Coleman is such a joke, why won't Al Gore debate him? (Or ANYONE.) Bill "deafening silence goes here" S. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming OT)
On Feb 9, 1:18*am, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
Woland99 wrote: Bill is probably right when he wants to limit discussion to "facts" which according to him are publication by "ground-breaking meteorologist" (ROFL ROFL ROFL). If Coleman is such a joke, why won't Al Gore debate him? *(Or ANYONE.) Bill "deafening silence goes here" S. Would you expect the Pope to debate skeptics of the Virgin Birth, eh Bill? *Of course* Gore won't debate. He's the leader of a religion. Scientists debate (when they haven't debauched their science for politics) but high priests issue obiter dicta. Andre Jute Visit Jute on Thisthatandtheother http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/...20ARISING.html |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming OT)
On Feb 8, 7:18*pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
Woland99 wrote: Bill is probably right when he wants to limit discussion to "facts" which according to him are publication by "ground-breaking meteorologist" (ROFL ROFL ROFL). If Coleman is such a joke, why won't Al Gore debate him? *(Or ANYONE.) Bill "deafening silence goes here" S. Simply because Coleman IS a joke. Getting into debate requires some degree of credibility it is something you EARN by producing well researched papers. If I will decide tomorrow that Moon is made out of blue cheese I may try all I want to get some top astronomers to debate me but unless I can produce few peer reviewed papers proving my point then well... you get the point. If you never worked in science you probably believe that there is some sort of conspiracy among them to bring in one world government etc. It is about as probable that riders in Tour de France conspired 7 times in a row to let Lance win - because of .... well exactly why? Why would ALL the scientist in the world want ONE world government. Here you have people that fight to advance their own theories on all other subject but suddenly they go hand in hand on GW.... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Global warming OT)
Woland99 wrote:
[...] Simply because Coleman IS a joke. Getting into debate requires some degree of credibility it is something you EARN by producing well researched papers. If I will decide tomorrow that Moon is made out of blue cheese I may try all I want to get some top astronomers to debate me but unless I can produce few peer reviewed papers proving my point then well... you get the point.[...] Indeed, everyone knows the moon is made of GREEN cheese. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 LOCAL CACTUS EATS CYCLIST - datakoll |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Global Warming | Tom Kunich | Racing | 308 | May 10th 08 03:54 PM |
A little global warming | WeaselPoopPower | Racing | 1 | November 16th 07 07:47 AM |
Global Warming | Tom Kunich | Racing | 212 | November 16th 07 03:41 AM |
Global Warming and RBR Experts | Tom Kunich | Racing | 69 | June 26th 07 04:55 PM |
Global Warming | Richard Bates | UK | 84 | July 25th 04 11:58 PM |