Adults Who Ride with their Children are Losers

Michael Press wrote:
Yes, I do. Fat people are the latest group
to be relegated to the ranks of the not equal.
Smokers are a good example of this treatment.

You're pining for the good old days when smokers could release carcinogens
in public places and feel perfectly righteous in doing so ?

Donald Munro wrote in
:

Michael Press wrote:
Yes, I do. Fat people are the latest group
to be relegated to the ranks of the not equal.
Smokers are a good example of this treatment.

You're pining for the good old days when smokers could release
carcinogens in public places and feel perfectly righteous in doing so
?


Well who doesn't?

--
Bill Asher

Bob Schwartz wrote:
And you no doubt would have noticed that there
were no fat kids [in Europe]. None.

Dumbass,

There are fat kids here. What you don't see is FAT kids.

Michael Press wrote:

Yes, I do. Fat people are the latest group
to be relegated to the ranks of the not equal.
Smokers are a good example of this treatment.

Also cannibals and mass murderers. As groups, they've been ostracized
for far too long.

Fred Fredburger wrote:
Michael Press wrote:

Yes, I do. Fat people are the latest group
to be relegated to the ranks of the not equal.
Smokers are a good example of this treatment.

Also cannibals and mass murderers. As groups, they've been ostracized
for far too long.

Merckx? Ostracized?

Donald Munro wrote:
Fred Fredburger wrote:
I don't have my dictionary handy ... does "surreal" mean fat?

http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2006/09/botero.jpg


Damn, you're good at that.

z wrote:
Fred Fredburger wrote:
Michael Press wrote:

Yes, I do. Fat people are the latest group
to be relegated to the ranks of the not equal.
Smokers are a good example of this treatment.

Also cannibals and mass murderers. As groups, they've been ostracized
for far too long.

Merckx? Ostracized?

Yeah. Haven't spoken to him in years.

SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
On Jul 27, 8:50 pm, Fred Fredburger
wrote:
MagillaGorilla wrote:

The average adult is an accident waiting to happen.
Agreed.

They vote and run for office.

They are such dumbasses.

Paul B. Anders wrote:
On Jul 27, 8:55 pm, Anton Berlin wrote:
On Jul 27, 9:59 pm, Ben Trovato wrote:





On Jul 27, 8:30 am, MagillaGorilla wrote:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lano...ld-girl-killed...
Even if the kid has a mellon cap how can any adult who rides with a
child on the back guarantee they won't crash? Since pros crash on
routine training rides all the time even when by themselves (Landis), on
what basis do adults with little bike riding experience and spaz-level
Booby Jew-lick skills and no racing experience whatsoever take their
children with them on the back of a bike?
This just reinforces whenever I see an adult riding a bike with their
kid in one of those child seats on the back...I think "What a ****ing
A-hole - he can't guarantee he won't stack it and turn the kid into a
Saul Raisin mellonhead."
Please discuss.
Thanks,
Magilla
Simple Simian,
you'll love this one, then:http://www.citizen-times.com/apps/pb...26/NEWS...Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I've always wondered if rode with an AK strapped to my back would the
cars honk less? I bet this wouldn't have happened- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If you had, it might have gone something like this:

http://linux.stevens-tech.edu/kmh/spike.bike.all.txt

Brad Anders

Thanks. Hadnt seen that in so long, I'd forgotten it.

In article ,
Donald Munro wrote:

Michael Press wrote:
Yes, I do. Fat people are the latest group
to be relegated to the ranks of the not equal.
Smokers are a good example of this treatment.

You're pining for the good old days when smokers could release carcinogens
in public places and feel perfectly righteous in doing so ?

Am I?

--
Michael Press