|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Driver told to expect at least six years jail
QUOTE:
"A former soldier has been warned he will be going to prison for "a significant period" after he today admitted causing the death of cyclist John Radford by dangerous driving. Michael Gledhill stood trial and was convicted in October last year of causing serious injury to Mr Radford on July 31 the previous year 2013, when he was alleged to have knocked him off his bike in Huddersfield Road between New Mill and Brockholes in a road rage incident. But before he could be sentenced on that charge Mr Radford died on November 5 last year. A decision was then made to charge Gledhill with the more serious charge of causing his death." http://www.examiner.co.uk/news/west-...dmits-10433526 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Driver told to expect at least six years jail
Alycidon wrote:
"A former soldier has been warned he will be going to prison for "a significant period" after he today admitted causing the death of cyclist John Radford by dangerous driving. Killed a cyclist and the CPS didn't 'sweeten the pill' by going for careless driving? Bloody hell. Was the cyclist a copper? An MP? A retired judge? -- john smith '_The Guardian_. Wrong about everything. All the time' (Anon) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Driver told to expect at least six years jail
On Thursday, 12 November 2015 13:28:03 UTC, John Smith wrote:
Alycidon wrote: "A former soldier has been warned he will be going to prison for "a significant period" after he today admitted causing the death of cyclist John Radford by dangerous driving. Killed a cyclist and the CPS didn't 'sweeten the pill' by going for careless driving? Bloody hell. Was the cyclist a copper? An MP? A retired judge? Road rage is not careless, it is deliberate. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Driver told to expect at least six years jail
Alycidon wrote:
On Thursday, 12 November 2015 13:28:03 UTC, John Smith wrote: Alycidon wrote: "A former soldier has been warned he will be going to prison for "a significant period" after he today admitted causing the death of cyclist John Radford by dangerous driving. Killed a cyclist and the CPS didn't 'sweeten the pill' by going for careless driving? Bloody hell. Was the cyclist a copper? An MP? A retired judge? Road rage is not careless, it is deliberate. Oh, I know. I also believe that at least 70% of so-called 'accidents' where some phony excuse is coughed up, like 'eww, the sun was too low!' or 'eww, he came out of nowhere!', or 'ewww, I was distracted by a unicorn running across the road!' are 'punishment passes' that have gone wrong - so murder. Or at the very least, manslaughter (as defined _inter alia_ [1] in _R v. Bateman_ (1925) 19 Cr App R 8, _Andrews_ _v. DPP_ [1937] AC 576 and _R v. Adomako_ [1995] 1 AC 171). Damn, legal training is really ****ing useful. ;-) [1] note for Nugent: that's Latin, by the way... -- john smith '_The Guardian_. Wrong about everything. All the time' (Anon) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Driver told to expect at least six years jail
On Thursday, 12 November 2015 14:38:04 UTC, John Smith wrote:
Alycidon wrote: On Thursday, 12 November 2015 13:28:03 UTC, John Smith wrote: Alycidon wrote: "A former soldier has been warned he will be going to prison for "a significant period" after he today admitted causing the death of cyclist John Radford by dangerous driving. Killed a cyclist and the CPS didn't 'sweeten the pill' by going for careless driving? Bloody hell. Was the cyclist a copper? An MP? A retired judge? Road rage is not careless, it is deliberate. Oh, I know. I also believe that at least 70% of so-called 'accidents' where some phony excuse is coughed up, like 'eww, the sun was too low!' or 'eww, he came out of nowhere!', or 'ewww, I was distracted by a unicorn running across the road!' are 'punishment passes' that have gone wrong - so murder. Have a coughing fit, kill and walk away a free man. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ared-jail.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Driver told to expect at least six years jail
Alycidon wrote:
On Thursday, 12 November 2015 14:38:04 UTC, John Smith wrote: Alycidon wrote: On Thursday, 12 November 2015 13:28:03 UTC, John Smith wrote: Alycidon wrote: "A former soldier has been warned he will be going to prison for "a significant period" after he today admitted causing the death of cyclist John Radford by dangerous driving. Killed a cyclist and the CPS didn't 'sweeten the pill' by going for careless driving? Bloody hell. Was the cyclist a copper? An MP? A retired judge? Road rage is not careless, it is deliberate. Oh, I know. I also believe that at least 70% of so-called 'accidents' where some phony excuse is coughed up, like 'eww, the sun was too low!' or 'eww, he came out of nowhere!', or 'ewww, I was distracted by a unicorn running across the road!' are 'punishment passes' that have gone wrong - so murder. Have a coughing fit, kill and walk away a free man. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ared-jail.html For example. -- john smith '_The Guardian_. Wrong about everything. All the time' (Anon) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Driver told to expect at least six years jail
On 12/11/2015 14:36, John Smith wrote:
Alycidon wrote: On Thursday, 12 November 2015 13:28:03 UTC, John Smith wrote: Alycidon wrote: "A former soldier has been warned he will be going to prison for "a significant period" after he today admitted causing the death of cyclist John Radford by dangerous driving. Killed a cyclist and the CPS didn't 'sweeten the pill' by going for careless driving? Bloody hell. Was the cyclist a copper? An MP? A retired judge? Road rage is not careless, it is deliberate. Oh, I know. I also believe that at least 70% of so-called 'accidents' where some phony excuse is coughed up, like 'eww, the sun was too low!' or 'eww, he came out of nowhere!', or 'ewww, I was distracted by a unicorn running across the road!' are 'punishment passes' that have gone wrong - so murder. Or at the very least, manslaughter (as defined _inter alia_ [1] in _R v. Bateman_ (1925) 19 Cr App R 8, _Andrews_ _v. DPP_ [1937] AC 576 and _R v. Adomako_ [1995] 1 AC 171). Damn, legal training is really ****ing useful. ;-) You should get some, instead of talking bollox. Have you written to Cleveland Police, Middlesbrough and Stockton councils & Highways England yet? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Driver told to expect at least six years jail
On 12/11/2015 14:36, John Smith wrote:
Alycidon wrote: On Thursday, 12 November 2015 13:28:03 UTC, John Smith wrote: Alycidon wrote: "A former soldier has been warned he will be going to prison for "a significant period" after he today admitted causing the death of cyclist John Radford by dangerous driving. Killed a cyclist and the CPS didn't 'sweeten the pill' by going for careless driving? Bloody hell. Was the cyclist a copper? An MP? A retired judge? Road rage is not careless, it is deliberate. Oh, I know. I also believe that at least 70% of so-called 'accidents' where some phony excuse is coughed up, like 'eww, the sun was too low!' or 'eww, he came out of nowhere!', or 'ewww, I was distracted by a unicorn running across the road!' are 'punishment passes' that have gone wrong - so murder. Or at the very least, manslaughter (as defined _inter alia_ [1] in _R v. Bateman_ (1925) 19 Cr App R 8, _Andrews_ _v. DPP_ [1937] AC 576 and _R v. Adomako_ [1995] 1 AC 171). Damn, legal training is really ****ing useful. ;-) [1] note for Nugent: that's Latin, by the way... He is well aware of that. Unlike you, he also knows what it means and what either word means. You proved that you do not. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Driver told to expect at least six years jail
JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2015 14:36, John Smith wrote: Alycidon wrote: On Thursday, 12 November 2015 13:28:03 UTC, John Smith wrote: Alycidon wrote: "A former soldier has been warned he will be going to prison for "a significant period" after he today admitted causing the death of cyclist John Radford by dangerous driving. Killed a cyclist and the CPS didn't 'sweeten the pill' by going for careless driving? Bloody hell. Was the cyclist a copper? An MP? A retired judge? Road rage is not careless, it is deliberate. Oh, I know. I also believe that at least 70% of so-called 'accidents' where some phony excuse is coughed up, like 'eww, the sun was too low!' or 'eww, he came out of nowhere!', or 'ewww, I was distracted by a unicorn running across the road!' are 'punishment passes' that have gone wrong - so murder. Or at the very least, manslaughter (as defined _inter alia_ [1] in _R v. Bateman_ (1925) 19 Cr App R 8, _Andrews_ _v. DPP_ [1937] AC 576 and _R v. Adomako_ [1995] 1 AC 171). Damn, legal training is really ****ing useful. ;-) [1] note for Nugent: that's Latin, by the way... He is well aware of that. Unlike you, he also knows what it means and what either word means. You proved that you do not. Simon is going nuts. He spends all day Goggling for naughty motorists. Same with that Smith pillock. So very sad. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Driver told to expect at least six years jail
JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2015 14:36, John Smith wrote: Alycidon wrote: On Thursday, 12 November 2015 13:28:03 UTC, John Smith wrote: Alycidon wrote: "A former soldier has been warned he will be going to prison for "a significant period" after he today admitted causing the death of cyclist John Radford by dangerous driving. Killed a cyclist and the CPS didn't 'sweeten the pill' by going for careless driving? Bloody hell. Was the cyclist a copper? An MP? A retired judge? Road rage is not careless, it is deliberate. Oh, I know. I also believe that at least 70% of so-called 'accidents' where some phony excuse is coughed up, like 'eww, the sun was too low!' or 'eww, he came out of nowhere!', or 'ewww, I was distracted by a unicorn running across the road!' are 'punishment passes' that have gone wrong - so murder. Or at the very least, manslaughter (as defined _inter alia_ [1] in _R v. Bateman_ (1925) 19 Cr App R 8, _Andrews_ _v. DPP_ [1937] AC 576 and _R v. Adomako_ [1995] 1 AC 171). Damn, legal training is really ****ing useful. ;-) [1] note for Nugent: that's Latin, by the way... He is well aware of that. Unlike you, he also knows what it means and what either word means. You proved that you do not. Which, presumably, is why I have used the expression sixty-five times on Usenet, not counting the times I was using graphical news clients and didn't archive my posts .. [~] john@server% (103) grep "inter alia" Documents/Usenet/My_Posts | wc -l 65 For example, on Monday 17 August 2015 in the UPM thread ' Unemployed will have to attend boot camps'. Or in the thread, ' The EU in 12 lessons: Lesson Nine'. That was on Sunday 19 July 2015. Lots more where that came from. How about Friday 19 September 2014 in the thread, ' The referendum'? I can go further back, if you'd like. The first time I have a record of having used it was on Tuesday 16 June 2009 in a thread on alt.activism.death-penalty (crossposted to talk.politics.misc and misc.legal) entitled ' Several States Abandon Death Penalty Because Of Cost'. So, tell us all again how I didn't know what the term meant until you 'confused' me. *rofl* Y. -- john smith '_The Guardian_. Wrong about everything. All the time' (Anon) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Our lady bishop gets seven years in jail | Alycidon | UK | 29 | November 2nd 15 08:15 PM |
Van driver who killed cyclist on A40 told he may face jail afterbeing found guilty | Simon Mason[_4_] | UK | 21 | March 2nd 12 06:33 AM |
Wiggle thief gets two years in jail | Simon Mason | UK | 2 | August 4th 11 11:13 PM |
Four years jail... | TOG@Toil | UK | 289 | March 10th 08 11:10 AM |
Driver who killed cyclist told to expect jail. | Simon Mason[_2_] | UK | 22 | February 3rd 08 08:17 PM |